What's new

US raises arms sales pitch to India to 'contain' China

faizahmad

BANNED
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
NEW DELHI: After describing India as "a linchpin" in its new strategic policy to "re-balance" military forces towards Asia-Pacific, in what is seen by many to be an unfolding grand design to "contain" China, the US is now cranking up its arms sales pitch to New Delhi.

From ballistic missile defence (BMD) and aeronautics to robotics and micro-UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles), the US is eager to collaborate with India in top-end defence technology in a bid to displace countries like Russia, Israel and France as the pre-eminent defence supplier to India.

India plans to spend upwards of $100 billion in acquiring weapon systems and platforms over the next decade. Having already bagged defence deals worth over $8 billion over the last few years, the US is obviously hungry for more.

"As a country committed to enduring peace and security in the Asia-Pacific region, India deserves the best military equipment available... India is a top priority in our export considerations," said visiting US deputy secretary of defence Ashton B Carter on Monday.

"Practically, we want to be India's highest-quality and most trusted long-term supplier of technology...We trust India and know India is not a re-exporter or exploiter of our technologies," he added, speaking at a CII function.

Carter, who held talks with defence minister A K Antony, national security advisor Shiv Shankar

Menon, defence secretary Shashikant Sharma and foreign secretary Ranjan Mathai during the day, said New Delhi had emerged Washington's second largest FMS ( foreign military sales) customer in 2011 with imports worth $4.5 billion.

India has certainly shed its long-held suspicions about the US not being a reliable long-term defence supplier to India, in part due to continuing problems with Russian propensity to jack-up costs mid-way through projects and not provide proper transfer of technology and product support.

But it still remains wary about whether the US will really provide cutting-edge defence technology.

Carter stressed US and India will move beyond mere defence trade, or a buyer-seller relationship, to joint R&D and co-production in the years ahead. He identified BMD as a potential area for this defence cooperation but said the two nations should first discuss it at the "strategic" level before engaging in technical discussions.

"We want to knock down any remaining bureaucratic barriers in our defence relationship, and strip away the impediments...Buying American systems, whether through direct commercial sales or FMS, will get India exceptionally high-quality technology, a high degree of transparency, and no corruption (this is mandated by our legal system)," he said.

The Indian defence ministry, too, seems to favour the direct government-to-government agreement under the American FMS system. India, for instance, is now close to inking $647 million contract for the acquisition of 145 M-777 ultra-light howitzers from the US in a FMS deal. This comes after the finalization of another such deal worth $4.1 billion for 10 C-17 Globemaster-III strategic airlift aircraft.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...dia-to-contain-China/articleshow/15115203.cms
 
.
Abbey yaar apney paisey chupa lo, uncle volture ke tarah chakar kaat raha hay
 
.
Abbey yaar apney paisey chupa lo, uncle volture ke tarah chakar kaat raha hay
Don't worry humne bhi apne paiso ke uppar Jmall Ghota Lagaya hua hai....Pehli Bite ke baad hi aise dasst lagenge ki Uss Vulture apni Nani yaad aajayegi.....
 
.
Abbey yaar apney paisey chupa lo, uncle volture ke tarah chakar kaat raha hay
'

True, America no doubt has the best defense Industry ,but if one sides with America u loose all ur room to maneuver.

India should handle china upto an extent where it has to protect it own interests on foreign soil, anything beyond that is not within our scope or capability , nor do we want to peruse such an doctrine..

Practically, we want to be India's highest-quality and most trusted long-term supplier of technology..."We trust India and know India is not a re-exporter or exploiter of our technologies," he added, speaking at a CII function.

We have China to thank for that , they did there part albeit indirectly.:coffee:
 
. . .
'

True, America no doubt has the best defense Industry ,but if one sides with America u loose all ur room to maneuver.

India should handle china upto an extent where it has to protect it own interests on foreign soil, anything beyond that is not within our scope or capability , nor do we want to peruse such an doctrine..

Your doctrine dealing with China would be no different before the U.S. even suggested an alliance with India. Take this opportunity to access to technologies that would have taken years to achieve.
 
.
hel1 i am all for buying certain equipment from the US , but why if they want to sell us stuff do they take so long to approve of sales. case and point being the additional 6 c130 we wanted . we asked last sep , it got approved this month . almost a year .
 
.
Your doctrine dealing with China would be no different before the U.S. even suggested an alliance with India. Take this opportunity to access to technologies that would have taken years to achieve.


We dont want to end up like the saudis when it comes to defense procurements.
 
.
We dont want to end up like the saudis when it comes to defense procurements.

Never mind you meant more independent.

In any case there is nothing right now that would antagonize us to refuse to provide weapons systems to you. So I'm saying take advantage of any experience of getting your hands on tech that would take years to develop on your own.
 
.
Never mind you meant more independent.

Yes that is what we are doing and that is why f-16 ,f-18 etc lost MMRCA . we don't like too much strings attached with our defense products . So much so that we modify them later on to suit our needs like in the the case with su-30 mki etc . Till the time TOT is there or removal of too many stings attached it will be be hard for India and U.S. to build Military relations .
 
.
Never mind you meant more independent.

In any case there is nothing right now that would antagonize us to refuse to provide weapons systems to you. So I'm saying take advantage of any experience of getting your hands on tech that would take years to develop on your own.
We have fought hard to earn our independence. If Us makes arrangements which doesn't jeopardize its sovereignty,independence & freedom of expression,I don't see any logic which can withheld India to make exceptional friendship with US. Neither we believe in bullying nor we want to do it. Cooperation is the only way forward.
 
.
hel1 i am all for buying certain equipment from the US , but why if they want to sell us stuff do they take so long to approve of sales. case and point being the additional 6 c130 we wanted . we asked last sep , it got approved this month . almost a year .

Most probably would have been in the queue of a long list of senate approvals. The US senate does deliberate on much more issues on an average.
 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom