What's new

Times Square Bombing Attempt: Analysis, Context, and Importance of Tehrik-e Taliban P

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Times Square Bombing Attempt: Analysis, Context, and Importance of Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) Claims

By Charlie Szrom, Chris Harnisch
May 3, 2010

UPDATE: TTP spokesman Azam Tariq has denied TTP responsibility for the video that featured Qari Hussain Mehsud and claimed responsibility for the Times Square attack. Tariq did, however, verify the legitimacy of one of the Hakimullah Mehsud videos threatening strikes in U.S. cities, thus corroborating the TTP’s efforts to increasingly target the U.S. and increase its international profile, as discussed below. The Critical Threats Project will continue to monitor developments.

Pakistan’s Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) has linked itself to the failed May 1 attack in New York City’s Times Square through a full-fledged media campaign over the last two days. The group’s propaganda efforts reveal several important points, all of which are significant irrespective of whether the TTP had operational links to the attack:

First, the TTP seeks credit for the attack due to its need for a high-profile success to show its strength.

Second, the TTP may be attempting to weaken international support and Pakistani will for any incursion into North Waziristan.

Third, the TTP clearly views itself as a member of the global violent Islamist network led by al Qaeda.

Fourth, the TTP has again identified the U.S. homeland as a primary target, a threat that should be taken seriously regardless of the group’s role in the Times Square attempt.

On May 2, the Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the failed May 1 vehicle bombing in New York City’s Times Square in an audio message. [1] The TTP issued a video that same day showing its nominal leader Hakimullah Mehsud, [2] previously believed to have died in late January until reports began to emerge of his survival last week.[3] Hakimullah Mehsud specifically mentions targets in the U.S. in this second video, allegedly produced on April 4, saying “The time is very near when our Fidaeen will attack the American states in their major cities.” [4] In a third video, allegedly recorded on April 19 but released on May 2, Hakimullah Mehsud goes into further detail on his threat, stating that, “From now on, the main targest of our Fidaeen are American cities. The good news will be heard within some days or weeks. Today on-wards, the direction of our Jehad [sic] is American states and cities.” This third video displayed these statements over a backdrop showing explosions imprinted on a satellite image of the continental United States. [5]

The TTP, by releasing the two videos immediately after taking credit for the Times Square attack, has sent several messages: first, that it should receive credit for the Times Square attack; second, that it follows through on its threats; third, that Americans should now recognize the threat posed by the TTP; and fourth, that the TTP remains a strong and active member of the international violent Islamist network led by al Qaeda.

The TTP may or may not bear responsibility for the Times Square attack. Reportage on May 3 indicates that U.S. officials are examining international connections, perhaps involving the TTP, to the attack, but it could take days or weeks to corroborate or dismiss the group’s self-proclaimed role.[6]

The TTP has a history of taking credit for terrorist plots and making threats without clear confirmation of its involvement or follow-through. Former TTP leader Beitullah Mehsud stated in a January 2008 interview, for instance, “…we want to defeat America and Britain, and to break the arrogance and the despotism of the infidel.” [7] No TTP-directed attacks in America occurred afterwards. Beitullah Mehsud also took credit in April 2009 for a shooting rampage at an immigration center in Binghamton, New York, an improbable claim given that the perpetrator of the attacks did not appear to have a connection to violent Islamists. [8]

The TTP’s attempt to take credit for the attack signifies its focus on the U.S. and underscores its role in the broader Islamist struggle led by al Qaeda; the results of the investigation into whether the TTP actually masterminded the Times Square attack will not fundamentally alter these conclusions.

OPERATIONAL CONTEXT

Shortly after Beitullah Mehsud claimed responsibility for the Binghamton shooting, the Pakistani military waged a significant campaign across Pakistan’s tribal region – in Swat, Waziristan, and Orakzai, among other areas – that has seized militant territory and significantly weakened the TTP organization. Beitullah Mehsud founded the TTP in December 2007 explicitly to combat the Pakistani state, following the July 2007 Red Mosque siege. Yet, the TTP has shifted at least some resources from targeting primarily Pakistani interests to focusing on American targets; the December 30, 2009 attack on the CIA base in Khost, Afghanistan, and the April 5, 2010 attack on the U.S. consulate in Peshawar, in part, demonstrate the results of such shifts. The TTP has often selected high-profile targets when it faces imminent threats on the ground, in an effort to show continued strength, as argued here. The group conducted a number of attacks in December 2009 across Punjab and Islamabad, some of the core population centers in Pakistan, shortly following the Waziristan campaign. [9] Yet, it has been unable to generate worldwide headlines this spring, aside from the U.S. consulate attack.

RHETORIC AND PLACE WITHIN GLOBAL MILITANT ISLAMIST NETWORK

TTP rhetoric has reinforced its choice of the U.S. as a target. The video allegedly produced on April 19 mentioned the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as Pakistan. [10] Hakimullah Mehsud specifically mentions “mujahideen” in Palestine, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen in the video allegedly produced on April 4.[11] The TTP and Hakimullah Mehsud see America as their enemy in all of these conflicts, often portraying the Pakistani government as a tool of the U.S. in its propaganda.

The TTP claim of credit for the Times Square attack also sheds light on the group’s ideology and place within the global militant Islamist movement led by al Qaeda. The group has focused primarily on attacking targets in Pakistan, but it views itself as part of a much greater struggle. The TTP stated that the motive for the attack was to avenge the deaths of martyred mujahideen leaders, naming explicitly Beitullah Mehsud and Abu Omar al Baghdadi and his companions in Iraq. A TTP attack avenging the death of its former Pakistani leader Beitullah Mehsud would be expected. Specifically mentioning Abu Omar al Baghdadi, the former leader of al Qaeda in Iraq (a.k.a the Islamic State of Iraq) killed by US and Iraqi forces on April 18,[12] reveals the group’s solidarity with the global movement and reverence for al Baghdadi.

Al Baghdadi served as the leader of the self-proclaimed Islamic State of Iraq (ISI) and came the closest to achieving a status sought by all factions of the global militant Islamist movement but attained only by the founder and current leader of the Taliban, Mullah Omar: the establishment of an Islamic state governed by the movement’s Salafist interpretation of Islamic law. The ISI never achieved the actual governance structure and independence that Omar’s Islamist government in Afghanistan did. But the use of the word “state” – a word lacking in the names of the two other official al Qaeda franchises franchises, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) – clearly shows the importance the ISI had within the greater movement. The ISI had an elevated role within the global movement because al Qaeda’s central leadership singled out Iraq as the future seat of an Islamic caliphate.

Al Baghdadi’s death fomented a passionate response among al Qaeda franchises and associated groups around the world. Al Shabaab, a terror group in Somalia that has pledged allegiance to bin Laden, conducted a suicide attack in Mogadishu for the stated purpose of avenging the death of al Baghdadi and fellow ISI leader Abu Ayyub al Masri.[13] An al Qaeda affiliate group in the Levant, Brigades of Abdullah Azzam, offered its condolences for the deaths of al Baghdadi and al Masri and vowed to avenge them.[14] AQIM and the al Qaeda-affiliated, though not officially franchised, Islamic Emirate of the Caucasus also expressed their condolences for the two slain ISI leaders.[15]

The TTP’s statement reflects its solidarity with the other groups in the global militant Islamist movement and highlights its position as part of the movement. Moreover, the TTP’s intention to conduct an attack (or claim to conduct an attack) in revenge for the death of an al Qaeda leader in Iraq, shows the group’s view that Iraq is a key front in the same overall struggle in which the TTP is engaged.

CONCLUSION

The TTP has attempted to use its operations and rhetoric to weaken Pakistani and American efforts targeting the organization. Reports have emerged in recent days suggesting that the Pakistani military and government may consider conducting an operation in North Waziristan, a suspected haven for al Qaeda and Taliban elements.[16] This operation would follow a successful military campaign in South Waziristan, formerly the primary TTP stronghold, and a series of drone strikes that have targeted TTP operatives and other militants with increased intensity in North Waziristan.

The flurry of Hakimullah Mehsud and TTP claims over the past two days may represent another TTP effort intended to deter military action, just as Beitullah Mehsud’s April 2009 claim of involvement in attacks in the U.S. preceded an intensive anti-TTP military campaign. The TTP is also attempting to exploit the Times Square incident to prove its vitality as a member of the global violent Islamist network. Highlighting al Baghdadi’s death as a motive for conducting an attacks shows that the group views itself as a key player in that network. The TTP likely desires a perceived success to attract recruits and fundraising dollars, lacking other high-profile successes and facing continued defeat upon its home turf.

A TTP attack attempt on the American homeland – regardless of its success – would signify a hitherto unknown capability of the TTP. Whether or not the TTP conducted the attack, observers should recognize the group’s propaganda campaign as an effort to weaken international support and Pakistani will for any North Waziristan incursion and prove its strength. The U.S. should also take all necessary precautions to defeat and defend against the TTP, recognizing that whatever its operational capacity in the U.S., the group has clearly identified the U.S. as a target and itself as a member of the global network led by al Qaeda.
 
.
i am really sorry for posting it in multiple threads but i found it important to post here again,,,, Must watch this

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
President Obama meets with his National Security Team on Pakistan and Afghanistan !



Posted By Anne McGinn On May 6, 2010 @ 2:41 pm In White House | No Comments

President Obama met late this morning with his national security team on Afghanistan and Pakistan. While Press Secretary Robert Gibbs wouldn't go into much detail, the group, which does meet regularly to discuss the region, also discussed last week's failed Times Square bombing attempt by Pakistani-American Faisal Shahzad. Gibbs characterized the conversation as an opportunity to discusses "where we were" on the investigation.

The national security team met with the President for an hour and 15 minutes in the Situation Room, just a week before Mr Obama is to meet with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

Participants in today's closed meeting included:

Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State

Robert Gates, Secretary of Defense

Rahm Emanuel, White House Chief of Staff

Ambassador Susan Rice, United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations

General James L. Jones, National Security Advisor

Admiral Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence

Tom Donilon, Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor

John Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism

James Steinberg, Deputy Secretary of State

Michele Flournoy, Undersecretary of Defense Policy

Leon Panetta, CIA Director

Rajiv Shah, USAID Administrator

Admiral Michael Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (via videoconference)

General James E. Cartwright, USMC, Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff

Richard Holbrooke, U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan

Anne Patterson, U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan (via videoconference)

Karl Eikenberry, U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan (via videoconference)

General David Petraeus, Commander, USCENTCOM

General Stanley McChrystal, Commander, International Security Assistance Force (ISAF)

Lieutenant General Douglas Lute, Special Assistant to the President for Afghanistan and Pakistan

Click here to print.

President Obama meets with his National Security Team on Pakistan and Afghanistan Row 2, Seat 4

Copyright © 2009 Row 2, Seat 4. All rights reserved.
 
Last edited:
.
Debate on Expanded Presence in Pakistan !

May 6, 2010

By MARK MAZZETTI and MARK LANDLER
WASHINGTON — The evidence of ties between the man accused of being the Times Square bomber and Pakistani militants has intensified debate inside the Obama administration about expanding America’s military presence in Pakistan, with some officials making the case to increase the number of Special Operations troops working with Pakistani forces in the country’s western mountains.

The American military presence in Pakistan has already grown substantially over the past year, and now totals more than two hundred troops, part of a largely secret program to share intelligence with Pakistani Army and paramilitary troops and train them to battle militant groups.

But the failed bombing in Times Square, and evidence that the accused man, Faisal Shahzad, received training in a camp run by the Pakistani Taliban, has given support to those who want to expand the mission.

In particular, some inside the administration believe that the C.I.A. program of killing militants from the air is insufficient for preventing attacks on the West, and that an expanded training mission might raise confidence in Pakistan’s military enough to launch an offensive in the militant sanctuary of North Waziristan, in the tribal areas.

“There is a growing sense that there will need to be more of a boots on the ground strategy,” said one Obama administration official.

Officials, who requested anonymity to discuss strategy surrounding a program that is technically secret, emphasized that any new troops in Pakistan would serve as advisers and trainers, not as combat forces.

But the presence of any American troops on Pakistani soil is extremely sensitive. It is thought to be widely opposed by Pakistanis, and the Pentagon has worked hard to keep a low profile. American troops there are careful about how much time they spend away from enclosed garrisons.

Officials said there was now discussion about presenting Pakistan’s government with a formal request to dispatch more Special Operations troops to the country. American officials believe they have improved relations with Islamabad in recent months, and that this might be a particularly opportune time to press the case.

But one senior Pakistani official cautioned that Washington should not overreach.

“The Americans have to be careful not to make demands that are disproportionate to the good will they have built up,” he said.

It is also unclear how much leverage the United States would have, given that the attack was amateurish and unsuccessful.

In the meantime, American officials said that Pakistan’s government had been helpful during the initial phase of the investigation. Investigators have passed along leads from Mr. Shahzad’s interrogation to officials at the American Embassy in Islamabad, who have passed the leads on to Pakistani authorities.

So far, administration officials said, Pakistani authorities have been cooperating with requests for details about Mr. Shahzad and his family. The American ambassador to Pakistan, Anne Patterson, spoke on Thursday with Pakistan’s prime minister, Yousaf Raza Gilani, and the foreign minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi.

Administration officials said their top priority was to nail down Mr. Shahzad’s links to militant groups, and then to press Pakistan to act against the groups. While the evidence continues to point to the Pakistani Taliban as the primary link, a senior official said Mr. Shahzad “appears to be at the intersection of a whole lot of strands.”

“There’s a bit of a false distinction being made between these groups,” said another official. “The Pakistani Taliban is connected to Al Qaeda, which is connected to the Haqqani network. I don’t think you can put team jerseys on them.”

Pakistani officials have blown hot and cold on the issue of American troops in the country. Months ago, when sentiment was running more strongly against additional troops, Pakistan held up issuing visas for advisers and trainers. After visits by senior officials, including Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Pakistan began issuing them again.

The near-miss in Times Square on Saturday evening is likely to make some Pakistani officials less reluctant to accept additional American trainers, said officials with knowledge of the Pakistani government. There is a sense in Islamabad, these officials said, that if the car bomb had exploded, it would have severely strained relations between the United States and Pakistan.

Gen. David H. Petraeus, the head of United States Central Command, has been very supportive of the American training mission in Pakistan. But military officials said General Petraeus was cautious about making a formal request to Pakistan now, as he is concerned about the impact such a move would have on relations with Pakistan’s military and on inflaming anti-American sentiment in the country.

For the Obama administration, the terrorist plot comes at a sensitive time in its effort to cultivate Pakistan. In March, it held a high-level strategic dialogue with Pakistan’s government, which officials said went a long way toward building up trust between the two sides.

Pakistan, for its part, said it would crack down on any group making the United States a target. “We do not, and we will not, make distinctions between any terrorist groups,” said Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States, Husain Haqqani. “Pakistan has proven over the last few years that it is fighting extremists for its own sake. We will continue to do that.”


Eric Schmitt contributed reporting.

More in Asia Pacific (5 of 43 articles)
Mumbai Gunman Sentenced to Death
Read More »

links THE NEW YORK TIMES

Debate on Expanded Presence in Pakistan - NYTimes.com
 
.
Back
Top Bottom