Horseman
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2014
- Messages
- 500
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes after he had been hurt himself. See if Musharraf toppled benazir's govt then how would have he reacted. He praises zia ul haq in 96 and in 99 his govt was toppled by army then he realizes that it is wrongNawaz Sharif was wrong in supporting Zia-ul-Haq Marshal Law, which I supported too in my teens. Everybody, learns from their mistakes, the problem are for those who didn't want to learn anything out of plain rigidness like Abu-jehal. May allah accords them true wisdom as well, shown by NS after his return in 2009.....Ameen!!
Some people find it hard to digest. I mean look at the history of military rulers. All of them created breeds of militancy and politicians to prolong their regimes.But as we know it that from Ayub to Musharraf, everybody died a bitter political death with their byproducts turning against them ultimately. How the great Ayub Khan and Zia ul Haq''s legacies now being reduced to a single seat. Musharraf was no exception. Ayub created PPP, Zia Created PML-N and MQM while Musharraf Created PML-Q. Irony is that the parties continue to exist but their creators have reduced to merely a mention in the books of political history.Nawaz Sharif was wrong in supporting Zia-ul-Haq Marshal Law, which I supported too in my teens. Everybody, learns from their mistakes, the problem are for those who didn't want to learn anything out of plain rigidness like Abu-jehal. May allah accords them true wisdom as well, shown by NS after his return in 2009.....Ameen!!
Two lies in your post.Some people find it hard to digest. I mean look at the history of military rulers. All of them created breeds of militancy and politicians to prolong their regimes but today from Ayub to Musharraf everybody died a biitter political death with their biproducts turning against them. How the great Ayub Khan and Zia ul Haq''s legacies now being reduced to a single seat. Musharraf was no exception. Ayub created PPP, Zia Created PML-N and MQM while Musharraf Created PML-Q. Irony is that the parties continue to exist but their creators have reduced to merely a mention in the books of political history.
do you find it hard to digest. MQMiets usually are mentally programmed not to accept the bitter reality....MQM was created by zia to counter and break PPP's strength.Two lies in your post.
1. Ayub created PPP
2. Zia Created MQM
first of all i'm not mqmiet. 2nd thing i just talk about reality not myths.do you find it hard to digest. MQMiets usually are mentally programmed not to accept the bitter reality....MQM was created by zia to counter and break PPP's strength.
Doesn't matter, you don't have to be one to behave like one.first of all i'm not mqmiet. 2nd thing i just talk about reality not myths.
I cant understand what do want to say.Doesn't matter, you don't have to be one to behave like one.
For those want to understand, I think I made my point clear. Now should I be bothered if somebody can't accept the truth? No I wouldn't be.I cant understand what do want to say.
How did you clear your point. can it be cleared to saying 'you don't have to be one to behave like one.'For those want to understand, I think I made my point clear. Now should I be bothered if somebody can't accept the truth? No I wouldn't be.
Some people find it hard to digest. I mean look at the history of military rulers. All of them created breeds of militancy and politicians to prolong their regimes.But as we know it that from Ayub to Musharraf, everybody died a bitter political death with their byproducts turning against them ultimately. How the great Ayub Khan and Zia ul Haq''s legacies now being reduced to a single seat. Musharraf was no exception. Ayub created PPP, Zia Created PML-N and MQM while Musharraf Created PML-Q. Irony is that the parties continue to exist but their creators have reduced to merely a mention in the books of political history.