What's new

USS Fitzgerald 'at fault': Crew failed to react to approaching cargo ship in devastating crash that

Nan Yang

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
5,269
Reaction score
1
Country
Malaysia
Location
Malaysia
USS Fitzgerald 'at fault': Crew failed to react to approaching cargo ship in devastating crash that killed seven American sailors off the coast of Japan, investigation suggests

  • USS Fitzgerald and a Philippine cargo ship crashed on June 17, killing seven
  • Preliminary findings suggest crew on Fitzgerald failed to avoid collision in time
  • They 'did nothing until the last second', according to a Defense official to CNN
  • Fitzgerald's captain, Bryce Benson, was asleep at the time of the collision and it remains unclear whether the crew called the commanding officer to the bridge
  • Investigators are looking into possibility Fitzgerald was moving at high speeds
  • The collision tore a hole in the Fitzgerald's hull and water poured into the berthing area while sailors slept; authorities said the $1.5bn could have sank
The crash between the USS Fitzgerald and a Philippine cargo ship off the coast of Japanwas likely caused by the Navy crew members' failure to respond in time.

The crew on Fitzgerald 'did nothing until the last second', according to one official familiar with the investigation into the June 17 crash off the coast of Honshu, Japan, that claimed the lives of seven American sailors, CNN reported.

Preliminary findings in the inquiry indicate crew members on the Fitzgerald failed to acknowledge the ACX Crystal was approaching and did not the necessary action to avoid a collision, according to two Defense Department officials who spoke to CNN.

42506C4900000578-4718884-image-a-24_1500659996676.jpg


+12
The crew on Fitzgerald 'did nothing until the last second', according to one official. Pictured, the damage sustained on the US warship after it collided with a cargo ship on June 17
42506C3D00000578-4718884-image-a-33_1500660265785.jpg


+12
Preliminary findings in the inquiry indicate crew members on the Fitzgerald failed to acknowledge the ACX Crystal was approaching and did not the necessary action
 
. . .
@jhungary. He previously claim very sure USN are very professional and such incident can only be the fault of merchant ship.

So what's happening?

All US Ase lickers keep silence from now on
Jhungry will claim China use voodo and blinded the USN crew. It must be the fault of China and never the fault of USN :enjoy:
 
.
The USN has been part of many accidents in the past. Given their size and mandate human error will show up every now and then. That's just human.

Not sure why one needs to make fun pf others over such? Did not an important chinese rocket crash recently? Such accidents happen and professional forces will learn from it.
 
.
The claim ACX turn and hit the navy ship was hilarious. :D
We are lucky the ship was not Chinese or the "free press" would certainly not be as honest about who was at fault or not... selfidentifying forum experts of anything would cite it as "obvious Chinese provocation" based on their unquestioned strong faith in "U.S. navy professionalism" years from now.
 
. .
The USN has been part of many accidents in the past. Given their size and mandate human error will show up every now and then. That's just human.

Not sure why one needs to make fun pf others over such? Did not an important chinese rocket crash recently? Such accidents happen and professional forces will learn from it.
Maybe you did not know. There was a debate about who was wrong. The US Navy or the Crystal. This is the final conclusion. That is all.
 
.
Maybe you did not know. There was a debate about who was wrong. The US Navy or the Crystal. This is the final conclusion. That is all.

Why do you want to believe conclusions drawn by US Navy? Don't you think Phillipines under China's influence carried out the attack to show US Navy who is boss in Asia?
 
.
The USN has been part of many accidents in the past. Given their size and mandate human error will show up every now and then. That's just human.

Not sure why one needs to make fun pf others over such? Did not an important chinese rocket crash recently? Such accidents happen and professional forces will learn from it.
That is a stupid mistake. It clearly terrible procedure and a massive lapse of control/command within USN in this incident. It clearly exposed USN is not the well disciplined and professional armed forces as what US propaganda trying to portray to the world.

Stop finding excuse for American. When its China , I can bet your cheap trolling of low class PLAN or whatever rubbish will come out of your mouth.
 
.
All US Ase lickers keep silence from now on


@jhungary. He previously claim very sure USN are very professional and such incident can only be the fault of merchant ship.

So what's happening?


Jhungry will claim China use voodo and blinded the USN crew. It must be the fault of China and never the fault of USN :enjoy:

Just because Daily Mail said CNN claim some "unnamed" official said so, then it is the truth? Wasn't CNN was lambasted by you guys being "FAKE NEWS" just a few month ago?

1.) If a ship collided in high sea, both side would have the responsibility to avoid each other. If a crash happened, given if both side did not neglecting their duty, then both side are at fault, and in this case, there are no one in the pilot house of ACX Crystal at the moment of the crash, that indicated the Negligent part of ACX Crystal.

I did go over the legal aspect as per UN Convention to Avoid Collision on the other thread. I wonder how people would make any judgement when they do not know anything other than the facts provided to us on how this crash happen in the first place?

2.) As far as the "report" concern, there are no speculation on the official investigation, which mean this "Report" is either a hearsay or speculation on someone that cannot be confirm.

If I said, Quoting from an unnamed source within the Chinese Government that Xi Jing Ping is gay, does that mean Xi is indeed gay? Or even, did it actually warrant a response?

You can say anything on the internet, it's a free tool, just because someone said something does not mean that is the truth, that's just some opinion by "Some Guy", it changes nothing.

it would be wise to wait for the US Navy and Japan Coast Guard report, otherwise, you may be the one that turn out to be a dick for shooting yourselves in the mouth. LOL
 
Last edited:
.
Immaturity.

Of all the Chinese members here, NONE have ever served in the PLA. They do not know what it takes to live such a life. Theirs are sheltered lives. The most dangerous parts of their daily routines are from shaving and pissing off their mothers. They have to find some ways to feel 'manly' somehow. :lol:
Trying to divert the question? The Destroyer is sailing in a less dense shipping lane in clear weather. Plus the fact, the merchant ship is so big that cannot be missed.

I can bet the sailors are playing cards or watching video instead of staying up on watch and lookout for passing ships. USN are a bunch of ill discipline sailor. I can bet Somalia pirates with same resources can do a better seamanship than USN. :rofl:

Just because Daily Mail said CNN claim some "unnamed" official said so, then it is the truth? Wasn't CNN was lambasted by you guys being "FAKE NEWS" just a few month ago?

1.) If a ship collided, both side would have the responsibility to avoid each other. If a crash happened, given if both side did not neglecting their duty, then both side are at fault, and in this case, there are no one in the pilot house of ACX Crystal at the moment of the crash, that indicated the Negligent part of ACX Crystal.

I did go over the legal aspect as per UN Convention to Avoid Collision on the other thread. I wonder how people would make any judgement when they do not know anything other than the facts provided to us on how this crash happen in the first place?

2.) As far as the "report" concern, there are no speculation on the official investigation, which mean this "Report" is either a hearsay or speculation on someone that cannot be confirm.

If I said, Quoting from an unnamed source within the Chinese Government that Xi Jing Ping is gay, does that mean Xi is indeed gay? Or even, did it actually warrant a response?

You can say anything on the internet, it's a free tool, just because someone said something does not mean that is the truth, that's just some opinion by "Some Guy", it changes nothing.

it would be wise to wait for the US Navy and Japan Coast Guard report, otherwise, you may be the one that turn out to be a dick for shooting yourselves in the mouth. LOL

You want to bet with me if USN later admit what those media claimed is true? I bet my account with you. Who lose, who cease up account and retired from PDF. Do you have balls to take up my challenge?
 
.
Maybe you did not know. There was a debate about who was wrong. The US Navy or the Crystal. This is the final conclusion. That is all.

lol, this is NOT the final conclusion. Nor does the article claim this is a "Final" conclusion, it said "Preliminary Finding" which has been already speculating a few weeks after the collision.

In fact, nobody can actually verify it was any kind of conclusion... As no one can provide an independent account as to the authenticity of this news.

Trying to divert the question? The Destroyer is sailing in a less dense shipping lane in clear weather. Plus the fact, the merchant ship is so big that cannot be missed.

I can bet the sailors are playing cards or watching video instead of staying up on watch and lookout for passing ships. USN are a bunch of ill discipline sailor. I can bet Somalia pirates with same resources can do a better seamanship than USN. :rolf:



You want to bet with me if USN later admit what those media claimed is true? I bet my account with you. Who lose, who cease up account and retired from PDF.

Your logic is fault, how do you know the Media claim is true to begin with? Just because you said so? So if I said., I am gonna bet my account with you and say the Chinese Communist Party will come out and say Xi is indeed Gay when the "Media" said so, are you going to retire from PDF??
 
.
That is a stupid mistake. It clearly terrible procedure and a massive lapse of control/command within USN in this incident. It clearly exposed USN is not the well disciplined and professional armed forces as what US propaganda trying to portray to the world.

Stop finding excuse for American. When its China , I can bet your cheap trolling of low class PLAN or whatever rubbish will come out of your mouth.

Not at all man. China navy has the world's BEST safety record. In 70 years of operations and expansion there has been only ONE accident in 2003 on a submarine. I think China navy is THE best navy out there.

My only confusion is why are you believing American media claims citing American Navy investigation?????
 
.
lol, this is NOT the final conclusion. Nor does the article claim this is a "Final" conclusion, it said "Preliminary Finding" which has been already speculating a few weeks after the collision.

In fact, nobody can actually verify it was any kind of conclusion... As no one can provide an independent account as to the authenticity of this news.



Your logic is fault, how do you know the Media claim is true to begin with? Just because you said so? So if I said., I am gonna bet my account with you and say the Chinese Communist Party will come out and say Xi is indeed Gay when the "Media" said so, are you going to retire from PDF??
:lol: Dare not bet with me on USS Fitzgerald is at fault and blah blah blah.. :lol:

You are a loser :enjoy:

Not at all man. China navy has the world's BEST safety record. In 70 years of operations and expansion there has been only ONE accident in 2003 on a submarine. I think China navy is THE best navy out there.

My only confusion is why are you believing American media claims citing American Navy investigation?????
Indeed. PLAN is world class. Unlike India submarine that will blow up itself in harbour or collapse in shipyard. :enjoy:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom