What's new

US makes the worlds finest anti-aircraft but sometimes they don't work.

.
This propaganda bot has to repeat delusional nonsense to soothe his butthurt. And in reality that was 50 years old S-200 without IFF that was also used to shoot down Israeli modified F-16 with latest electronics. Sorry for disappoint.

and how many Ivan Made jets did the F-16 shot down? Oh my I forgot Pakistani F-16s not even the best tier F-16 shot down an Ivan Made Su-30 earlier this year right? So that too is propaganda? o_O 8-) :o:
 
. . . .

Interesting this is not the first time its happened mind you.
To be honest, i feel 90% of the reason for poor performance by military weapons, especially in developing countries is lack of proper training and lack of proficiency in using the military systems. The systems often work, so it must be human error. The only time the weapon wont be "combat ready" is if the country is either sanctioned OR poor.
 
.
PAC-3 and THAAD , since the ARAMCO saga a lot of questions have been raised over US AD capabilities , why do you think they failed if they failed ?
1. There is no such thing as PAC-3 in itself.

Patriot defense system can be equipped with PAC-2 class interceptors (M901 configuration), or PAC-3 class interceptors (M902 configuration), or both (M903 configuration). M903 configuration is latest and not commonly deployed yet.

Patriot defense systems in Saudi hands are equipped with PAC-2 class interceptors on average to neutralize incoming ballistic missiles from Yemen (and Iran), and they have absolutely delivered in this respect; 100+ kills since 2015 which is very impressive.

Patriot battery stationed in Mecca is equipped with PAC-3 class interceptors (M902 configuration ???), but this configuration is not confirmed for others.

However, all are/were pointed towards Yemen because KSA and Yemen are at war since 2015, and majority of attacks are expected from Yemen consequently.

Not surprisingly, Patriot battery stationed near Abqaiq oil field, was also pointed towards Yemen. Abqaiq oil field was therefore struck from a different direction:


That is why the attack succeeded, and Iran's involvement is suspected.

French-origin defenses were also stationed there, and failed. This might be due to poor and/or disrupted radar coverage in this sector since Abqaiq oil field contain numerous parts that undermine radar coverage.

There are also reports of Saudi negligence in managing defenses surrounding Abqaiq oil field - radar systems not being active.

2. KSA does not have THAAD in its possession so I am not sure why you mentioned it.

THAAD is also designed for big-game hunting (strategic applications).

--- --- ---

KSA needs to invest much more in its defenses, address its operational negligences, and concentrate on Iran.
 
Last edited:
.
1. There is no such thing as PAC-3 in itself.

Patriot defense system can be equipped with PAC-2 class interceptors (M901 configuration), or PAC-3 class interceptors (M902 configuration), or both (M903 configuration). M903 configuration is latest and not commonly deployed yet.

Patriot defense systems in Saudi hands are equipped with PAC-2 class interceptors on average to neutralize incoming ballistic missiles from Yemen (and Iran), and they have absolutely delivered in this respect; 100+ kills since 2015 which is very impressive.

Patriot battery stationed in Mecca is equipped with PAC-3 class interceptors (M902 configuration ???), but this configuration is not confirmed for others.

However, all are/were pointed towards Yemen because KSA and Yemen are at war since 2015, and majority of attacks are expected from Yemen consequently.

Not surprisingly, Patriot battery stationed near Abqaiq oil field, was also pointed towards Yemen. Abqaiq oil field was therefore struck from a different direction:


That is why the attack succeeded, and Iran's involvement is suspected.

French-origin defenses were also stationed there, and failed. This might be due to poor and/or disrupted radar coverage in this sector since Abqaiq oil field contain numerous parts that undermine radar coverage.

There are also reports of Saudi negligence in managing defenses surrounding Abqaiq oil field - radar systems not being active.

2. KSA does not have THAAD in its possession so I am not sure why you mentioned it.

THAAD is also designed for big-game hunting (strategic applications).

--- --- ---

KSA needs to invest much more in its defenses, address its operational negligences, and concentrate on Iran.
Furthermore it also highlights the importance of point defence systems for key installations.

By the way isnt it stupid to face them towards Yemen despite knowing the dont have the capability to reach that deep for a facility which is not only close to border and sea but towards the biggest rival iran ..
 
.
Furthermore it also highlights the importance of point defence systems for key installations.

By the way isnt it stupid to face them towards Yemen despite knowing the dont have the capability to reach that deep for a facility which is not only close to border and sea but towards the biggest rival iran ..
True.

Houthi have demonstrated credible ballistic missile, cruise missile and even UAV strike capability lately. Yemen used to be a client of Soviet hardware back in the days of Cold War, and Houthi are receiving ample input and funds from Iran since war with KSA.

KSA have prevented lot of damage in its mainland by fielding and using Patriot defense systems. American hardware does work as advertised but operators need to up their game. Complacency will not work.
 
Last edited:
.
This propaganda bot has to repeat delusional nonsense to soothe his butthurt. And in reality that was 50 years old S-200 without IFF that was also used to shoot down Israeli modified F-16 with latest electronics. Sorry for disappoint.
S-200 was stationed in Syria for 35 years and during all this time at planes inside Israel. Then one day they suddenly fired 2 dozen missiles at planes deep inside Israel not expecting attack and one of the pilots did not respond quickly.

Less than a hour after this attack Israel destroyed S-200, so they will never fire at Israel again. After this attack each time Israel feels even a little threat SAMs are immediately destroyed. This happened to 3 vaunted Pantsirs.

 
.
Lets now make serious comparison of US and Russian SAMs.

* Both Patriot and S-300 weer deployed in 1980-es, both had track via missile semi active homing guidance.

* Both have capability vs. tactical ballistic missiles (up to 300 km).

S-300 are stationed on large vehicles. This gives them better tactical mobility, however it also makes them much heavier. S-300 can be transported only by huge Ruslan aicrafts, while Patriots can be trasported by medium transports.

What happened next? The biggest threat became ballistic missiles.

* US developed small PAC-3 missile for short range ballistic missiles (up to 1000 km). Russia developed similar missile for their S-400 only 10+ years later.

* US developed THAAD which intercepts short and medium range ballistic missiles in space. Russian S-300/S-400 are still limited only to 30 km altitude.
 
.
Do talk whatever you want but reality is American Defense Technology is better than European, Russian and Chineese
 
.
According to Saudis, this attack must have come from Iran because Ansar Allah do not have the military equipment to reach that far into KSA territory.

Also according to Saudis, their radars in the Abqayq region were only focused on Yemen (not north or even east).

Go figure.
 
.
S-200 was stationed in Syria for 35 years and during all this time at planes inside Israel. Then one day they suddenly fired 2 dozen missiles at planes deep inside Israel not expecting attack and one of the pilots did not respond quickly.

Less than a hour after this attack Israel destroyed S-200, so they will never fire at Israel again. After this attack each time Israel feels even a little threat SAMs are immediately destroyed. This happened to 3 vaunted Pantsirs.


Stop repeteating your delusional BS stories you are making up, retarded troll. They were debunked already dozen of times.
Isreal failed to destroy any single S-200 launcher after the humiliation of losing F-16 to one single fired missile. Your excuses about incompetent and junk Israeli military failed to suppress and jam 50 years old SAM are laughable. Syrian S-200 is active and was used just recently over Cyprus. After this attack Israeli jets are afraid to enter Syrian air defence engagement zones and just desperatly and uselessly fire cruise missiles against random empty buildings for Netanyahu's propaganda purposes.
 
.
Stop repeteating your delusional BS stories you are making up, retarded troll. They were debunked already dozen of times.
Isreal failed to destroy any single S-200 launcher after the humiliation of losing F-16 to one single fired missile.
You keep embarrassing urself:

5N62V illumination radar:
Dc63G9yXkAAhcyW.jpg


PRV-17 radar altimeter:
Dc63HaQW0AMxoa4.jpg


P-35 2D radar:
Dc63H-1X4AEdBMx.jpg


Note: these pics were posted by Russians themselves there are much more. And Israel destroyed it just one hour after reckless Assadist attack.

Syrian S-200 is active and was used just recently over Cyprus.
Israel did not touch S-200 in Homs and Latakia. As result u killed 15 of ur own officers.

After this attack Israeli jets are afraid to enter Syrian air defence engagement zones and just desperatly and uselessly fire cruise missiles against random empty buildings for Netanyahu's propaganda purposes.
In fact after that we bombed Khamenaist mercenaries in Deir Ez Zor province, far more distant than ever before.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom