What's new

US military changing strategy after losing simulated war with China

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
US military changing strategy after losing simulated war with China
‘They knew exactly what we’re going to do before we did it,’ a US general revealed
Helen Elfer
17 hours ago

A general has revealed that the US military “failed miserably” in a war game, leading to a major fighting strategy change.

The United States’ readiness for armed conflict was put to the test in an exercise last October, which ended up uncovering serious weaknesses in its warfighting strategy, reports Business Insider.

Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General John Hyten said on Monday: “Without overstating the issue, it failed miserably."

During the simulated war, described as “a fictional confrontation with China” that involved a fight over Taiwan, the imaginary enemy upended the blue team’s (ie the United States’) strategy of “information dominance”.

“An aggressive red team [taking the role of hostiles] that had been studying the United States for the last 20 years just ran rings around us," said Mr Hyten. He added: "they knew exactly what we’re going to do before we did it, and they took advantage of it.”

“Imagine what our actual competitors have been doing for the last 20 years, with probably even more focus, with larger numbers,” Mr Hyten said. “So we had to take a step back and look broadly and say: ‘OK, what did we miss?’”

Mr Hyten said that the US forces attempted to establish information dominance, “just like it was in the first Gulf War, just like it has been for the last 20 years, just like everybody in the world, including China and Russia, have watched us do for the last 30 years.”

The attempt failed immediately, because of the US military’s reliance on digital data and communications, which can be disrupted if US satellites are targeted. The simulated engagement also showed that aggregating American forces might leave them more vulnerable against great power enemies.

“In today’s world, with hypersonic missiles, with significant long-range fires coming at us from all domains, if you’re aggregated and everybody knows where you are, you’re vulnerable,” Mr Hyten said.

The Pentagon has since been looking at how to update its warfighting approach to an "expanded maneuver" strategy. Its purpose is to develop the capability to attack in a way that makes it impossible for an adversary to defend itself, and connect command and control links to give commanders a clearer picture of the battlefield.


Mr Hyten said the changes were essential as the US military’s warfighting edge over rival powers like China is “shrinking fast”.


 
.
The problem is that the red team who was portraying as China was also Americans, which means even if their strategy failed, they knew what the enemy is capable off. That makes them better prepared for for real time scenarios.
So this in my opinion is nothing to cheer about.
 
.
The problem is that the red team who was portraying as China was also Americans, which means even if their strategy failed, they knew what the enemy is capable off. That makes them better prepared for for real time scenarios.
So this in my opinion is nothing to cheer about.
People WILL get into circle jerks for this.

I have said this many times on this forum, but it seems to never sink in, nevertheless, for the benefits of the silent readers out there: The US military is the most self critical in the world. And this exercise is one of many past and future events where we expose our own deficiencies.

War is the ultimate test, but if there is no war, the only option left is to simulate as approximate as possible. So before you (generically speaking) wank off to this article, examine what have your country's military done to prepare itself for war. What was the scope? How much of the military was involved? Allies? Environment, such as sea or land? A rigged exercise can be good or bad, depending on intent. If you rig an exercise to stress to failure a particular unit, machine or man, to see how that unit respond, is that a bad exercise? Why is it either good or bad?

The wankers have no interests in these details. And fortunately for US, the world's militaries are filled with leaders like them at all levels.
 
.

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom