david blain
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2012
- Messages
- 214
- Reaction score
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you forget here you are dealing with a super power USA . also NATO of 34 countries . pakistan is not on that seat as china is .they are our largest trade partners arms suppliers donors and supporters in world . we have no oil like iran or less population like NK . we are not in great position now even in economics . today they said sorry accept it otherwise you have to say sorry when we will have no money and go to IMF -WB then we will do it with their terms . first make a strong economical country make good gov and better country with good voice in world politics then say whatever my brother its not good time for pak already . god know what they agreed on money TTP BLA and others its just secrets between kiyani and john .
[:::~Spartacus~:::];3139711 said:if we are dealing even with super power, does it mean it has license to kill our citizens, violate our border, and kill our soldiers?
It appears we need more security from your gunships than those insurgents.I think Pakistan army should deploy its Ah-1z cobra helicopters to escort US tankers, in order to prevent it from attack from insurgents.
petty indians as expected discussing the definition of word sorry-
shame on those miserable creatures-
open a dictionary for a change losers--
wrong news!
Why say sorry over a Telephonic conversation? Why there isn't any official Pentagon statement issued with a 'formal apology'?
This looks like a 'fake' apology just to give an excuse and open supply lines by the more money monger PPP.
Pakistan, stung by the suspension of American military assistance last year, at first demanded a fee of $5,000 for each truck that crossed its territory from the port in Karachi to Afghanistan. Before the November attack, NATO had paid $250. Pakistan later reduced that demand to about $3,000 a truck; the United States had offered $1,000 per vehicle.
In the end, however, American officials said Pakistan agreed to keep the fee at $250 a truck. In return, the United States is expected to reimburse Pakistani up to $1 billion for costs incurred by some 150,000 Pakistani troops carrying out counterinsurgency operations along the border with Afghanistan, the officials said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/04/w...-routes-to-nato-after-us-apology.html?_r=2&hp
I think you need to do that mate.. There is a difference between
I am Sorry for You
and
I am Sorry to you..
But hey, believe that you got your apology if thats what you want..
Pakistan will continue not to charge any transit fee in the larger interest of peace and security in Afghanistan and the region. This is a tangible demonstration of Pakistan's support for a secure, peaceful, and prosperous Afghanistan and our shared objectives in the region.three things are to be cleared:
1st, why did the Pakistan's rulers accepted to have just $250 fee while US was once agreed for $1000 per vehicle? what type of 'sorry' is this, which has resulted in so serious loss? why didnt the pakistani rulers cleared that 'sorry' is OK but why dont you want to pay even as much as you was agreed once, the $1000?