What's new

US designates Pakistani madrassa as 'terror organisation'

it's rather foolish to think that counter-terrorism is something that is successful overnight....the Americans/NATO claim to have invaded Afghanistan in 2001 on the grounds of counter terrorism. To an extent, the coalition effort succeeded (if John McCain's words as well as suggestions by U.S. operations data are to be believed) vis-a-vis al qaeda.

the main issue has been to ensure that TTP, al qaeda and like-minded groups have no breathing room....they are more of a threat to Pakistan than anyone else - india included

quite frankly - any suggestion that al qaeda even had anything to do with 26/11 drama is beyond absurd -- and a white-wash. if anything, what indians should really be fixated on is why the government in india allowed it to drag on for so long...surely they werent as incompetent as outsiders would think to stop a few unruly kids with small arms

curiously - the Americans denied india unfettered access to David Headley, who was an informant for the US DEA even while he allegedly was scouting out targets in the heart of hindustan's financial capital --and that too despite desperate pleas from new delhi
 
.
The thought of good and bad terrorist is not feasible n practical in real life. there can not be be two sides of a terrorist good n bad
 
.
[Bregs];4668469 said:
The thought of good and bad terrorist is not feasible n practical in real life. there can not be be two sides of a terrorist good n bad

Like Once Dr. Zakir Naiq said, "It depends who you are, terrorist are just as per your perception." Police says Criminals are terrorist and criminal think Police is. It's just the path which one follows to determine who is wrong or right. And that is the only difference between Good Terrorist or Bad Terrorist.
 
.
Like Once Dr. Zakir Naiq said, "It depends who you are, terrorist are just as per your perception." Police says Criminals are terrorist and criminal think Police is. It's just the path which one follows to determine who is wrong or right. And that is the only difference between Good Terrorist or Bad Terrorist.

So are there some people in Pakistan who consider LeJ and TTP to be good ?
 
.
So are there some people in Pakistan who consider LeJ and TTP to be good ?

Ill take the liberty to answer it for him

LeT doesn't exist; TTP does have local sympathizers. Which is why the security forces are cognizant of the internal threat as well
 
.
Pakistan eyes US crackdown on TTP sanctuaries in Afghanistan

ISLAMABAD - Pakistan may seek severing of ties between Mullah Omar-led Afghan Taliban and the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and urge the United States to eliminate TTP sanctuaries across the border in Afghan provinces of Kunar and Nuristan, as it plays the role of facilitator for a peace dialogue between the two sides of the Afghan conflict. The Obama administration is eyeing 2014 for the withdrawal of US forces from the war-torn Afghanistan, but it also realises that without any understanding or a peace deal with the Taliban, it is a daunting task. Also, Washington sees the role of key facilitator by Pakistan as vital for the success of any peace dialogue with the Taliban insurgents. Currently, the proposed peace talks between the US and the Taliban and between Kabul and the Taliban are stalemated because of Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s opposition to the title of “Islamic Emirates of Afghanistan” and the “flag” that the Taliban used for their political office in Doha, Qatar, which was opened in June this year.

The Taliban office was shut down in July because of that row and since then, the US has been trying to establish contacts with the Taliban for peace dialogue and it is of strong desire that Pakistan uses its “good offices” for the purpose. Diplomatic sources privy to the renewed efforts for the start of peace talks between the US and Taliban said Pakistan could play its role for the commencement of US-Taliban peace talks for the sake of peace and stability in the neighbouring state of Afghanistan. “Pakistan could reach out to the Afghan Taliban seeking their willingness to re-engage with the US and Afghan authorities as part of its commitment to peace and stability in Afghanistan,” said a source seeking anonymity. However, he said Pakistan would also like to see the US and the Taliban trying to address Islamabad’s concerns as well. “Pakistani authorities could ask for severing of links between the Afghan Taliban and TTP, which is involved in gory acts of terror on Pakistani soil and that could weaken the capacity of TTP to carry out assaults in different parts of the country, including the border regions,” he said.

Moreover, he said Pakistan could also ask the US to eliminate the hideouts of TTP terrorists in Kunar and Nuristan provinces of Afghanistan. Another source said since the Doha peace process had been scuttled due to row over the Taliban office, Pakistan could help the US in the shifting of talks’ venue to some other Islamic country, such as Saudi Arabia or Turkey. He said the visit of Afghan President Hamid Karzai later this month to Islamabad was crucial and Pakistani authorities would discuss with the Afghan leader the Afghanistan reconciliation process, new possible venue for peace talks with the Taliban and all other related issues in detail. “For the success of Afghanistan reconciliation process it is vital that all Afghan groups are willing to talk to each other. Equally important are the talks between the US and the Taliban and Pakistan would like this whole process of reconciliation moving towards success,” he said.

Pakistan eyes US crackdown on TTP sanctuaries in Afghanistan | Pakistan Today | Latest news | Breaking news | Pakistan News | World news | Business | Sport and Multimedia
 
. .
The report clearly says that they recruit for Al Qaida, Taliban and LeT. So is this a good move or not?

You won't get a clear yes or no. It's the same old "good terrorist/bad terrorist syndrome".
 
.
lol US first learn School ka doosra naam he madarsa hey ***** kaheen kay hahahahha :omghaha:

PS: "WAR ON TERROR" terminology used by BUSH Govt after 9/11 Drama but since Obama's Govt in house, the term WOT is no longer officially used by US administration and why because it’s all about interests. One side US Govt used the word "Terrorst Organizations" for Al-Qaida and Taliban on the other side used and supporting Al-Qaida and similar organization’s against Libya Gadafi regime and also supporting similar groups in Syria. One side trying to talk with Talibans "Mullah Omar and Co" meanwhile pressurizing Pakistan Military not to collaborate with so called Talibans who are actually "FUNDED Terrorists Organizations" from Afghanistan who are working under our enemies umbrella.
 
. .
Ill take the liberty to answer it for him

LeT doesn't exist; TTP does have local sympathizers. Which is why the security forces are cognizant of the internal threat as well

I asked for LeJ.. I know the mode of denial Pakistanis switch to when the question of LeT comes up.. Its the same mode that used to be activated when there was talk about terrorism in Pakistan 10 years back.
 
.
So are there some people in Pakistan who consider LeJ and TTP to be good ?

Nope.... No one... other than who are part of ....

lol US first learn School ka doosra naam he madarsa hey ***** kaheen kay hahahahha :omghaha:

PS: "WAR ON TERROR" terminology used by BUSH Govt after 9/11 Drama but since Obama's Govt in house, the term WOT is no longer officially used by US administration and why because it’s all about interests. One side US Govt used the word "Terrorst Organizations" for Al-Qaida and Taliban on the other side used and supporting Al-Qaida and similar organization’s against Libya Gadafi regime and also supporting similar groups in Syria. One side trying to talk with Talibans "Mullah Omar and Co" meanwhile pressurizing Pakistan Military not to collaborate with so called Talibans who are actually "FUNDED Terrorists Organizations" from Afghanistan who are working under our enemies umbrella.

Once and ISI colnel (who was part of initial attack in matta, swat) said : USA is playing double game, on the one hand telling us to fight, while on the other hand they are providing weapons to militants.
 
.
lol US first learn School ka doosra naam he madarsa hey ***** kaheen kay hahahahha :omghaha:

PS: "WAR ON TERROR" terminology used by BUSH Govt after 9/11 Drama but since Obama's Govt in house, the term WOT is no longer officially used by US administration and why because it’s all about interests. One side US Govt used the word "Terrorst Organizations" for Al-Qaida and Taliban on the other side used and supporting Al-Qaida and similar organization’s against Libya Gadafi regime and also supporting similar groups in Syria. One side trying to talk with Talibans "Mullah Omar and Co" meanwhile pressurizing Pakistan Military not to collaborate with so called Talibans who are actually "FUNDED Terrorists Organizations" from Afghanistan who are working under our enemies umbrella.
tuhan ka dusara nam hi**** hai......are you going to accept this?.........nahi na
 
.
.
Nope.... No one... other than who are part of ....



Once and ISI colnel (who was part of initial attack in matta, swat) said : USA is playing double game, on the one hand telling us to fight, while on the other hand they are providing weapons to militants.

US will harm Pakistan & they are NOT a friend of Pakistan. They are trying their very best to harm Pakistan by playing double games & they can do it because Pakistan is still ruled by corrupt, incompetent & spineless politicians who don't know how to handle such situation & they are truly incompetent.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom