What's new

US Republicans hit aid to Israel neighbors, Pakistan

Dance

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 20, 2010
Messages
4,850
Reaction score
0
WASHINGTON: US Republicans moved Wednesday to cut aid to Pakistan, Israel’s neighbors and leftist countries in Latin America, vowing to get tough on militants and US rivals amid a drive to curb spending.

In an often contentious session that ran late into the night, the Republican-led House Foreign Affairs Committee took up a range of priorities as it aimed to cut $6.4 billion from President Barack Obama’s budget requests.

But to come into force, Republican lawmakers will need to reach a compromise with the Senate where Obama’s Democratic Party retains control and is mostly supportive of the administration’s international outreach.

In one key measure, the bill would impose further conditions on assistance to Pakistan at a time of mounting US concern about the country’s military and intelligence in the wake of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

“The language in this bill puts that government on notice that it is no longer business as usual and that they will be held to account if they continue to refuse to cooperate,” said Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the Republican chairwoman of the committee.

The Obama administration recently suspended about one-third of its $2.7 billion annual defense aid to Pakistan. But it has assured Islamabad it is committed to a five-year, $7.5 billion civilian package approved in 2009 that aims to build schools, infrastructure and democratic institutions.

The Republican bill would put that civilian aid in the firing line, requiring the United States to cut it if the administration does not certify measurable progress by Pakistan in fighting militants.

Representative Howard Berman, the top Democrat on the committee and a main author of the 2009 bill, said he agreed on the need to “get tough with Pakistan” but disagreed on restrictions over civilian aid.

“The key to long-term stability in Pakistan, and the only way we’ll ever get Pakistan to change its behavior, is by strengthening its civilian institutions — not weakening them as this bill will do,” Berman said.

The committee was expected to make a final vote Thursday, when it will also take up controversial issues including a Republican proposal to ban aid to non-governmental groups that provide abortions.

The bill would also end decades of security aid to Egypt, where protests swept out president Hosni Mubarak in February, unless the new leaders fully implement a peace treaty with Israel and exclude the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Republicans would also cut off security assistance to Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority and Yemen if militant movements such as Hezbollah and Hamas hold any position in government.

In a series of largely party line votes, the committee took aim at assistance to Latin American nations. The Republicans approved a measure to bar any aid to left-leaning Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Argentina.

Obama had requested some $96 million geared toward the five countries in the fiscal year starting in October but that includes aid to non-governmental organizations, which would not be affected.

The Republicans also pushed through the elimination of the $44 million in US funding for the Organization of American States, a regional bloc of 35 countries.

“Every time we turn around, the OAS instead of supporting democracies is supporting and coddling, if you will, the likes of Hugo Chavez,” said Republican Representative Connie Mack, referring to Venezuela’s firebrand president.

Democrats sharply criticized Mack. Representative Gary Ackerman said that the United States would effectively be withdrawing in its own continent from a global competition with China for “hearts and minds.”

“At the proper time, I might just offer an amendment to pull out of the world and put all this money into digging a moat around the United States and putting a big dome over the thing,” Ackerman said sarcastically.

In one measure that enjoyed bipartisan support, the bill would prevent China from opening further consulates until the United States is allowed to maintain a mission in Lhasa, from where US diplomats could assess human rights in Tibet.

US Republicans hit aid to Israel neighbors, Pakistan | Pakistan | DAWN.COM
 
.
you cant use the carrot and stick method with a country like Pakistan . it will not work . as an Indian i should be happy that they want to do this , but i am not . as it will only push Pakistan to the brink ,
when will people in the States learn that cant handle everyone with the same yardstick .
 
.
you cant use the carrot and stick method with a country like Pakistan . it will not work . as an Indian i should be happy that they want to do this , but i am not . as it will only push Pakistan to the brink ,
when will people in the States learn that cant handle everyone with the same yardstick .

You should also know the fact that for many years that we did get US assistance it didnt help Pakistan as a nation but a few that helped US's agenda, and for many years that we actually didnt get any help from them we have not only survived but done alot better. So thanks but no thanks.
 
.
Pakistan should try to be self reliant and certainly not accept money with strings. Also accepting aid makes us dependent and reliant on a country which we should know by now is unreliable.
 
.
the so-called ''aid'' isnt ''aid'' at all....it hardly benefits Pakistan

it is in BOTH American (tax-payer) and Pakistani (national) interests that they end all of these bribes to the Zardari government. The Pakistani people themselves have time and time again shown that not only do they not require the ''aid'' --but they dont WANT it as well

Pakistan is more than capable of being self-reliant, since we are endowed by so many resources......in actuality, the remmitance payments alone by overseas Pakistanis DWARFS any ''aid'' that Pakistan receives. That in itself is very telling.

The material losses Pakistan has faced by the externalities caused by the war of Afghanistan next-door (as well as non-financial costs) can NEVER be forgotten or discounted either. The total figures dwarf any ''aid'' that Pakistan ever received.


and my post doesnt aim to dis-credit good intentioned aid initiatives by some American NGOs; or towards any disaster relief funds/supplies that were received during earthquakes or recent floods....despite some ''aid drain'' that did take place (as the global recession was still very much lingering). Even in those extreme cases, Pakistanis showed much resilience, national unity, and generosity (private donours, private sector, and overseas Pakistanis especially)
 
.
the so-called ''aid'' isnt ''aid'' at all....it hardly benefits Pakistan

it is in BOTH American (tax-payer) and Pakistani (national) interests that they end all of these bribes to the Zardari government. The Pakistani people themselves have time and time again shown that not only do they not require the ''aid'' --but they dont WANT it as well

Pakistan is more than capable of being self-reliant, since we are endowed by so many resources......in actuality, the remmitance payments alone by overseas Pakistanis DWARFS any ''aid'' that Pakistan receives. That in itself is very telling.

The material losses Pakistan has faced by the externalities caused by the war of Afghanistan next-door (as well as non-financial costs) can NEVER be forgotten or discounted either. The total figures dwarf any ''aid'' that Pakistan ever received.


and my post doesnt aim to dis-credit good intentioned aid initiatives by some American NGOs; or towards any disaster relief funds/supplies that were received during earthquakes or recent floods....despite some ''aid drain'' that did take place (as the global recession was still very much lingering). Even in those extreme cases, Pakistanis showed much resilience, national unity, and generosity (private donours, private sector, and overseas Pakistanis especially)

sir this is bound to happen....we were told 1400 years ago that Christians and jews arent your friends.....go to certain limit with them when dealing..this is ordained by God but since musharfies have their own wisdom like secular fanatics and they say hehehe USA is our friends and you usually find on burger chamcha blogs that what wrong has israel done to Pakistan and that Pakistan should recognize israel so that they can easily travel to and fro....they dont know the history ...just the 100 dollar bribe they receive via paypal for their pro zionist blogs....that it was Ben Gurion the undisputed father of zionists who said that its Pakistan which is the only threat to israel and it should destroyed if we want to survive....no point arguing with this lot.

they dont know that federel reserve is owned by zionists and every single cent and dollar that comes to Pakistan comes with the "yes"of zionist lobby...its haram ka maal and brings with it bloodshed and destruction..its was musharfy who couldnt resist the smell of a dollar bill and fell for it bringing in destruction
 
.
sir this is bound to happen....we were told 1400 years ago that Christians and jews arent your friends.....go to certain limit with them when dealing..this is ordained by God but since musharfies have their own wisdom like secular fanatics and they say hehehe USA is our friends and you usually find on burger chamcha blogs that what wrong has israel done to Pakistan and that Pakistan should recognize israel so that they can easily travel to and fro....they dont know the history ...just the 100 dollar bribe they receive via paypal for their pro zionist blogs....that it was Ben Gurion the undisputed father of zionists who said that its Pakistan which is the only threat to israel and it should destroyed if we want to survive....no point arguing with this lot.

they dont know that federel reserve is owned by zionists and every single cent and dollar that comes to Pakistan comes with the "yes"of zionist lobby...its haram ka maal and brings with it bloodshed and destruction..its was musharfy who couldnt resist the smell of a dollar bill and fell for it bringing in destruction

it wasnt my hopes to delve into the ''crusades'' debate

you can thank the current leadership for most of the 'woes' and lack of direction (and excess of apathy)
 
.
it wasnt my hopes to delve into the ''crusades'' debate

you can thank the current leadership for most of the 'woes' and lack of direction (and excess of apathy)

sir its not about crusade neither does it says so in Quran....it only says that they are not your friends and in your daily dealing go to a certain limit and lay out the boundries and limits.....

current leadership i agree.but the civilian leadership has nothing to do with allowing nato supply routes and choosing bugged F-16's over J-10's and making the future generation handicapped and dependent on americans for spare parts...it was musharfy the dictator..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom