What's new

Tony Blair: 'We didn't cause Iraq crisis'

BDforever

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
14,387
Reaction score
8
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
The 2003 invasion of Iraq is not to blame for the violent insurgency now gripping the country, former UK prime minister Tony Blair has said.

Speaking to the BBC's Andrew Marr, he said there would still be a "major problem" in the country even without the toppling of Saddam Hussein in 2003.

Mr Blair said the current crisis was a "regional" issue that "affects us all".

And he warned against believing that if we "wash our hands of it and walk away, then the problems will be solved".

_75534860_hi022690800.jpg
Shias in Iraq have been urged to take up arms against the Sunni militants
"Even if you'd left Saddam in place in 2003, then when 2011 happened - and you had the Arab revolutions going through Tunisia and Libya and Yemen and Bahrain and Egypt and Syria - you would have still had a major problem in Iraq," Mr Blair said.

"Indeed, you can see what happens when you leave the dictator in place, as has happened with Assad now. The problems don't go away.

Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote
Where the extremists are fighting, they have to be countered hard, with force”

Tony Blair
"So, one of the things I'm trying to say is - you know, we can rerun the debates about 2003 - and there are perfectly legitimate points on either side - but where we are now in 2014, we have to understand this is a regional problem, but it's a problem that will affect us."

'Hitting them'
Syria is three years into a civil war in which tens of thousands of people have died and millions more have been displaced.

In August last year, a chemical attack near the capital Damascus killed hundreds of people.

In the same month, UK MPs rejected the idea of air strikes against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's government to deter the use of chemical weapons.

Writing on his website, the former prime minister warned that every time the UK puts off action, "the action we will be forced to take will be ultimately greater".

He said the current violence in Iraq was the "predictable and malign effect" of inaction in Syria.

"We have to liberate ourselves from the notion that 'we' have caused this," he wrote. "We haven't."

He said the takeover of Mosul by Sunni insurgents was planned across the Syrian border.

"Where the extremists are fighting, they have to be countered hard, with force," Mr Blair said.

The Sunni insurgents, from the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), regard Iraq's Shia majority as "infidels".

After taking Mosul late on Monday, and then Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit, ISIS militants pressed south into the ethnically divided Diyala province.

On Friday, they battled against Shia fighters near Muqdadiya - just 50 miles (80km) from Baghdad's city limits.

Reinforcements from both the Iraqi army and Shia militias have arrived in the city of Samarra, where fighters loyal to ISIS are trying to enter from the north.

'Bizarre views'
Security analyst Professor Eric Groves said he found Mr Blair's position to be "bizarre".

He told the BBC that had the UK intervened in Syria, it would have been against the Assad regime, which ISIS is fighting.

"So therefore, intervening in Syria might well have actually been in the interests of the ISIS people," he said.

_75481316_iraq_isis_control_624_v3.gif

US deploys warship amid Iraq crisis

Prof Groves, of Liverpool Hope University, added: "So saying this is a result of our non-intervention, if Mr Blair really thinks that going into Syria and basically fighting everyone was going to lead to a better situation, I think his views are somewhat bizarre actually. I can see very little logic in this."

BBC political correspondent Gary O'Donoghue said there would be "many who take issue" with Mr Blair's comments.

_75526207_75526206.jpg
Thousands of Shias are reported to have volunteered to help halt the advance of ISIS
_75526000_75525999.jpg
The capital Baghdad is a tense place following the reverses for Iraqi government forces
The 2003 invasion of Iraq by British and US forces, on the basis that it had "weapons of mass destruction", has come back into focus as a result of the insurgency in the country.

The Iraq War has been the subject of several inquiries, including the Chilcot inquiry - which began in 2009 - into the UK's participation in military action against Saddam Hussein and its aftermath.

Last month, the inquiry said details of the "gist" of talks between Tony Blair and former US president George Bush before the Iraq war are to be published.

Mr Blair has said he wants the Chilcot report to be published and he "resented" claims he was to blame for its slow progress.

source: BBC News - Tony Blair: 'We didn't cause Iraq crisis'
 
Well, let me admit as a westerner and usually-supporter-of-the-NATO-bunch, that this statement by Blair sounds to me like Blair is going 'tralalaaa let me plug my ears for the sound of reality' - this statement by Blair is political purposes only and does not acknowledge the reality i saw unfold in the news about Iraq since the invasion to ouster Saddam; that our support for the Shias of Iraq has led to a jo-jo movement of revenge between Sunnis and Shia in Iraq.

The western 'calls for unity in Iraq' have certainly come way too late. And then it remains to be seen if these public calls for unity are going to be backed up by western actual effective diplomatic pressure on the Shias of Iraq.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's right, it wasn't him but his and Bush's religious fantasies.
 
Back
Top Bottom