What's new

US data: 90% of captured 'Taliban' were civilians

wmdisinfo

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
Official US military data shows that almost 90 percent of the over 4,000 suspected “Taliban” captured by US forces in Afghanistan in the second half of 2010 were civilians who were released within days.


In December 2010, commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan General David Petraeus claimed in an interview that a total of 4,100 Taliban rank and file had been captured and 2,000 others had been killed in the space of six months.

The claim followed another set of misleading figures that had been released three months earlier and which said US Special Operations Forces had captured 1,355 rank and file Taliban militants, killed 1,031, while having killed or captured 365 middle or high-ranking Taliban members through May and July of the same year.

The figures were apparently released for media publicity and intended to restore US reputation over its losses in Afghanistan, IPS reported.

However, unclassified graphs by Task Force 435 -- the military command responsible for detainee affairs -- on Bagram airbase's monthly intake and release totals for 2010, shows that only 270 detainees were admitted to that facility during the 90-day period from May through July 2010.

The report indicates that even more detainees were released from the US detention facility at Bagram airbase, also known as the Detention Facility in Parwan, after their files were reviewed by a panel of military officers.

Although verification of the number of Taliban deaths claimed by the US is impossible, the number of detainees can be monitored, as detainees can only be held in a Forward Operating Base for 14 days before being released or sent to long-term detention.

The death toll of the US-led forces in 2010 stood at 711, making the year the deadliest on record for foreign forces in Afghanistan since 2001.

NATO has admitted that the power of militants in Afghanistan is on the rise despite the presence of nearly 150,000 US-led forces in the war-ravaged country.
press tv

SZH/MB/HRF/HGH/MMN
 
. .
If this is true then why Pakistan is not doing anything to save its nationals?
 
. .
corrupt leaders,

With such a blatant in your face type of corruption, you would think the people would have more leverage in making changes. I'd go with adept leaders who are corrupt yes but good at what they are doing to you guys and staying afloat this long.
 
.
With such a blatant in your face type of corruption, you would think the people would have more leverage in making changes. I'd go with adept leaders who are corrupt yes but good at what they are doing to you guys and staying afloat this long.

usa is backing zardari like mushraff or husni mubarak or some other leaders of the world.
 
.
usa is backing zardari like mushraff or husni mubarak or some other leaders of the world.

Alright, I think I can go with that. But then who's backing your military? Certainly not the USA would tell anyone to hide Osama. Then how could it be possible to have two conflicting powers within the same nation, if this is indeed what you are telling me.
 
.
Alright, I think I can go with that. But then who's backing your military? Certainly not the USA would tell anyone to hide Osama. Then how could it be possible to have two conflicting powers within the same nation, if this is indeed what you are telling me.

army has nothing to do with politics.
 
. .
Policies are made by the politicians even to be implemented within the military. And I know you are not seriously telling me that the "army" has nothing to do with politics. I wasn't born yesterday.

Kiyani does not interfere in politics,
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom