What's new

Trump 'signs off' on deal to pause US-China trade war

vi-va

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Messages
6,475
Reaction score
3
Country
China
Location
United States
Trump 'signs off' on deal to pause US-China trade war

_110121970_gettyimages-1188051888.jpg

Image copyright AFP/Getty Images
Asian stock markets rose on Friday as the US and China moved close to signing a trade deal to avert a new round of tariffs.

The deal could be announced later in the day, after US President Donald Trump reportedly signed off on the terms.

Washington is said to have agreed to remove some tariffs, while Beijing would boost purchases of US farm goods.

However, many of the more difficult issues are still to be addressed.

In early trading, Japan's Nikkei 225 rose 2.2% while Hong Kong's Hang Seng was up 1.9%.

Earlier, optimism surrounding a trade deal pushed US markets higher, with the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq closing at fresh record highs.

"It's a good starting point," Chamber of Commerce head of international affairs Myron Brilliant told broadcaster CNBC after meeting with White House officials.

A deal would deliver a victory to Mr Trump, who is under political pressure, with debate on his impeachment underway in the US Congress.

He tweeted earlier on Thursday that the US and China were "very" close to an agreement.

"They want it and so do we!" he wrote.

Skip Twitter post by @realDonaldTrump
Getting VERY close to a BIG DEAL with China. They want it, and so do we!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2019
Report
End of Twitter post by @realDonaldTrump

Previous truces have collapsed and without a formal announcement or presentation of a written agreement, many remained wary. The hints of progress on Thursday still sent the main US stock indexes up about 1%.

The US reportedly offered to halve tariff rates on about $350bn (£260bn) worth of Chinese goods, some of which had climbed as high as 25%.

However, the deal is not expected to address many of the more difficult issues that triggered the fight, like China's subsidies for certain industries.

As described, the potential agreement falls short of what the US initially said were its goals, said Jennifer Hillman, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a former trade official.

"This should NOT be described as a trade agreement," she wrote on Twitter.

"It is a purchase and sale agreement that does virtually nothing to address substantive concerns of US (+rest of the world) with China's trade practices."

Skip Twitter post by @J_A_Hillman
As former USTR Mike Froman put it, this should NOT be described as a trade agreement. It is a purchase and sale agreement that does virtually nothing to address substantive concerns of US (+rest of the world) with China's trade practices. +US farmers + consumers paid heavy price. https://t.co/uqwbAKefeQ

— Jennifer Hillman (@J_A_Hillman) December 12, 2019
Report
End of Twitter post by @J_A_Hillman

Mr Trump has repeatedly declared progress toward a deal that would end the trade war, which has seen tariffs imposed on more than $450bn worth of US-China trade and weighed on the global economy.

In October, he announced that the two sides had agreed to terms for a "Phase One" deal, but negotiations dragged on.

Without progress, the US had threatened to impose tariffs on more than $150bn worth of Chinese exports on 15 December.

Unlike earlier rounds of tariffs, this one was slated to fall largely on everyday items, including smartphones, children's books, footwear and clothing, heightening the economic stakes, since the US economy is driven by consumer spending.

Goldman Sachs analysts estimated that US economic growth could be 0.4% lower next year, without some sort of deal to avoid the next tariffs and roll back some of those already in place.

White House officials have downplayed the risks, arguing the tariffs are aimed at making China give up "unfair" trade practices, such as alleged intellectual property theft.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-50765743
 
.
What? Just 2 years and caving in already, aye trumpy ol' boy? I guess it makes sense...his way of taking revenge from america for impeaching his pink pimply arse.
 
. . . .
lol. I wonder why people here just report one side of the news story?

Trump sign this because China agreed in principle to double the purchase of US farm product (mostly soybean) from 24 billions to 50 billions. That is what trump calls his phase one goal. He got it, and in return, he sign the deal to "suspend" the tariff, pending a written agreement is formed.

The phase one deal was offered and on the table since October.....

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/othe...goods-for-tariff-relief-us-sources/ar-AAK3WL6

I don't think China get anything else other than a reprieve from the tariff
 
. .
What? Just 2 years and caving in already, aye trumpy ol' boy? I guess it makes sense...his way of taking revenge from america for impeaching his pink pimply arse.
All this was to fluctuate the stock maret to make his family and friends richer. Trump is corrupt to the hilt as can be seen by the impeachment hearing, willing to sell his people and country for money.
 
.
lol. I wonder why people here just report one side of the news story?

Trump sign this because China agreed in principle to double the purchase of US farm product (mostly soybean) from 24 billions to 50 billions. That is what trump calls his phase one goal. He got it, and in return, he sign the deal to "suspend" the tariff, pending a written agreement is formed.

The phase one deal was offered and on the table since October.....

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/othe...goods-for-tariff-relief-us-sources/ar-AAK3WL6

I don't think China get anything else other than a reprieve from the tariff

SCMP reports that Trump also will make cuts in duties which is already in place.
 
. .
Yeah, it's 50% cut and suspension of new tariff, it was the same Phase 1 deal from Trump the Chinese rejected back in October.

I don't remember Trump wants to cut back any tariff at all, hence his famous statement. It's the Chinese demand that a cut back in tariff is a must.
 
.
I don't remember Trump wants to cut back any tariff at all, hence his famous statement. It's the Chinese demand that a cut back in tariff is a must.

Not sure if China had demanded that, I think at some point they demanded the remove of 100% on existing tariff. But not really sure if they ever wanted 50% off.

Also, I don't think the deal is complete, term and condition may and can still change, maybe US offered so China would do some tits-for-tats? Nobody knows
 
. .
It's matter of more or less profit for China.

In what way it profit for China?

Before trade war, there were 0% extra tariff impose on Chinese import, and now they offer to cut back 50% of the not previously existed tariff and you are stuck with buying 50 billions extra worth of product. How does it mean profit to you?

It's like I go to a shop and buy a stereo for $100, when I am at the check out, the shop owner come to me and say, "hey, you need to get that TV as well or else I will increase the price of Stereo to $120". And after a few moment of argument, he offer me a deal and ask me to buy the stereo for $110 (Half the $20 tariff) if I buy the TV, did I make a profit buying the TV I don't want on the other hand I were charge $10 more for the stereo? Remember, I come to the store only wanting to buy a stereo for $100, not $110, not $120, and certainly not that damn TV...

Do you know the definition of blackmail? This is the dictionary definition of blackmail. Which if China taken this deal, mean US have successfully blackmail China into it....
 
Last edited:
.
did you forgot China put tariff on US product as well? your example did not include how you slapped the shop manager.

You intentionally neglected the fact what China is doing against US, what's for?
In what way it profit for China?

Before trade war, there were 0% extra tariff impose on Chinese import, and now they offer to cut back 50% of the not previously existed tariff and you are stuck with buying 50 billions extra worth of product. How does it mean profit to you?

It's like I go to a shop and buy a stereo for $100, when I am at the check out, the shop owner come to me and say, "hey, you need to get that TV as well or else I will increase the price of Stereo to $120". And after a few moment of argument, he offer me a deal and ask me to buy the stereo for $110 (Half the $20 tariff) if I buy the TV, did I make a profit buying the TV I don't want on the other hand I were charge $10 more for the stereo? Remember, I come to the store only wanting to buy a stereo for $100, not $110, not $120, and certainly not that damn TV...

Do you know the definition of blackmail? This is the dictionary definition of blackmail. Which if China taken this deal, mean US have successfully blackmail China into it....
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom