What's new

US-NATO LOOSING CONTROL IN AFGHANISTAN

lem34

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
US-NATO LOOSING CONTROL IN AFGHANISTAN? Insurgents attack heart of US-led occupation

by James Cogan

Global Research, April 17, 2012

Small groups of insurgents fighting the US-led occupation of Afghanistan carried out a coordinated series of attacks on Sunday against prominent NATO and Afghan government facilities in the capital Kabul and three other provinces. Among the buildings hit with small arms and rocket propelled grenades were the parliament, the US, British, German, Japanese and Russian embassies, the NATO headquarters and a newly-opened hotel. In the country’s eastern provinces, airfields and police stations were attacked.

Operations by Afghan and foreign troops to regain control of the heavily-guarded governmental and diplomatic zone in Kabul continued for 20 hours into Monday afternoon. Afghan government forces, assisted in some cases by foreign troops, claimed yesterday that they had killed 39 insurgents. Eight Afghan army and police personnel were reportedly killed and up to 40 wounded. At least four civilians were killed in cross-fire and several dozen injured. There were no reported casualties among foreign military forces or diplomatic staff.

The attacks had parallels with last September’s assault on the US embassy and NATO’s main command centre in Kabul. On Sunday, fighters were again able to infiltrate weapons, ammunition and explosives into the city and take up positions undetected in construction sites within a few hundred metres of their intended targets.

The puppet Afghan government headed by President Hamid Karzai claimed that insurgents had dressed in female burkas that covered their faces and decorated cars with flowers in order to pass through security checkpoints. This was contradicted by locals, who told the New York Times they had seen a utility vehicle occupied by a group of men simply drive into the car park of a building site near the embassy zone. As in earlier incidents, the seeming ease with which security was breached suggests the insurgents were assisted by elements in the Afghan government forces.

In a statement yesterday, Karzai described the attacks as “an intelligence failure for us and especially for NATO.” The coordinated assault inflicted another blow to the claims of the Obama administration and its allies that Karzai’s regime will soon be able to exert full control over the country without large-scale foreign military assistance. After more than ten years of constant operations by tens of thousands of American and allied troops to crush Afghan resistance, insurgents have demonstrated their ability to strike at the heart of the US-led occupation.

The Taliban, the Islamist movement that held power in Afghanistan before the 2001 US invasion, claimed responsibility for the attacks. A Taliban spokesman issued a statement on Sunday, describing them as the beginning of the insurgency’s “spring offensive.” Throughout the decade-long war, resistance operations have ebbed during the bitter Afghan winter and surged as weather conditions improve.

This week’s events will only add to the sense of crisis and failure surrounding the US-led occupation. Over the past year, there has been a string of attacks on US and other foreign troops by members of Afghan government security forces, indicating both the widespread hostility to the occupation among the local police and army and the extent to which they have been infiltrated by insurgent organisations.

The Taliban or other resistance groups have been able to carry out a wave of high profile assassinations, killing some of the most prominent allies of Hamid Karzai and scores of police and government officials. Since the beginning of the year, Afghan hostility to the occupation has also been revealed in the outpourings of anger over incidents such as US troops burning copies of the Koran, urinating on corpses and killing unarmed villagers, including women and children.

US officials, including the ambassador to Afghanistan Ryan Crocker, dismissed the Taliban claims that it had organised Sunday’s attacks and instead blamed the Haqqani network—an insurgent movement based among ethnic Pashtun tribes in southern Afghanistan and North West Pakistan. The Haqqani movement has its origins in the US and Pakistani-backed Islamist insurgency against the occupation of Afghanistan by the Soviet Union in the 1980s. It has fought the US occupation since 2001, allegedly operating from safe havens in Pakistan.

Just hours before the attacks in Kabul, as many as 150 militants stormed a prison in the town of Bannu in North West Pakistan. Close to 400 prisoners were released, including at least 30 men being held for fighting against the pro-US Pakistani government. Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), the main anti-government Islamist organisation, which maintains close ties with the Afghan Haqqani fighters, claimed responsibility.

A recent report by the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War described the Haqqani network as the most capable and sophisticated of the insurgent groups and asserted that it had been able to spread its influence from the south to Kabul and the eastern provinces. Institute analyst Jeff Dressler told the BBC that Sunday’s attacks were “likely intended to send a message to the US, UK, Russia and the Afghans that this will in fact be a bloody year for all forces in Afghanistan, particularly [in] the east of the country.”

The US attempt to blame the Haqqani network for the latest attacks is more than likely bound up with the desperate efforts that have been made by the Obama administration to initiate negotiations and strike some form of deal with the main Taliban leadership, hoping to bring most of the resistance to an end. US conditions, however, have included the Taliban recognising Karzai’s US-backed regime and bowing to Washington’s demand to maintain bases in Afghanistan into the indefinite future.

Tentative moves toward talks collapsed in March after the Taliban rejected the US insistence that discussions involve the Karzai government. With the bulk of American forces scheduled to withdraw from Afghanistan over the next two-and-a-half years, and numerous European countries preparing to exit even sooner, the Taliban leaders appear increasingly convinced that they will be able to dispense with the US-backed regime altogether and reclaim power.

After more than ten years of bloody repression in Afghanistan, which the Obama administration has extended over the border into Pakistan, the only response of US imperialism to the debacle it confronts will be further violence. With deadlines for withdrawal approaching, the US will escalate the killing in order to pressure the Taliban into accepting talks on its terms and realise the neo-colonial objectives of the war.

US-NATO LOOSING CONTROL IN AFGHANISTAN? Insurgents attack heart of US-led occupation
 
.
they are not loosing control you need to have control first to lose it:p::p:P: but yeah they r losing control of kabul you know something is wrong when the heart of your command post is taken and held hostage for 20 hours
 
.
The militants attacked at the time and place of their chosing dressed in some cases in Burkas, they had the advantage of timing, choice of target and suprise and got thier *** handed to them by cogans style of assement Custer won little bighorn
 
.
A small group of combatants (dressed like civilians) can easily sneak in to important places and cause mayhem. Remember the PNS Mehran incident?

This incident does not proves that ISAF is powerless or have little control in Afghanistan. Kabul has witnessed similar incidents in the past.
 
.
Afghanistan should be politically and socially stable otherwise it will be very bad for its neighbours especially Pakistan and India.
Taliban should not be allowed to return to afghanistan ..........As the foreign troops leave , I am sure Afghan forces , with help from its neighbours will be able to stablize its nation
 
.
This incident does not proves that ISAF is powerless or have little control in Afghanistan. Kabul has witnessed similar incidents in the past.

ok but for ten years they have been there and these attacks are not decreasing but increasing more of their troops are dieing the taliban are looking stronger then ever and the isaf so far cant even touch their enemies and for 20 hours their home base the city they called the safe zone or the green zone was attacked and held hostage. doesnt that sho ineptness that this sort of thing is happening increasingly and the taliban are getting stronger whereas no matter what the isaf does this wont end

Afghanistan should be politically and socially stable otherwise it will be very bad for its neighbours especially Pakistan and India.
Taliban should not be allowed to return to afghanistan ..........As the foreign troops leave , I am sure Afghan forces , with help from its neighbours will be able to stablize its nation

considering how the us are trying to bring them to talk and they opened their office in qatar they seem pretty poised to take control of afghanistan. the fact is that area will never have stability even if we remove the outside interference card the pushtun tribes and the non pashtun tribes just dont work with each other as the pushtun support the taliban the non pushtun support the current regime and even that is losing strenght due to american blunders. the point is both factions will dowhatever it takes to keep control
 
. .
ok but for ten years they have been there and these attacks are not decreasing but increasing more of their troops are dieing the taliban are looking stronger then ever and the isaf so far cant even touch their enemies and for 20 hours their home base the city they called the safe zone or the green zone was attacked and held hostage. doesnt that sho ineptness that this sort of thing is happening increasingly and the taliban are getting stronger whereas no matter what the isaf does this wont end
Brother, this incident does not gives you the whole picture. In reality, we are witnessing signs of a civil war in Afghanistan. This nation is split between Pro-Taliban and Anti-Taliban factions. Yes, many people do not realize that Taliban enjoys local support in some provinces of Afghanistan and this is the key to its survival. ISAF knows this but does not wants to acknowledge this truth publicily.

Also, US military forces have conducted lots of military operations in Afghanistan. However, their is a limit to what can be accomplished in a war-torn nation, which is divided internally.

To be honest, their is no military solution for Afghanistan. The sooner this is realized, the better.

considering how the us are trying to bring them to talk and they opened their office in qatar they seem pretty poised to take control of afghanistan. the fact is that area will never have stability even if we remove the outside interference card the pushtun tribes and the non pashtun tribes just dont work with each other as the pushtun support the taliban the non pushtun support the current regime and even that is losing strenght due to american blunders. the point is both factions will dowhatever it takes to keep control
Yes, my friend. You do understand the big picture here. :)
 
.
they are not loosing control you need to have control first to lose it:p::p:P: but yeah they r losing control of kabul you know something is wrong when the heart of your command post is taken and held hostage for 20 hours

Comming from a nation which just had 400 prisoners freed by the Taliban from a prison in Bannu where the PA claimed they had full control? **** happens even in Pakistan.
 
.
The militants attacked at the time and place of their chosing dressed in some cases in Burkas, they had the advantage of timing, choice of target and suprise and got thier *** handed to them by cogans style of assement Custer won little bighorn

These are excuses the fact of the matter is taliban owned Nato in Kabul.
 
.
The Talibans have completely destroyed Afghanistan... right from 1979. First, they could not bear a communist Afghanistan and started havoc against the communist government. They had to call in USSR for defending themselves.

After USSR left, the Talibans had afghanistan in their hand but they started civil war. It is at this point that whatever was left of afghanistan was completely destroyed.

Talibans gained control in 1996. But they completely wiped out art, culture, science, education, women's rights and everything. Tell me, if Afghanistan was a progressive society, a standing army and a good economy, would US have dared to invade it? Or would US have any reason to invade it?

I think it is the extremist form of Islam (exported from a country I would not prefer to name here), due to which afghanistan is at this state today.
 
.
The Talibans have completely destroyed Afghanistan... right from 1979. First, they could not bear a communist Afghanistan and started havoc against the communist government. They had to call in USSR for defending themselves.

After USSR left, the Talibans had afghanistan in their hand but they started civil war. It is at this point that whatever was left of afghanistan was completely destroyed.

Talibans gained control in 1996. But they completely wiped out art, culture, science, education, women's rights and everything. Tell me, if Afghanistan was a progressive society, a standing army and a good economy, would US have dared to invade it? Or would US have any reason to invade it?

I think it is the extremist form of Islam (exported from a country I would not prefer to name here), due to which afghanistan is at this state today.

unintended consequences of American Pakistani and guess who
 
.
Usa, has lost in Afghanistan and is trying to put the blame on Pakistan.
 
.
Comming from a nation which just had 400 prisoners freed by the Taliban from a prison in Bannu where the PA claimed they had full control? **** happens even in Pakistan.

big difference though taliban is in control of around 80% of afghanistan you were even negotiating with them and karzai is called the mayor of kabul for that very reason and with this attack it shows you are even losing control of what little you had left.NATO spent TRILLIONS on this war and you have NOTHING to show for it sorry but you've failed and that is why u wanna exit quickly.
 
.
Usa, has lost in Afghanistan and is trying to put the blame on Pakistan.
Brother, every power looses in Afghanistan. To Afghans, USA is just another nation to add in its list of graveyards it has dug for invaders.

Basic Afghan question: what do you mean by superpower? :P
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom