What's new

To engage with China, India must stop peddling myths about the Line of Actual Control

Just because we can, doesn't mean we will. Do you also doubt our ability to win against Vietnam? Yet we made no moves. They don't have a defence treaty with US, if you must go that route.

I understand the skepticism, and the pride really. You feel India has made advances and it should be behind in fact it could be ahead in a few fields.

Well that's how we feel with the US, but facts remain facts.

Just look at what India is doing and what China is doing, India is still testing and tendering artillery, tanks, normal rifles, and things of that nature.

But if you feel India can defeat China, then I have really nothing to say, other than if nothing else is an indicator of military might, would spending be it? The more you spend the more you can do that's not me talking, that's the money talking.



then in the future just have discussions with countries and people you have an advantage over, Africa seems a good starting point, but avoid Botswana.


Money can talk to a certain extent only, we are building our defence against China not offense, remember, defense is much cheaper than offence and remember we are not called a major military power without a reason.

You attack us and you will get much more than just a bloddy nose, this is also a fact. This fact if better understood will be better for all sides, we are not asking China to settle for less, what we are pushing for is to demarcate clearly L.A.C which will reduce this jingoism and our wild media in turn making people more agreeable to China as a partner.

In any case China as a country would most probably be better off without the ill will of 1.2 billion people.
 
.
Money can talk to a certain extent only, we are building our defence against China not offense, remember, defense is much cheaper than offence and remember we are not called a major military power without a reason.

You attack us and you will get much more than just a bloddy nose, this is also a fact. This fact if better understood will be better for all sides, we are not asking China to settle for less, what we are pushing for is to demarcate clearly L.A.C which will reduce this jingoism and our wild media in turn making people more agreeable to China as a partner.

In any case China as a country would most probably be better off without the ill will of 1.2 billion people.
yes, defense is cheaper, you will hear no arguments from me.

Just curious, can you name some weapons systems the Indian army uses and in good number that would support this? Military strength is subjective in a way, but in many more ways it is very objective. You can also direct me to a page if you don't feel like listing and the other source can summarize it very neatly.
 
.
yes, defense is cheaper, you will hear no arguments from me.

Just curious, can you name some weapons systems the Indian army uses and in good number that would support this? Military strength is subjective in a way, but in many more ways it is very objective. You can also direct me to a page if you don't feel like listing and the other source can summarize it very neatly.

There are many systems in use and each one for a specific purpose, you can go through hrrp://idp.justthe80.com for the various systems in service and in development.
 
.
In any case China as a country would most probably be better off without the ill will of 1.2 billion people.

And you'd have been far better off without the ill will of 1.4 billion people, who collectively have the highest economic, industrial and scientific output in the world. Too bad most Chinese are absolutely blind to your ongoing criminal occupation of Sino-Tibetan and Mon territory.
 
.
And you'd have been far better off without the ill will of 1.4 billion people, who collectively have the highest economic, industrial and scientific output in the world. Too bad most Chinese are absolutely blind to your ongoing criminal occupation of Sino-Tibetan and Mon territory.
Mornonic reply, please come back when you can understand the context of my post.
 
.
And you'd have been far better off without the ill will of 1.4 billion people, who collectively have the highest economic, industrial and scientific output in the world. Too bad most Chinese are absolutely blind to your ongoing criminal occupation of Sino-Tibetan and Mon territory.
tibetans has nothing to do with han chinese. There culture is totally different from mainland china and they are far more closer to indians in cultural sense.
 
.
But we will also defend ourselves with everything we have,
tibetans has nothing to do with han chinese. There culture is totally different from mainland china and they are far more closer to indians in cultural sense.
so how many different cultural on Indian land? should we separate it first?
 
.
so how many different cultural on Indian land? should we separate it first?
every chinese boast about cultural similarity of all chinese. Tibetans has nothing to do with mainland china, you can't oppress them for long.
 
.
then in the future just have discussions with countries and people you have an advantage over, Africa seems a good starting point, but avoid Botswana.

It's not about that, it's as if we are discussing with a bamboo wall. It's as if what's in front is a rehearsed script. I guess it's the commie effect. It's as if we are conversing with people from a different world.
 
. . . .
It's not about that, it's as if we are discussing with a bamboo wall. It's as if what's in front is a rehearsed script. I guess it's the commie effect. It's as if we are conversing with people from a different world.
come on, have you ever read the Indian comments? It's always terrorists, no freedom, you do it too, terrorists, terrorists, commies, terrorists.

See, even your comment has the word commie.
 
. .
Bottom line: Indians need to be massacred every few years to remind them their status compared to China.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom