What's new

Turkey’s Election Results Stink of Fraud

Solomon2

BANNED
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
19,475
Reaction score
-37
Country
United States
Location
United States
nationalreview_logo200x50.png


Turkey’s Election Results Stink of Fraud
by DANIEL PIPES November 3, 2015 11:54 AM

Like other observers of Turkish politics, I was stunned on Nov. 1 when the ruling Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, or AKP) was reported to have increased its share of the national vote since the last round of elections in June 2015 by 9 percent and its share of parliamentary seats by 11 percent.

The polls had consistently shown the four major parties winning about the same number of seats as in June. This made intuitive sense; they represent mutually hostile outlooks (Islamist, leftist, Kurdish, nationalist), making substantial movement between them in under five months highly unlikely. That about one in nine voters switched parties defies reason.


3297.jpg

Polling results between the June and November 2015 Turkish elections.

The AKP's huge increase gave it back the parliamentary majority it had lost in the June 2015 elections, promising President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan a semi-legal path to the dictatorial powers he aspires to.

But, to me, the results stink of fraud. It defies reason, for example, that the AKP's war on Kurds would prompt about a quarter of Turkey's Kurds to abandon the pro-Kurdish party and switch their vote to the AKP. As news of irregularities comes in, Michael Rubin of AEI summed up the problems at Commentary:


Turkish political analysts attribute Erdoğan's cheating quotient at around 5 percent – that takes into account stuffed ballots, shenanigans on the state-run Turkish Airlines as it transports ballots from abroad, disappeared ballot boxes from opposition-run towns and districts, and pretty much everything involving the mayor of Ankara. In the case of Sunday's elections, it appears that Erdoğan's AKP won the votes of hundreds of thousands of dead people..​

Given the history of fraud in Turkey's elections, that this one was rigged should come as no shock, especially as rumors swirled in advance about sophisticated efforts to manipulate the results. (For methods, think the Volkswagen emissions scam.)

The citizens of Turkey now face the decisive question of whether to accept or reject the results of this election. Which will prevail – fear of Erdoğan's ruthlessness or anger at his swindle? Sadly, because his electoral coup d'état has blocked the path of democracy, should Turks resist, they are compelled to do so in non-democratic ways. (November 3, 2015)
 
It seems just a propaganda. There are many inside Turkey and in foreign world that can't digest the victory of AKP once again. If there is no solid proof then it is nothing more than a propaganda.
 
Better have a fraudulant election than to shuffle prime ministers like they do in israel
 
Hihi asshurt Zionists are asshurt
 
It seems just a propaganda. There are many inside Turkey and in foreign world that can't digest the victory of AKP once again. If there is no solid proof then it is nothing more than a propaganda.
Observers critical of Turkish elections

The elections in Turkey were hampered by restrictions that were imposed by the authorities on the media through violence and the security situation in general.
This is reported by the official observer missions of the Council of Europe and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) on Monday.
Officers, members and buildings of the parties were attacked in run-up to the parliamentary elections on Sunday, which they could not perform good campaign, said the observers. They are also 'deeply concerned' 'about restrictions on press freedom.

Erdogan
The elections were won by the AK Party, founded by incumbent President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. '' Unfortunately, the campaign for the elections was characterized by dishonesty and, seriously, by fear, '' judge Andreas Gross, head of the parliamentary observer mission of the Council of Europe.
'Although Turkish citizens could choose between political alternatives in this highly polarized election, the electoral process was affected by a rapidly diminishing choice of media and restrictions on freedom of expression,' 'said Sanchez Amor which the OSCE mission led.
Terrorism
Observers expressed strong criticism of the investigations into journalists and media that would support terrorism or Erdogan would offend. Further violence in the mainly Kurdish southeast of the country had a '' significant '' impact on the election.
However, it was to go observers asked at seven polling stations were off and people who wanted to observe in some cases on behalf of political parties denied access. The counting of votes proceeded '' transparent '', though some irregularities were noted.
Waarnemers kritisch over Turkse verkiezingen | NU - Het laatste nieuws het eerst op NU.nl
 
nationalreview_logo200x50.png


Turkey’s Election Results Stink of Fraud
by DANIEL PIPES November 3, 2015 11:54 AM

Like other observers of Turkish politics, I was stunned on Nov. 1 when the ruling Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, or AKP) was reported to have increased its share of the national vote since the last round of elections in June 2015 by 9 percent and its share of parliamentary seats by 11 percent.

The polls had consistently shown the four major parties winning about the same number of seats as in June. This made intuitive sense; they represent mutually hostile outlooks (Islamist, leftist, Kurdish, nationalist), making substantial movement between them in under five months highly unlikely. That about one in nine voters switched parties defies reason.


3297.jpg

Polling results between the June and November 2015 Turkish elections.

The AKP's huge increase gave it back the parliamentary majority it had lost in the June 2015 elections, promising President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan a semi-legal path to the dictatorial powers he aspires to.

But, to me, the results stink of fraud. It defies reason, for example, that the AKP's war on Kurds would prompt about a quarter of Turkey's Kurds to abandon the pro-Kurdish party and switch their vote to the AKP. As news of irregularities comes in, Michael Rubin of AEI summed up the problems at Commentary:


Turkish political analysts attribute Erdoğan's cheating quotient at around 5 percent – that takes into account stuffed ballots, shenanigans on the state-run Turkish Airlines as it transports ballots from abroad, disappeared ballot boxes from opposition-run towns and districts, and pretty much everything involving the mayor of Ankara. In the case of Sunday's elections, it appears that Erdoğan's AKP won the votes of hundreds of thousands of dead people..​

Given the history of fraud in Turkey's elections, that this one was rigged should come as no shock, especially as rumors swirled in advance about sophisticated efforts to manipulate the results. (For methods, think the Volkswagen emissions scam.)

The citizens of Turkey now face the decisive question of whether to accept or reject the results of this election. Which will prevail – fear of Erdoğan's ruthlessness or anger at his swindle? Sadly, because his electoral coup d'état has blocked the path of democracy, should Turks resist, they are compelled to do so in non-democratic ways. (November 3, 2015)
CHP are strong secularists...their vote stayed the same.
Kurds...economic reasons...MHP economic reasons... Dollar was 2.55 Lira 5 months ago...due to politic instability. It rose to 3.10.
Also maybe you know there was 3 term rule in AKP. A parlimenter can't be re-elected for the 4th term (self established rule by AKP on their members). Because of that many acknowledged MPs couldn't been candidate in July elections. Caused a decrease in AKP's votes. This time, AKP brought all of them back which helped it's vote to increase in certain cities, towns.

There are many many many reasons....like AKP's promises if they got elected, Erdogan didn't involved and didn't talked about presidency which irked voters in the last election, two smaller parties entered the last election (SP and BBP, one ultra-conservative, other one strongly conservative and nationalist) in an alliance.They scored 2.7% in the last elections. This time they scored %0.6, remaining 2 percent shifted to AKP.

There are many reasons...which allowed AKP to raise their votes by 9 percent.... AKP skillfully review the reasons of the fall of their votes in June elections...and done their homework good this time.

MHP's leader lost 14 elections, last night he said that he is not going to resign.
CHP's leader lost 5 elections (not counting municipality elections), he said that his party rosed it's votes. (0.4 percent rose and he sees at as a win.) And he is not resigning.

Opposition is extremely weak against AKP, their leader's lost all of their charisma, losing elections one after another and they still do not resign.

Turkish political analysts attribute Erdoğan's cheating quotient at around 5 percent – that takes into account stuffed ballots, shenanigans on the state-run Turkish Airlines as it transports ballots from abroad, disappeared ballot boxes from opposition-run towns and districts, and pretty much everything involving the mayor of Ankara. In the case of Sunday's elections, it appears that Erdoğan's AKP won the votes of hundreds of thousands of dead people..

All of these things are absolute BS. But "won the votes of hundreds of thousands of dead people"...really ???

"Turkish political analysts" saying this based on what ???

There were many observants near the ballot boxes, from AKP,MHP,CHP, HDP and other civil platforms like "oy ve ötesi ".

They together, check voters name and ID, before you vote. Only one guy tried to cheat when he tried to vote for his brother and got apprehended.

After the voting, observers counts the votes and write down to final number. They photograpgh it and send to their Party headquaters and news agencies, "AA", "Cihan"

Votes and put into a bag, and send to local building where the votes get counted by government officials. While votes are being transported a police car escorts the van where all of observant rides in it.

Counted votes gets listed by YSK (High Election Council)

And parties can check the votings of each ballot box with their data base. If there had been any cheating, opposition would detect it.

This system eliminates "stuffed ballots, shenanigans on the state-run Turkish Airlines as it transports ballots from abroad, disappeared ballot boxes from opposition-run towns and districts, votes of hundreds of thousands of dead people"

Like, i want to ask this person..."which ballot box got disappeared ?, i you are saying so, give the exact number of the ballot box".....it's impossible.


Mate, you posted this stuff, what's it's connection with fraud ???
 
CHP are strong secularists...their vote stayed the same.
Kurds...economic reasons...MHP economic reasons... Dollar was 2.55 Lira 5 months ago...due to politic instability. It rose to 3.10.
Also maybe you know there was 3 term rule in AKP. A parlimenter can't be re-elected for the 4th term (self established rule by AKP on their members). Because of that many acknowledged MPs couldn't been candidate in July elections. Caused a decrease in AKP's votes. This time, AKP brought all of them back which helped it's vote to increase in certain cities, towns.

There are many many many reasons....like AKP's promises if they got elected, Erdogan didn't involved and didn't talked about presidency which irked voters in the last election, two smaller parties entered the last election (SP and BBP, one ultra-conservative, other one strongly conservative and nationalist) in an alliance.They scored 2.7% in the last elections. This time they scored %0.6, remaining 2 percent shifted to AKP.

There are many reasons...which allowed AKP to raise their votes by 9 percent.... AKP skillfully review the reasons of the fall of their votes in June elections...and done their homework good this time.

MHP's leader lost 14 elections, last night he said that he is not going to resign.
CHP's leader lost 5 elections (not counting municipality elections), he said that his party rosed it's votes. (0.4 percent rose and he sees at as a win.) And he is not resigning.

Opposition is extremely weak against AKP, their leader's lost all of their charisma, losing elections one after another and they still do not resign.



All of these things are absolute BS. But "won the votes of hundreds of thousands of dead people"...really ???

"Turkish political analysts" saying this based on what ???

There were many observants near the ballot boxes, from AKP,MHP,CHP, HDP and other civil platforms like "oy ve ötesi ".

They together, check voters name and ID, before you vote. Only one guy tried to cheat when he tried to vote for his brother and got apprehended.

After the voting, observers counts the votes and write down to final number. They photograpgh it and send to their Party headquaters and news agencies, "AA", "Cihan"

Votes and put into a bag, and send to local building where the votes get counted by government officials. While votes are being transported a police car escorts the van where all of observant rides in it.

Counted votes gets listed by YSK (High Election Council)

And parties can check the votings of each ballot box with their data base. If there had been any cheating, opposition would detect it.

This system eliminates "stuffed ballots, shenanigans on the state-run Turkish Airlines as it transports ballots from abroad, disappeared ballot boxes from opposition-run towns and districts, votes of hundreds of thousands of dead people"

Like, i want to ask this person..."which ballot box got disappeared ?, i you are saying so, give the exact number of the ballot box".....it's impossible.
Thank you for your specific responses, which I hope to take time to evaluate.
 
Koenders still summons Turkish ambassador about AKP letter

Bert Koenders, Minister of Foreign Affairs will summon the Turkish ambassador in The Hague because of the letter with a voting recommendation which the ruling AK Party has sent to Turkish Dutch.

So the minister said on Friday shortly before the start of the Cabinet Meeting

'' It is undesirable that there is such a letter, '' he said

Voting advice
In the letter that was sent earlier this month, the Dutch Turks are called to vote for the AK Party President Tayyip Erdogan in the upcoming parliamentary elections.

Thursday the Lower House complained to minister Lodewijk Asscher (of Integration) about the fact that the Cabinet had not taken a stand against the state of affairs

"Intimidation"

The Lower House called Turkish interference "intimidating" and "threatening" because the Turkish government managed to reach the Turkish Dutch at their front doors in The Netherlands. Asscher said at the debate to find the letter "completely inappropriate" and that together with minister Koenders he would seek the appropriate diplomatic channels to convey the displeasure of the Dutch government to Ankara.

The MPs thought that action does not go far enough and demanded that the Turkish ambassador be summoned before the elections on Sunday.

And so it now happens. . The summoning of the ambassador, according to Koenders is ' a very clear diplomatic signal of displeasure'.
Koenders ontbiedt alsnog Turkse ambassadeur om brief AK-partij | NU - Het laatste nieuws het eerst op NU.nl

Mate, you posted this stuff, what's it's connection with fraud ???

It tells you what international observers (from the Council of Europe, of which Turkey is a member, and from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, of which Turkey is also a member) to the election thought of the proces. IMHO, that is relevant.

And, or free, you also get and idea of how this topic is reported on in the Dutch press.
 
Last edited:
There are many many many reasons....like AKP's promises if they got elected, Erdogan didn't involved and didn't talked about presidency which irked voters in the last election -
logo-hurriyet-daily-news.png


Presidential spokesperson addresses referendum for presidential system
ANKARA
n_90724_1.jpg


Presidential spokesperson İbrahim Kalın at a press conference on Nov. 4, 2015. AA Photo

Presidential spokesperson İbrahim Kalın addressed a referendum for a possible change to a powerful presidential system in Turkey.

“In the case of such an important issue, this debate cannot be considered apart from the nation. One would go to a referendum if the mechanism is so,” Kalın told reporters at a press conference on Nov. 4

Kalın stressed that this issue was not a situation about the fate of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, since “he is constitutionally already a powerful, strong leader and has passed onto history.”

The spokesperson stated that the debate on how the system would better work was beneficial for the country.

“A new assessment can be made taking the Nov. 1 elections into consideration,” he said.

In the upcoming months, this discussion would continue gaining momentum in a healthy way, Kalın added.
November/04/2015
 
logo-hurriyet-daily-news.png


Presidential spokesperson addresses referendum for presidential system
ANKARA
n_90724_1.jpg


Presidential spokesperson İbrahim Kalın at a press conference on Nov. 4, 2015. AA Photo

Presidential spokesperson İbrahim Kalın addressed a referendum for a possible change to a powerful presidential system in Turkey.

“In the case of such an important issue, this debate cannot be considered apart from the nation. One would go to a referendum if the mechanism is so,” Kalın told reporters at a press conference on Nov. 4

Kalın stressed that this issue was not a situation about the fate of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, since “he is constitutionally already a powerful, strong leader and has passed onto history.”

The spokesperson stated that the debate on how the system would better work was beneficial for the country.

“A new assessment can be made taking the Nov. 1 elections into consideration,” he said.

In the upcoming months, this discussion would continue gaining momentum in a healthy way, Kalın added.
November/04/2015

Funny ain't it ?

What i said was. "Erdogan didn't involved and didn't talked about presidency which irked voters in the last election"

Elections held in 1 November. After the elections in 4 November they again began to talk about presidency system, not before the elections. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom