What's new

Urge Chinese to eat less meat to 'change the world'? Stop passing the buck

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
Urge Chinese to eat less meat to 'change the world'? Stop passing the buck

Feb 04, 2021, 09:01 ET

BEIJING, Feb. 4, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- A news report by China.org.cn on meat consumption and environmental issues:
TIME magazine recently published an article titled "How China could change the world by taking meat off the menu."


It gives an overview of the development of plant-based meat in China. Seemingly objective, the author linked China'smeat consumption with global environmental issues between the lines, implying that China should and can put its weight behind the plant-based meat industry and cut meat consumption.

However, the author deliberately ignores an important fact: per capita consumption of meat in China is well below levels seen in Europe and America.

In light of eating habits and spending power, people in China don't eat meat every day or every single meal, compared with European and American countries where meat consumption has a larger place in culture and tradition. OECD data shows that in 2014, the three countries with the highest per capita meat consumption were Australia (90.3kg), the United States (90.1kg), and Argentina (86.6kg), while the average consumption in the EU countries is 64.9kg. In light of these figures, China's per capita meat consumption of 49.8kg ranks behind many Western countries.

In recent years, some Western media have tended to play up China's meat consumption. TIME's article is nothing new. In 2016, the Washington Post reported on the updated set of dietary guidelines released by the Chinese government, but its focus was on how the new recommendations had the potential to reduce China's meat consumption, or at least slow its growth, which in turn it said would help put a substantial dent in global greenhouse gas emissions. In 2018, the Atlantic published a piece with the headline "China's love for meat is threatening its green movement," while in 2019, an article from the Economist stated that "The planet needs China to curb its appetite for meat."

These articles sensationalized beliefs around the ideas that "China's meat consumption is high" and "China could change the world by eating less meat." They maintained that China should take a large portion of responsibility for environmental issues and accused China of being the "biggest environmental destroyer," trying to pass the buck on how their own practices affect the environment.

China has always advocated and taken action in trying to solve environmental problems in different ways. For example, China has promoted frugality nationwide and launched campaigns to curb food waste, which effectively reduces energy consumption, including those related to meat. China's total installed capacity for renewable energy currently accounts for 30% of the entire world's volume and the proof of its afforestation efforts and making the country greener are for all to see. In 2019, China's carbon emission intensity dropped by 48.1% compared with 2005 and achieved its 2020 emission reduction targets ahead of schedule. After the United States withdrew from the Paris Agreement, Chinaonce again made a new emission reduction commitment. It can be said that China has tangible evidence of its contributions to addressing climate change.

Environmental issues should be taken seriously by all humanity, but paying more attention to the issue doesn't mean asking any country to simply "eat less meat." It's better to unite and do one's part, rather than shifting responsibility onto others. Saving the planet is not the responsibility of China alone. To change the world requires the joint efforts of the whole world.

 
. .
Western media and NGO use propaganda to encourage Chinese people to eat less meat, so that people in Western countries can eat more meat.
Western media encourage Chinese people to live an environmentally friendly life so that they can live a life that is not environmentally friendly.
 
.
If 30 or 50 million Chinese were nice enough to move to Canada and raise animals then there would be more meat for China. :-)
 
. .
Nah, Canadian can raise animals and ship them to China. And don't forget the good quality check.

I was just speaking of feeding 30-50 million meat eating Chinese (that is about how many of you we could try to keep alive). Barriers to trade are going up. Financial system is dying. Food trade will be in decline not increasing.

Not our fishing fleets that are cleansing the oceans of life. Not Canada that is desperately building huge water diversion channels. Not Canada that is preparing to fight a water war.
 
.
I was just speaking of feeding 30-50 million meat eating Chinese (that is about how many of you we could try to keep alive). Barriers to trade are going up. Financial system is dying. Food trade will be in decline not increasing.

Not our fishing fleets that are cleansing the oceans of life. Not Canada that is desperately building huge water diversion channels. Not Canada that is preparing to fight a water war.
SILLY, Canada don't have to do all of the above.
They are SMART, rather modus operandi of the FIVE EYES NATIONS.
ROB THE RESOUCE RICH LAND and GENOCIDE THE NATIVES.

Now they have VAST AMOUNT OF SEA to fish.
Now they have VAST AMOUNT OF LAND to grow food, livestock and mine minerals, gas and oil.
No need for water war as the LAND ROBBERS now have VAST AMOUNT OF WATER SUPPLIES.
.
 
.
ROB THE RESOUCE RICH LAND and GENOCIDE THE NATIVES.

You mean like was done by the debt loving hot potato with money playing people of Singapore to the Orang Asli? Those waters and lands team with life. Easy to take them and have a bounty.
Non violent non thieving peoples forced out go to the unwanted lands and create life not just a pile of concrete/steel buildings and debt used to cheat their people and neighbors.
 
.
You mean like was done by the debt loving hot potato with money playing people of Singapore to the Orang Asli? Those waters and lands team with life. Easy to take them and have a bounty.
Non violent non thieving peoples forced out go to the unwanted lands and create life not just a pile of concrete/steel buildings and debt used to cheat their people and neighbors.
Singapore was a thriving island before the FAKE DISCOVERER, Sir Stamford Raffles who purported to have discovered Singapore.
The Stamford Raffles from the LAND ROBBING GENOCIDAL EMPIRE.

A thriving Singapore - even before Stamford Raffles
07 Nov 2020
We've been taught( "Edit:BRAINWASHED" ) that Sir Stamford Raffles founded Singapore in 1819. But what was life in Singapore like before the colonial era?
.
 
.
Singapore was a thriving island before the FAKE DISCOVERER, Sir Stamford Raffles who purported to have discovered Singapore.
The Stamford Raffles from the LAND ROBBING GENOCIDAL EMPIRE.

A thriving Singapore - even before Stamford Raffles
07 Nov 2020
We've been taught( "Edit:BRAINWASHED" ) that Sir Stamford Raffles founded Singapore in 1819. But what was life in Singapore like before the colonial era?
.

we are off topic so I will stop replying and give you the last word.

Actually I was pointing at anybody in Malaysia and Singapore who isn't an Orang Asli. Similar to what is done towards people in Canada. The double standard. LOTS of indigenous tribes in Asia. The climate and land in SE Asia is MUCH better. Want to trade North America for Asia? I will throw in some beads, a tea pot and a faux fur hat. Sorry no muskets. You have no water and we are supposedly just parasitic takers. So wanna trade?
 
.
we are off topic so I will stop replying and give you the last word.

Actually I was pointing at anybody in Malaysia and Singapore who isn't an Orang Asli. Similar to what is done towards people in Canada. The double standard. LOTS of indigenous tribes in Asia. The climate and land in SE Asia is MUCH better. Want to trade North America for Asia? I will throw in some beads, a tea pot and a faux fur hat. Sorry no muskets. You have no water and we are supposedly just parasitic takers. So wanna trade?
Big difference between us and the ROBBER GENOCIDAL CRIMINAL IMPERIALISTS.
We are later immigrants, nothing to do with whatever injustices done to the Orang Asli centuries ago.
Here to help develop the island and enrich the lives of the natives with our technical skills.

NOT GENOCIDE THE NATIVES and claim the land for ourselves.
Thanks for letting me have the last word.
.
 
.
Chinese with more meat will probably be able to grow MUCH larger. We can see the Chinese have what appears to be a LARGE head. Truth is the Chinese have bodies that are small compared to their LARGE head.

A person's head does most of it's growing in the first few years of life. difficult to manipulate a persons head size.
A person's body does most of it's growing over 15-20 years. Lots of time to manipulate the body size.

It is the size of the head that tells us how large a person should be. HUGE head should = HUGE GIANT body. Small head should = small elf or goblin body.

Chinese undoubtedly enjoy meat and with increased meat consumption we will see young Chinese grow to sizes that once again match their LARGE head. Chinese GIANTS.

Must wonder if the Mongol hordes rode small horses or if the Mongols were giants and made the horses look small.

look at your own head. What people are you?
 
Last edited:
.
Chinese with more meat will probably be able to grow MUCH larger. We can see the Chinese have what appears to be a LARGE head. Truth is the Chinese have bodies that are small compared to their LARGE head.

A person's head does most of it's growing in the first few years of life. difficult to manipulate a persons head size.
A person's body does most of it's growing over 15-20 years. Lots of time to manipulate the body size.

It is the size of the head that tells us how large a person should be. HUGE head should = HUGE GIANT body. Small head should = small elf or goblin body.

Chinese undoubtedly enjoy meat and with increased meat consumption we will see young Chinese grow to sizes that once again match their LARGE head. Chinese GIANTS.

Must wonder if the Mongol hordes rode small horses or if the Mongols were giants and made the horses look small.

look at your own head. What people are you?
Not smart to indulge in eating more meat than necessary for normal requirements in view of our increasingly overpopulated planet.
Eat chicken only where possible and avoid large carbon footprint meat like lamb and beef.
The world should thank China for its MASSIVE SACRIFICE in imposing the draconian one-child policy on its population that have helped ease the world's food crunch.

I am all for Big head with big brains rather than big body with TINY BRAIN.

Frankly I don't see much benefit of being taller and bigger, except during my younger days.
Being bigger means having to eat more contaminated food and have more walking problems in my old age, in addition to giving the petite hospital nurses heavy work.
Now I somewhat envy those short types going for a run while I struggle with walking sticks.
.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom