US Politics
- Thread starter RabzonKhan
- Start date
cloud4000
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2015
- Messages
- 4,862
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Max Boot is a noted Republican and neo-con. That he thinks that Donald Trump is stupid is a telling sign that not even the GOP is full on board; and, in fact, are probably looking at ways to jettison him less he single-handily destroys their party.
http://www.businessinsider.com/is-d...tm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer-bi
MAX BOOT: Donald Trump is proving too stupid to be president
Donald Trump. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
I’m starting to suspect that Donald Trump may not have been right when he said, "You know, I’m like a smart person."
The evidence continues to mount that he is far from smart — so far, in fact, that he may not be capable of carrying out his duties as president.
There is, for example, the story of how Trump met with the pastors of two major Presbyterian churches in New York.
"I did very, very well with evangelicals in the polls," he bragged.
When the pastors told Trump they weren’t evangelicals, he demanded to know, "What are you then?"
They told him they were mainline Presbyterians. "But you’re all Christians?" he asked. Yes, they had to assure him, Presbyterians are Christians. The kicker: Trump himself is Presbyterian.
Or the story of how Trump asked the editors of the Economist whether they had ever heard of the phrase "priming the pump." Yes, they assured him, they had. "I haven’t heard it," Trump continued. "I mean, I just … I came up with it a couple of days ago, and I thought it was good." The phrase has been in widespread use since at least the 1930s.
Or the story of how, after arriving in Israel from Saudi Arabia, Trump told his hosts, "We just got back from the Middle East."
These aren’t examples of stupidity, you may object, but of ignorance.
These aren’t examples of stupidity, you may object, but of ignorance.
This has become a favorite talking point of Trump’s enablers.
House Speaker Paul Ryan, for example, excused Trump’s attempts to pressure FBI Director James Comey into dropping a criminal investigation of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn on the grounds that "the president’s new at this" and supposedly didn’t realize that he was doing anything wrong.
But Trump has been president for nearly five months now, and he has shown no capacity to learn on the job.
More broadly, Trump has had a lifetime — 71 years — and access to America’s finest educational institutions (he’s a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, he never tires of reminding us) to learn things.
Trump in the 80's. AP
And yet he doesn’t seem to have acquired even the most basic information that a high school student should possess. Recall that Trump said that Frederick Douglass, who died in 1895, was "an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more."
He also claimed that Andrew Jackson, who died 16 years before the Civil War, "was really angry that he saw what was happening in regard to the Civil War."
Why does he know so little? Because he doesn’t read books or even long articles.
"I never have," he proudly told a reporter last year. "I’m always busy doing a lot."
As president, Trump’s intelligence briefings have been dumbed down, denuded of nuance, and larded with maps and pictures because he can’t be bothered to read a lot of words. He’d rather play golf.
As president, Trump’s intelligence briefings have been dumbed down.
The surest indication of how not smart Trump is that he thinks his inability or lack of interest in acquiring knowledge doesn’t matter.
He said last year that he reaches the right decisions "with very little knowledge other than the knowledge I [already] had, plus the words ‘common sense,’ because I have a lot of common sense and I have a lot of business ability."
How’s that working out? There’s a reason why surveys show more support for Trump’s impeachment than for his presidency.
From his catastrophically ill-conceived executive order on immigration to his catastrophically ill-conceived firing of Comey, his administration has been one disaster after another. And those fiascos can be ascribed directly to the president’s lack of intellectual horsepower.
President Donald Trump shakes hands with then-FBI director James Comey.Andrew Harrer/Pool,Getty Images
How could Trump fire Comey knowing that the FBI director could then testify about the improper requests Trump had made to exonerate himself and drop the investigation of Flynn? And in case there was any doubt about Trump’s intent, he dispelled it by acknowledging on TV that he had the "Russia thing" in mind when firing the FBI director.
That’s tantamount to admitting obstruction of justice. Is this how a smart person behaves?
Is this how a smart person behaves?
If Trump decides to fire the widely respected special counsel Robert Mueller, he will only be compounding this stupidity.
Or what about Trump’s response to the June 3 terrorist attack in London?
He reacted by tweeting his support for the "original Travel Ban," rather than the "watered down, politically correct version" under review by the Supreme Court. Legal observers — including Kellyanne Conway’s husband — instantly saw that Trump was undermining his own case, because the travel ban had been revised precisely in order to pass judicial scrutiny.
Indeed, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, in refusing to reinstate the travel ban on June 12, cited Trump’s tweets against him. Is this how a smart person behaves?
You could argue that Trump’s lack of acumen is actually his saving grace, because he would be much more dangerous if he were cleverer in implementing his radical agenda. But you can also make the case that his vacuity is imperiling American security.
You could argue that Trump’s lack of acumen is actually his saving grace. But you can also make the case that his vacuity is imperiling American security.
Trump shared "code-word information" with Russia’s foreign minister, apparently without realizing what he was doing.
In the process, he may have blown America’s best source of intelligence on Islamic State plots — a top-secret Israeli penetration of the militant group’s computers.
Trump picked a fight on Twitter with Qatar, apparently not knowing that this small, oil-rich emirate is host to a major US air base that is of vital importance in the air war against the Islamic State.
Trump criticized London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, based on a blatant misreading of what Khan said in the aftermath of the June 3 attack: The mayor had said there was "no reason to be alarmed" about a heightened police presence on the streets — not, as Trump claimed, about the threat of terrorism.
In the process, Trump has alienated British public opinion and may have helped the anti-American Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, win votes in Britain’s general election.
President Donald Trump and other world leaders at the G7 summit on May 26, 2017 in Taormina, Italy. Guido Bergmann/Bundesregierung via Getty Images
Trump pulled out of the Paris climate accord apparently because he thinks that global warming — a scientifically proven fact — is a hoax. His speech announcing the pullout demonstrated that he has no understanding of what the Paris accord actually is — a nonbinding compact that does not impose any costs on the United States.
Trump failed to affirm Article V, a bedrock of NATO, during his visit to Brussels, apparently because he labors under the misapprehension that European allies owe the United States and NATO "vast sums of money."
In fact, NATO members are now increasing their defense spending, but the money will not go to the United States or to the alliance; it will go to their own armed forces. Trump has since said he supports Article V, but his initial hesitation undermines American credibility and may embolden Russia.
Trump supporters used to claim that sage advisors could make up for his shortcomings. But he is proving too willful and erratic to be steered by those around him who know better. As Maggie Haberman of the New York Timesnotes: "Trump doesn’t want to be controlled. In [the] campaign, [he] would often do [the] opposite of what he was advised to do, simply because it was opposite."
The 25th Amendment to the US Constitution provides that if the vice president and a majority of the cabinet certify that the president is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office," he can be removed with the concurrence of two-thirds of both houses.
That won’t happen, because Republicans are too craven to stand up to Trump. But on the merits perhaps it should.
After nearly five months in office, Trump has given no indication that he possesses the mental capacity to be president.
http://www.businessinsider.com/is-d...tm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer-bi
MAX BOOT: Donald Trump is proving too stupid to be president
- Max Boot, Foreign Policy
I’m starting to suspect that Donald Trump may not have been right when he said, "You know, I’m like a smart person."
The evidence continues to mount that he is far from smart — so far, in fact, that he may not be capable of carrying out his duties as president.
There is, for example, the story of how Trump met with the pastors of two major Presbyterian churches in New York.
"I did very, very well with evangelicals in the polls," he bragged.
When the pastors told Trump they weren’t evangelicals, he demanded to know, "What are you then?"
They told him they were mainline Presbyterians. "But you’re all Christians?" he asked. Yes, they had to assure him, Presbyterians are Christians. The kicker: Trump himself is Presbyterian.
Or the story of how Trump asked the editors of the Economist whether they had ever heard of the phrase "priming the pump." Yes, they assured him, they had. "I haven’t heard it," Trump continued. "I mean, I just … I came up with it a couple of days ago, and I thought it was good." The phrase has been in widespread use since at least the 1930s.
Or the story of how, after arriving in Israel from Saudi Arabia, Trump told his hosts, "We just got back from the Middle East."
These aren’t examples of stupidity, you may object, but of ignorance.
These aren’t examples of stupidity, you may object, but of ignorance.
This has become a favorite talking point of Trump’s enablers.
House Speaker Paul Ryan, for example, excused Trump’s attempts to pressure FBI Director James Comey into dropping a criminal investigation of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn on the grounds that "the president’s new at this" and supposedly didn’t realize that he was doing anything wrong.
But Trump has been president for nearly five months now, and he has shown no capacity to learn on the job.
More broadly, Trump has had a lifetime — 71 years — and access to America’s finest educational institutions (he’s a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, he never tires of reminding us) to learn things.
And yet he doesn’t seem to have acquired even the most basic information that a high school student should possess. Recall that Trump said that Frederick Douglass, who died in 1895, was "an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more."
He also claimed that Andrew Jackson, who died 16 years before the Civil War, "was really angry that he saw what was happening in regard to the Civil War."
Why does he know so little? Because he doesn’t read books or even long articles.
"I never have," he proudly told a reporter last year. "I’m always busy doing a lot."
As president, Trump’s intelligence briefings have been dumbed down, denuded of nuance, and larded with maps and pictures because he can’t be bothered to read a lot of words. He’d rather play golf.
As president, Trump’s intelligence briefings have been dumbed down.
The surest indication of how not smart Trump is that he thinks his inability or lack of interest in acquiring knowledge doesn’t matter.
He said last year that he reaches the right decisions "with very little knowledge other than the knowledge I [already] had, plus the words ‘common sense,’ because I have a lot of common sense and I have a lot of business ability."
How’s that working out? There’s a reason why surveys show more support for Trump’s impeachment than for his presidency.
From his catastrophically ill-conceived executive order on immigration to his catastrophically ill-conceived firing of Comey, his administration has been one disaster after another. And those fiascos can be ascribed directly to the president’s lack of intellectual horsepower.
How could Trump fire Comey knowing that the FBI director could then testify about the improper requests Trump had made to exonerate himself and drop the investigation of Flynn? And in case there was any doubt about Trump’s intent, he dispelled it by acknowledging on TV that he had the "Russia thing" in mind when firing the FBI director.
That’s tantamount to admitting obstruction of justice. Is this how a smart person behaves?
Is this how a smart person behaves?
If Trump decides to fire the widely respected special counsel Robert Mueller, he will only be compounding this stupidity.
Or what about Trump’s response to the June 3 terrorist attack in London?
He reacted by tweeting his support for the "original Travel Ban," rather than the "watered down, politically correct version" under review by the Supreme Court. Legal observers — including Kellyanne Conway’s husband — instantly saw that Trump was undermining his own case, because the travel ban had been revised precisely in order to pass judicial scrutiny.
Indeed, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, in refusing to reinstate the travel ban on June 12, cited Trump’s tweets against him. Is this how a smart person behaves?
You could argue that Trump’s lack of acumen is actually his saving grace, because he would be much more dangerous if he were cleverer in implementing his radical agenda. But you can also make the case that his vacuity is imperiling American security.
You could argue that Trump’s lack of acumen is actually his saving grace. But you can also make the case that his vacuity is imperiling American security.
Trump shared "code-word information" with Russia’s foreign minister, apparently without realizing what he was doing.
In the process, he may have blown America’s best source of intelligence on Islamic State plots — a top-secret Israeli penetration of the militant group’s computers.
Trump picked a fight on Twitter with Qatar, apparently not knowing that this small, oil-rich emirate is host to a major US air base that is of vital importance in the air war against the Islamic State.
Trump criticized London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, based on a blatant misreading of what Khan said in the aftermath of the June 3 attack: The mayor had said there was "no reason to be alarmed" about a heightened police presence on the streets — not, as Trump claimed, about the threat of terrorism.
In the process, Trump has alienated British public opinion and may have helped the anti-American Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, win votes in Britain’s general election.
Trump pulled out of the Paris climate accord apparently because he thinks that global warming — a scientifically proven fact — is a hoax. His speech announcing the pullout demonstrated that he has no understanding of what the Paris accord actually is — a nonbinding compact that does not impose any costs on the United States.
Trump failed to affirm Article V, a bedrock of NATO, during his visit to Brussels, apparently because he labors under the misapprehension that European allies owe the United States and NATO "vast sums of money."
In fact, NATO members are now increasing their defense spending, but the money will not go to the United States or to the alliance; it will go to their own armed forces. Trump has since said he supports Article V, but his initial hesitation undermines American credibility and may embolden Russia.
Trump supporters used to claim that sage advisors could make up for his shortcomings. But he is proving too willful and erratic to be steered by those around him who know better. As Maggie Haberman of the New York Timesnotes: "Trump doesn’t want to be controlled. In [the] campaign, [he] would often do [the] opposite of what he was advised to do, simply because it was opposite."
The 25th Amendment to the US Constitution provides that if the vice president and a majority of the cabinet certify that the president is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office," he can be removed with the concurrence of two-thirds of both houses.
That won’t happen, because Republicans are too craven to stand up to Trump. But on the merits perhaps it should.
After nearly five months in office, Trump has given no indication that he possesses the mental capacity to be president.
RabzonKhan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2008
- Messages
- 4,289
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
John Oliver hilariously exposed Trumps coal job lies. 
cloud4000
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2015
- Messages
- 4,862
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
John Oliver hilariously exposed Trumps coal job lies.
Love the squirrel! Yes, the biggest delusion Trump ever uttered was that coal miners would get their jobs back if only onerous regulations are repealed when, in fact, economic and technology factors are killing coal jobs. Oliver showed this with great effect, in addition to proving that coal companies are, in fact, screwing over coal workers.
CBU-105
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2016
- Messages
- 1,136
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
Steven Crowder hilariously rebutts John Oliver's segment on CoalJohn Oliver hilariously exposed Trumps coal job lies.
Nilgiri
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2015
- Messages
- 24,797
- Reaction score
- 81
- Country
- Location
@CBU-105
Georgia
Dems are raging pretty hard right now....they made it a "referendum" on Trump and poured 30 million dollars in (for just one seat - a historical record apparently) and had a few % improvement to show for it (but performed way worse than nov 8th federal result and thus lost pretty badly).
Georgia
Dems are raging pretty hard right now....they made it a "referendum" on Trump and poured 30 million dollars in (for just one seat - a historical record apparently) and had a few % improvement to show for it (but performed way worse than nov 8th federal result and thus lost pretty badly).
CBU-105
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2016
- Messages
- 1,136
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
Yep, watched bits of a panel discussion on fake news CNN earlier. Don Lemon, Symone 'harambe' Sanders and others looked pretty ruffled lol@CBU-105
Georgia
Dems are raging pretty hard right now....they made it a "referendum" on Trump and poured 30 million dollars in (for just one seat - a historical record apparently) and had a few % improvement to show for it (but performed way worse than nov 8th federal result and thus lost pretty badly).
btw, not super interested in this run off stuff but it's great to see the party of Trump win. That Gianforte body slammer guy winning was also epic
Dems are doomed with crooked H refusing to fade away gracefully, great news for Trump.
lmao, Nate Silver is getting trolled hard.
CBU-105
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2016
- Messages
- 1,136
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
LeGenD
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 15,813
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
Democrats performance (i.e. losses) in special elections 2017 at a glance:
Georgia = L
Montana = L
South Carolina = L
Kansas = L
Republicans = 4
Democrats = 0
------
Democrats tried an inoffensive moderate message in Georgia. They ran a banjo-strumming populist in Montana. They called in the cavalry in South Carolina and tried to catch their foe sleeping through a long-shot in Kansas.
None of it worked.
Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/21/politics/democrats-georgia-elections-analysis/
Georgia = L
Montana = L
South Carolina = L
Kansas = L
Republicans = 4
Democrats = 0
------
Democrats tried an inoffensive moderate message in Georgia. They ran a banjo-strumming populist in Montana. They called in the cavalry in South Carolina and tried to catch their foe sleeping through a long-shot in Kansas.
None of it worked.
Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/21/politics/democrats-georgia-elections-analysis/
CBU-105
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2016
- Messages
- 1,136
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
The President's detractors really should let that particular false talking point go. He won the popular vote in 30 out of 50 states, she won by a huge margin in California.
Americans overwhelmingly voted for President Trump.
CBU-105
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2016
- Messages
- 1,136
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
Jacob Martin
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2015
- Messages
- 1,453
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Democrats will not win elections unless they dump the SJW, PC, wannabe-Fascist brigade. They are literally sitting on the notion that their control of mainstream media and emerging demographics will eventually turn things in their favour.
Well guess what, they don't understand the internet and use it exclusively as a tool to supplement their control over the discourse, by doubling down in their own echo chamber. So they think that BuzzFeed is the entire internet because they go there.
If you don't include people in the discussion today, they will invite themselves to the party through social media. This elitist nonsense will not do anymore.
CBU-105
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2016
- Messages
- 1,136
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
Yep, they've moved too far left with the name-calling, bullying, and labeling everyone who disagrees with their SJW platform a racist, sexist and homo/zeno/islamophobe etc nonsense and have alienated a bunch of regular working class white people, who also happen to be the majority.
iski suno, chutiye water buffalo ki:
the blue dogs
(aka white working class democrats) are worse than republicans because they're helping the capitalist "1%ers"
posted this more than a year ago, and the article was right, these are the Obama voters who flipped it for Trump in all those formerly blue bastions.
http://www.cnbc.com/heres-a-map-of-the-us-counties-that-flipped-to-trump-from-democrats/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/obama-trump-counties/
and they want to call them racist, and raise their taxes..
prediction: dems go "populist progressive" in 2020 and will be defeated again, by a bigger margin.
