This Suicide Bomber Will NOT Be Called Terrorist Because He Is White

[YeBeWarned]

The usual whining from You, how surprising...

Its called personal Opinion where i live ..

Also disproven, since several white men have been branded terrorists.
Facts do not count of course, when there is an opportunity to spew out racist hatred, I guess.

Of course , but not in mainstream Media a white person is rarely a Terrorist ... the word Terrorism only associated with Muslims , Arabs , Asians .. not Caucasians in past few years ....
You call this Racist ? lol i am glad my White Wife agree with me so i wonder why you think its a racist comment , unless you are yourself a racist bigot ..

There is no agreed definition of terrorism.
Each country have their own definition.
The US have one definition, and it is not surprising that they use that when
they decide what to call an act of violence.

To me there is a standard definition of Terrorism ... to me any person who terrorize or his/her action terrorize innocent civilians are Terrorists , regardless of their race, color , religion , nationality ..

You can start complaining when people are branded terrorists, without meeting the criteria,

This person certainly fulfill my Criteria of been Terrorist , unfortunately when the person's skin is White, no Criteria is enough to prove him/her a Terrorist .

Complaining about people beeing branded terrorists after meeting the criteria is a non-flyer.

tell me who is Whining

 

[gambit]

To me there is a standard definition of Terrorism ... to me any person who terrorize or his/her action terrorize innocent civilians are Terrorists , regardless of their race, color , religion , nationality ..

That is not a helpful standard. You essentially put police officers into that category because in order for them to do their job, they have to -- no matter how brief -- induce some measures of fear of authority and even 'terror' into the situation. You put them into the same class as law breakers.

Think carefully before you respond. The moment you start arguing why police officers should not be consider as 'terrorists' in those unique situations, you pretty much confirm the other side's argument that there are conditions attached to some situations and not to others, and those conditions differentiate true terrorists, the ones with political motivations and agenda, from the rest.

 

[YeBeWarned]

That is not a helpful standard. You essentially put police officers into that category because in order for them to do their job, they have to -- no matter how brief -- induce some measures of fear of authority and even 'terror' into the situation. You put them into the same class as law breakers.

I disagree, Police's actions under certain circumstance to prevent a violence may disturb someone but terrorizing is something else .. you are mixing Terror with Disturbance. if a Police officer Shoots an innocent unarmed Civilian he land in the same Terrorist Category to me .. because the only difference between him and an ISIS fighter is that one wears a uniform .

Think carefully before you respond. The moment you start arguing why police officers should not be consider as 'terrorists' in those unique situations, you pretty much confirm the other side's argument that there are conditions attached to some situations and not to others, and those conditions differentiate true terrorists, the ones with political motivations and agenda, from the rest.

I pretty much stand by my standard .. A terrorist is someone who is terrorizing Innocent Civilians by his or her action , he/she can be motivated by a Political or religious agenda which in this case is Conservative ideas this man has, and many others in USA who were called or portrayed as Mentally challenged or Disturbed people .. I wonder when was the last time when USA actually Designate a White American male/Female a Terrorist ? maybe you can remind me

 

[gambit]

I disagree, Police's actions under certain circumstance to prevent a violence may disturb someone but terrorizing is something else .. you are mixing Terror with Disturbance. if a Police officer Shoots an innocent unarmed Civilian he land in the same Terrorist Category to me .. because the only difference between him and an ISIS fighter is that one wears a uniform .

You did exactly what we know you would.

First, you made an overly broad generalization to try to make effective your indictment of US. Then you parse your 'terrorism' criteria to try to preserve that failed generalization.

I pretty much stand by my standard .. A terrorist is someone who is terrorizing Innocent Civilians by his or her action , he/she can be motivated by a Political or religious agenda which in this case is Conservative ideas this man has, and many others in USA who were called or portrayed as Mentally challenged or Disturbed people .. I wonder when was the last time when USA actually Designate a White American male/Female a Terrorist ? maybe you can remind me

Tim McVeigh for one. Not that hard to find.

https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism

The FBI do call out 'terrorism' and labels 'terrorist' when appropriate. The problem with you and others in this thread is that you dislike the quickness of labeling 'terrorist' to anyone associated with Islam and that when white people are involved in similar acts, you do not like the slowness of investigations before any labeling.

 

[YeBeWarned]

You did exactly what we know you would.

Who are we i wonder ?

First, you made an overly broad generalization to try to make effective your indictment of US. Then you parse your 'terrorism' criteria to try to preserve that failed generalization.

well half of the west world lives in such generalization my friend , my own Parents and grandparents in law have this brutal Generalization about Muslim that we beat our wives , we sold white girls in slavery and so on .. i guess you are either been to naive or trying so desperately to hide this Generalization of Muslims by the west ..not working ..

The FBI do call out 'terrorism' and labels 'terrorist' when appropriate. The problem with you and others in this thread is that you dislike the quickness of labeling 'terrorist' to anyone associated with Islam and that when white people are involved in similar acts, you do not like the slowness of investigations before any labeling.

Line from the link you posted ..
International terrorism: Perpetrated by individuals and/or groups inspired by or associated with designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (state-sponsored).

This lands US into a State Sponsor Terrorist , when Groups US been arming in Syria or Iraq .. ??
we don't dislike anything, if US declare someone a Terrorist and shove down it to their European pets what it will effect us ? for example US designated Hafiz Saeed a Terrorist , on who's behalf ? ( not a fan nor supporter of this guy ) .. American are selling the word Terrorism to the highest bidder .. so i don't take that seriously

enjoy

 

[khansaheeb]

timothy mcveigh was called a terrorist and executed. Eric Rudolph was called a terrorist.

Muslim community has its problems. Deal with it head on. Otherwise others will deal with your problems in a manner they seem fit.

Hindu community has huge problems, deal with it head on. Otherwise the issues you are facing will multiply and others will deal with them as seen.

 

[wiseone2]

Hindu community has huge problems, deal with it head on. Otherwise the issues you are facing will multiply and others will deal with them as seen.

we are not the ones facing immigration restrictions

 

[khansaheeb]

we are not the ones facing immigration restrictions

What cloud cuckoo land are you living in? I have an Indian friend who went back to India for holiday and US aren't letting him back in and he is a Hindu!

 

[wiseone2]

What cloud cuckoo land are you living in? I have an Indian friend who went back to India for holiday and US aren't letting him back in and he is a Hindu!

some politicians are explicitly calling for ban on muslim immigration

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Its called personal Opinion where i live ..

Of course , but not in mainstream Media a white person is rarely a Terrorist ... the word Terrorism only associated with Muslims , Arabs , Asians .. not Caucasians in past few years ....
You call this Racist ? lol i am glad my White Wife agree with me so i wonder why you think its a racist comment , unless you are yourself a racist bigot ..



To me there is a standard definition of Terrorism ... to me any person who terrorize or his/her action terrorize innocent civilians are Terrorists , regardless of their race, color , religion , nationality ..

This person certainly fulfill my Criteria of been Terrorist , unfortunately when the person's skin is White, no Criteria is enough to prove him/her a Terrorist .

tell me who is Whining

Mainstream media does not have the final word here.
And since your claim that Caucasians are not branded as terrorists is easily disproved,
It is a racist remark, and a whining remark.

States which has signed the Geneva Convention are excluded from beeing terrorists.
They may be war criminals but not terrorists. That term is reserved for non state actors.
That you may think differently, and complain that people do not share your definition is just more whining.

That terrorism is associated with Muslims has a lot to do with the the activities by Muslims,
and the racist hate shown by Muslims like yourself on social media.
You are actively contributing to the bad reputation.

There is a world of difference between someone who enters his workplace/school and shoots it up because of perceived maltreatment, and a Muslim which starts killing random people stating that his goal is to kill all infidels.

No amount of your whining will change that.

 

[YeBeWarned]

Mainstream media does not have the final word here.

Who does ?

And since your claim that Caucasians are not branded as terrorists is easily disproved,
It is a racist remark, and a whining remark.

Please disproved me wrong .. when was the last time those Red necks or Conservative Hilly billy's were called terrorists ? I am waiting
well its not Whining its called slapped by Reality to bigots ..

States which has signed the Geneva Convention are excluded from beeing terrorists.

So why US was up to declare Pakistan a State sponsor Terrorist ? have we not Signed Geneva Conventions ?

and the racist hate shown by Muslims like yourself on social media.
You are actively contributing to the bad reputation.

I haven't blame the entire race for the actions of some individuals , in fact i haven't blame anyone to begin with , all i said that when a white male commits a mass murder its either a lone wolf or Mentally disturbed, but when is a Muslim who murder someone, the mental disorder is out of the questions , cause all Muslims are mentally Stable according to WEST
I am actively showing you the Bigoted face of the west ... that might is hurting you

That terrorism is associated with Muslims has a lot to do with the the activities by Muslims,
and the racist hate shown by Muslims like yourself on social media.

The Terrorism has no associations with anyone in General , anyone who mass murder people , Terrorize innocent Civilians under any Political , religious or Racial Ideology is a Terrorist , so that white male who shoot 7 black people in Church is a Terrorist , the man who killed 30 young people in Oslo was a Terrorist , Those bomb and Van attacks by White males in UK were Terrorists , Attacks on Asians , Sikhs , Arabs after 911 were also act of terrorism . PERIOD
You can cry a ocean all you want, but that does not change the fact that West has double standards when it comes to declaring certain individuals Terrorists .
I haven't even said a single Word that would declare me a racist is there anyone who share your thoughts here ? other than some other Caucasian?

There is a world of difference between someone who enters his workplace/school and shoots it up because of perceived maltreatment, and a Muslim which starts killing random people stating that his goal is to kill all infidels.

So what if that Muslim killing infidels have mental issues ? if someone is mentally sick he/she can do certain things and say whatever they want ? remember that Dallas shootout ? which kills 5 Police officers ? that man said he is doing it in the name of Black lives matter , so does that make the entire Movement questionable ? or entire black community killers ? just because someone says something does not mean it .. Muslims can be mentally disturbed to , as they see constant bombing of US/NATO of Muslims countries in the name of WoT , so how are you and west is so sure that no Muslim on earth is mentally disturbed by the fact of these WARS ? you should stop embarrassing yourself
and for the reference that Oslo dude has killed 30 people in the name of his beliefs and ideology of his religion .

No amount of your whining will change that.

No amount of whining will not save you from the embarrassment and humiliations .. the double standards and bigotry is hard to miss or ignore

 

[khansaheeb]

some politicians are explicitly calling for ban on muslim immigration

Racists just jump from one pretext to another. Declaring Jihad on one billion people is suicidal, lol

 

[wiseone2]

Racists just jump from one pretext to another. Declaring Jihad on one billion people is suicidal, lol

countries have the right to restrict immigration - their country their rules

 

[khansaheeb]

countries have the right to restrict immigration - their country their rules

Especially when they are illegal themselves?

 

[Wolfhunter]

This Suicide Bomber Will NOT Be Called Terrorist Because He Is White
March 22, 2018 Eminraja 19 Views
Facebook532TwitterWhatsApp

57-year-old Robert Lewis Dear admitted killing 3 people at a Planned Parenthood, Dylann Roof, a white supremacist, murdered 9 African American as a result of Charleston Church mass shooting and then the Austin bomber Anthony Conditt – the media had countless names for them from mentally upset to suffering from depression to what not.

But, there was one word that media despite the killing of hundreds of people are afraid to call them and that is terrorist. It seems like the term has been only specified if your skin is brown or you’re a Muslim. It’s ironic that if the attacker has the religious affiliation to Islam, the topic of mental health never comes under question and the entire Muslim community living in these heterogeneous ‘’liberal’’ societies suffer from extreme labels like extremists and terrorists.

We don’t need to dive deeper into the history to discover examples. Let’s just go one day back on March 21st, when 23-year-old Mark Anthony terrorized the city of Austin when explosions, killing two and injuring several. But, soon after it, media along with condemning the incident labelled Anthony as mentally challenged.

The authorities and media purposefully avoid using the word terrorist for white people and instead always have justifications for these horrifying acts, calling them frustrated due to problems in their own life.

https://www.facebook.com/

It is concerning that these advocates and apparent world leaders of human rights are scared to use the label for their homegrown terrorists while will slap it on a Muslim or a black man without thinking twice. As writer and producer David Simon said that it’s his wish to once listen mainstream media calling confession of a Muslim or black suspect to crime as ‘’the outcry of a very challenged young man, talking about challenges that led him to this point’’ before death.
What are your thoughts on this? Let us know in the comments bar below.

Oh come on correct the headline of the thread, clearly calling this poor man with mental health issues a suicide bomber is a bit of a stretch, everyone knows white people can't be terrorists!