US risks war with China and Russia - World War III

[gpit]

This has been there for a month. Your comments.

 

[DelhiDareDevil]

Dont see no winners in this war.

 

[gpit]

According to the U.S., “Defense News,” 25 reported that a former Air Force Chief of Staff, U.S. General Moseley Fisher Institute in Israel on the development of air power, said the annual forum, the U.S. military in future conflicts with China and Russia confrontation between the military system, the “possibility is very high.” He recalled that when President Bush asked the future of the United States to fight with China or Russia the possibility of a war. He said: “At the time my answer is almost zero. I believe that our politicians cleverly designed to make the necessary policy decisions, to avoid such a war, and I am highly confident.”

But then change the attitude of Mosley. Mosley believes that the U.S. Air Force F-22 require large-scale equipment to China and Russia to maintain absolute military superiority, was Gates dismissed as “crazy fantasy next war” and therefore dismissed. “Defense News,” said Mosley said: “For my son and the son of my generation, the future of China or the Russian military system with the possibility of war almost 100 %。”

“Washington Times” reported on 26th, at the recently held U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on China’s new stealth fighter, ballistic missiles and other advanced weapons posed a “threat” led the conference content. U.S. Air Force is responsible for operations, deputy chief of staff Lieutenant Herbert Carlyle declared earlier this year show China’s new stealth fighter jets like the F -20 stealth fighter aircraft jointly developed by Russia and India as very worrying. Carlisle said: “These two fighters are likely to be sold to Iran, will affect the U.S. intervention against Iran’s nuclear program.”

Carlisle said, “We thought the Chinese new fighter may be a later time.” This senior intelligence official with the U.S. Navy Lieutenant David’s view is exactly the same Dorset, Dorset that the U.S. has underestimated China weapons systems development and delivery capabilities. “Washington Times” said Carlisle of China’s growing military power was “extraordinary confession” comment: “As long as across the Pacific to see China is doing, not just Air Force capabilities, and their surface to air missile capability, ballistic missile capability, in particular, anti-ship ballistic missiles, and the ability to hit the U.S. territory of Guam and Japan, all of these new missile … … Let us more and more uneasy. ”

Report also described that hearing, the Navy Office of David 菲尔曼准将 integrated operations in the face of “what makes you sleep at night,” answered the question: “First and foremost is the Chinese . they are more advanced, particularly ships at sea and ‘anti-access’ capabilities. “” Washington Times “said the Pentagon that China’s development, including anti-ship ballistic missiles, new submarines, anti-satellite weapons and cyber warfare and other advanced weapons systems in the to create “anti-intervention and regional refused only” capability.

Lot of the Pentagon hawks argue that bin Laden too much consumption of the United States national power, the U.S. military operations around the core of terrorism for a decade, Houla Deng era need to reverse this trend. Japan’s “diplomats” magazine website 26 article entitled “China’s why Osama bin Laden” comment is very able to represent the views of these people. Commented that George W. Bush took office not friendly to China, Japan and South Korea to win over his neighbors, China and India, and to promote anti-missile system in East Asia. But “9.11″ incident changed everything. The result is that in 2001 Bush declared that “to enjoy unparalleled military strength, strong economic and political influence,” the United States into the image is now fading, and the past 10 years, China is making great strides. Some analysts believe that the United States in fighting terrorism and other issues still need Russia’s cooperation, which restricted the United States and the possibility of conflict between the two countries. Houla Deng era, but the U.S. will be able to devote more energy, attention and deal with Russia.

the former Air Force Chief of Staff General Moseley

Former U.S. general: the possibility of future war with Russia is almost 100% - - China News
-------

I believe this news is from China: http://war.news.163.com/11/0529/10/757FFIMC00011MTO.html

 

[kakazhu]

According to the U.S., “Defense News,” 25 reported that a former Air Force Chief of Staff, U.S. General Moseley Fisher Institute in Israel on the development of air power, said the annual forum, the U.S. military in future conflicts

 

[jha]

Will this be another attempt to resurrect the economy the WW-II way..
I dont think so.. USA will not put its existance at the stake..Unless of course they have developed a really credible Missile defense tech..

 

[luckyyy]

why few people always try to drag russia into this ..

 

[NmHqh2JbVo]

This has been there for a month. Your comments.

You go down under with the Jews.

 

[khurasaan1]

According to the U.S., “Defense News,” 25 reported that a former Air Force Chief of Staff, U.S. General Moseley Fisher Institute in Israel on the development of air power, said the annual forum, the U.S. military in future conflicts with China and Russia confrontation between the military system, the “possibility is very high.” He recalled that when President Bush asked the future of the United States to fight with China or Russia the possibility of a war. He said: “At the time my answer is almost zero. I believe that our politicians cleverly designed to make the necessary policy decisions, to avoid such a war, and I am highly confident.”

But then change the attitude of Mosley. Mosley believes that the U.S. Air Force F-22 require large-scale equipment to China and Russia to maintain absolute military superiority, was Gates dismissed as “crazy fantasy next war” and therefore dismissed. “Defense News,” said Mosley said: “For my son and the son of my generation, the future of China or the Russian military system with the possibility of war almost 100 %。”

“Washington Times” reported on 26th, at the recently held U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on China’s new stealth fighter, ballistic missiles and other advanced weapons posed a “threat” led the conference content. U.S. Air Force is responsible for operations, deputy chief of staff Lieutenant Herbert Carlyle declared earlier this year show China’s new stealth fighter jets like the F -20 stealth fighter aircraft jointly developed by Russia and India as very worrying. Carlisle said: “These two fighters are likely to be sold to Iran, will affect the U.S. intervention against Iran’s nuclear program.”

Carlisle said, “We thought the Chinese new fighter may be a later time.” This senior intelligence official with the U.S. Navy Lieutenant David’s view is exactly the same Dorset, Dorset that the U.S. has underestimated China weapons systems development and delivery capabilities. “Washington Times” said Carlisle of China’s growing military power was “extraordinary confession” comment: “As long as across the Pacific to see China is doing, not just Air Force capabilities, and their surface to air missile capability, ballistic missile capability, in particular, anti-ship ballistic missiles, and the ability to hit the U.S. territory of Guam and Japan, all of these new missile … … Let us more and more uneasy. ”

Report also described that hearing, the Navy Office of David 菲尔曼准将 integrated operations in the face of “what makes you sleep at night,” answered the question: “First and foremost is the Chinese . they are more advanced, particularly ships at sea and ‘anti-access’ capabilities. “” Washington Times “said the Pentagon that China’s development, including anti-ship ballistic missiles, new submarines, anti-satellite weapons and cyber warfare and other advanced weapons systems in the to create “anti-intervention and regional refused only” capability.

Lot of the Pentagon hawks argue that bin Laden too much consumption of the United States national power, the U.S. military operations around the core of terrorism for a decade, Houla Deng era need to reverse this trend. Japan’s “diplomats” magazine website 26 article entitled “China’s why Osama bin Laden” comment is very able to represent the views of these people. Commented that George W. Bush took office not friendly to China, Japan and South Korea to win over his neighbors, China and India, and to promote anti-missile system in East Asia. But “9.11″ incident changed everything. The result is that in 2001 Bush declared that “to enjoy unparalleled military strength, strong economic and political influence,” the United States into the image is now fading, and the past 10 years, China is making great strides. Some analysts believe that the United States in fighting terrorism and other issues still need Russia’s cooperation, which restricted the United States and the possibility of conflict between the two countries. Houla Deng era, but the U.S. will be able to devote more energy, attention and deal with Russia.

the former Air Force Chief of Staff General Moseley

Former U.S. general: the possibility of future war with Russia is almost 100% - - China News
-------

I believe this news is from China: ÃÀÇ°ÉϽ«£ºÎ´À´ÓëÖÐ¶í½»Õ½¿ÉÄÜÐÔ¼¸ºõΪ100%_ÍøÒ×ÐÂÎÅÖÐÐÄ

This news is very true ..cuz there is 200% chance of thisNuclear 3rd world war...

 

[NmHqh2JbVo]

This news is very true ..cuz there is 200% chance of thisNuclear 3rd world war...

No chance. 1. The Germans didn't go along with Tripoli bombing; 2. Germans don't want nuclear energy (phased out beyond 2022) meaning? They don't want mother f*cking nukes in Germany.
One black man plus da queen don't change the world.
Cute wedding.
It's over.

 

[redrj]

The sides will be evenly matched...they know it...so there won't be a war at all...who want to fight a war if not sure abt it's outcome

 

[faithfulguy]

The sides will be evenly matched...they know it...so there won't be a war at all...who want to fight a war if not sure abt it's outcome

The question for India is, 'which side is India on when push comes to shove'

 

[luckyyy]

The question for India is, 'which side is India on when push comes to shove'

just to protect themself ....

 

[NmHqh2JbVo]

just to protect themself ....

I guess his question is:
What would India do if your generals were blown away by American's Taliban suicide bombers in Afghanistan like Germany?

 

[jha]

I guess his question is:
What would India do if your generals were blown away by American's Taliban suicide bombers in Afghanistan like Germany?

let him rephrase himself and go easy on BLOW terminology..

 

[jha]

The question for India is, 'which side is India on when push comes to shove'

We are in neither group..NAM remember...