Way to go; India decides to eliminate top Maoist commanders

[Pksecurity]

India is in the grip of multiple insurgencies, the notable among them is Maoist rebellion in some Indian districts called the Red Corridor. Country’s para-military force, Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) is fighting against the insurgents with 65,000 personnel. In this fight, the government and its political leadership are standing behind the security forces like a hard rock. The latest attack by the insurgents was launched on a Congress convoy in Chhattisgarh that left 28 people dead. This has totally devastated the government which has now given the go-ahead to a massive counteroffensive against the Maoists with focus on eliminating top rebel leaders. According to reports by India Today, CRPF has prepared a hit list of 25 senior Maoist commanders responsible for masterminding deadly attacks, and got the approval of the Union Home Ministry to go after them.
The Indian government on Tuesday ruled out peace talks with Maoist rebels as previously talks offer did not make any headway. Instead of talking, the Maoists demanded that the government first withdraw thousands of paramilitary soldiers deployed to fight the rebels in several states.
India is also deploying Israeli drones in tracking the Maoists in the Andhra-Odisha and Andhra-Chhattisgarh borders, though these UAVs are proving ineffective due to the terrain in which the rebels are operating.
The rebels, known as Naxalites, have been fighting the central government for more than four decades, demanding land and jobs for tenant farmers and the poor. Since 2005, more than 6,000 people — including civilians, security troops and the rebels themselves — have died in Maoist violence across the country, according to data compiled by the Institute for Conflict Management.
Can Pakistani politicians learn a lesson from the stance taken by the Indians? Their insurgency is not as lethal and destructive as the phenomenon of terrorism in Pakistan. The Indian rebels do not slit throats of security forces and bomb civilians. They only demonstrate their disapproval of the economic policies of the government. They are pro-poor and have a large number of sympathizers in the area of their operation. Yet the Indian politicians do not consider them as their “brothers” like the Pakistani politicians.
When the security forces have clearly informed the politicians that terrorists are a graver threat to the solidarity of Pakistan, it is not understood why the politicians should try to appease and protect the terrorists. Why is it that the menace of terrorism is not given priority which killed 50,000 innocent lives and why there is an increased focus on drones which killed 3,000 including the deadly terrorists?
India may Pakistan’s enemy, but Pakistan can learn from India how to deal with the enemies of the state. Pakistan can even learn from Sri Lanka’s Rajapakse Model of dealing with home-grown terrorism.

Way to go; India decides to eliminate top Maoist commanders | Pakistan Express

 

[littleboy]

I completely agree with the above post but mate do not think Maoist are less dangerous than TTP or tailiban. Terrorism has no religion or nationality.The only people suffering from their havoc is the innocent people like you and me. we the people of subcontinent must stand together against them.

 

[Koovie]

Good, now cut off the head of this red snake-

 

[Android]

we should do away with this "Maoists are our people" BS and eliminate every single one of them

 

[MilSpec]

I find the romanticism with Maoists utterly disgusting when it is claimed that they disprove economic policies of government. They instead take the disapproval of of government policies to veil thier disgusting agenda to kill and maim security personnel and civilians alike, to maintain their power in the affected region. There objective is to bring chaos and cause havoc to the government to try and bring about their own version of rebellion to gain their own version of socialist dictum.

Murderers are murderers, and the government needs a have a clear cut definition of how to deal with them, and for heavens sake stop playing petty votebank politics to gain tribal belt votes.

 

[HongWu]

First you ignored them
Then you laughed at them
Then you hated them
Then you attack them
Then they win!

 

[WarMonger]

First you ignored them
Then you laughed at them
Then you hated them
Then you attack them
Then they win!

And then @HongWu wakes up with his bed wet.

 

[soumya1989]

First you ignored them
Then you laughed at them
Then you hated them
Then you attack them
Then they win!

Hiii HonhWu
How was todays noodles???

 

[gubbi]

Their insurgency is not as lethal and destructive as the phenomenon of terrorism in Pakistan. The Indian rebels do not slit throats of security forces and bomb civilians. They only demonstrate their disapproval of the economic policies of the government. They are pro-poor and have a large number of sympathizers in the area of their operation. Yet the Indian politicians do not consider them as their “brothers” like the Pakistani politicians.

Au contraire. The naxalites do kill and maim those who do not 'support' their cause, especially innocent tribal people - the very people whose rights they are supposedly fighting for! The only reason why they dont attack civilian/commercial centers in cities or urban areas is because their "ideological" support comes from the 'romanticism of an armed revolution' created by the ultra left leaning urban elite/intelligentisa. That and what @sandy_3126 mentioned.

 

[Soumitra]

And then @HongWu wakes up with his bed wet.

Arey yaar he would have got his salary today. Let him show his loyalty

 

[Android]

First you ignored them
Then you laughed at them
Then you hated them
Then you attack them
Then they win!

you are funny

 

[MilSpec]

dont feed the trolls.