Faith was the criteria to decide nationhood
It simply isn't.
We are talking about priority.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Faith was the criteria to decide nationhood
I find that a person with a weak faith, usually tends to put nationality over religion. Usually, in the Muslim countries. Religion supports the nationality, however those who have no faith (atheists) will always put nationality over religion for obvious reasons.
No matter what, i dont find kurds can do a damn thing about it, all they wiil get is destruction and nothing more. Iraq which seems to be very supportive will soon come to know what it is to be when you support the wrong end and same stands for US as well. We as pakistanies support turkey in her justified actions against the kurds. Its time they go in and clean the dirt out.
turkey will never give land to the kurd's same for iran so i dont think it will ever happen a kurdistan nope, the kurdish rebel's will get what they are asking for and that's a good hiding from the miltary of turkey.
if thats so, then there should be only one nation comprising of all muslims. pakistan shouldnt exist as a seperate state, but as part of a larger islamic empire.
the fact is that faith is not the only thing deciding your nation. your nation should always take precedence over religion. Remember, its because pakistani soldiers value nation over religion that they fight the taliban.
Other than shelling the Iraq side of Kurds controlled areas the Generals of Turkey are just playing to the galleries. The generals have been gradually loosing popularity in Turkey as we saw during the recent elections there and there no better way to divert the attention but by declaring they will attack Iraq.
However one thing I need to ask the distinguished members here. Why are they not sympathetic to the Kurds (who are also muslims) cause which is more valid and older than say Kashmir, Bosnia, Iraq or even Palestine for whom they do very passionately on this forum?
Is it because they donot wish to criticize fellow muslim countries like Iran / Turkey whereas in the other causes mentioned above, there are jews, Christians, hindus involved ?
Just an observation.
Best regards
Collateral damage is the unfortunate reality of any military operation. Shells have killed innocent tribesmen in FATA as well.
The Kurds are an unfortunate bunch - the carving out of so many states with artificial boundaries, and the divvying up of Kurd territory between them, has ensured that as justified as their struggle may be, it is doomed to failure.
Most of the countries with large Kurdish populations remain strongly nationalistic and will never cede territory to a Kurdish State.
Other than shelling the Iraq side of Kurds controlled areas the Generals of Turkey are just playing to the galleries. The generals have been gradually loosing popularity in Turkey as we saw during the recent elections there and there no better way to divert the attention but by declaring they will attack Iraq.
However one thing I need to ask the distinguished members here. Why are they not sympathetic to the Kurds (who are also muslims) cause which is more valid and older than say Kashmir, Bosnia, Iraq or even Palestine for whom they do very passionately on this forum?
Is it because they donot wish to criticize fellow muslim countries like Iran / Turkey whereas in the other causes mentioned above, there are jews, Christians, hindus involved ?
Just an observation.
Best regards