Tu-160. World's biggest combat plane.

[Ultima Thule]

It don't matter with aerial refueling.

TU-22M3 don't have air refueling probe, it had been eliminated because of deal between USA/Soviets during the cold war @undertakerwwefan

Unproven stealth. Tu-160 is capable of Mach 2. B-2 is subsonic.

TU-160 is more unproven than B-2 @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

TU-22M3 don't have air refueling probe, it had been eliminated because of deal between USA/Soviets during the cold war

whateva man

 

[Ultima Thule]

whateva man

B-1 can't be compare to T-22M3, the real competitor for B-1 is TU-160, all the world major defense experts/website said that @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

B-1 can't be compare to T-22M3, the real competitor for B-1 is TU-160, all the world major defense experts/website said that @undertakerwwefan

Who cares what you think?

Russia has 60 + 69 + 16 = 145 Tu bombers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Russian_military_aircraft

Russia population 146 million.

0.99 bombers per million people.

America has 75 + 60 + 20 = 155 B bombers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_United_States_military_aircraft

America population 325 million.

0.47 bombers per million people.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Who cares what you think?

Russia has 60 + 69 + 16 = 145 Tu bombers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Russian_military_aircraft

Russia population 146 million.

0.99 bombers per million people.

America has 75 + 60 + 20 = 155 B bombers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_United_States_military_aircraft

America population 325 million.

0.47 bombers per million people.

not Me but the whole world thinks defense Experts/website,so you always right and the whole world is always wrong what a stupid you're @undertakerwwefan and this comparison is not relate to this topic @undertakerwwefan , you're blindly falling in love with Russian weapons for your baseless reasons @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

not Me but the whole world thinks defense Experts/website,so you always right and the whole world is always wrong what a stupid you're @undertakerwwefan and this comparison is not relate to this topic @undertakerwwefan , you're blindly falling in love with Russian weapons for your baseless reasons @undertakerwwefan

Each bomber has its pros and cons. B-1 has more range. Tu-22 has maritime strike capability. B-2 has less RCS. Tu-160 has more speed.

Anyway, Tu-95 is counterpart of B-52. Tu-22 is counterpart of B-1. Tu-160 is counterpart of B-2.

you're blindly falling in love with Russian weapons

I'm a fan of Russia because Russia is a white country, not a non white country like America is. That's my personal freedom.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Tu-160 is counterpart of B-2.

you're wrong about this Tu-160 was/is not comparable to B-2 but Russian upcoming PAK-DA @undertakerwwefan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_PAK_DA

Tu-22 has maritime strike capability

So does B-1/B-52/Tu-95 have this capabilities to attack target at sea @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

So does B-1/B-52/Tu-95 have this capabilities to attack target at sea

But not with dedicated anti ship missiles.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Not with dedicated anti ship missiles.

for B-52 it can be equipped with harpoon, B-1 is also carrying harpoon and upcoming LARSM and TU-95 carrying multiple type of anti ship missiles like sizzler/ Brahmos/ sunburn, Bomber are being designed to carry multiple types of missiles/bombs/Cruise missile not single dedicated type of missiles in mind, so your baseles theories of using didcated missile for any specific target is totally wrong @undertakerwwefan

 

[khansaheeb]

This is what the Russian bombers helped do in Syria:-

http://www.rudaw.net/english/middleeast/syria/210720181