What's new

US Diplomacy in Pakistan - Fight against Terror - Who Got What

PakistanFront

BANNED

New Recruit

Joined
Jan 20, 2008
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
The two high profile US diplomats arrived in Islamabad couple of days before and they toured the whole country, meeting with almost ever single Leader of every single party which has seats in National Assembly or in any Provincial Assemblies or at least have potential of street protest. In this regard, this was one of the most unique visit of US diplomats in Pakistan. The purpose, as usual, was unclear but everybody knows what it was meant for. The diplomats had repeatedly tried to give decent justification of their visit, but the outcome of the visit proved that the concern were true.

Today, Mr. Zardari and one of the two US diplomats had held a press conference. In which, Mr. Zardari announced that the so-called war on terror will keep going and Pakistan will not withdraw from this war. If we analyse the visit of the US diplomats of Pakistan in the light of today's joint press conference of Mr. Zardari & Mr. Richard Boucher, we will clearly come to the end that why they were doing rocket tour of the country from MazaffarAbad to Gwadar and from Karachi to Torkhum. And also we will easily figure out what have they got for them.

After arrival in Pakistan, the two US diplomats had not spend a minute free and keep visiting almost all the prominent figures in the country. They visited Rawalpindi / Islamabad, Pashawar, Lahore, Karachi and met with President of Pakistan Gen (Ret) Pervaiz Musharraf, Prime Minister Gillani, Head of PPP Mr. Zardari, Bar Council President Aitazaz, suspended Chief Justice Iftikhar, Head of PML (N) Nawaz Shariff, Head of PML (Q) Ch. Shujaat, Head of ANP Mr. Wali, leaders from MQM, Moulana Fazal ur Rahman and many others.

And now departing with a simple joint press conference with Mr. Zardari, in which Mr. Zardari had finally given the policy statement of the current government that Pakistan will not take exit from the so called war on terror.

The question is why? Why the US diplomats felt it necessary to consult with the whole leadership of the country before Mr. Zardari could make this policy statement? Is this Mr. Zardari, who made this clear to US diplomats to obtain consensus from all parties on this issue before he make this policy statement? Is President Musharraf is still considering so-called war on terror is in Pakistan favour and he engaged US to get Pakistani leadership on board over this issue? What if before this visit, Mr. Zardari might have been announced party policy over this issue? Was there a risk of protest by opposition parties or from the nation?

One thing is clear that US had made sure that there will be no resistance, if Mr. Zardari announce his policy regarding so called war on terror. As many of the government benches occupiers were previously raising their voices against this so called war on terror and criticising the previous government and were demanding to stop exit this war. Now, when they are in government, they have concerns about the current opposition benches that they would be questioning them in the Parliament or in the streets.

But now, as we saw that immediately after the declaration of official policy of current government regarding so called war on terror, there would be no significant reaction from any big or small party. It would be interesting to analyse, how the US had made sure that no one will be speaking against this policy of the new government.

President Musharraf is heavily dependent over US support for his Presidency and also for his safety and he will never like to disagree with what the US wants to do in Pakistan. Especially, after he resigned from the Army. His powers decreased to the lowest level and the only weapon left in his hands is 58 2(B). However, it is very very unlikely that he would be using this power in his defence. As the new Army Chief clearly giving indications of military back off from civil and political battle fields, Mr. Musharraf would find him all alone if he ever tried to do so. Additionally, there is already an example of restoration of government by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the past. Probably, this is one of the reasons, why Mr. Nawaz Sheriff is demanding restoration of suspended judges. He is finely demonstration his learning experience and capabilities to apply it. Keeping this fact in mind, there is only hope left for him and that is US.

The new Prime Minister of Pakistan, Mr. Gillani is well known personality of PPP. He is not only polite and gentle and also very honest to and loyal to his party. Mr. Gillani would be doing everything exactly, he would be dictated to do so. As Mr. Gillani knows that he would be nothing without the support of his party, PPP. There will be no chance that he will be doing something without obtaining guidelines from the PPP, infect from Mr. Zardari. Meetings of US Diplomats with Mr. Gillani were merely a matter of formalities.

It is noted that US Diplomats met with Mr. Zardari for at least two times. In early meetings between them, my guess is that, they discussed the probabilities of Pakistan's future role under the new government and US Diplomats must had agreed the framework with him about how to obtain the consensus from all big and small parties, before Mr. Zardari announce Pakistan's continues support for so called war on terror.

One of the important meetings of US Diplomats was with Moulana Fazal ur Rahman. Who has very good political presence in bordering areas, where most of the Pakistani are getting murdered with US missiles. Though, Mr. Fazal ur Rahman had given a very good speech in the first session of Parliament. Where he said that the US has no right to declare every bearded person, a terrorist. But it seems that he is also half agreed over this issue. While keeping the current political situation in bordering areas, it is obvious that he must have advocated against this war on terror and also, must have demanded for solid proof before any aggression by US or Pakistani Military. Perhaps, he is trying to help himself understand that he cannot stop this war all alone.

The other big player is ANP, which has won good number of seats in Provincial and National Assembly and did a good come back. ANP had three main points in its agenda. 1. Change of name of NWFP province, 2. Calabash Dam, 3. ANP also opposed this so called war on terror, in which thousands of Pakhtoons are sacrificing their lives. Overall, ANP consider itself a Pakhtoon Voice.

PML (Q) had also been taken in confidence by US diplomats and made sure that they will not remembering the promises of the previous opposition and current rulers of the country, which they had committed on the issue of so called war on terror. While the PML (Q) had actively taken part in this fight, it would be always less unlikely that they will every give tough time to the current government over this issue.

Many others also taken into confidence. For example MQM. But many others had not been simply taken into confidence but they were approached to do certain arrangements for different parties, as the price that they will not opposing this so called war on terror. Such Aitazaz Ahsan, suspended Chief Justice Iftikhar etc.

The President of the Pakistan needs a surety that the old Judiciary, if restored, will not be taking revenge from him. Mr. Zardari has his own concerns regarding corruption cases in the higher courts against him. So both personality must had used their position to convince the US diplomats to do certain arrangements without they give green signal to the US diplomats. Similarly Bar Council President and suspended Chief Justice had their own initiatives, which must have been presented to them. This matter directly belongs to the judiciary, so I will not prefer to talk about it. Who knows... that I will be receiving a legal notice from restored judiciary???

If we try to summarize the outcome of recent visit of two US diplomats and try to explain that WHO GET WHAT?

US obtained surety from Pakistan that it will not withdraw from the so-called war on terror or at least will keep providing logistic support to the American forces. As without this, the American forces would be unable to survive in Afghanistan. While the President of Pakistan get assured by the US that he will not be touched by anybody including the current government and Mr. Nawaz Shariff and if he has to leave the country. The US would be giving him permanent visa. Thus another President of Pakistan would be leaving the country and spending rest of his life in other country. I do not when we will suitable enough for the retiring Presidents and Prime Ministers of our country to stay and live within Pakistan.

Nawaz Shariff might have given more than he took from the US Diplomats. Perhaps, he would be receiving his reward for his favour about war on terror in future. But Mr. Zardari needs something immediately. He wants stable government of PPP and he would be looking for more aid and financial support from the US government to help PPP government rule the country nicely. It is also very likely that Mr. Nawaz Shariff also looking for same reward from the US as he is also a partner of the current government. ANP would have been assured preferred treatment by the government. As they are very optimistic this time regarding their decades old demand of name change in NWFP. However, it is also very likely that Mr. Nawaz Shariff and Mr. Zardari would try to negotiate and get approval from ANP to build Kalabagh Dam. Moulana Fazl ur Rahman might be the biggest loser in this game. As the government finally announced its commitment with so called war on terror. However, he might be hopeful that the intensity of this war would decrease upto some acceptable level.

The biggest winner in this visit is, no doubt, USA who had finally managed that Pakistan will not be escaping from this so called war on terror and the biggest loser is the Pakistani nation, which will have to sacrifice more lives in this Anti-Islam war.
 
.
Pakistan or Pakistanis are loosers as per this article because none of the people who ruled or misruled Pakistan have ever been held accountable for their misdeeds and this includes Gen M.

Regards
 
. .
Plz do tell us your observations about this issue


Well friend please explain

1. Why was Daniel Pearls killer a UK citizen not deported after he was freed by the Indian's at Kandahar ?
2. Why did Nawaz fly to USA to meet Mr. Clinton at Gen M's request over Kargil ?
3. How did a civilian scientist AQK have access to PAF transport planes for his illegal trade ?
4. Why was Nawaz Sharif sent back from the airport and then a month later allowed back into the country ?
5. Who drafted the NRO ?
6. Has any independant audit been done on the funds recieved from overseas for the WOT ?
7. Etc, etc, etc...........................................

Please don't take it as a criticism but even Blair had to account for why we went to war in Iraq and he came out covered in slime. If it can happen in UK why not a third world country like Pakistan ?

I could go on but it would be futile.

Regards
 
.
Hi,

Why not pakistan---because pakistan has too many enemies waiting to exploit any kind and form of information. UK on the other hand does not have any natural enemies at this time and stage.

A Q Khan was a total dictator with dictatorial powers and all the resources of the nation were at his disposal with a snap of his fingers or just a nod of his head. There were no questions asked, as a matter of fact there dare not be any questions asked.

When you people discuss the power and authority of A Q Khan, just don't use your perspective and experience to judge him---his authority was way beyond an average person's imaginations. You guys talk about one C 130, A Q could have had a second one just for spare, if he thought it was neccessary.

Why should there be an independent audit regarding the funds for WOT.



" The biggest winner in this visit is, no doubt, USA who had finally managed that Pakistan will not be escaping from this so called war on terror and the biggest loser is the Pakistani nation, which will have to sacrifice more lives in this Anti-Islam war".

Pakistan is not the biggest loser yet---as a matter of fact it is the biggest winner out of this catastrophe---pakistanis didnot have any need to kill its own people---only if they had the common sense of killing the foreigners when they had the oppurtunity.

Pakistan had all kinds of money coming in since 9/11, the sanctions were lifted, the economy was booming, the world came to the resuce of kashmir, the millitary hardware is upgraded, from a position of despondency on 9/10/2001, we were on our way to recovery---so where does this pakistan biggest loser kind of stuff come into picture.
 
.
Hi,

Today's dawn---enjoy this article---wake up and smell the coffee pakistan.


‘Americans to attack Fata if Musharraf steps down’




By Ashraf Mumtaz

LAHORE, April 6: President Pervez Musharraf thinks that if he steps down as head of state the United States will go for direct military attacks on tribal areas and will also take away Dr A. Q. Khan for interrogation.

Official sources told Dawn on Sunday that the president was also of the view that Gwadar port project would be adversely affected if he left the scene and consequently the country’s time-tested relations with China could suffer a setback.

Similarly, the president believes that in his absence no leader or party will be able to maintain cordial relations with the Muttahida Qaumi Movement.

In view of the likely negative fallout, the sources said, the president had no intention to quit the post to which he had been elected for five years.

Moreover, they claimed the president’s decision to stay in office was more in the ‘national interests’ than in his own.

The sources said it was President Musharraf who was keeping the United States away from Dr Khan.

They said the US had been seeking access to the nuclear scientist for interrogation but it was the president who resisted all pressures and kept Dr Khan in a safe custody at home.

It was also because of Pesident Musharraf’s strong personal links with US President George Bush, the sources claimed, that the US was not attacking tribal areas. However, they said, the situation would change if the president resigned.

The sources said the US and many other countries were opposed to the deep-sea Gwadar port project and they did not like to see it functional mainly because of China’s role in the project.

President Musharraf, the sources claimed, was determined to get the project completed without any foreign interference. In case Pakistan gave in to foreign pressures, its relations with China would be adversely affected.

The sources said the MQM had brought about a positive change in its outlook and role in national issues because of the behind-the-scenes role played by President Musharraf.

It was because of the president’s influence that the MQM was supporting the PPP in Sindh, they said, adding that no party or leader would have such relations with the MQM as the president.

The sources also said the president had been keeping a low profile for a few weeks under advice from his friends in the establishment.

They claimed that political developments were taking place in accordance with the president’s calculations and nothing ‘unexpected’ had happened so far.

According to sources the ‘worst’ was over and the situation will soon take a favourable turn for the president.

“Thus, there is no possibility of the president stepping down the demands or the wishes of his adversaries notwithstanding.”
 
.
read Kamran Shafi's article in todays DAWN called the vultures are out
 
.
Well friend please explain

1. Why was Daniel Pearls killer a UK citizen not deported after he was freed by the Indian's at Kandahar ?
2. Why did Nawaz fly to USA to meet Mr. Clinton at Gen M's request over Kargil ?
3. How did a civilian scientist AQK have access to PAF transport planes for his illegal trade ?
4. Why was Nawaz Sharif sent back from the airport and then a month later allowed back into the country ?
5. Who drafted the NRO ?
6. Has any independant audit been done on the funds recieved from overseas for the WOT ?
7. Etc, etc, etc...........................................

Please don't take it as a criticism but even Blair had to account for why we went to war in Iraq and he came out covered in slime. If it can happen in UK why not a third world country like Pakistan ?

I could go on but it would be futile.

Regards
Here are the answers of your questions.
1. Why was Daniel Pearls killer a UK citizen not deported after he was freed by the Indian's at Kandahar ?

Daniel Pearl killer released by India ? in Kandaha?

Before I put up the answer, I believe that it would be a good idea if you briefly explain further, what you intend to ask.

2. Why did Nawaz fly to USA to meet Mr. Clinton at Gen M's request over Kargil ?

Infect, this has the same reasons. Un-ethical political involvment of US in Pakistan and then US desire to make India, a proxy state against China are the reasons of Nawaz visit to US.

And that is absolutely not on the request of Gen. Musharraf. This is something new, I heard. May be you have some supporting evidence or information about it. and you would like to put it up for us too.

3. How did a civilian scientist AQK have access to PAF transport planes for his illegal trade ?

Dr. AQ Khan not only had access to PAF transport planes, but he had access to everything he needs, including financial resources. He had been given what he demanded. All those financial resaurces had been used by him according to his own will.

Moreover, he was not simply a civilian scientist.

And what do you mean by illegal trade? As far as I can understand this. It seems to me like you saying that he did all that for money? Or maybe for religious purposes? If he did that for religious purposes, then he should not be helping Korea. Isn't it? The only reason left is for money. Which you intending to say. That he started illegal trade of Nuclear equipment for money.

While he had access PAF planes, he had access to unlimited funds etc etc. How much, do you believe, Iran and Libya could pay him?

4. Why was Nawaz Sharif sent back from the airport and then a month later allowed back into the country ?

Which event you are talking about. Please explain.

5. Who drafted the NRO ?

Again, what, you think, is wrong in or with NRO? Please tell us first than I will answre this question too.

6. Has any independant audit been done on the funds recieved from overseas for the WOT ?

Funds received for WOT were not funds received for NGOs. Those funds were not funds in a sense the word funds usually used in such situation. You are saying this like the funds were grants or aid or something like that. The money paid by US was also not bribe or loan or something like that.

First of all, all military expenses are recorded and analysed by the concerned military departments. And Pakistan is not obliged to let you guys know, where that money gone. The laws are there and followed strictly.

This is the cost of the so called WOT, which the US is told that it will have to pay. So they paying the cost. As this is not our war. This is the war of US against the poor and innocent Afghanis.

Af far as audit thing is concern. Again, the concerned military departments are responsible for this and doing their jobs good.

I hope, one day the british prime minister would also be telling its nation, why we are building nuclear sub marines, while we have no enemy country in 1000 miles radius.

Thanks

PF
 
.
Well friend please explain

1. Why was Daniel Pearls killer a UK citizen not deported after he was freed by the Indian's at Kandahar ?
2. Why did Nawaz fly to USA to meet Mr. Clinton at Gen M's request over Kargil ?
3. How did a civilian scientist AQK have access to PAF transport planes for his illegal trade ?
4. Why was Nawaz Sharif sent back from the airport and then a month later allowed back into the country ?
5. Who drafted the NRO ?
6. Has any independant audit been done on the funds recieved from overseas for the WOT ?
7. Etc, etc, etc...........................................

Please don't take it as a criticism but even Blair had to account for why we went to war in Iraq and he came out covered in slime. If it can happen in UK why not a third world country like Pakistan ?

I could go on but it would be futile.

Regards

Hi,

Why not pakistan---because pakistan has too many enemies waiting to exploit any kind and form of information. UK on the other hand does not have any natural enemies at this time and stage.

A Q Khan was a total dictator with dictatorial powers and all the resources of the nation were at his disposal with a snap of his fingers or just a nod of his head. There were no questions asked, as a matter of fact there dare not be any questions asked.

When you people discuss the power and authority of A Q Khan, just don't use your perspective and experience to judge him---his authority was way beyond an average person's imaginations. You guys talk about one C 130, A Q could have had a second one just for spare, if he thought it was neccessary.

Why should there be an independent audit regarding the funds for WOT.



" The biggest winner in this visit is, no doubt, USA who had finally managed that Pakistan will not be escaping from this so called war on terror and the biggest loser is the Pakistani nation, which will have to sacrifice more lives in this Anti-Islam war".

Pakistan is not the biggest loser yet---as a matter of fact it is the biggest winner out of this catastrophe---pakistanis didnot have any need to kill its own people---only if they had the common sense of killing the foreigners when they had the oppurtunity.

Pakistan had all kinds of money coming in since 9/11, the sanctions were lifted, the economy was booming, the world came to the resuce of kashmir, the millitary hardware is upgraded, from a position of despondency on 9/10/2001, we were on our way to recovery---so where does this pakistan biggest loser kind of stuff come into picture.

Well, my theory is that Dr. AQ Khan was not a dictator. Although, he enjoyed great authority. And this authority had been given to him according to the decesion of the governments and top military leadership. The reasons include to keep the nuclear program secret and allow him to interact DIRECTLY with his friends and companions outside country. So they also feel comfortable, while helping him.

Pakistan does not have to kill local or foriegn nationals. However, if someone violate the law, he will have to face the law. Either the police or the military would be responding to them. Simple as that.

and not all kind of money is coming from everywhere to Pakistan. Only the fresh foriegn investment and the money transfered by oversease Pakistani ar e two sources. However, the overseas Pakistani started sending more and more money back to Pakistan, simply because they were feeling less secure in their current countries of residence. Additionally, Pakistan's foriegn reserve increase is not merely because of these two reasons. Infect, reschedulling also helped less outflow of funds and the changed government policy to build up the foreign reserves for bad times are also two other major reasons.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom