Alexander Conquests in Subcontinent are hugely Biased ones, He only conquered Persian Empire and some regions of Afghanistan that to Greeks failed to hold them soon after his death.
West always glorifies Alexander and his conquests as he is a symbol of West domination on East. Where as they fail to acknowledge Great Persian empire who repeatedly ravaged Greece.
Again a display of ignorance.
Those regions of Afghanistan, "some regions of Afghanistan", actually encompassed the whole of Afghanistan, which was then the Persian provinces of Arachosia, Sogdiana and Bactria. In fact, these went beyond the present boundaries of Afghanistan, so I fail to understand why "some regions" is used.
Second, he also conquered the entire Indus Valley, unless you have decided that the Indus Valley is Afghanistan.
Third, far from losing it, the Greeks set up the Bactrian Greek kingdoms, which gave India Gandhara art and sculpture, and also the art of theatre.
Fourth, your ignorance mounts - or descends - from peak to peak. The Great Persian Empire attacked European Greece twice. The first time, after penetrating the Greek outer kingdoms of Thrace and Macedonia, the Persian general Mardonius lost his ships in a storm off Mount Athos, and retired in disarray. This was in 490 BC. The second time, Datis and Artaphernes took the attack forward, met initial successes earlier, then got a bloody nose from the Athenians at Marathon and retired - in disarray. That was 492 BC. Emperor Darius then gave it up as a bad joke, but Xerxes took up the unfinished agenda in his turn in 480 BC and mounted a massive invasion. This time, the Persians crushed the Spartans at Thermopylae, captured Athens but lost their fleet at the very well-fought battle of Salamis. After Salamis, the Greeks fought the best battle of the campaign at Plataea, and that was the end of the game for the Persians.
The conflict started with the burning of Sardis by Ionian Greeks, and ended with Alexander demolishing the Persian Empire.
Why do you always try to distort history to make your political points?
It was clearly mentioned that Ghori was routed and do even know what Routing means??
Don't try to stupid and try to make wrong conclusion based on it.
Yes, I know what a rout means. You seem to think that it means that the enemy commander is captured. It does not mean that. So you should finish your studies before starting to comment.