What's new

US to counter hypersonic vehicles with extended range THAAD

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
Pentagon seeks new weapons to counter China’s hypersonic missiles

The Missile Defense Agency has tasked a major defense contractor to develop advanced missiles capable of knocking out maneuvering, ultrahigh-speed targets such as China’s high-tech Wu-14 hypersonic glide vehicle.

Missile defense specialists at Lockheed Martin, the main contractor for the Pentagon’s agency, told reporters Wednesday that an extended-range version of the Army’s Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense system is being developed to deal with hypersonic threats.

Hypersonic missiles are maneuvering strike vehicles launched atop missiles that travel at speeds of up to Mach 10, or 10 times the speed of sound. They maneuver and glide along the edge of space, making them difficult targets for missile defenses.

China surprised U.S. intelligence agencies last year by conducting three flight tests of the Wu-14 in January, August and December. The vehicle traveled at speeds up to Mach 10, or nearly 8,000 miles per hour.

U.S. intelligence agencies assessed the Wu-14 to be a nuclear delivery vehicle designed to break through U.S. defenses.

In addition to China, Russia and India are working on hypersonic strike vehicles. A U.S. test of a hypersonic missile blew up shortly after launch in August. U.S. officials are concerned that hypersonic technology will proliferate to the missile systems of North Korea and Iran, the main focus of current U.S. missile defenses.

“One of the things that the MDA is looking very closely at is the upgrade of the THAAD system so that we can extend the reach in dealing with a target just like that,” said Mike Trotsky, a vice president at Lockheed for defense missiles and fire control.

Hypersonic warheads seek to “find a seam” between space-capable interceptors and air-breathing defenses to avoid being shot down, he told reporters on a conference call. Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense interceptors can blast missile warheads into space and into the upper atmosphere “in the region where that threat flies,” Mr. Trotsky said.

The extended-range version, with a larger booster and an enhanced upper stage, is being developed to deal with hypersonic threats, he added, noting that work has been underway for the past 12 to 18 months.

“And so the MDA is very interested in [Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense] ER and that’s one of the key reasons,” Mr. Trotsky said.

Doug Graham, Lockheed’s vice president for strategic and missile defense systems, said hypersonic glide vehicles travel at the top of the atmosphere, the system’s optimum target zone.

“So, in a sense, you can’t fly around THAAD’s battle space,” he said, “which is why there is intense interest in building an enhanced version of the system,” currently deployed on the U.S. island of Guam.

J.D. Hammond, Lockheed’s director of command and control battle management systems, said software is being developed to tie together space-based and ground-based sensor data, both infrared and radio frequency, “so that we have better sensor data on that type of threat.”

“That is something that is being worked on in coordination with MDA,” he said.

Mr. Graham said maneuvering hypersonic glide vehicle threats, along with continued ballistic missile flight tests by North Korea and Iran, indicate that adversaries are seeking for ways to defeat missile defense systems.

“So we’re constantly having to stay ahead of the curve so that our systems remain robust against the full range of threats,” he said.

Inside the Ring: Pentagon to counter hypersonic missiles - Washington Times
 
.
It will not be much difficult to counter such gliders as they are not much maneuverable and prone to shoot down in last leg of journey and their carriers can also be shot down in space as this is the time when they are at their weakest point if we exclude short launch window. Only advantage it has is speed but when US has already global tracking abilities it's not a worry for them, for others hell yeah. Thank you.
 
.
"noting that work has been underway for the past 12 to 18 months"

That'll throw a wrench into the HGV hype:p:. The US always has a counter and HGV's are nothing special, just a more modernized MARV, which we have plenty of experience with via our Pershing II and own HGV testing. As with every system there is an initial fear and once that gets out of everyone's systems we develop our countermeasures.

THAAD, laser weapons, rail-guns and who knows what else... we always have a counter ready.

@Nihonjin1051 - time for Japan to get in on the THAAD action too:cheers:
 
.
"noting that work has been underway for the past 12 to 18 months"

That'll throw a wrench into the HGV hype:p:. The US always has a counter and HGV's are nothing special, just a more modernized MARV, which we have plenty of experience with via our Pershing II and own HGV testing. As with every system there is an initial fear and once that gets out of everyone's systems we develop our countermeasures.

THAAD, laser weapons, rail-guns and who knows what else... we always have a counter ready.
isn't that how it's suppose to work. You go one way, we go another, we go one way and you go another. We keep trying to one up each other until one of us ends up like the Soviets and then we start the process again with a new party.
 
.
The Extended Range technology consists of adding a two-stage booster system to the current THAAD system: an initial booster stage and a second stage that is called a kick stage, Trotsky explained.

“The first stage gets you out longer and higher against modern threats, and the kick stage is responsible for narrowing the distance between the target and the interceptor, so you can turn over to the kill vehicle. And the kill vehicle is going to be the same vehicle that exists on the THAAD today. We’ve done some initial work on the booster stages … and some initial testing to prove viability.”

The current THAAD handles both the endoatmosphere and the extoatmosphere—operating exactly in the area the hypersonic gliders try to exploit. “By going to the ER version, where you have a bigger booster and a kick stage, you can launch much earlier, and you can attack that threat before [it] might try to do some evasive maneuver,” Trotsky said. “The ER has specific capability that would be good to intercept that kind of target. We can’t go into specifics, but it has much more battle space than the current THAAD.”

Emerging Technology Could Patch the Seam in U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense | SIGNAL Magazine

A bit more info....
 
.
US mainland is far from Chinese mainland and due to their sheer quantity and quality of intelligence I think even 30 minutes of time should be more than enough to shoot down such gliders with ease. What can make it difficult is good maneuvering capability if incorporated in such missiles.
 
.
isn't that how it's suppose to work. You go one way, we go another, we go one way and you go another. We keep trying to one up each other until one of us ends up like the Soviets and then we start the process again with a new party.

Absolutely!!! And the end result is both our nations develop new technology, skill and tactics, and are better off for it. I say bring it on - in a polite way, I don't actually want a war. That benefits no one. Friendly competition never hurt anyone and it actually pushed the US and Soviets to be better. I welcome this and in the end, when we finally come to the realization that war is stupid, both the US and China will have gained so much from their competition. Just take a look at the space race!

Here's to a fun race. You guys bring your "A" game, because we sure are:china::usflag:
 
. .
Absolutely!!! And the end result is both our nations develop new technology, skill and tactics, and are better off for it. I say bring it on - in a polite way, I don't actually want a war. That benefits no one. Friendly competition never hurt anyone and it actually pushed the US and Soviets to be better. I welcome this and in the end, when we finally come to the realization that war is stupid, both the US and China will have gained so much from their competition. Just take a look at the space race!

Here's to a fun race:china::usflag:

Have you seen the Soviets? lol they are not better, but I get your point.

Anyways, like I say to everyone who work with me, I hope you crash and burn. lol keep it classy.
 
.
waste of money
I never liked THAAD. take that money and time and develop a hypersonic vehicle that is better and cheaper, and make the Chinese waste billions on countering it, and if they are smart they wouldn't

these anti ballistic missiles and shields are pointless and probably wouldn't even be effective. it also is smack to the face of the whole concept of Mutuality Assured Destruction.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom