A Week of Unprecedented Diplomatic Activity
The week began with Trump announcing a U.S.-brokered ceasefire between India and Pakistan, two nuclear-armed rivals locked in escalating hostilities following a gun massacre of tourists that India attributed to Pakistan. Trump’s Truth Social post claiming credit for the deal was met with praise from his MAGA base, with figures like Representative Andy Ogles and retired General Mike Flynn hailing him as a “peace president.” However, reports of blasts in Indian-held Kashmir shortly after the announcement underscored the fragility of the agreement and raised questions about its durability.
Simultaneously, Trump embarked on a Middle East tour, visiting Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. His agenda was a blend of economic ambition and diplomatic posturing. In Riyadh, he attended a Saudi-U.S. investment forum alongside global business titans like BlackRock’s Larry Fink and Palantir’s Alex Karp, securing major investment pledges. In the UAE, he announced deals worth over $200 billion, including cooperation in artificial intelligence, and referenced a staggering $1.4 trillion UAE pledge to invest in the U.S. Trump’s rhetoric in Riyadh emphasized “commerce not chaos,” painting a vision of a Middle East that “exports technology not terrorism.”
Elsewhere, Trump’s administration lifted sanctions on Syria, negotiated the release of a U.S. citizen held by Hamas, and ended military strikes on Houthi fighters in Yemen. In a surprising move, Trump slashed American tariffs on China, signaling a potential thaw in U.S.-China relations. He also ordered Ukraine to engage in peace talks with Russia in Turkey, though these talks faltered when Russian President Vladimir Putin skipped the negotiations, prompting Trump to declare that “nothing” would happen until he and Putin met in person. Quiet negotiations with Iran over a nuclear deal continued, with Trump hinting at a proposal for “long-term peace.”
The Art of the Deal: Trump’s Pragmatic Mercantilism
At the heart of Trump’s frenetic week lies a clear throughline: a foreign policy rooted in pragmatic mercantilism. His vision, as articulated in Riyadh, is one where nations engage in mutually beneficial business deals to foster peace through profit. This approach marks a stark departure from traditional U.S. foreign policy, which often emphasized multilateral cooperation, human rights, and collective action on issues like climate change. Notably absent from Trump’s speeches was any mention of these themes, reflecting his preference for bilateral dealmaking over global alliances.
Trump’s focus on economic deals was evident in his Middle East tour. His strategic bet on Saudi Arabia’s leadership under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman paid dividends, with Riyadh emerging as a linchpin for regional stability and economic diversification. The Gulf’s authoritarian regimes, with their vast wealth and centralized power, are ideal partners for Trump’s deal-driven diplomacy. By prioritizing investment agreements over contentious issues like democratic reforms, Trump signaled that his primary goal is to leverage U.S. influence for economic gain.
The ceasefire between India and Pakistan, while a diplomatic win, also fits this pattern. Vice-President JD Vance’s initial comment that the conflict was “none of our business” gave way to pressure from both Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the nuclear powers to de-escalate. Trump’s claim of brokering the deal, though likely exaggerated given the involvement of other countries, underscores his desire to project an image of strength and dealmaking prowess.
The Limits of Trump’s Approach
Despite the flurry of activity, Trump’s week was not without setbacks, revealing the limitations of his approach. The Russia-Ukraine peace talks in Istanbul descended into chaos, with Putin’s absence and the Russian delegation’s junior status prompting accusations that Moscow was not taking the process seriously. Trump’s insistence that progress depended on a personal meeting with Putin highlighted his reliance on high-profile, leader-to-leader negotiations a strategy that falters when counterparts are unwilling to engage. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s skepticism and European allies’ reluctance to accept territorial concessions further complicated the talks.
In the Middle East, Trump’s lofty goals of securing peace deals in Gaza and Ukraine remained elusive. While he secured investment pledges, the absence of concrete progress on these conflicts underscored the challenges of applying a business-deal mindset to intractable geopolitical issues. Hamas confirmed direct talks with the U.S., but Israel’s continued airstrikes and blockade of Gaza aid worsened the humanitarian crisis, complicating negotiations. Similarly, Trump’s approval of a $310 million arms sale to Ukraine, alongside a minerals deal, suggested a shift away from neutrality, undermining his role as an honest broker.
What Trump Really Wants
Trump’s week of peace brokering offers a window into his broader ambitions. First, he seeks to cement his legacy as a global dealmaker, using high-profile diplomatic wins to bolster his domestic image. The ceasefire between India and Pakistan, though fragile, was trumpeted as a triumph of “peace through strength,” resonating with his MAGA supporters. Second, Trump aims to reorient U.S. foreign policy toward economic self-interest, prioritizing trade and investment over ideological crusades. His Gulf tour and tariff cuts on China reflect a belief that prosperity can stabilize volatile regions.
Third, Trump’s actions suggest a desire to project American dominance through personal charisma and bilateral relationships. His insistence on meeting Putin and his hands-on approach in the Middle East underscore a preference for top-down diplomacy, where he plays the central role. This aligns with his “America First” doctrine, which views multilateral institutions and collective action as secondary to U.S. power.
However, Trump’s vision is not without contradictions. His simultaneous pursuit of peace and arms deals, as seen in Ukraine, raises questions about his commitment to neutrality. His focus on economic deals risks alienating allies who prioritize security guarantees or human rights. Moreover, his reliance on personal relationships makes his strategy vulnerable to the whims of other leaders, as evidenced by Putin’s no-show in Turkey.
Implications for the Future
Trump’s frantic week has reshaped perceptions of U.S. foreign policy. Allies in Europe and Asia, accustomed to multilateral frameworks, may struggle to adapt to his transactional approach. Adversaries like Russia and Iran, while open to negotiations, may exploit Trump’s eagerness for deals to extract concessions. The Middle East, where Trump’s economic focus aligns with regional priorities, may prove more receptive, but unresolved conflicts like Gaza could undermine progress.
Domestically, Trump’s diplomacy has polarized opinion. Supporters view him as a master negotiator restoring American greatness, while critics warn that his deal-driven approach risks long-term instability. The coming months will test whether Trump’s vision of “commerce not chaos” can deliver lasting peace or merely temporary deals.
Conclusion
Trump’s week of peace brokering was a masterclass in high-stakes diplomacy, blending economic ambition with geopolitical maneuvering. From the Gulf to South Asia, his actions reflected a belief that profit and pragmatism can resolve global conflicts. Yet, the fragility of his achievements and the complexity of the challenges he faces suggest that the “art of the deal” has its limits. As Trump continues to reshape U.S. foreign policy, the world watches to see whether his frenetic pace will yield enduring stability or merely fleeting headlines. What is clear is that Trump’s true aim is to redefine America’s role on the global stage not as a moral arbiter, but as a dealmaking superpower.
The week began with Trump announcing a U.S.-brokered ceasefire between India and Pakistan, two nuclear-armed rivals locked in escalating hostilities following a gun massacre of tourists that India attributed to Pakistan. Trump’s Truth Social post claiming credit for the deal was met with praise from his MAGA base, with figures like Representative Andy Ogles and retired General Mike Flynn hailing him as a “peace president.” However, reports of blasts in Indian-held Kashmir shortly after the announcement underscored the fragility of the agreement and raised questions about its durability.
Simultaneously, Trump embarked on a Middle East tour, visiting Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. His agenda was a blend of economic ambition and diplomatic posturing. In Riyadh, he attended a Saudi-U.S. investment forum alongside global business titans like BlackRock’s Larry Fink and Palantir’s Alex Karp, securing major investment pledges. In the UAE, he announced deals worth over $200 billion, including cooperation in artificial intelligence, and referenced a staggering $1.4 trillion UAE pledge to invest in the U.S. Trump’s rhetoric in Riyadh emphasized “commerce not chaos,” painting a vision of a Middle East that “exports technology not terrorism.”
Elsewhere, Trump’s administration lifted sanctions on Syria, negotiated the release of a U.S. citizen held by Hamas, and ended military strikes on Houthi fighters in Yemen. In a surprising move, Trump slashed American tariffs on China, signaling a potential thaw in U.S.-China relations. He also ordered Ukraine to engage in peace talks with Russia in Turkey, though these talks faltered when Russian President Vladimir Putin skipped the negotiations, prompting Trump to declare that “nothing” would happen until he and Putin met in person. Quiet negotiations with Iran over a nuclear deal continued, with Trump hinting at a proposal for “long-term peace.”
The Art of the Deal: Trump’s Pragmatic Mercantilism
At the heart of Trump’s frenetic week lies a clear throughline: a foreign policy rooted in pragmatic mercantilism. His vision, as articulated in Riyadh, is one where nations engage in mutually beneficial business deals to foster peace through profit. This approach marks a stark departure from traditional U.S. foreign policy, which often emphasized multilateral cooperation, human rights, and collective action on issues like climate change. Notably absent from Trump’s speeches was any mention of these themes, reflecting his preference for bilateral dealmaking over global alliances.
Trump’s focus on economic deals was evident in his Middle East tour. His strategic bet on Saudi Arabia’s leadership under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman paid dividends, with Riyadh emerging as a linchpin for regional stability and economic diversification. The Gulf’s authoritarian regimes, with their vast wealth and centralized power, are ideal partners for Trump’s deal-driven diplomacy. By prioritizing investment agreements over contentious issues like democratic reforms, Trump signaled that his primary goal is to leverage U.S. influence for economic gain.
The ceasefire between India and Pakistan, while a diplomatic win, also fits this pattern. Vice-President JD Vance’s initial comment that the conflict was “none of our business” gave way to pressure from both Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the nuclear powers to de-escalate. Trump’s claim of brokering the deal, though likely exaggerated given the involvement of other countries, underscores his desire to project an image of strength and dealmaking prowess.
The Limits of Trump’s Approach
Despite the flurry of activity, Trump’s week was not without setbacks, revealing the limitations of his approach. The Russia-Ukraine peace talks in Istanbul descended into chaos, with Putin’s absence and the Russian delegation’s junior status prompting accusations that Moscow was not taking the process seriously. Trump’s insistence that progress depended on a personal meeting with Putin highlighted his reliance on high-profile, leader-to-leader negotiations a strategy that falters when counterparts are unwilling to engage. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s skepticism and European allies’ reluctance to accept territorial concessions further complicated the talks.
In the Middle East, Trump’s lofty goals of securing peace deals in Gaza and Ukraine remained elusive. While he secured investment pledges, the absence of concrete progress on these conflicts underscored the challenges of applying a business-deal mindset to intractable geopolitical issues. Hamas confirmed direct talks with the U.S., but Israel’s continued airstrikes and blockade of Gaza aid worsened the humanitarian crisis, complicating negotiations. Similarly, Trump’s approval of a $310 million arms sale to Ukraine, alongside a minerals deal, suggested a shift away from neutrality, undermining his role as an honest broker.
Critics argue that Trump’s approach underestimates the complexity of global conflicts. Former President Joe Biden, in a May 2025 BBC interview, described Trump’s suggestion that Ukraine cede territory to Russia as “modern-day appeasement,” warning that it could embolden Putin to pressure neighboring states. European leaders, wary of acknowledging Russian gains, also resisted Trump’s peace plan, viewing it as politically toxic. These dynamics highlight a key flaw: Trump’s dealmaking assumes all parties share his transactional mindset, ignoring ideological, historical, and domestic political constraints.
What Trump Really Wants
Trump’s week of peace brokering offers a window into his broader ambitions. First, he seeks to cement his legacy as a global dealmaker, using high-profile diplomatic wins to bolster his domestic image. The ceasefire between India and Pakistan, though fragile, was trumpeted as a triumph of “peace through strength,” resonating with his MAGA supporters. Second, Trump aims to reorient U.S. foreign policy toward economic self-interest, prioritizing trade and investment over ideological crusades. His Gulf tour and tariff cuts on China reflect a belief that prosperity can stabilize volatile regions.
Third, Trump’s actions suggest a desire to project American dominance through personal charisma and bilateral relationships. His insistence on meeting Putin and his hands-on approach in the Middle East underscore a preference for top-down diplomacy, where he plays the central role. This aligns with his “America First” doctrine, which views multilateral institutions and collective action as secondary to U.S. power.
However, Trump’s vision is not without contradictions. His simultaneous pursuit of peace and arms deals, as seen in Ukraine, raises questions about his commitment to neutrality. His focus on economic deals risks alienating allies who prioritize security guarantees or human rights. Moreover, his reliance on personal relationships makes his strategy vulnerable to the whims of other leaders, as evidenced by Putin’s no-show in Turkey.
Implications for the Future
Trump’s frantic week has reshaped perceptions of U.S. foreign policy. Allies in Europe and Asia, accustomed to multilateral frameworks, may struggle to adapt to his transactional approach. Adversaries like Russia and Iran, while open to negotiations, may exploit Trump’s eagerness for deals to extract concessions. The Middle East, where Trump’s economic focus aligns with regional priorities, may prove more receptive, but unresolved conflicts like Gaza could undermine progress.
Domestically, Trump’s diplomacy has polarized opinion. Supporters view him as a master negotiator restoring American greatness, while critics warn that his deal-driven approach risks long-term instability. The coming months will test whether Trump’s vision of “commerce not chaos” can deliver lasting peace or merely temporary deals.
Conclusion
Trump’s week of peace brokering was a masterclass in high-stakes diplomacy, blending economic ambition with geopolitical maneuvering. From the Gulf to South Asia, his actions reflected a belief that profit and pragmatism can resolve global conflicts. Yet, the fragility of his achievements and the complexity of the challenges he faces suggest that the “art of the deal” has its limits. As Trump continues to reshape U.S. foreign policy, the world watches to see whether his frenetic pace will yield enduring stability or merely fleeting headlines. What is clear is that Trump’s true aim is to redefine America’s role on the global stage not as a moral arbiter, but as a dealmaking superpower.
Attachments
Last edited:
