What's new

Twins separated at birth met and married

genmirajborgza786

PDF VETERAN
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
4,303
Reaction score
20
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
November 4, 2006 Reuters
London, January 12, 2008
First Published: 12:30 IST(12/1/2008)
Last Updated: 14:20 IST(12/1/2008)

Twins separated at birth met and marriedA couple discovered after they had married that they were twins who had been split up at birth and adopted by separate families, according to a member of Britain's House of Lords.

British peer David Alton recounted the story to parliament last month to support his argument that artificially conceived children should be told who their biological parents are.

Alton said he had heard the story of the separated twins from a High Court judge who had dealt with the case.

"This did not involve in vitro fertilization: It involved the normal birth of twins who were separated at birth and adopted by separate parents," said Alton, an independent member of the Lords. "They were never told that they were twins."

"They met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation," he said.

"I suspect that it will be a matter of litigation in the future if we do not make information of this kind available to children who have been donor-conceived," he said.

Alton could not immediately be reached for comment and no further information was available about the twins or where they were from.

"I think it's a very tragic story for the people involved," said Pam Hodgkins, head of a group that helps adults affected by adoption.

"It is a lesson that we need to learn and apply to the situation of donor-conceived children," she told Sky News.

"Whilst ... nowadays it would be most unusual for siblings to be separated ... the risk of secrecy affecting the lives of people born as a result of egg and sperm donation is exactly the same as the risks that have affected adopted people in the past," she said.

(Reporting by Adrian Croft; Editing by Stephen Addison)

HindustanTimes-Print

© Copyright 2007 Hindustan Times
 
.
Wow. I always find the law stupid that says these children cannot be told who their biological parents are. If they want to find out, why not tell them?
 
.
British twins separated at birth got married without realizing they were related
Published: Friday, January 11, 2008 | 12:25 PM ET
Canadian Press: Thomas Wagner, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
LONDON - Twins who were separated at birth got married without realizing they were brother and sister, a legislator told the Britain's House of Lords.

A court annulled the British couple's union after they discovered their true relationship, Lord David Alton said.

The legislator provided few other details about the case when he mentioned it during a five-hour debate about a bill that would change regulations about human embryology. He said he had been told about the unusual case by a judge, who he did not name.

"I was recently involved in a conversation with a High Court judge who was telling me of a case he had dealt with," Alton said during the Dec. 10 debate. "It involved the normal birth of twins who were separated at birth and adopted by separate parents.

"They were never told that they were twins. They met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation."

The case was first reported Friday in London's Evening Standard.

Continue Article

The High Court's Family Division declined to discuss or confirm Alton's account about the twins.

Alton, an independent legislator who works at Liverpool's John Moores University, said in a telephone interview Friday that the twins' inadvertent marriage raises the wider issue of the importance of strengthening the rights of children to know the identities of their biological parents, including kids who were born through in vitro fertilization.

Under British law, only a mother has to be named on a birth certificate. Such certificates also are not required to identify births that result from IVF or to identify the sperm donor.

In addition, British law does not require parents to ever tell children that they were the result of donated sperm.

Alton believes this should be changed.

"Everyone has a right to knowledge about their lineage, genealogy and identity. And if they don't, then it will lead to cases of incest," he said.

Alton said he favours an amendment to the Human Fertility and Embryology bill - which is still being debated in the House of Lords - that would require birth certificates of children born from donated sperm to say that and to identify the genetic father.

Referring to the twins' case, he said: "If you start trying to conceal someone's identity, sooner or later the truth will come out. And if you don't know you are biologically related to someone, you may become attracted to them and tragedies like this may occur."

British twins separated at birth got married without realizing they were related
 
. . . .
That's a dilemma. If they stick with the marriage, they will be social outcasts. if they seperate, they will be denying their love for each other.

If i was in such a situation, i would choose a divorce. i dont think i'd ever be able to even think of incest.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom