What's new

Tomahawk missile anti ship upgrade

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
PATUXENT RIVER NAS, Md. – Smart munitions experts at the Raytheon Co. are moving forward with a U.S. Navy program to retrofit the venerable Block IV Tactical Tomahawk missile for the anti-ship role with a new sensor system to enable the weapon to attack moving enemy vessels at sea.

Officials of the Naval Air Systems Command at Patuxent River Naval Air Station, Md., announced a $7.2 million order on Thursday to the Raytheon Missile Systems segment in Tucson, Ariz., to support the Maritime Strike Tomahawk (MST) rapid deployment capability.

The order calls for Raytheon to update technical data package of the guidance test set, and upgrade existing units to support the MST additions -- including hardware and software.

The Maritime Strike Tomahawk program is planned for initial operational capability in 2022, with procurement of upgrade kits continuing into 2023. Raytheon has been sole Tactical Tomahawk missile producer since 1994.

Raytheon's research on this program will involve architecture and algorithm development; prototyping; modeling and simulation test analysis; modernizing test equipment; hardware and software development; captive carry build-up and test; ground launch; and testing aboard surface warships.

Raytheon will provide 32 Maritime Strike Tomahawk upgrade kits in 2020; 50 kits in 2021, and 80 kits in 2022, at an estimated cost of about $457.9 million.

Navy joint task force commanders increasingly face long-range anti-ship missiles that threaten their surface forces and potentially deny access to mission-critical areas of operation, so they need a near-term capability to counter hostile surface forces. Without this, the Navy could face loss of life or critical mission failure, Navy officials say.

The Tactical Tomahawk missile has unique flight, launch, and information-processing capabilities that a seeker modification could help meet these needs affordably, officials say. Raytheon can integrate a new sensor suite into the Tactical Tomahawk quickly, and is the only known source with the technical knowledge to update the missile quickly enough for rapid delivery to the Fleet.

Since 2012 Raytheon has spent about $55 million of its own money for studies, mock-ups, and engineering analysis to find a Tomahawk missile seeker solution with the limited space available inside the missile to accommodate seekers, ancillary equipment and the processor.

For the Maritime Strike Tomahawk, Raytheon is proposing a seeker, processor, software, and a new inertial measuring unit for terminal maneuvers. Raytheon also is redesigning the system’s power budget and system cooling.

https://www.militaryaerospace.com/sensors/article/14038802/tomahawk-missile-antiship-upgrade
 
. . . . .
Tomohawk range can reach 2500 to 3000km so its antiship will be much lethal missiles and will destroy shipat very long distances unlike harba whose range is only 700km
 
. .
Tomohawk range can reach 2500 to 3000km so its antiship will be much lethal missiles and will destroy shipat very long distances unlike harba whose range is only 700km
Source that harba has 700km range? I have heard its potential range is 450km
 
.
Tomohawk range can reach 2500 to 3000km so its antiship will be much lethal missiles and will destroy shipat very long distances unlike harba whose range is only 700km
No anti ship version of Tomahawk will not have that range but most probably have 1500-1000 km range @Yaseen1
 
.
I think after china has developed long range anti ship missiles like df21 having range of 4000km u.s is expected to develop long range version of tomahawk missile
No anti ship version of Tomahawk will not have that range but most probably have 1500-1000 km range @Yaseen1
 
.
I think after china has developed long range anti ship missiles like df21 having range of 4000km u.s is expected to develop long range version of tomahawk missile
Are taking about anti ship ballistic missiles, both of them different ball game, One travel at hypersonic speeds ( 5 time faster then speed of sound) and other travel subsonic speeds 500-600 miles per hours, and don't trying to relate/mixed one & another, this unrelated to DF-21 ASBM tech @Yaseen1 :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
Issue with Anti-surface (Ship) warfare missiles are the target acquisition at longer ranges. Unlike land targets ship are not stationary. There isn’t much terrain on ocean surface. So real issue here is up to date target information via, satellite, over the horizon radar and other sensors.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom