What's new

Was The Apollo Moon Landing Fake?

x_man

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
1,012
Reaction score
1
Please find below few excerpts from the original article ( as it was too big to copy paste here). What do you guys think, did man really set foot on the moon or it was just a big hoax?

Few years’ back I also read somewhere that Neil Armstrong's heard the sound of Athaan as he landed on the moon and later he converted to Islam, does anyone knows about this also??? :what:


According to DARK SIDE OF THE MOON, the most important film of its kind, images of Neil Armstrong's walk on the moon on July 20, 1969 were shown to the world through the lens of master film-maker Stanley Kubrick and were staged on the same Borehamwood, U.K., soundstage where Kubrick made his landmark film, 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Motives
Several motives have been suggested for the U.S. government to fake the moon landings - some of the recurrent elements are:
1. Distraction - The U.S. government benefited from a popular distraction to take attention away from the Vietnam war. Lunar activities did abruptly stop, with planned missions cancelled, around the same time that the US ceased its involvement in the Vietnam War.
2. Cold War Prestige - The U.S. government considered it vital that the U.S. win the space race with the USSR. Going to the Moon, if it was possible, would have been risky and expensive. It would have been much easier to fake the landing, thereby ensuring success.
3. Money - NASA raised approximately 30 billion dollars pretending to go to the moon. This could have been used to pay off a large number of people, providing significant motivation for complicity. In variations of this theory, the space industry is characterized as a political economy, much like the military industrial complex, creating fertile ground for its own survival.
4. Risk - The available technology at the time was such that there was a good chance that the landing might fail if genuinely attempted.


Screw-up’s

"How can the flag be fluttering?" the 47 year old American kept asking himself when there's no wind on the atmosphere free Moon?

For a start, he says, the TV footage was hopeless. The world tuned in to watch what looked like two blurred white ghosts throw rocks and dust. Part of the reason for the low quality was that, strangely, NASA provided no direct link up. So networks actually had to film man's greatest achievement from a TV screen in Houston - a deliberate ploy, says Rene, so that nobody could properly examine it.

By contrast, the still photos were stunning. Yet that's just the problem. The astronauts took thousands of pictures, each one perfectly exposed and sharply focused. Not one was badly composed or even blurred.

As Rene points out, that's not all: The cameras had no white meters or view ponders. So the astronauts achieved this feet without being able to see what they were doing. There film stock was unaffected by the intense peaks and powerful cosmic radiation on the Moon, conditions that should have made it useless. They managed to adjust their cameras, change film and swap filters in pressurized suits. It should have been almost impossible with the gloves on their fingers.

Award winning British photographer David Persey is convinced the pictures are fake. His astonishing findings are explained alongside the pictures on these pages, but the basic points are as follows: The shadows could only have been created with multiple light sources and,in particular, powerful spotlights. But the only light source on the Moon was the sun.

The American flag and the words "United States" are always Brightly lit, even when everything around is in shadow. Not one still picture matches the film footage, yet NASA claims both were shot at the same time.

The pictures are so perfect, each one would have taken a slick advertising agency hours to put them together. But the astronauts managed it repeatedly. David Persey believes the mistakes were deliberate, left there by "whistle blowers" who were keen for the truth to one day get out.

For full reading, the link is Was The Apollo Moon Landing Fake?
 
. .
There is an explanation for each and everyone of those myths. It probably wasn't faked. It could be the reasons were there, but it probably wasn't.
 
.
There is an explanation for each and everyone of those myths. It probably wasn't faked. It could be the reasons were there, but it probably wasn't.

Contrary to conspiracies I too believe that it wasn’t faked and the moon landing was genuine. However there is a general query that why didn’t they attempt again to go to the moon. Well, who knows that they might have gone not only once but may be number of times again. But didn’t make it public purposely because they didn’t want to let them know that what they are upto on the moon? They might have secret bases there or some research ficilities or something else that hasn’t been disclosed yet.
 
.
from the period of 70 the US did make trips to the moon ( i think it wars about 2 more not sure)
however the cost was too high and they needed save some funds to start another war in the 90s whilst having the Vietnam war.

.
.
.
.
space programme is expensive
space programme and having a war will run the country into bankcrupcy.
 
.
Well they don't have a moonbase. China has made the roundtrip taking a swirl around the moon. They could've picked up something. It's too risky to keep denying a moonbase since satellites, telescopes n all of other nations would've picked those things up.

But they certainly wanted a moonbase. But suddenly gave up on it, and gave up on visiting the moon altogether. There's one theory that something spooked them up there. Right about then, when they reached up there, they discovered they weren't alone.

Buzz Aldrin admitted to see a UFO on their first landing on the moon. Several other astronauts have seen UFOs.

Heck I saw a video on Google Vids where an astronauts doing some routing spare work with another one. One of them goes like "There's a bogey behind us", the other one says "Don't worry about it" reminding him to keep working and not draw attention to that fact.

The camera which was recording in Night vision actually captures the UFO. There's something a lot more sinister about the moon than faking the landing.
 
.
Presence of Aliens or another intelligent life form cannot be denied and scientists are still searching for concrete explanation for incidents like Roswell or Crop Circles or UFOs etc. I personally had my doubts about UFOs until few PAF pilots reported UFO sightings in mid 90s and in one case (near Risalpur), it orbited T-37 for times until vanished into the space. The officers were interviewed and their statements recorded but nothing followed after that. So who know what’s out there and as Pink Floyd called it THE DARK SIDE OF THE MOON, we are yet to discover that who else is out there to give us the company.
 
.
UFO theories have been prevalent ever since roswell. most of the time it turned out to be some US or soviet aircraft, like the SR-71 or the B-2.

I am not saying there are no aliens. with a universe as big as ours, with hundreds of billions of galaxies and countless stars, the chance of life not being out there is almost impossible. but i dont think every sighting can be attributed to UFOs.
 
.
If the moon landing was faked the Russians would have exposed it as a part of their propaganda war.

Regards
 
.
If it was a fake then the first people to land on the moon will be Chinese or Indian's as I read somewhere that they both have active moon landing projects.


Regards
 
.
If it was a fake then the first people to land on the moon will be Chinese or Indian's as I read somewhere that they both have active moon landing projects.


Regards

Maybe India and China will develop the same moon-landing-faking technology. :devil:
 
.
UFO theories have been prevalent ever since roswell. most of the time it turned out to be some US or soviet aircraft, like the SR-71 or the B-2.

I am not saying there are no aliens. with a universe as big as ours, with hundreds of billions of galaxies and countless stars, the chance of life not being out there is almost impossible. but i dont think every sighting can be attributed to UFOs.
Not every but many are utterly unexplainable. Especially the one's that are caught on NASA's own cameras!

Goto google vids and type in NASA UFOs. You'll be amazed at the amount of video library with clear depiction of space-craft.
 
.
Not every but many are utterly unexplainable. Especially the one's that are caught on NASA's own cameras!

Goto google vids and type in NASA UFOs. You'll be amazed at the amount of video library with clear depiction of space-craft.

yes i have seen some of them and i do believ they are genuine. but if so many UFOs are buzzing around, why havent the aliens already landed here and tried to make conatct with humans? or why havent they attacked us? these are questions that trouble all UFO buffs.
 
.
I doubt it very much that the reason why they didn't go to the moon more than a decade is Aliens.

yes there are aliens out there but not living on the moon. If it was the case we would known about it.

In a lighter note i think that Man - space exploration can only achieve with co-operation with the rest of the nation not just one country goal to succeed. Otherwise it will be like 500 years more for planning a space -exploration to the nearest solar system.
 
.
In a lighter note i think that Man - space exploration can only achieve with co-operation with the rest of the nation not just one country goal to succeed. Otherwise it will be like 500 years more for planning a space -exploration to the nearest solar system.

USA definitely has the resources and knowledge needed. even assuming the 69 moon landing was fake, you cant deny every launch they have made into space, and what about the international space station?
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom