US drama of “nuclear free world”

[pakomar]

American must realize that US got most of the nuclear warhead and they are the only country who used them against innocent civilian. If US want a nuclear free world stop threading and attacking other countries and nation. Because of US war on Afghanistan and Iraq every country is trying to develop nuclear weapon so they can safeguard their freedom. History shows the worst enemy of US was and is Russia and only thing stopping US war on Russia is Russia nuclear warheads. Infect US and Israel is the real reason that Iran is so scared to be invaded that they want to develop nuclear weapon to safeguard their freedom.
Here comes a new drama from American government .now slowly Turing their gun on Pakistan and the first step has been exactitude by Obama speech the world on “nuclear free world”.
Now is the time Pakistan must realize who the real enemy is and start working to defend its nuclear arsenal.

 

[white_pawn]

i agree with you, the only strategy of US is that no one accept them should have nuclear wepons because they know the day they have not nuclear weapon they will loose their "the so called command" on the world.

 

[pakomar]

US main objective from day one is to have total world domination .history speak for its self countries and nation who want to lead their life according to their culture are either already engages in war with us or in sanctions.

 

[AchtungSpitfire]

Obama is just throwing a bone to the Non-Proliferation nuts in his Admin because thats distinctly Democrat issue. In the end it's a whole lotta hot air.

 

[omerhhh]

If the U.S wants to have a nuclear free world they must first dispose of their own nukes before they tell anyone else to do it.No way pak will be the first to loose it's nukes.

 

[pakomar]

CAI is running Pakistan and playing game with Pakistani people lives. Who is aiding Taliban of Pakistan. Like osama bin laden work as an agent for US (he is still working) to bring Russia down now Taliban in Pakistan is working for US to take away Pakistan nuclear weapons.

 

[PeacefulIndian]

Never gonna happen till they specifically link CTBT to disarmament.

 

[Lockheed F-16]

It is a great joke. They want a nuclear free world and got the most nuclear bombs which they used agauinst civilians, they want to impose democracy all over the world and aren't a democracy theirself, they telll everybody about human rights and torture in the USA.....etc. List can go on endless

I wonder why the media takes the US serious in those matters, I think Obama wants to get the entertaining factor with bad jokes which Bush had.

 

[PeacefulIndian]

It is a great joke. They want a nuclear free world and got the most nuclear bombs which they used agauinst civilians, they want to impose democracy all over the world and aren't a democracy theirself, they telll everybody about human rights and torture in the USA.....etc. List can go on endless

I wonder why the media takes the US serious in those matters, I think Obama wants to get the entertaining factor with bad jokes which Bush had.

I think Obama is serious with his intent. But does not have a plan how to do it. He spoke of this even during election campaigns. But it is for sure, we need to have a nuclear free world in future. How distant future, I don't know. May be 100 - 150 more years? But good thing is that world leaders have at least started to think on it.

 

[pakomar]

I think Obama is serious with his intent. But does not have a plan how to do it. He spoke of this even during election campaigns. But it is for sure, we need to have a nuclear free world in future. How distant future, I don't know. May be 100 - 150 more years? But good thing is that world leaders have at least started to think on it.

First of all US serious on nuclear free world but they do not include US in the world. Why Obama is running his mouth when he can not fulfill his promise. No leaders in the world have to think on nuclear free world issue on one country has to think is US to stop invading countries. US is the only reason every country in the race to produce nuclear weapon.
Double standard of American government never in Obama speech they mansion Israel nukes.

 

[PeacefulIndian]

First of all US serious on nuclear free world but they do not include US in the world. Why Obama is running his mouth when he can not fulfill his promise. No leaders in the world have to think on nuclear free world issue on one country has to think is US to stop invading countries. US is the only reason every country in the race to produce nuclear weapon.
Double standard of American government never in Obama speech they mansion Israel nukes.

Well clearly, you can not tell one particular country to destroy its nuclear stockpile, to start nuclear disarmament. Look at the positive side of it. Nuclear free world is in everybody's interest. And world leaders like Obama have at least started thinking towards it. This is not question of US or China or India or Pakistan to get rid of the nukes. What we need is environment of global trust.


Slowly we will move ahead, and we will build plans of doing it. Yes the goal is tough, seems very distant. But it is important that we make our first move towards it. Hope it clears my point of view.

 

[TruthSeeker]

There can never be a nuclear free world as long as the world has human beings. Human beings have too many defects to just get along completely peacefully. Even if, someday, the world was governed by a single entity, and a single political and ethical culture, we would keep nuclear weapons in the off chance that aliens from outer space would arrive and we would need to nuke them. The presence of nuclear weapons is probably the single biggest reason that there has not been a "hot" world war in the past 60 years and the reason that powerful national governments are willing to forgo deadly biological and chemical weapons. The world needs nuclear weapons to keep hostilities among nations from getting even worse than they are now. And, I agree, that having nuclear weapons is a possible way for a nation to guarantee it's independence from foreign domination.

Obama's talk of a "nuclear free" world is just his usual cum ba ya talk to try to keep his adoring masses happy and enthralled with his magnificence.

And, by the way, factually, the Russia government has the largest number of operational nuclear weapons today.

 

[PeacefulIndian]

There can never be a nuclear free world as long as the world has human beings. Human beings have too many defects to just get along completely peacefully. Even if, someday, the world was governed by a single entity, and a single political and ethical culture, we would keep nuclear weapons in the off chance that aliens from outer space would arrive and we would need to nuke them. The presence of nuclear weapons is probably the sinle biggest reason that there has not been a "hot" world war in the past 60 years and the reason that powerful national governments are willing to forgo deadly biological and chemical weapons. The world needs nuclear weapons to keep hostilities among nations from getting even worse than they are now. And, I agree, that having nuclear weapons is a possible way for a nation to guarantee it's independence from foreign domination.

Obama's talk of a "nuclear free" world is just his usual cum ba ya talk to try to keep his adoring masses happy and enthralled with his magnificence.

And, by the way, factually, the Russia government has the largest number of operational nuclear weapons today.

Fair points...and we will need nukes when a large meteorite will come to destroy earth

 

[Lockheed F-16]

There can never be a nuclear free world as long as the world has human beings. Human beings have too many defects to just get along completely peacefully. Even if, someday, the world was governed by a single entity, and a single political and ethical culture, we would keep nuclear weapons in the off chance that aliens from outer space would arrive and we would need to nuke them. The presence of nuclear weapons is probably the single biggest reason that there has not been a "hot" world war in the past 60 years and the reason that powerful national governments are willing to forgo deadly biological and chemical weapons. The world needs nuclear weapons to keep hostilities among nations from getting even worse than they are now. And, I agree, that having nuclear weapons is a possible way for a nation to guarantee it's independence from foreign domination.

Obama's talk of a "nuclear free" world is just his usual cum ba ya talk to try to keep his adoring masses happy and enthralled with his magnificence.

And, by the way, factually, the Russia government has the largest number of operational nuclear weapons today.

I never thought I'd ever agree with you
Obama just keeps the masses on 180° and will do nothing for nuclear free world.

 

[pakomar]

Well clearly, you can not tell one particular country to destroy its nuclear stockpile, to start nuclear disarmament. Look at the positive side of it. Nuclear free world is in everybody's interest. And world leaders like Obama have at least started thinking towards it. This is not question of US or China or India or Pakistan to get rid of the nukes. What we need is environment of global trust.


Slowly we will move ahead, and we will build plans of doing it. Yes the goal is tough, seems very distant. But it is important that we make our first move towards it. Hope it clears my point of view.

What Obama and other leaders of America had to do is to stop threading other countries freedom and respect their cultures.
The reason behind Pakistan nuclear weapons is India simply because after 1971 what India did to Pakistan it has to defend its and self its freedom. That why nuclear weapons are developed.
Why Turkey is not so interested in nuclear weapon because it got no threads. Only those countries are interested in nuclear weapon are the enemy of American (simply because in past we all saw how US invades other countries freedom)