What's new

US Navy Aims to Install Over-the-Horizon Missile on Littoral Combat Ship by End of 2016

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States

A Kongsberg Naval Strike Missile (NSM) is launched from the Littoral Combat Ship USS Coronado (LCS 4) during a Sept. 23, 2014, test off the coast of Southern California. US Navy photo.


PENTAGON – The Navy hopes to have an over-the-horizon missile on a Littoral Combat Ship by the end of the year, the service’s surface warfare director told USNI News on Thursday.

Rear Adm. Peter Fanta (OPNAV N96) said in an interview that putting an OTH missile on LCS is “an absolute requirement” for the Navy. Despite challenges associated with moving money around mid-fiscal year, he said the stakeholders are all on board and engineers are hard at work studying which missiles could operate from the LCS deck.

“It takes a little while for the guys with the slide rules to figure out … what the deck strength needs to be and what angle the launcher needs to sit at,” Fanta said.
“That’s my biggest hold right now is guys doing math.”

Fanta said he is on track to have a missile on the LCS by the end of 2016, at least as a demonstration if not a permanent solution. He said the missile and the ship would be much more connected than a previous one-time demonstration of firing a Kongsberg Naval Strike Missile from USS Coronado (LCS-4).

“I’m looking at a number of missiles – not just the Norwegian missile, I’m also looking at Harpoon and several other missiles. What bolts on, and what can I put on a console that has feeds from the combat system? … I’m trying to do that, again, if I can get enough engineering done to allow me to do this, I’m trying to do that this year.”

The idea to put an OTH missile on the LCS came out of the study that recommended building an up-armored and up-gunned LCS-based frigate, Fanta said. But the idea also nestles nicely with Fanta’s vision for how the Navy’s small surface combatant should participate in anti-surface warfare in the future.

“What happens when you put long-range missiles on something? What happens when you take smaller combatants and hit an adversary from multiple directions?” Fanta said.
“We did a study up with the [U.S. Naval War College] and we’ve done internal OPNAV studies that say, what happens if – just do away with the rest of the fleet and just let small ships hit the adversary. And we find out that you lose a bunch of small ships, but you also put the enemy fleet on the bottom of the ocean.”

The addition of an OTH missile to the suite of weapons on LCS would allow the ships to use their low draft and 40 knot top speeds to fight in different ways.

150511-N-VO234-613.jpg

USS Fort Worth (LCS-3) conducts patrols in international waters of the South China Sea near the Spratly Islands on May 11, 2015. US Navy Photo


“If you’re in a bunch of islands and you’re moving around fast, and you’re continuously shifting your logistics hubs, and you can take fuel at any little port, and you can turn around and grab a couple more missiles and go hit them again, and you bring back Ulithi Atoll, which in World War II had these huge ammunition dumps,” the wargame suggests the small surface combatants would be successful, he said.
“We relearned what we learned with the [Pegasus] hydrofoils back in the 80s. … We did an exercise back in the 80s, we brought the 2nd Fleet into an enclosed area of water, and we had two Harpoon-carrying hydrofoils take down most of 2nd Fleet. Why? Because you come at them where they can’t target you, in amongst the small context, in amongst the reef lines, and you can get in there in eight to 10 feet of water and you can come at them from all directions. You’re small, you’re hard to target, they don’t know where you’re coming from, and as long as you get the targeting information coming to you, they don’t know where you’re coming from.”

Fanta said the 1980s exercise showed that this strategy forced the 2nd Fleet to disperse its air wing, with each plane seeking out the small combatants, and “if you hit them from multiple directions, you put a lot of those ships on the bottom before they catch up to you.”

That strategy – learned in World War II, relearned in the 1980s and relearned yet again during the recent small surface combatant studies with OPNAV and the Naval War College – is precisely how Fanta would like to see the LCS fleet operate.

Bolting on the OTH missile is a good start but not a final step in realizing the vision, he added.

“What happens if I shoot a torpedo at an enemy surface combatant? Everything they’re building, everything the rest of the world is building is to take on cruise missiles,” he said.
“What happens if I’ve got a really good anti-surface torpedo the size of a Mk 48 and I pop it off the side of a surface ship and point it at an enemy group, and it goes a really long way and blows something up? I don’t know how they’re going to get away from it, that’s a cost-imposing strategy. And that’s really what we’re developing with that modular ability of LCS – bolt something else on and go try it. If I get a better missile, bolt it on. If I get a better weapon, sensor, whatever, bolt it on, let’s go try it.”

Navy Aims to Install Over-the-Horizon Missile on Littoral Combat Ship by End of 2016 - USNI News
 
amazing what they are discussing. that you could potentially destroy an enemy fleet including the U.S fleet with small ships armed with OTH missiles.... which Iran has or might peruse.


I have a little more respect for the LCS, but I hope we have a defense against the enemy who might operate similar type of ship/system
 
amazing what they are discussing. that you could potentially destroy an enemy fleet including the U.S fleet with small ships armed with OTH missiles.... which Iran has or might peruse.


I have a little more respect for the LCS, but I hope we have a defense against the enemy who might operate similar type of ship/system
Any frigate carriers OTH missiles (simply put: antishipmissiles with a range of more than 25km)

NSM
Weight 410 kg (900 lb)
Length 3.95 m (13.0 ft)
Warhead 125 kg (276 lb) HE blast-fragmentation
Detonation mechanism :Programmable fuze
Engine: Solid fuel rocket booster, Microturbo TRI 40 turbojet
Operational rang: NSM 185 km (115 mi; 100 nmi)+ /JSM 290 km (180 mi; 160 nmi)+
Flight altitude: Sea skimming
Speed: High subsonic
Guidance system:Inertial, GPS, terrain-reference navigation, imaging infrared homing, target database

Harpoon

Weight :1,523 lb (691 kg) with booster
Length: Surface- and submarine-launched: 15 ft (4.6 m)
Warhead: 488 pounds (221 kg)
Detonation mechanism: Contact
Engine: Teledyne CAE J402 Turbojet/solid propellant booster for surface and submarine launch; greater than 600 pounds (greater than 272.2 kg) of thrust
Operational range: in excess of 67 nmi (124 km) depending on launch platform
Flight altitude: Sea-skimming
Speed: 537 miles per hour (864 km/h)(240 m/s)
Guidance system:Sea-skimming cruise monitored by radar altimeter / active radar terminal homing

Wonder what those 'several other missiles' could be. Suggestions anyone?

The aging anti-ship missiles currently in use– such as the Boeing RGM-84 Harpoon Block II and the French-designed MBDA Exocet — no longer fulfill the operational requirements set out in the navy’s new more aggressive warfighting strategy.

According to naval-technology.com, “The NSM is a successor to the Penguin anti-ship missile and is the only fifth generation long-range precision strike missile in the world.” The midrange missile can strike land and sea targets at a distance of over 200 km.
Will the US Buy the Naval Strike Missile? | The Diplomat

NSM: been tested by USN
US Navy Fires Norwegian Naval Strike Missile | Military.com

Both Harpoon and NSM will be deployed on LCS of both types for trials
LCS To Get Missiles for Next Deployment
 
Back
Top Bottom