What's new

Top US General: USA will need to maintain troops in Afghanistan till there is an insurgency

excellent decision! it is better that they remain in afghanistan. stay longer in a quagmire.
 
what is the point of this
when you post some third person you must also give your opinion about it
just open a new thread and post a random tweet!!
It is not a random third person as it was a statement by top US General.
 
LOL means an indefinite stay.

Russia, Iran, China and Pakistan are going to party indefinitely.
 
If Americans decide to Stay, At least take down the TTP , JuA , BLA/BRA leaders .
 
This general is one of about ten people in the USA that thinks the USA should stay in Afghanistan. The public, war veterans, and most politicians think the USA needs to get out. Only experts at think tanks and some generals think the USA needs to stay. There professional creditably is on the line.
 
I guess he's just admitting that the Afghanistan war is "within budget".
 
The generals need a ground to test in real conditions new weapons, new technologies etc. In Afghanistan they have free hands. Nobody will register an FIR :-)pop:) for thé killing of «unknown» randomly selected target painted as terrorist.

Poor Afghanis.

So yes they need to stay there for this reason among others.

I could be wrong.

If Americans decide to Stay, At least take down the TTP , JuA , BLA/BRA leaders .

How could they kill their own children ? At least while they are still useful against Pakistan?
 
u.s will implant isis in afghanistan and in coming years terrorist attacks will increase in Pakistan
 
the iq level of american generals has really gone down the drain in recent years. they just don't realize that they are:
1. are the very reason for the insurgency and
2. they lost and lost MISERABLY the battle for the hearts & minds...
3. they aren't in a position to decide if they can keep troops or not.

let's face it, the afghan taliban have the hearts and minds of the masses on their side.
 
Back
Top Bottom