What's new

‘US not powerful enough to bring peace to Syria’ – France’s Hollande

Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
1,767
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Published time: 12 Oct, 2016 22:16Edited time: 13 Oct, 2016 16:14

57fe9cd6c36188c01b8b4740.jpg

© Ethan Morgan / Reuters

The US is strong enough to financially discriminate against European companies, but it lacks the capacity to bring peace to Syria, French President Francois Hollande said.

“The US has enough power to get money, but not enough – to establish peace (in Syria),” Hollande told L'Obs magazine on Wednesday.

In his interview, the French leader slammed Washington for imposing multibillion dollar fines on major European companies, while, at the same time, shielding American firms.

France's Hollande blasts US for going after corporate Europe

As for the situation in Syria, Hollande said that he doesn’t expect any decisive actions from the US until the end of the year because US President Barack Obama, who promised not to engage US in new conflicts abroad, will soon be leaving office.

The French leader promised that France will “not abandon Aleppo” after Russia vetoed its UN Security Council resolution proposing a ‘no fly zone’ over the strategic city, which remains split between government forces and the militants.

“The first condition is that the bombing stops,” he said, adding that Paris will keep pressing for the ceasefire to be reached “in the coming days” to allow humanitarian aid deliveries to Aleppo and the beginning of talks between the interested parties.

Hollande also expressed regret that Russia’s proposal to destroy Syrian chemical weapons averted airstrikes against the government of President Bashar Assad three years ago.

“August 2013 will remain a key date in the history of this conflict. France was ready to hit the Syrian regime, which had crossed a red line,” he said.

But “another route” that was taken by the international community which laid the foundation for the current state of things in the country,” the French leader said.

READ MORE: 'Moscow is being obstructive': French PM Valls doubles down on Russia policy after criticism

Assad sensed the weakness of the West and asked for military assistance from Moscow, while Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) reduced the numbers of moderate opposition, he explained.

“Aleppo today is a challenge for the international community. It’s either honor or shame,” he concluded.


On Wednesday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that he believes a peaceful resolution to the situation in Aleppo is still possible. Speaking to CNN's Christiane Amanpour he said that Russia still “strongly supports the initiative by [UN Special Representative for Syria] Staffan de Mistura, who proposed that Al Nusra fighters should be [allowed] to leave eastern Aleppo with the weapons ‘in dignity’” along with the moderate rebels that want to “stay with them.” Rebels who want to stay in Aleppo, meanwhile, should join in with the cessation of hostilities, he said.


RT
 
What that hints actually gone are the days of glory.

When Pakistani envoy mentioned same thing they were going to shoot him.
 
what does he mean peace in syria???does he mean to stop Russia and Assad bombing?? even if we could make Russia and Assad disappear, does that mean peace would happen in Syria?? or would it just turn into another Libya.

I think Holland should listen to some good advice from a former great French leader


 
what does he mean peace in syria??? is he saying to stop russia and assad bombing?? even we could make russia and assad dissapear does that mean peace would happen in Syria?? or would it just turn into another Libya.

I think Holland should listen to some good advice from a great French leader



If the US is incapable of establishing peace in Syria, so is every other participant. And it's not a question of US capability, but a matter of interest. Does US really want to insert itself into what is essentially a sectarian conflict? Attack Obama all you want, but I praise him for keeping US at arms length in Syria.

If Clinton wins, however, all bets are off. Her foundation has received millions from the Gulf states, and they want to ensnare US in their geo-political games.
 
If the US is incapable of establishing peace in Syria, so is every other participant. And it's not a question of US capability, but a matter of interest. Does US really want to insert itself into what is essentially a sectarian conflict? Attack Obama all you want, but I praise him for keeping US at arms length in Syria.

If Clinton wins, however, all bets are off. Her foundation has received millions from the Gulf states, and they want to ensnare US in their geo-political games.


Attack Obama all you want, but I praise him for keeping US at arms length in Syria

funding and training terrorists I wouldn't say that's a hands off approach, but yeah at least he hasn't invaded Syria with ground troops.


U.S shouldn't even be involved in the Middle East period.
 
Its sheer stupidity to think that USA can bring peace.. They just intrude everywhere considering it an obligation of superpower..

USA can only gift world the Chaos..And nothing else..!!!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom