What's new

US court summons ISI chief in Mumbai terror case

Status
Not open for further replies.

Surrender2me

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 3, 2010
Messages
212
Reaction score
0
Washington: A U.S. court has issued summons to senior Inter-Services Intelligence officials including its powerful chief Maj. Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha, along with Mumbai attack masterminds and Lashkar-e-Taiba leaders Hafiz Saeed and Zakiur Rahman Lakhvi in response to a lawsuit filed by relatives of two American victims accusing them of providing material support for the 26/11 attacks.

US court summons ISI chief in Mumbai terror case

File photo of Pakistan's ISI chief Major Gen. Ahmad Shuja Pasha (right). A U.S. court has summoned ISI officials including Maj. Gen. Pasha and several LeT leaders in response to a lawsuit filed by relatives of two Americans killed during the 26/11 attacks. PTI

The 26-page lawsuit was filed before a New York Court on November 19 against the ISI and LeT by the relatives Rabbi Gavriel Noah Holtzberg and his wife Rivka, who were both gunned down by militants at the Chhabad House in Mumbai. Their son Moshe was saved by his Indian nanny.

The 26-page lawsuit accusing the ISI of aiding and abetting the LeT in the killing of more than 160 people was filed before a New York Court on November 19, following which the Brooklyn court issued summons to Major Samir Ali, Azam Cheema, the ISI, Major Iqbal, Lakhvi, LeT, Sajid Majid, Mr. Pasha, Saeed and Nadeem Taj.

"The ISI has long nurtured and used international terrorist groups, including the LeT, to accomplish its goals and has provided material support to the LeT and other international terrorist groups," said the lawsuit filed by relatives of the slain Rabbi.

Mr. Pasha, who has been director general of the ISI since September 2008, has been summoned, so is Nadeem Taj, the director general of ISI from September 2007 to September 2008.

US court summons ISI chief in Mumbai terror case

The 26-page lawsuit was filed before a New York Court on November 19 against the ISI and LeT by the relatives Rabbi Gavriel Noah Holtzberg and his wife Rivka, who were both gunned down by militants at the Chhabad House in Mumbai.

Major Iqbal and Major Samir Ali are other ISI officers who have been issued summons.

The one of its kind lawsuit also brings as defendants Lashkar operatives like operations commander Lakhvi, JuD chief Saeed, and Azam Cheema.

"The Mumbai terrorist attack was planned, trained for and carried out by members of defendant, the LeT. Defendant ISI provided critical planning, material support, control and coordination of the attacks," the lawsuit alleges.

It accuses ISI officers Mr. Pasha, Mr. Taj, Maj. Iqbal and Major Ali of being purposefully engaged in the direct provision of material support or resources including weapons and explosives.

"On and prior to November 26, 2008, the ISI, Pasha, Taj, Iqbal and Ali (as well as other officials, agents and employees of the ISI) directed, engaged and/or relied upon the efforts of U.S.-based individuals, including but not limited to David Headley and Tahawwur Rana, for raising funds, building a network of connections, recruiting participants and planning the operation of the Mumbai terror attack," the lawsuit claims.

US court summons ISI chief in Mumbai terror case

Prior to and following each trip to Mumbai, Headley reported to and received further instructions from both the LeT, including defendants Majid and Maj. Iqbal, and the ISI, it alleges.

Noting that the LeT still operates training camps in Pakistan, Kashmir and Afghanistan, the petition said the group has openly advocated violence against India, Israel and the United States.

It names Muridke, Manshera and Muzaffarabad as centres of training camps operated by the LeT.

The 10 LeT members who undertook the on-the-ground Mumbai terrorist attack underwent extensive training in the LeT camps in Pakistan, the lawsuit alleged.

It also says that Pakistani American LeT operative David Headley, who has already pleaded guilty for his role in the plotting of the attack, built a network of connections from Chicago to Pakistan, undertaking these efforts at the direction and with the material support of both LeT and the ISI.

Prior to and following each trip to Mumbai, Headley reported to and received further instructions from both the LeT, including defendants Majid and Maj. Iqbal, and the ISI, it alleges.

"In September 2008, the 10 LeT attackers were moved to Karachi and installed in an ISI/LeT safe house and isolated from outside contact," it said, adding that while staying in the Karachi safe house, they received specific instructions on Mumbai targets.

US court summons ISI chief in Mumbai terror case

“In September 2008, the 10 LeT attackers were moved to Karachi and installed in an ISI/LeT safe house and isolated from outside contact,” it said, adding that while staying in the Karachi safe house, they received specific instructions on Mumbai targets.

The safe house was part of the ISI's "Karachi Project," an initiative by which anti-Indian groups were tasked and supported by the ISI in a surreptitious fashion to engage in acts of international terrorism.

"During the period Headley communicated with and took directions from the ISI regarding the Mumbai plot, defendant Taj, as ISI's Director-General, exerted full command and control over the ISI.

"During the final two months of training of the LeT attackers and throughout the attack, defendant Pasha exerted full command and control over the ISI," it alleged.

During the Mumbai attacks, the lawsuit alleges defendant Majid along with other LeT men operated from a mission control room in Karachi, passing instructions and encouragement to the attackers via telephone.

"By reason of the foregoing, LeT, Saeed, Lakhvi, Cheema and Majid are each liable to each plaintiff, individually and as the personal representative and/or surviving family member of their decedents, for compensatory damages in excess of $75,000, such amount to be determined by a jury," it said.


US court summons ISI chief in Mumbai terror case -  International News ? News ? MSN India
 
. .
But i think pakistan won't allow ISI chief to be prosecuted by US court..
 
. .
American Court Case Against LeT, ISI For Mumbai Terror Massacre

What is interesting here is the case's representative Mr. James Kreindler.

The case, first of its kind accusing the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) of aiding and abetting Lashkar-e Tayyiba (LeT) in the slaughter of 166 people and the wounding hundreds, is represented by James Kreindler whose law firm successfully sued Libya for billions of dollars on behalf of the 259 passengers blown out of the sky over Lockerbie, Scotland, by a bomb on Pan Am flight 103, and there were 11 people killed on the ground.

Lawyer Kreindler, said the suit may not be politically popular.

“Obviously, Pakistan is an ally of the U.S. in the war in Afghanistan and our efforts to fight Al Qaeda,” Kreindler said.

“We know, however, that I.S.I. has straddled some fences and while Pakistan is certainly cooperating with us, the I.S.I. has used LeT for its own purposes,” he added.

Another attorney, on condition of anonymity told AHN, “The problem is the US has not declared Pakistan or the ISI as a state sponsor of terrorism. So it may be hard to maintain this lawsuit in the US, unless it is converted against individuals who are employed by the ISI.”

“If that happens, it is possible to maintain the suit. The lawyer suing is the same lawyer who had sued the Libya government; so I am sure he knows what to do,” the lawyer added.

More on James P. Kreindler
 
.
This shows how others countries are join against Pakistan which from there heart don't like it. To call ISI cheif which don't have even link to those terrorist who attacked in Mumbai, secondly its calling US court not Indian court.
Any sane person can make idea how those peoples are from there heart want to give a bad name to Pakistan.
 
. . . .
My fingers are crossed. :smitten:

The US court will get a middle finger from Pakistan. If they want to impose sanctions, go right ahead!!!!! Our DG-ISI is not sitting around to respond to every Tom, Dick and Harry's gripe or agenda against Pakistan.

I suspect they will try to freeze some assets to pay for damages if the GoP and ISI tell them to buzz off. The goal of the litigation is just that. Get some $ for damages.
 
. .
This shows how others countries are join against Pakistan which from there heart don't like it. To call ISI cheif which don't have even link to those terrorist who attacked in Mumbai, secondly its calling US court not Indian court.
Any sane person can make idea how those peoples are from there heart want to give a bad name to Pakistan.
Without any evidence or suspicion a court will not summon a person..
Do u think they have summoned to have a party?:what:
 
.
much like they summoned the Saudi intelligence and royal family..had a lot of success with that..yeah right..its all about the money and get rich quick mentality. ISI has much important things to do than attend or respond to a silly law suit.
 
.
The US court will get a middle finger from Pakistan. If they want to impose sanctions, go right ahead!!!!!

So much hubris?

Keeping aside the fact that the US court will most probably not take any solid action, let me ask you one simple hypothetical question.

Do you think that at this point of time, Pakistan can afford any kind of sanctions put on it by the US or the international community?
 
.
Nobody gives a hoot for what US courts are asking, they can take their ruling up their *****s!

I think that if the US courts, hypothetically award damages to the plantiff, to be paid by ISI/Pakistan, then in the case of non payment, the courts have the rights to freeze the assets of the defendent (Pakistan/ISI in this case) if any in the US jurisdiction and use them to award the damages to the plantiffs
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom