What's new

Was DRDO developing rail gun technology from 90's alone. Or other depth. R also there

samy1618

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 2, 2014
Messages
107
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
India
Various of Publications/Newsletters from government agencies like BARC and DRDO’s ARDE, HEMRL etc. is indicative of that Railgun research in India was really started vary long back in the mid 80s or early 90s. Two ARDE publications in the DRDO website dating back to the April [Ref-1] and July [Ref-2] of 1994 clearly writes that: > “A railgun using electromagnetic propulsion was developed to launch hypervelocity projectiles.” > “A 240 kJ , low inductance capacitor bank operating at 5 kV powered the railgun.” > “Launchers and projectiles were designed and developed for this purpose.” > “A simulation code was developed to optimise the performance of the railgun.” > “Control and instrumentation facilities were set up along with a computer-based data acquisition system for measurement and analysis.” > “The capacity to launch projectiles of 3-3.5 g weight to a velocity of more than 2.00 km/s was demonstrated.” The articles then goes into details including inner workings, mathematical details, test details, and results of the already developed prototypes etc. So clearly enough, if they already had working prototypes of Railgun and were testing it in the time of publication of those two articles then they obviously started working on it at least 5 to 10 years before from the publication date. Another DRDO publication of October 2003 originating from HEMRL [Ref-3] indicates that they are researching on the fields of nonconventional concepts of solid projectile propulsion such as Liquid Gun Propellant, Rail Gun, Coil Gun, Electrothermal Gun, Electrothermal Chemical Gun along with Conventional Energetic Solid Gun propellants. So, as per the article, its not only Railgun which they are working on but other kind of alternate projectile propulsion also including Coil Gun. Their inner working concepts, properties, pros and cons are also mentioned briefly. But is it only DRDO going it alone? No other govt agencies involved? An article in the 2015 foundation day spacial issue newsletter [Ref-4, p48] from BARC by Dr. T.C Kaushik from BARC’s Applied Physics Division itself writes that: > “In our lab, we have developed a 60cm long; 6mm square bore Rail Gun. The rails consist of two 12×12 mm2 ETC grade copper bars. A 4mm deep step was introduced on either side of the rails to get a bore size of 6mm x 6mm. The rail gun is fired by a 38 kJ capacitor bank with peak current of 150kA with a quarter cycle rise time 0.12ms. A velocity of 3.1 km/s has been obtained which matches well with theoretically expected value of 3.2 km/s. Another 200 kJ capacitor bank has been commissioned for enhancing the velocity further with a new rail gun set up.” The interesting part of that BARC article is that it do not mentions development date. It seems the development was done in the past but on request for the spacial issue he wrote it in 2015. Its realy confusing which agency doing what. Are both the DRDO and BARC carrying development of Railgun separately? But why separately? Its wastage of resources and hard to believe also because they are government agencies and not private. So the best logical assumption would be they both are working together given that BARC is already experienced in vary high energy pulse power generation be it a capacitor bank, marks generator or a explosive based generator e.g. Explosively Pumped Flux Compression Generator (EPFCG) because of their KALI, LINAC and LIA programs [Ref-5]. They are doing it for decades. More precisely: > “The pulsed power program has been started in BARC since 1970s, it was developed for fusion related research (till 1980s) and then focus was shifted to NEMP (nuclear electro-magnetic pulse) simulation, hardening andsurge suppression. Pulse power systems were developed for generation of high power microwave and Flash X-rays for strategic applications.” [Ref-5] [Ref-1] http://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/dsj/article/view/4160/2422 [Ref-2] http://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/dsj/article/view/4179/2439 [Ref-3] http://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/dsj/article/download/2279/1236 [Ref-4] http://www.barc.gov.in/publications/nl/2015/spl2015/pdf/completeissue.pdf – p48 [Ref-5] http://www.barc.gov.in/publications/nl/2015/spl2015/pdf/completeissue.pdf http://www.barc.gov.in/publications/nl/2013/spl2013/web/newsletter/pdf/DAE EA/paper05.pdf
 
. .
Various of Publications/Newsletters from government agencies like BARC and DRDO’s ARDE, HEMRL etc. is indicative of that Railgun research in India was really started vary long back in the mid 80s or early 90s. Two ARDE publications in the DRDO website dating back to the April [Ref-1] and July [Ref-2] of 1994 clearly writes that: > “A railgun using electromagnetic propulsion was developed to launch hypervelocity projectiles.” > “A 240 kJ , low inductance capacitor bank operating at 5 kV powered the railgun.” > “Launchers and projectiles were designed and developed for this purpose.” > “A simulation code was developed to optimise the performance of the railgun.” > “Control and instrumentation facilities were set up along with a computer-based data acquisition system for measurement and analysis.” > “The capacity to launch projectiles of 3-3.5 g weight to a velocity of more than 2.00 km/s was demonstrated.” The articles then goes into details including inner workings, mathematical details, test details, and results of the already developed prototypes etc. So clearly enough, if they already had working prototypes of Railgun and were testing it in the time of publication of those two articles then they obviously started working on it at least 5 to 10 years before from the publication date. Another DRDO publication of October 2003 originating from HEMRL [Ref-3] indicates that they are researching on the fields of nonconventional concepts of solid projectile propulsion such as Liquid Gun Propellant, Rail Gun, Coil Gun, Electrothermal Gun, Electrothermal Chemical Gun along with Conventional Energetic Solid Gun propellants. So, as per the article, its not only Railgun which they are working on but other kind of alternate projectile propulsion also including Coil Gun. Their inner working concepts, properties, pros and cons are also mentioned briefly. But is it only DRDO going it alone? No other govt agencies involved? An article in the 2015 foundation day spacial issue newsletter [Ref-4, p48] from BARC by Dr. T.C Kaushik from BARC’s Applied Physics Division itself writes that: > “In our lab, we have developed a 60cm long; 6mm square bore Rail Gun. The rails consist of two 12×12 mm2 ETC grade copper bars. A 4mm deep step was introduced on either side of the rails to get a bore size of 6mm x 6mm. The rail gun is fired by a 38 kJ capacitor bank with peak current of 150kA with a quarter cycle rise time 0.12ms. A velocity of 3.1 km/s has been obtained which matches well with theoretically expected value of 3.2 km/s. Another 200 kJ capacitor bank has been commissioned for enhancing the velocity further with a new rail gun set up.” The interesting part of that BARC article is that it do not mentions development date. It seems the development was done in the past but on request for the spacial issue he wrote it in 2015. Its realy confusing which agency doing what. Are both the DRDO and BARC carrying development of Railgun separately? But why separately? Its wastage of resources and hard to believe also because they are government agencies and not private. So the best logical assumption would be they both are working together given that BARC is already experienced in vary high energy pulse power generation be it a capacitor bank, marks generator or a explosive based generator e.g. Explosively Pumped Flux Compression Generator (EPFCG) because of their KALI, LINAC and LIA programs [Ref-5]. They are doing it for decades. More precisely: > “The pulsed power program has been started in BARC since 1970s, it was developed for fusion related research (till 1980s) and then focus was shifted to NEMP (nuclear electro-magnetic pulse) simulation, hardening andsurge suppression. Pulse power systems were developed for generation of high power microwave and Flash X-rays for strategic applications.” [Ref-5] [Ref-1] http://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/dsj/article/view/4160/2422 [Ref-2] http://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/dsj/article/view/4179/2439 [Ref-3] http://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/dsj/article/download/2279/1236 [Ref-4] http://www.barc.gov.in/publications/nl/2015/spl2015/pdf/completeissue.pdf – p48 [Ref-5] http://www.barc.gov.in/publications/nl/2015/spl2015/pdf/completeissue.pdf http://www.barc.gov.in/publications/nl/2013/spl2013/web/newsletter/pdf/DAE EA/paper05.pdf

I had posted it on my thread. But I cannot find the exact date of that.

"http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.906.6034&rep=rep1&type=pdf
publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/dsj/article/download/4179/2439
India DRDO tested a 12 mm square bore railgun in 1990s? The railgun launched a 3 g projectile at 2.08 km/s."

May I get any information about the date of first experiment?
 
Last edited:
. .
This is india's rail gun

N2OtM8k.jpg
LOL. Good one, they couldn't catch the joke tho.
 
. .
A simple railgun can be developed at home. It requires a very basic understanding on physics and magnetism. A military grade railgun is a whole another level of railgunning. So I am not sure what DRDO has developed unless we see some pictures.
 
.
lol But how had railgun back then? No one, till now have operational one. So you burning back will continue to burn. lol




False flag joker.
False? I am Chinese and I work and live in Singapore. What is false?
 
.
False? I am Chinese and I work and live in Singapore. What is false?


I have stayed in Singapore and met many Chinese nationals there and been to Shanghai as well. I did not even single ethnic Chinese least bothered about India as enemy.

And you little loser, dedicated your life to troll on some online defence forum and want me to believe you are a Chinese?

In past I even saw you replying to Hindi-Urdu posts.
 
.
I have stayed in Singapore and met many Chinese nationals there and been to Shanghai as well. I did not even single ethnic Chinese least bothered about India as enemy.

And you little loser, dedicated your life to troll on some online defence forum and want me to believe you are a Chinese?

In past I even saw you replying to Hindi-Urdu posts.
No, we don't hate Indians at all. I don't hate India, I just like to debate with Indians when they get overboard and start thinking they are supa powa and start comparing with China while putting down whatever achievement China has made. Believe me, the typical Indians is envious and hates China even though none have ever been to China. It's in the Indian culture, if India cannot do it, China can't either.

Urdu? I can't speak Urdu or Hindi. Please copy paste one post I did in Urdu. Why are you so obsess in calling me Pakistani? Just because I argue more than a typical Chinese? Let me tell you this, the typical Chinese don't like to argue and will like to prove themselves through results. Contrast that with Indians.
 
.
lol But how had railgun back then? No one, till now have operational one. So you burning back will continue to burn. lol
Learn to accept reality.. stop living in fake ego.
Even the name 'Brahmos' is racist.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom