What's new

US objects to increase in calling rates by Pakistan

UmarJustice

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
PTA, IT Ministry reject US intervention

ISLAMABAD: The United States has raised serious objections on the unilateral increase in international calling rates by Pakistan which has become a serious issue of concern to millions of overseas Pakistanis.

US has expressed concerns over Islamabad’s increased rates saying that this step raised serious questions with respect to Pakistan’s World Trade Organisation (WTO) commitments, The News has learnt.

But Pakistani side has rejected the concerns expressed by US on the pretext that this new mechanism placed by the government would not affect the country’s commitments towards WTO.

A spokesman for IT Ministry on Tuesday confirmed the US letter and said a reply to address their concerns was being sent.

He said the ICH was in the interest of the country and there would be a lot of benefits for Pakistan in the aftermath of implementing this regime. The LDI industry, he said, was suffering a lot because of uncertainty in the ICH regime.

When contacted, Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) Chairman Farooq Awan on Tuesday said the ICH would play a crucial role for earning precious foreign currency for the country keeping in view balance of payment pressures.

“The ICH mechanism is even more important than auction of Third Generation (3G) licence because it would ensure continuous revenue streams in shape of foreign currency instead of one time transaction,” he said.

An official communication sent out by the executive office of President, Office of the United States Trade Representative, Washington DC, Christine Bliss, a copy of which is available with The News, states that economic fundamentals suggested that such a rate increase would significantly affect the cost of services related to telecommunication tariff between Pakistan and the world. It would cause negative affects on foreign telecommunication operators (US operators).

According to documents available with The News, Pakistan’s Ministry of Information Technology (MoIT) in consultation with 14 LDI operators including PTCL has been engaged preparing detailed response to address the concerns of US authorities by explaining that the industry gave advance notices to all international operators and carriers to adjust their tariffs, therefore, they do not see any negative effect of foreign telecommunication operators.

Pakistani side also argued that the new regime implemented by the government for Pakistan inward termination has no conflict with the country’s commitment towards WTO. The US letter cited an example by stating that one US company reported to them that currently it pays less than $0.0140 per minute of traffic placed to Pakistan, thus, increase in termination cost is expected by 400 percent. According to most recent report from US Federal Communication Commission, almost 300 million minutes of traditional circuit switched traffic from United States terminates in Pakistan every year.

In response to US concerns, Pakistani side also stated that there were a number of operators providing more than 300 million minutes a year and they accepted the new regime placed by the government. The rate of $0.0146 per minute was offered based on heavy discount by LDIs from their shares which now have been withdrawn.

The Pakistani side said in pre-ICH the Approved Settle Rate (ASR) for termination of incoming calls stood at $6.25 which was revised upward to $8.80 per minute, registering net increase by 40 percent against claims of 300 to 500 percent.

It has been conceded that actual prevailing rate before ICH was around $1.25 per minute for reasons that LDI gave discount to foreign carriers. Now the discount is no more sustainable financially and commercially, the official communication says.

It also disclosed that the prevailing charges for termination of Pakistani traffic is higher by 70 to 100 percent as margin for international operators in case of Saudi Arabia stood in the range of $0.437 per minute to $0.497 per minute, in UK up to $1.607, UAE up to $1.997 per minute and in US up to $0.347 per minute.

A representative of LDI operator claimed that after placing ICH mechanism, the outward calling from Pakistan increased by 30 percent in first 22 days of October as ICH got implemented from October 1, 2012. He said the State Bank of Pakistan had so far received $53 million in first 22 days after placing ICH.


US objects to increase in calling rates by Pakistan - thenews.com.pk
 
I always wondered- why PTA doesnt care for us Expatriates-
they keep on increasing the fcukin rates- 600 minutes on a card has now became only 100 minutes- this is kuss ummak-

would play a crucial role for earning precious foreign currency for the country

looty jao hum ghareebon ko-:cry:-
 
I always wondered- why PTA doesnt care for us Expatriates-
they keep on increasing the fcukin rates- 600 minutes on a card has now became only 100 minutes- this is kuss ummak-



looty jao hum ghareebon ko-:cry:-

wht is kuss ummak??:o

BTW the rates for calling from Pakistan is toooo low....
i guess its the rates of the company which expatriates are using .
 
I always wondered- why PTA doesnt care for us Expatriates-
they keep on increasing the fcukin rates- 600 minutes on a card has now became only 100 minutes- this is kuss ummak-



looty jao hum ghareebon ko-:cry:-

I pity on those people who still use telephone in this era of SKYPE.

I always wondered- why PTA doesnt care for us Expatriates-
they keep on increasing the fcukin rates- 600 minutes on a card has now became only 100 minutes- this is kuss ummak-



looty jao hum ghareebon ko-:cry:-

I pity on those people who still use telephone in this era of SKYPE.
 
I pity on those people who still use telephone in this era of SKYPE.

Does skype makes Phone to Phone calls for free genius?-
or you can afford to give a skype enabled phone to every chacha mama taya of yours living in pind or city?-
 
Does skype makes Phone to Phone calls for free genius?-
or you can afford to give a skype enabled phone to every chacha mama taya of yours living in pind or city?-

That's correct!

Any update on this PTCL 'cruelty'? For an economic impact, see this:
Increasing call rates to Pakistan is plain cruelty – The Express Tribune Blog

and, according to this, the PTCL increase should be gone by now but it has not.

PTA withdraws clearing house directive – The Express Tribune

?

Any calling cards recommended for Pakistan?
 
skype, whatsapp and all these forms of communications are free for a reason. And trust me its not because they like human beings so much. Calling rates being higher in Pakistan means that people rather call from the United states, which in turn means that they will most probably have to have an illegal wire tap on that said call, whereas if its originating from a droned country it wouldn't be a problem. What other sense does it make for the United states to come in and cite the WTO as an excuse while they are going to court defending their illegal kill lists and killing children as "wise" strategy against terrorism.
 
Try Boss revolution or Hola.

Thanks. But these are even higher than Raza.com (which I use at 8.3 cents/minute on Pakistan Direct) and TelephonePakistan.com

This is pure greed by PTCL. Not a good business decision too. And they have apparently reversed the decision but the calling card companies are still waiting to see the reversal--at least that's what the Raza.com guy told me today.
 
Thanks. But these are even higher than Raza.com (which I use at 8.3 cents/minute on Pakistan Direct) and TelephonePakistan.com

This is pure greed by PTCL. Not a good business decision too. And they have apparently reversed the decision but the calling card companies are still waiting to see the reversal--at least that's what the Raza.com guy told me today.

Try 2$ black, I heard it gives 30 minutes. :meeting:
 
Pakistanis overseas need to PAY up and stop whinning provided the money goes to GOP
 
State-corporate nexus: The unholy alliance in the telecom sector
By Ali Salman
Published: September 17, 2012

The ICH will reduce choices for the consumers, enhance entry barriers, increase dominance of PTCL and facilitate cartelisation in the telecom sector.

LAHORE: Recent developments in the telecom sector indicate that the federal government is undoing its own acts by inviting, coercing and facilitating private sector players to form a cartel, thus not only ruining the gains made from competition, but also potentially robbing off consumers.

The Ministry of Information Technology has issued a policy directive for the establishment of International Clearing House (ICH) for incoming international calls for long distance international, fixed-line local loop, wireless local loop and mobile operators.

The ICH and the policy directive will not only reduce competition significantly, but are also in direct violation of the ministry’s own deregulation policy of 2003, which says “Increase service choice for customers of telecommunication services at competitive and affordable rates and liberalise the telecommunication sector by encouraging fair competition amongst service providers.”

This directive disregards the proceedings held earlier by the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP), which were initiated on the request of long distance international (LDI) operators themselves. As per the policy note of CCP, available on its website, the LDI operators, who had earlier requested CCP for its approval, were warned against creation of ICH.

At present, there are 13 LDI operators in addition to PTCL who are licensed to originate and terminate voice traffic in Pakistan. The sector dynamics are such that incoming international voice traffic dominates the outgoing international voice traffic despite the fact that international dialing is now easily available on pre-paid SIMs and on PSTN lines.

Under ICH arrangement, all incoming traffic in future will terminate on PTCL infrastructure, which will lead to less incentive to use international bandwidth from PTCL’s competitors. This will not only eliminate competition, but also further strengthen PTCL’s dominant position.

Presently, it is possible to call overseas high-volume destinations in US, Canada, UK and Australia for Rs2 plus tax or around 2 cents, so termination cost to foreign operator has to be less than that. Similarly, termination costs for Pakistan are presently under 8.8 cents. With the ICH agreement, the termination rates for Pakistan will be increased by the consortium to approved PTA levels, which will likely result in foreign operators increasing outgoing termination rates.

This potential increase to around 8.8 cents will affect consumers in Pakistan, who are likely to pay more for making international calls in future under ICH arrangement and it can also foreclose the option for the remaining LDI operators to negotiate.

Through ICH, it appears that competition among LDI operators is prevented as each operator will have a guaranteed quota of incoming international traffic as per their existing market share. This is a typical example of cartelisation. In this environment, there is no incentive for an LDI operator to improve sales or enhance quality of service or for that matter to invest in network.

In the instant matter, a substantial advantage will be available to existing LDI operators. They will be in a position to exploit the arrangement through cost advantage over potential new entrants. They may use this advantage to cut prices if and when new players enter the market.

The policy directive of the ministry mentions the appointment of an independent undertaking to monitor the said arrangement and submit MIS reports on a daily basis to PTA or the IT ministry to prevent “collusive behaviour and to ensure transparency”. This is ridiculous, impractical and in fact counter-productive.

In fact, such monitoring tools are typically used by cartels to monitor the observance of the common policy and not otherwise. Monitoring essentially is a regulatory role entrusted to the sector regulator and should be discharged accordingly.

The ICH will reduce choices for the consumers, enhance entry barriers, increase dominance of PTCL and facilitate cartelisation in the telecom sector.

It is apparent that the federal government, instead of protecting interests of public at large, which are guaranteed through competition in a free market economy, has itself colluded with the corporate sector. It has not happened for the first time and examples of a similar state-corporate nexus abound, for instance in fertiliser, sugar, cement, banking, etc. This nexus not only brings bad name to market economy, it also denies fruits of economic development to the public.

The Competition Act 2010 was a step in the right direction. It is time that its scope should be widened to include the policy directives and frameworks issued by the government with a punitive clause. The CCP should be authorised to refer to any such policy directives to parliament, which is the mother of all institutions, for corrective action.

The writer is a managing partner of economic research organisation Development Pool, and a founding member of the Economic Freedom Network Pakistan
 
Back
Top Bottom