What's new

US backs India on UNSC seat despite Syria vote

Vibs

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
1,535
Reaction score
0
The United States continues to support a UN Security Council seat for India even as it's in touch with Indian officials on the situation in Syria, according to a US official. "It remains our position that we support a UN Security Council seat for India," State Department spokesperson


Victoria Nuland told reporters on Tuesday when asked if the US still supported backed New Delhi even after it abstained from a UN Human Rights Council vote on Syria.
"I'm not going to speak to the Indian decision," she said. "I think the fact that the resolution was so strong and it was so strongly supported, including in the neighbourhood, speaks volumes about the fact that this guy (Syrian President Bashar al Assad) has been conducting revolting brutality against his own people, and even the neighbourhood's patience is growing thin with him."

Asked if it was an issue of concern for the US that a democratic country like India is not siding with Washington on the issue of Syria, Nuland said: "We continue to talk to India about what we are seeing in Syria."

Assistant Secretary of State Robert Blake "has been in contact with some of his counterparts there and we'll continue to have that conversation going forward," she said.

Asked if Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had spoken to Indian External Affairs minister S M Krishna in the recent past, she said: "She has not. Some of her deputies have been in contact. I'm not going to get into who and where and what."

In response to another question about US stand on ongoing anti-corruption movement in India, the spokesperson repeated, "We are confident that India is going to be able to address its current political disputes, its internal issues, through its own democratic system. We support peaceful protest. India has a strong, vibrant democracy, and that's where we stand."
US still backs India on UNSC seat despite Syria vote - Hindustan Times
 
.
Can someone tell me what is there to be done now to get into the security council. If I'm not wrong, all the 5 members of SC have supported India.

Is someone aware about the process. I'm sure we have to get the support from other members also, but is someone aware about the majority required?
thanks.
 
. .
Can someone tell me what is there to be done now to get into the security council. If I'm not wrong, all the 5 members of SC have supported India.

Is someone aware about the process. I'm sure we have to get the support from other members also, but is someone aware about the majority required?
thanks.

We need all 5 permanent members to vote for it. When it comes to voting, China has indicated it might back out in order to maintain good diplomatic relations with Pakistan.
 
.
We need all 5 permanent members to vote for it. When it comes to voting, China has indicated it might back out in order to maintain good diplomatic relations with Pakistan.

Haven't China also supported it? Did I miss when they indicated of backing out?

Do we need just 5 permanent members? I mean, don't we have to ask other members?
 
.
Haven't China also supported it? Did I miss when they indicated of backing out?

Do we need just 5 permanent members? I mean, don't we have to ask other members?

There's a different between supporting and then actually voting for it. The 5 permanent members have veto powers. It doesn't matter if 99% of the assembly votes in favor. If even 1 member with veto power votes against it, it won't happen.
 
.
Its not a permanent seat. It's not with veto powers

---------- Post added at 02:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:08 PM ----------

Haven't China also supported it? Did I miss when they indicated of backing out?

Do we need just 5 permanent members? I mean, don't we have to ask other members?

US will not vote for India to have permanent membership with veto powers.
 
.
China showed interest to support India for Communist Party of India (Marxist) so don't ignore it, second bypass Pakistan's interests couldn't be possible and China will not go against its important ally in south Asia.
 
.
Its not a permanent seat. It's not with veto powers

---------- Post added at 02:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:08 PM ----------



US will not vote for India to have permanent membership with veto powers.

India is already a member of UNSC.
 
. .
London has riots, France has a lot of riots, China kills a lot of people and have a strict police force.

Maybe we should kick out UK, China and France out of UNSC and replace them with perfect Pakistan instead. :woot:

Your list missed India who killed countless Sikhs (Golden Temple) and Muslims (Kashmir and Gujarat)
 
.
Your list missed India who killed countless Sikhs (Golden Temple) and Muslims (Kashmir and Gujarat)

USA killed a lot of blacks. Lets kick them out. lol

Btw it was Sikh terrorists killed, not Sikhs.
 
.
USA killed a lot of blacks. Lets kick them out. lol

Btw it was Sikh terrorists killed, not Sikhs.

The riots after Indira's death saw thousands of innocent sikhs being killed. Justice is yet pending. Shameful but true. If one does not see anything wrong in it, he or she should not consider themselves humans.

Having said that Pakistan ridiculing Indian about communal violence is the pinnacle of hypocrisy.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom