Two thousand year old Jewish scrolls found yet again in Jerusalem

[KingMamba]

You are now simply trying to get me and other folks bogged down in semantics.

Does the river Indus flow in India? Yes.
Did the name India represent land east of Indus - Yes.
Is India the legal successor to the British Indian Empire - Yes.
Does India have another name - Yes.
Is Bharat, India's ancient name - Yes.
Does modern India have IVC sites - Yes.
Is everyone allowed to visit those sites - Yes.
Are archeologists globally allowed to come and visit any site already excavated or under excavation - Yes
Are even Pakistani's allowed to come and visit those sites - Yes.

I think the point has been made.

-Does the river flow in India, yeah 5% but India wants to say IVC was their civilization.
-Does the name India represent land east of Indus yes but hundreds of years after the name was first coined and thousands of years after the IVC ended.
-Irrelevant to IVC
-Irrelevant to IVC
-Irrelevant to IVC and based on a tale of some emperor who probably did not even exist cannot be taken as historical reality
-According to government of India itself India has sites that have something to do with IVC
-Yes visit not excavate, look don't touch
-Repeat as above
-Irrelevant who comes to visit for tourism purposes

I think you are missing the point.

The Jewish Foundation of Islam : Mohammed's Legislation

The Jewish Foundation of Islam

answering Islam founder got embarrassed in a debate with one of our lower tier Imams and is hardly the scholar on the subject, I have never seen the bottom site before though I will look it over but it is probably BS as always.