Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,006
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Oye Trumpiya ye dhandli sey bani hakomat nahi chaley giThat's it time for a.....
Bill o Riely is like Salim Safi of US
US Politics
- Thread starter RabzonKhan
- Start date
Bill o Riely is like Salim Safi of US
The Eagle
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2015
- Messages
- 24,239
- Reaction score
- 258
- Country
- Location
But wait, it was our line not the worlds best and top democracy, the great system on earth and transparency at best that none have any doubt about the same yet copying what we the third world countries use to do.... That is actually a conspiracy theory against the greatest country and democracy.
XenoEnsi-14
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2014
- Messages
- 2,987
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,006
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Yahodi lobby in US equals Muslim BrotherhoodBut wait, it was our line not the worlds best and top democracy, the great system on earth and transparency at best that none have any doubt about the same yet copying what we the third world countries use to do.... That is actually a conspiracy theory against the greatest country and democracy.
Geo =Fox
ARY=CNN
DPC=Alt right
Salim Safi =Bill o Reily
Cenk Uighyur=Hasan Nisar
Its dharna time
Oh hell no!
XenoEnsi-14
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2014
- Messages
- 2,987
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
We will deny them Wi-Fi. End of dharna.Its dharna time
Dragon Ball
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2015
- Messages
- 888
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
RabzonKhan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2008
- Messages
- 4,289
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
More than 15,000 US lawyers sign letter asking Donald Trump to rescind appointment of Steve Bannon
'His contempt for our governmental institutions has no place in a crucial leadership position'
Thursday 24 November 2016
Steve Bannon has been accused of supporting white nationalist views Getty
Thousands of senior US lawyers have signed a letter asking President-elect Donald Trump to rescind his recent appointment of Breitbart News chief Steve Bannon as head strategist for his transition team.
More than 15,000 attorneys and legal experts from across the United States have so far given their signatures to the letter penned by Professor Nancy Leong from the University of Denver law school, highlighting Mr Bannon’s “opposition to a stable, democratic form of government”.
It was circulated to all members of Congress, days after Mr Trump was forced to defend the appointment against widespread accusations Mr Bannon was a white nationalist with racist views, which he denies.
“We are attorneys whose political views span the ideological spectrum. We write to ask that you call upon President-elect Trump to rescind his appointment of Stephen Bannon as White House Chief Strategist,” the letter read.
“As attorneys, we swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. We committed to protect the institutions upon which our democracy depends. We committed to provide zealous representation for all our clients, regardless of their race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic.
“Mr Bannon has demonstrated his opposition to the stable, democratic form of government that our profession embraces and strives to maintain…Mr Bannon has also enabled and promoted white supremacy.
“Mr Bannon has intentionally legitimised racism, anti-Semitism, and other hate-based ideologies. Such bigotry runs counter to the values enshrined in the Constitution we promised to defend.
“President-elect Trump has promised to be 'a President for all Americans'. The selection of Mr Bannon as a key advisor communicates exactly the opposite.”
“Many of the signatories to the letter self-identify as conservative or libertarian,” Professor Leong told Huffington Post. “Opposing the appointment of someone who has enabled white nationalism and other hate-based ideologies is not a partisan issue.”
As the executive chairman of Breitbart News, Mr Bannon has referred to the website as “the platform for the alt-right” and praised the group as a “populist, nationalist movement” of “right, young people, young activists”.
In an interview with the New York Times, Mr Trump defended the decision and said he had known Mr Bannon “for a long time”. He confirmed he would not have considered hiring him “if I thought he was a racist”.
Read the letter to Congress members in full below
Dear members of Congress,
We are attorneys whose political views span the ideological spectrum. We write to ask that you call upon President-elect Trump to rescind his appointment of Stephen Bannon as White House Chief Strategist.
As attorneys, we swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. We committed to protect the institutions upon which our democracy depends. We committed to provide zealous representation for all our clients, regardless of their race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic.
Mr Bannon has demonstrated his opposition to the stable, democratic form of government that our profession embraces and strives to maintain. His words could not be more clear: 'Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal, too . . . I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment'. His contempt for our longstanding governmental institutions has no place in a crucial leadership position.
Mr Bannon has also enabled and promoted white supremacy. Under his leadership, Breitbart News has become what Mr Bannon himself describes as "a platform for the alt-right" - another term for white nationalism. Through Breitbart, Mr Bannon has intentionally legitimised racism, anti-Semitism, and other hate-based ideologies. Such bigotry runs counter to the values enshrined in the Constitution we promised to defend. Indeed, it threatens democracy itself by undermining the equality of all citizens.
Of course we do not dispute that Mr Bannon has the right to voice his opinions. Indeed, some of us have devoted our careers to safeguarding a robust First Amendment that protects individuals, the media, and other organisations. But these extreme and hateful views do not belong in the White House.
This is not a partisan issue. The white supremacy and political insurgency that Mr Bannon has embraced and amplified contradicts everything we stand for as attorneys and as Americans.
President-elect Trump has promised to be "a president for all Americans." The selection of Mr Bannon as a key adviser communicates exactly the opposite. We call upon you to take all possible measures to ensure that Mr Trump rescinds his appointment of Mr Bannon. Link
Please sign the petition, let's try to stop this racist and keep him out of the White House.
Steve Bannon's racist, anti-semitic, misogynistic views don't belong in the White House
Share this petition: Link
President-elect Donald Trump has just appointed his campaign CEO and chairman of Breitbart News, Stephen Bannon, as chief White House strategist and senior counselor. Trump’s team said the position will be equal to the Chief of Staff -- making Steve Bannon one of the most powerful and influential people in the world.
The appointment has drawn outrage from all sides of the political spectrum. Under Bannon’s leadership, Breitbart News has become the online destination for white nationalism, anti semitism, xenophobia, sexism, the spreading of lies and conspiracy theories, and hateful rhetoric.
Steve Bannon himself has been accused of horrible behavior. He referred to feminists as “a bunch of dykes” and reportedly didn’t want his children to go to school with “a bunch of jews.” Former employee Ben Shapiro left Breitbart News because he said Bannon was a “vindictive, nasty figure.”
Bannon’s abuse has even turned physical. In 1996, he was arrested for domestic violence. His ex-wife feared for their children, and reported Bannon threatened her and the kids if she appeared in court against him. She believed him and didn’t want to put her children in more danger. Bannon’s ex wife didn’t appear and the charges were dropped.
President-elect Trump can do better. Our country has a deep well of talent to help him lead our country. There is no reason to select a figure like Steve Bannon. Bannon's vitriol and divisiveness have no place in the White House. Please sign if you agree that this is NOT the person who should have the ear of the president.
Thank you.
Please sign the petition, let's try to stop this racist and keep him out of the White House.
@LA se Karachi @Desertfalcon @F-22Raptor @gambit @anon45 @Anubis @Moonlight @Syed.Ali.Haider @TruthSeeker @Hamartia Antidote
'His contempt for our governmental institutions has no place in a crucial leadership position'
Thursday 24 November 2016
Steve Bannon has been accused of supporting white nationalist views Getty
Thousands of senior US lawyers have signed a letter asking President-elect Donald Trump to rescind his recent appointment of Breitbart News chief Steve Bannon as head strategist for his transition team.
More than 15,000 attorneys and legal experts from across the United States have so far given their signatures to the letter penned by Professor Nancy Leong from the University of Denver law school, highlighting Mr Bannon’s “opposition to a stable, democratic form of government”.
It was circulated to all members of Congress, days after Mr Trump was forced to defend the appointment against widespread accusations Mr Bannon was a white nationalist with racist views, which he denies.
“We are attorneys whose political views span the ideological spectrum. We write to ask that you call upon President-elect Trump to rescind his appointment of Stephen Bannon as White House Chief Strategist,” the letter read.
“As attorneys, we swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. We committed to protect the institutions upon which our democracy depends. We committed to provide zealous representation for all our clients, regardless of their race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic.
“Mr Bannon has demonstrated his opposition to the stable, democratic form of government that our profession embraces and strives to maintain…Mr Bannon has also enabled and promoted white supremacy.
“Mr Bannon has intentionally legitimised racism, anti-Semitism, and other hate-based ideologies. Such bigotry runs counter to the values enshrined in the Constitution we promised to defend.
“President-elect Trump has promised to be 'a President for all Americans'. The selection of Mr Bannon as a key advisor communicates exactly the opposite.”
“Many of the signatories to the letter self-identify as conservative or libertarian,” Professor Leong told Huffington Post. “Opposing the appointment of someone who has enabled white nationalism and other hate-based ideologies is not a partisan issue.”
As the executive chairman of Breitbart News, Mr Bannon has referred to the website as “the platform for the alt-right” and praised the group as a “populist, nationalist movement” of “right, young people, young activists”.
In an interview with the New York Times, Mr Trump defended the decision and said he had known Mr Bannon “for a long time”. He confirmed he would not have considered hiring him “if I thought he was a racist”.
Read the letter to Congress members in full below
Dear members of Congress,
We are attorneys whose political views span the ideological spectrum. We write to ask that you call upon President-elect Trump to rescind his appointment of Stephen Bannon as White House Chief Strategist.
As attorneys, we swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. We committed to protect the institutions upon which our democracy depends. We committed to provide zealous representation for all our clients, regardless of their race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic.
Mr Bannon has demonstrated his opposition to the stable, democratic form of government that our profession embraces and strives to maintain. His words could not be more clear: 'Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal, too . . . I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment'. His contempt for our longstanding governmental institutions has no place in a crucial leadership position.
Mr Bannon has also enabled and promoted white supremacy. Under his leadership, Breitbart News has become what Mr Bannon himself describes as "a platform for the alt-right" - another term for white nationalism. Through Breitbart, Mr Bannon has intentionally legitimised racism, anti-Semitism, and other hate-based ideologies. Such bigotry runs counter to the values enshrined in the Constitution we promised to defend. Indeed, it threatens democracy itself by undermining the equality of all citizens.
Of course we do not dispute that Mr Bannon has the right to voice his opinions. Indeed, some of us have devoted our careers to safeguarding a robust First Amendment that protects individuals, the media, and other organisations. But these extreme and hateful views do not belong in the White House.
This is not a partisan issue. The white supremacy and political insurgency that Mr Bannon has embraced and amplified contradicts everything we stand for as attorneys and as Americans.
President-elect Trump has promised to be "a president for all Americans." The selection of Mr Bannon as a key adviser communicates exactly the opposite. We call upon you to take all possible measures to ensure that Mr Trump rescinds his appointment of Mr Bannon. Link
Please sign the petition, let's try to stop this racist and keep him out of the White House.
Steve Bannon's racist, anti-semitic, misogynistic views don't belong in the White House
Share this petition: Link
President-elect Donald Trump has just appointed his campaign CEO and chairman of Breitbart News, Stephen Bannon, as chief White House strategist and senior counselor. Trump’s team said the position will be equal to the Chief of Staff -- making Steve Bannon one of the most powerful and influential people in the world.
The appointment has drawn outrage from all sides of the political spectrum. Under Bannon’s leadership, Breitbart News has become the online destination for white nationalism, anti semitism, xenophobia, sexism, the spreading of lies and conspiracy theories, and hateful rhetoric.
Steve Bannon himself has been accused of horrible behavior. He referred to feminists as “a bunch of dykes” and reportedly didn’t want his children to go to school with “a bunch of jews.” Former employee Ben Shapiro left Breitbart News because he said Bannon was a “vindictive, nasty figure.”
Bannon’s abuse has even turned physical. In 1996, he was arrested for domestic violence. His ex-wife feared for their children, and reported Bannon threatened her and the kids if she appeared in court against him. She believed him and didn’t want to put her children in more danger. Bannon’s ex wife didn’t appear and the charges were dropped.
President-elect Trump can do better. Our country has a deep well of talent to help him lead our country. There is no reason to select a figure like Steve Bannon. Bannon's vitriol and divisiveness have no place in the White House. Please sign if you agree that this is NOT the person who should have the ear of the president.
Thank you.
Please sign the petition, let's try to stop this racist and keep him out of the White House.
@LA se Karachi @Desertfalcon @F-22Raptor @gambit @anon45 @Anubis @Moonlight @Syed.Ali.Haider @TruthSeeker @Hamartia Antidote
Last edited:
ultron
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2015
- Messages
- 4,999
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
Reportedly is code word for fake. Breitbart is the most pro Jewish website out there.
Devil Soul
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 22,931
- Reaction score
- 45
- Country
- Location
Desert Fox
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 10,584
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
- Location
Request denied
These LibShits were the same people who kept demanding reassurances from Trump that he will peacefully accept the election results and tell his supporters to not riot. And yet they are rioting and burning down neighborhoods and asking for a recount.
Desert Fox
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 10,584
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
- Location
The ShitLibs project their own filth onto others.
RabzonKhan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2008
- Messages
- 4,289
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Some interesting development.
Wisconsin to hold statewide recount of votes for president
NOVEMBER 26,2016
The Wisconsin Elections Commission on Nov. 25 received two recount petitions from the Jill Stein for President Campaign and from Rocky Roque De La Fuente.
“The commission is preparing to move forward with a statewide recount of votes for president of the United States, as requested by these candidates,” WEC Administrator Michael Haas announced.
He continued, “We have assembled an internal team to direct the recount, we have been in close consultation with our county clerk partners, and have arranged for legal representation by the Wisconsin Department of Justice,.
“We plan to hold a teleconference meeting for county clerks next week and anticipate the recount will begin late in the week after the Stein campaign has paid the recount fee, which we are still calculating.”
The last statewide recount was of the Supreme Court election in 2011.
The state is working under a federal deadline of Dec. 13 to complete the recount.
As a result, county boards of canvassers may need to work evenings and weekends to meet the deadlines, according to a news release from the department.
Haas said, “The recount process is very detail-oriented, and this deadline will certainly challenge some counties to finish on time.”
A recount is different than an audit and is more rigorous.
More than 100 reporting units across the state were randomly selected for a separate audit of their voting equipment as required by state law, and that process has already begun.
Electronic voting equipment audits determine whether all properly-marked ballots are accurately tabulated by the equipment.
In a recount, all ballots — including those that were originally hand counted — are examined to determine voter intent before being retabulated.
In addition, the county boards of canvassers will examine other documents, including poll lists, written absentee applications, rejected absentee ballots, and provisional ballots before counting the votes.
Haas said the commission’s role is to order the recount, to provide legal guidance to the counties during the recount and to certify the results.
If the candidates disagree with the results of the recount, the law gives them the right to appeal in circuit court within five business days after the recount is completed.
The circuit court is where issues are resolved that may be discovered during the recount but are not resolved to the satisfaction of the candidates.
“Wisconsin has the most decentralized election system in the United States,” Haas said in his statement. Link
Wisconsin to hold statewide recount of votes for president
NOVEMBER 26,2016
The Wisconsin Elections Commission on Nov. 25 received two recount petitions from the Jill Stein for President Campaign and from Rocky Roque De La Fuente.
“The commission is preparing to move forward with a statewide recount of votes for president of the United States, as requested by these candidates,” WEC Administrator Michael Haas announced.
He continued, “We have assembled an internal team to direct the recount, we have been in close consultation with our county clerk partners, and have arranged for legal representation by the Wisconsin Department of Justice,.
“We plan to hold a teleconference meeting for county clerks next week and anticipate the recount will begin late in the week after the Stein campaign has paid the recount fee, which we are still calculating.”
The last statewide recount was of the Supreme Court election in 2011.
The state is working under a federal deadline of Dec. 13 to complete the recount.
As a result, county boards of canvassers may need to work evenings and weekends to meet the deadlines, according to a news release from the department.
Haas said, “The recount process is very detail-oriented, and this deadline will certainly challenge some counties to finish on time.”
A recount is different than an audit and is more rigorous.
More than 100 reporting units across the state were randomly selected for a separate audit of their voting equipment as required by state law, and that process has already begun.
Electronic voting equipment audits determine whether all properly-marked ballots are accurately tabulated by the equipment.
In a recount, all ballots — including those that were originally hand counted — are examined to determine voter intent before being retabulated.
In addition, the county boards of canvassers will examine other documents, including poll lists, written absentee applications, rejected absentee ballots, and provisional ballots before counting the votes.
Haas said the commission’s role is to order the recount, to provide legal guidance to the counties during the recount and to certify the results.
If the candidates disagree with the results of the recount, the law gives them the right to appeal in circuit court within five business days after the recount is completed.
The circuit court is where issues are resolved that may be discovered during the recount but are not resolved to the satisfaction of the candidates.
“Wisconsin has the most decentralized election system in the United States,” Haas said in his statement. Link
Last edited:
Similar threads
