US urges India to avoid Pakistan-centric policies

[Contrarian]

Off on first part and sadly misinformed on the other. Seems to be far too habitual for you and your people. The people we kill are mostly just your proxies fighting a fake war for money. Whereas we lens nothing more than moral support to Kashmiris and we will continue to do so and there's little you can do about it

Funny. People would not be willing to blow themselves up for money though. And these people are simply a result of your pious upbringing that is promoted in Pakistan by the military. Nothing to do whatsoever with India.

Trust me, if we were arming them to the teeth the same way we were to the mujahideen who fought your soviet friends then the mass graves would be containing your coward occupation forces and not the other way around (I.e. unarmed Kashmiris hardline and secular alike -chanting Azadi)

There is nothing to trust you or Pakistani's Zolfiqar. India has seen the terrorists being trained, funded and supplied and pushed over the borders. We have caught not just Kashmiris but Pakistani Punjabi's and Afghans and even a few times Uzbek.

Pakistan can fund and arm them as much as they want to - the reality that you are loath to accept is that Pakistan is a weak country. It simply not capable enough -try as it might -to harm India. Try as you might, arm them as you might, they would still end up with a bullet in their head and under some unmarked grave.

By the way once you find a tampon and a chaar pai to lay down on go use google an search for "beef bacon". It exists. Like beef pepperoni as i recently discovered. It ain't a steak, but it's not too bad for a quick shot of carbs and sodium

I am aware. I merely quoted that you know the other guy mentioned bacon in the traditional sense. Let me make it clearer for you - pigs meat.

 

[INDIC]

Lessons in logic...

Pakistanis=Muslims
Muslims ruled over India for 700 years
Since Pakistanis=Muslims, therefore Pakistanis ruled over India for 700 years!!

Damn! I think I've had one too many!!

Its sounds like some native African Christian saying we Christians ruled India for 200 years. Isn't it @Spring Onion.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

As I said - we don't need to arm them. Your occupation forces (sissies) cut out most of the work for us.

Since supporting bdesh freedom wasn't terrorism, I see no problem in support for Kashmir which actually is disputed territory and in fact Kashmiri nationalists are within their right to take up arms against a foreign nation occupying a portion of it.

In fact I personally wouldn't object to providing further support. Libya and Syria rebels were armed to the teeth by the west and few seem to be blinking. Worth noting.

 

[INDIC]

Aur nahin tou kiyaaa @Gigawatt usss waqt ka meriii Biryani kiii plate pe nazar lagaii beithaa haiii jub ke mein neiii iss ke Karela Ghost kooo eik baariii bhiii nahin deekhaaa !

I think adding vegetable in mutton is the insult of mutton, so no Karela gosht.

 

[Contrarian]

As I said - we don't need to arm them. Your occupation forces (sissies) cut out most of the work for us.

Since supporting bdesh freedom wasn't terrorism, I see no problem in support for Kashmir which actually is disputed territory and in fact Kashmiri nationalists are within their right to take up arms against a foreign nation occupying a portion of it.

In fact I personally wouldn't object to providing further support. Libya and Syria rebels were armed to the teeth by the west and few seem to be blinking. Worth noting.

There is a major difference in those cases. Try to use sense at times. US and Western countries can do it against Syria because they are much stronger than Syria, and frankly Syria is a weak nation.

On the other hand, India is the 7th largest nation in teh world, our military is one of the largest in the globe, our economy is meshed strongly in the world economy and lastly, our word carries credibility in international circles.

You want - Pakistan to go against that?
Best of luck

 

[Windjammer]

Can post any links of say aggressive statements?

Immediately after its nuclear tests, India has brazenly raised the demand that 'Islamabad should realise the change in the geo-strategic situation in the region' and threatened that 'India will deal firmly and strongly with Pakistan'.

Nuclear Files:

 

[nForce]

hindustan stops occupying and killing Kashmiri youth and even women/children - people won't be forced to become terrorists and retaliate against them

Who made you the guardian angel? and who said it is your land to begin with? You cant even properly take care of yourself,but still try to act like the big brother.Hypocrisy at its best.

 

[Windjammer]

Its sounds like some native African Christian saying we Christians ruled India for 200 years. Isn't it @Spring Onion.

And i supopose Indians have their own standards.

American cows have Indian origins, scientists find - Times Of India

 

[Vinod2070]

But indias tone did change after the blasts and became aggressive & threatening against Pakistan

Prime minister Veggie-pai said (verbatim) "Pakistan must accept the new reality" in a snide way and we had a good response to him and those fanboys cheering behind him.

So quite frankly - who cares what they said. Let them drown in their inferiority complex

The "aggressive statements" were well choreographed. To get a certain kind of response from Pakistan.

And it worked like a charm.

Read Talbott's book. It contains the details including the prior message that he had been given about this whole thing.

As I said - we don't need to arm them. Your occupation forces (sissies) cut out most of the work for us.

Since supporting bdesh freedom wasn't terrorism, I see no problem in support for Kashmir which actually is disputed territory and in fact Kashmiri nationalists are within their right to take up arms against a foreign nation occupying a portion of it.

In fact I personally wouldn't object to providing further support. Libya and Syria rebels were armed to the teeth by the west and few seem to be blinking. Worth noting.

Well, if I were you, I would be more worried about Pushtnistan and what is happening around it.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

The "aggressive statements" were well choreographed. To get a certain kind of response from Pakistan.

And it worked like a charm.

Read Talbott's book. It contains the details including the prior message that he had been given about this whole thing.



Well, if I were you, I would be more worried about Pushtnistan and what is happening around it.

Going nuclear was a covert agenda but remember that it was india that started the arms race not us

If I were you I'd be more worried about Manipur, Orissa, Assam for sure, and perhaps Tamil Nadu which is the ideological home for Tamil nationalism

 

[Vinod2070]

Going nuclear was a covert agenda but remember that it was india that started the arms race not us

Nope. You try and read the book.

The agenda was to get the response from you that we got. The events transpired exactly as we wanted them to.

If I were you I'd be more worried about Manipur, Orissa, Assam for sure, and perhaps Tamil Nadu which is the ideological home for Tamil nationalism

OK. But the former is a real and present danger.

Let's wait and watch. Hopefully we will both be here when the events transpire.

 

[forcetrip]

So if muslims ruled india for 700 years, did the hindus actually take india away from the muslims after the white people left?

 

[SamantK]

So if muslims ruled india for 700 years, did the hindus actually take india away from the muslims after the white people left?

I like how you think...

 

[KS]

So if muslims ruled india for 700 years, did the hindus actually take india away from the muslims after the white people left?

No the Muslim first took India from them, then Marathas (along with the Sikhs) got it back from the Mughals and the English got it from these two. So the English should have given back powers to these two if you are specific about details.

 

[forcetrip]

No the Muslim first took India from them, then Marathas (along with the Sikhs) got it back from the Mughals and the English got it from these two. So the English should have given back powers to these two if you are specific about details.

It was my feeble attempt to troll my country men with their ridiculous assumptions of grandeur. History alludes everyone in both countries with versions and predictions of its future that would make a brown man blush.