Update of FATF Meeting: Outcomes FATF Plenary, 21-23 February 2018

[CriticalThinker02]

you can contact them here and ask yourself.
View attachment 455709
NO need to say thanks.
But to make you save your time, in summer coz they hve given pak 3 months to come up with a plan and if pak has a plan then will be named in grey list and if they don't have a plan they will be added in black list. Also FTFA meets only 3 times in year and summer time happens to be the 2nd time.

Where is the official FATF source where it says that it has given Pakistan 3 months to come up with a plan and if Pakistan doesn't than it will be placed on the black list, show me the official FATF source not some news articles and hogwash twitter comments, stop trolling indian.

 

[Chaosmaster]

You can give what you want, it doesn't me it's true.
Where's your evidence about China?
Oh and you're so cute about the whole deeper than the oceans thing.

That's alright, like I said you don't have to believe it.
here is the article, its your choice if you don't wanna believe it.
https://theprint.in/2018/02/23/pakistan-fatfs-grey-list-india-convinced-china-pak-shot-foot/
Cmon sir, don't call me cute, I'm just reiterating a terms someone else came up with.

See, erstwhile PM Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani should be called cute.

 

[waz]

Fine. Lets not fight, i put my understanding in the quote above. Lets wait to see how it all folds in a few hours when we'll have a clearer picture. Obviously we both are seeing what we want to see at this time.

Yes that's all I am saying.

 

[ziaulislam]

That's alright, like I said you don't have to believe it.
here is the article, its your choice if you don't wanna believe it.
https://theprint.in/2018/02/23/pakistan-fatfs-grey-list-india-convinced-china-pak-shot-foot/
Cmon sir, don't call me cute, I'm just reiterating a terms someone else came up with. View attachment 455710
See, erstwhile PM Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani should be called cute.

you do realize that this is not the offical link right...so why bother to reply

 

[Peshwa]

Journalists can go wrong with major headlines , how long have you been around for? No one knows the "proceeds. of the meeting" because it is kept secret as per the FATF themselves.....
My country's publications, what are you going to quote The Times/Guardian/Telegraph to me? Pakistani journalism is terrible.

Yes they can, for that matter anyone can. It’s only human.

But a reputable newspaper, the likes of NY times and WSJ do not just allow journalists to post willy nilly.
There is a process of vetting the sources, editorial screening etc before the news is even published.

Not saying that mistakes don’t happen, but with reputable sources, the chances are greatly reduced.

 

[Chaosmaster]

Where is the official FATF source where it says that it has given Pakistan 3 months to come up with a plane and if Pakistan doesn't than it will be placed on the black list, show me the official FATF source not some news articles and hogwash twitter comments, stop trolling indian.

Like I have said, you can choose to not believe them. But let me remind you that trolling is done without any source or sources from hogwash companies. That's not what I am doing.
Thank you.

 

[ziaulislam]

PS:
pakistan is clearly a worse place for money laundering we know about ayan and all other cases, so we do deserve to be on list just like srilanka is lol

 

[RIP Pak LAW]

This is actually major diplomatic victory for Pakistan when US was bend on putting Pakistan on the list yet we escaped and the confidence which Khawaja Asif depicted 2 days back, clearly shows that we won't be put into the list in June as well since we have already amended strict law as per FATF requirement. Major major slap on Indian media.

 

[karakoram]

That's alright, like I said you don't have to believe it.
here is the article, its your choice if you don't wanna believe it.
https://theprint.in/2018/02/23/pakistan-fatfs-grey-list-india-convinced-china-pak-shot-foot/
Cmon sir, don't call me cute, I'm just reiterating a terms someone else came up with. View attachment 455710
See, erstwhile PM Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani should be called cute.

So the source is indian

 

[waz]

That's alright, like I said you don't have to believe it.
here is the article, its your choice if you don't wanna believe it.
https://theprint.in/2018/02/23/pakistan-fatfs-grey-list-india-convinced-china-pak-shot-foot/
Cmon sir, don't call me cute, I'm just reiterating a terms someone else came up with. View attachment 455710
See, erstwhile PM Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani should be called cute.

Now you're changing the topic. Gilani is no benchmark for me so why on earth are you quoting him to me? I won't even go into the embarrassing quotes many your Indian counterparts say about their mythical friendship with Israel.
Stick to the topic, and no Gilani isn't cute. He doesn't use the lowest form of wit (sarcasm) like you do.

Yes they can, for that matter anyone can. It’s only human.

But a reputable newspaper, the likes of NY times and WSJ do not just allow journalists to post willy nilly.
There is a process of vetting the sources, editorial screening etc before the news is even published.

Not saying that mistakes don’t happen, but with reputable sources, the chances are greatly reduced.

I've seen it with major papers, the WSJ is no different. I'm sorry if you folks just accept it all hook, line and sinker I don't.

 

[protest]

Yes they can, for that matter anyone can. It’s only human.

But a reputable newspaper, the likes of NY times and WSJ do not just allow journalists to post willy nilly.
There is a process of vetting the sources, editorial screening etc before the news is even published.

Not saying that mistakes don’t happen, but with reputable sources, the chances are greatly reduced.

Well, may be they do so to malign Pakistan at global level per @waz. But there's no harm to wait before we pull the trigger at each other.

 

[Chhatrapati]

The anticipation on both sides look like this is a wc final.

Stick to the topic

Don't ban me, just passing by.

 

[Chaosmaster]

Now you're changing the topic. Gilani is no benchmark for me so why on earth are you quoting him to me? I won't even go into the embarrassing quotes many your Indian counterparts say about their mythical friendship with Israel.
Stick to the topic, and no Gilani isn't cute. He doesn't use the lowest form of wit (sarcasm) like you do.



I've seen it with major papers, the WSJ is no different. I'm sorry if you folks just accept it all hook, line and sinker I don't.

I am not trying to change the topic, I was very much on topic, yeah I agree I used the tagline of pak-china relations, but I didn't bring in the cute. Besides I did support my arguments about the results of meeting with links.
Anyways I agree with the discussion u had with protest that we are just seeing what we both want to since there hasn't been official announcement by FTAF. So lets wait till June or few hours whichever makes the issue clear.
Cheers.

 

[BHarwana]

Pakistan not on FATF grey-list


10 hours ago BY Staff Report

• FATF spokesperson says organisation not responsible for media reports pertaining to Pakistan’s inclusion to the list
• List includes Ethiopia, Iraq, Serbia, Sri Lanka, Syria, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Vanuatu and Yemen.

https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2018/02/23/pakistan-not-on-fatf-grey-list/

 

[waz]

I am not trying to change the topic, I was very much on topic, yeah I agree I used the tagline of pak-china relations, but I didn't bring in the cute. Besides I did support my arguments about the results of meeting with links.
Anyways I agree with the discussion u had with protest that we are just seeing what we both want to since there hasn't been official announcement by FTAF. So lets wait till June or few hours whichever makes the issue clear.
Cheers.

Now you're stretching it a bit, there was nothing about China from me or anyone else.
But anyway like you said, let's just see what the FTAF say.