What's new

US willing to fund Afghan border security: Bilawal

hydrabadi_arab

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
1,462
Reaction score
6
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
WASHINGTON: Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari has said the United States is willing to provide Pakistan funds to enhance border security for preventing cross-border attacks from Afghanistan.

Responding to queries from Dawn, the foreign minister said that during his visit to the US Congress last week, two senior senators — Bob Menendez from New Jersey and Lindsey Graham from South Carolina — told him that they were provided “funding in the 2023 budget to help us with border security”.


Senator Menendez chairs the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations while Senator Graham, a senior Republican, heads the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Mr Bhutto-Zardari said, while emphasising the strong standing of the two lawmakers.

Responding to a question about the US offer of help to improve relations with India, Mr Bhutto-Zardari said: “They never brought up India other than in public statements.”

On Washington’s offer to mediate with India, FM says relations with Delhi ‘not discussed in meetings, only public statements’
At a news briefing in Washington on Dec 19, US State Department’s Spokesperson Ned Price noted Afghanistan-based terrorist groups like the outlawed Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan have recently increased attacks on Pakistani targets and offered help to Islamabad to deal with the “increasingly dangerous threat”.

“We have partnered with our Pakistani friends to help them take on this challenge. We stand ready to assist, whether with this unfolding situation or more broadly,” Mr Price said.

During the foreign minister’s visit to the UN headquarters in New York last week, both India and Pakistan engaged in a war of words over occupied Kashmir and other issues. Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar called Pakistan “the hub of terrorism” that “hosted Osama bin Laden”.

In his riposte, Mr Bhutto-Zardari reminded that India Prime Minister Narendra Modi was once called “the butcher of Gujarat” and that while bin Laden was dead “Mr Modi lives and is India’s prime minister”.

Asked to comment on these statements, Mr Price underlined “the indispensability of maintaining valuable partnerships” with both India and Pakistan.

“The fact that we have partnerships with both countries leaves us not wanting to see a war of words between India and Pakistan,” he said.

“We would like to see constructive dialogue between them. The United States stands ready to assist as a partner to both.”

But the foreign minister’s response to Dawn made it clear that while the US wanted good relations between the two South Asian neighbours, it appears keener to cooperate with Islamabad in combating terrorist attacks from Afghanistan.

This also reflects in the omnibus bill that Congress passed on Friday, setting aside $200 million for promoting gender equality in Pakistan and also emphasising the need to combat terrorism.

The bill doesn’t mention a specific amount for combating terrorism, but it does say that funds appropriated under the heading “Foreign Military Financing Program” can be “made available only to support counterterrorism and counterinsurgency capabilities in Pakistan.”

It also noted the funds appropriated for “International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement” shall be made available for border security programmes in Pakistan.”

Commenting on the US offers, former ambassador Touqir Hussain, an adjunct professor at Georgetown University, told Dawn that defeating terrorism was a shared goal of both countries.

“So, the US cannot only ask for Pakistan’s help without offering its own help. It is a shared challenge which neither can address alone.”

Mr Hussain noted the public statement of support for Pakistan was “obviously a part of the ongoing US efforts to rehabilitate [its ]image in the country.”

He said the offer to assist India and Pakistan in resolving their differences, was “important not so much for its practical value – in the resolution of India Pakistan differences, which is not much as India would not accept outside involvement – but the context in which this offer is made.”

“The language with which the respective relations with India and Pakistan have been described is clearly meant to convey a shift away from the US’ South Asia policy of recent years resting on the centrality of India,” the former ambassador pointed out.

In the statement, Mr. Price spoke of a “global strategic partnership with India” and a “deep partnership … with Pakistan.”

“Each of them is indispensable to us,” said the spokesperson.

He added that “the promotion and the pursuit of shared goals” with India and Pakistan were equally important to the US.

Published in Dawn, December 25th, 2022
 
. . . .
Its very good deal, get funds to kill afghan terrorists and stop them from entering Pakistan.
US could not able todo that after spending billions of dollars , do u really think this aid will change any thing on ground? US want pak to keep fighting with taliban until the last afghani or Pakistani , in that case be ready for another suicide attacks in our country
 
Last edited:
.
A few million US dollars as aid and as per reports just in textile sector the loss in exports are touching 1 billion US dollars per month.

All the gains achieved in textile sector with extra orders are lost and the yearly loss in exports can exceed 10 billion USD.
 
.
US could not able todo that after spending billions of dollars , do u really think this add will change any thing on ground? US want pak to keep fighting with taliban until the last afghani or Pakistani , in that case be ready for another suicide attacks in our country
They want data. Probably similar arrangement after 911 when US had provided the face recognition cameras to be installed at immigration counters during Mush era.
 
. . .
fvck these reards who left all this arsenal to intentionally destabilize Asia. The biggest retards tho, are the public who do not question their politicians over the colossal fvuk ups & are more concerned bout them stupid pronounes and that gender is what a person perceives, not what the doctor said at birth! so sick of this crap.
 
.
Will this not give Afghan Taliban an excuse to keep helping TTP ?
Hmm, I was thinking of the other end of the beast. Pakistan military may encourage some action by TTP to keep the money spigot open. Pakistan military is a mutant beast. Its interests are not congruent with the State. Its first loyalty is to itself. Any loyalty to the State is frugal.
 
.
Hmm, I was thinking of the other end of the beast. Pakistan military may encourage some action by TTP to keep the money spigot open. Pakistan military is a mutant beast. Its interests are not congruent with the State. Its first loyalty is to itself. Any loyalty to the State is frugal.

Yes.. This is true as well. Only reason TTP is still alive because it's been kept alive by Pakistan’s military.
 
.
If US is really sincere in helping Pakistan without any hidden Agenda than release the CSF funds, give Pakistan the AHZI Zulu's and Intel sharing, Radars , drones. Not just that but also put some Pressure on Afghan Taliban through the drone strikes (Not from Pakistan Territory). But I know this won't be the case, unless PA start using drones and this time they own these strikes, and than if Afghan Taliban still failed to handle TTP than its time to call for an open war against them, we don't need to send troops deep inside, just carpet bomb the areas close to Pakistan border, make sure there is no camp/village/city that could be used against Pakistan for cross border attacks, Start kicking out Afghans, and their Biraaather Pashtoons and deport them let them cry. Nations are not build on weak decisions, if Pakistan has to survive in this and next century they have to stop this pu&&y policy of appeasing the Afghans. Seal the border, and open it only to deport Afghans or Tribal, no more business or Trade or travel for treatment. Let them suffer as they make Pakistan and Pakistani's suffer for 2 decades.
 
. .
If US is really sincere in helping Pakistan without any hidden Agenda than release the CSF funds, give Pakistan the AHZI Zulu's and Intel sharing, Radars , drones. Not just that but also put some Pressure on Afghan Taliban through the drone strikes (Not from Pakistan Territory). But I know this won't be the case, unless PA start using drones and this time they own these strikes, and than if Afghan Taliban still failed to handle TTP than its time to call for an open war against them, we don't need to send troops deep inside, just carpet bomb the areas close to Pakistan border, make sure there is no camp/village/city that could be used against Pakistan for cross border attacks, Start kicking out Afghans, and their Biraaather Pashtoons and deport them let them cry. Nations are not build on weak decisions, if Pakistan has to survive in this and next century they have to stop this pu&&y policy of appeasing the Afghans. Seal the border, and open it only to deport Afghans or Tribal, no more business or Trade or travel for treatment. Let them suffer as they make Pakistan and Pakistani's suffer for 2 decades.
I think U.S., especially the Congress (especially with Republicans back in House) won't like to appropriate anything for Afghanistan. Any small amount has to come from existing budget for general anti-terrorism fight. That will be triggered only if something in Afghanistan is deemed dangerous far afield. Fighting Taliban inside Afghanistan or Pakistan may not fit the bill. Biden considers Afghanistan lost cause and doesn't want to throw good money after bad.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom