What's new

U.S. Democrats withdraw $25B offer to fund Trump's border wall

Zibago

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
37,006
Reaction score
12
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
U.S. Democrats withdraw $25B offer to fund Trump's border wall
Issue has become major sticking point in talks on immigration and funding of federal agencies
Thomson Reuters Posted: Jan 24, 2018 6:56 AM ET Last Updated: Jan 24, 2018 6:56 AM ET

budget-battle-schumer.jpg

Senate minority leader, Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington on Tuesday. Schumer says an offer to fund Trump's border wall is 'off the table.' (Andrew Harnik/Associated Press)

12 shares
facebook-up.png

Facebook
twitter-up.png

Twitter
reddit-up.png

Reddit
plus-up.png

Google
share-up.png

Share
email-up.png

Email
Related Stories
Democrats have withdrawn an offer to fund U.S. President Donald Trump's border wall, as tough negotiations over the future of young immigrants known as Dreamers resumed Tuesday in the Senate.

A day after the end of a government shutdown linked to wrangling over immigration, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said he pulled the offer because of what he said was Trump's failure to follow through on the outlines of an agreement the two men discussed last Friday.

"So we're going to have to start on a new basis and the wall offer is off the table," Schumer told reporters. An aide said the offer was pulled on Sunday.

The Congressional Hispanic Caucus expressed fears on Tuesday that Republicans in the House of Representatives would pursue a harsh immigration bill written by judiciary committee chairman Bob Goodlatte.

The House measure would allow Dreamers to renew their legal status for three years, instead of putting them on a pathway to citizenship, and would call for hiring 10,000 more agents at U.S. borders while shutting down some visa programs and taking other steps to find people who are in the country illegally.

During the 2016 election campaign, Trump said Mexico would pay the cost of building a wall along the southwestern border of the United States to keep out illegal immigrants. Mexico has rejected the idea.

border-wall-prototypes.jpg

These border wall prototypes are near the border with Tijuana, Mexico, in San Diego, as show Oct. 19. (Gregory Bull/Associated Press)

As a result, Trump has been forced to ask Congress for U.S. taxpayer funds for the wall. Government estimates are that it could cost over $21 billion.

With Democrats and many Republicans arguing there are more effective border enforcement tools than a wall, the proposal has become a major sticking point in immigration negotiations, which in turn have complicated talks about funding federal agencies.

The Senate's No. 2 Democrat, Dick Durbin, asked by a reporter whether Schumer offered Trump $25 billion for the wall in a major concession to the president, did not dispute the figure, but said: "He did it in the context of a negotiation."

Protecting 'dreamers'
Democrats have been spearheading an effort to protect about 700,000 young Dreamers after Trump last September announced the end of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program instituted by his Democratic predecessor, Barack Obama.

The program, which began in 2012, gave qualified individuals brought illegally to the United States as children temporary protection from deportation, and the ability to study and work in the United States.

trump-immigration.jpg

Tough negotiations over the future of young immigrants known as Dreamers, some of them shown here listening to lawmakers at the Capitol in Washington on Jan. 10, resumed Tuesday in the Senate. (J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press)

Senator John Cornyn, the No. 2 Senate Republican, criticized Schumer for pulling the wall funding offer.

"That basically sets the DACA discussion back," he told reporters.

Cornyn said there had been discussions of he and Durbin being a "clearinghouse" for suggestions from senators on legislation to rescue Dreamers from the threat of deportation and provide permanent protections for them.

In agreeing on Monday to end a three-day government shutdown and fund the government until Feb. 8, Senate Democrats got a promise from Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell that he would allow an immigration debate on he Senate floor in the near future, the first one since 2013.

Durbin said a similar commitment was now needed from Paul Ryan, the Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives, where a Dreamer bill would presumably face a much harder path to passage than in the Senate.

The White House on Tuesday rejected the idea that a bipartisan bill sponsored by Durbin and Republican Senator Lindsey Graham could be the core of a solution.

White House spokesperson Sarah Sanders said the proposal was "totally unacceptable to the president and should be declared dead on arrival."

Trump himself has vacillated on immigration between tough rhetoric demanding a U.S. border wall and a softer tone urging a "bill of love" for Dreamers.

"Nobody knows for sure that the Republicans & Democrats will be able to reach a deal on DACA by February 8, but everyone will be trying," Trump wrote on Twitter.



https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/955795912374267907
Donald J. Trump

✔@realDonaldTrump


Nobody knows for sure that the Republicans & Democrats will be able to reach a deal on DACA by February 8, but everyone will be trying....with a big additional focus put on Military Strength and Border Security. The Dems have just learned that a Shutdown is not the answer!

6:34 PM - Jan 23, 2018
Twitter Ads info and privacy


© Thomson Reuters, 2018

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/us-democrats-withdraw-offer-funding-trump-border-wall-1.4501264
 
.
Our budget deficit is nearly half a trillion dollars and these idiots want to erect a useless 70 billion dollar wall in a time when only around 30-40% of illegal Mexican immigrants use the land border and more Mexican immigrants are leaving the United States than there are illegally entering.
 
.
I get it. Democrats don't like the wall, but are they really going to endanger the future of Dreamers for it? Like it or not, Trump is POTUS; and if you want to keep Dreamers in US give him his wall. This is how US government works: through consensus and compromise.
 
.
I get it. Democrats don't like the wall, but are they really going to endanger the future of Dreamers for it? Like it or not, Trump is POTUS; and if you want to keep Dreamers in US give him his wall. This is how US government works: through consensus and compromise.
How does it feel to live in a bobble? Dems already reached a deal with trump for Wall, Dreamers and CHIP but trump refused. But of course, facts don't matter to trumpsters since facts have liberal bias.
 
.
How does it feel to live in a bobble? Dems already reached a deal with trump for Wall, Dreamers and CHIP but trump refused. But of course, facts don't matter to trumpsters since facts have liberal bias.

Because Democrats were trying to expand DACA to include more than Dreamers. They wanted their parents and people under TPS and other designations. It would push the number well north of 2 million. Of course, Trump and Republicans would refuse such a deal.
 
.
Because Democrats were trying to expand DACA to include more than Dreamers. They wanted their parents and people under TPS and other designations. It would push the number well north of 2 million. Of course, Trump and Republicans would refuse such a deal.

How about end chain migration for daca permanent residence.
 
Last edited:
. .
The Wall paid by US taxpayers... and Mexico in all of that? weren't they the one to pay for it... :)

Tag me...when they start making it...

The whole "Mexico will be paying for the wall" is a complete con.

Most of the Trump voters that I know now even acknowledge that. if a wall is built, the American taxpayer will foot the bill.
 
.
The whole "Mexico will be paying for the wall" is a complete con.

Most of the Trump voters that I know now even acknowledge that. if a wall is built, the American taxpayer will foot the bill.
Wall over mountains and rivers will require some serious maintaiance
 
. .
Wall over mountains and rivers will require some serious maintaiance

Of course..

And there are some out there that are still convinced there's going to be a literal wall stretching for roughly 2000 miles without interruption of any kind.
 
.
Because Democrats were trying to expand DACA to include more than Dreamers. They wanted their parents and people under TPS and other designations. It would push the number well north of 2 million. Of course, Trump and Republicans would refuse such a deal.
So you are retracting your initial reply where you said dems didn't agree to fund the wall? Because nothing you are saying now has anything to do with what I replied to you on, the wall.
 
.
Of course..

And there are some out there that are still convinced there's going to be a literal wall stretching for roughly 2000 miles without interruption of any kind.
The cost outweighs the benefits no?
 
.
The cost outweighs the benefits no?

Unfortunately just like you guys have a flood of people from Afghanistan we are dealing with a flood of people trying to cross our border. It isn't just Mexicans either it is from countries south of Mexico and beyond (like China).

There's over 10 million people here illegally.
 
.
Unfortunately just like you guys have a flood of people from Afghanistan we are dealing with a flood of people trying to cross our border. It isn't just Mexicans either it is from countries south of Mexico and beyond (like China).
Wouldn't it be better to actually go for increased patrolling instead of an expensive wall that wont work?
People will get permanent jobs in that case
 
.
Back
Top Bottom