What's new

Third Dash-8 aircraft ‘Shwetbalaka’ arrives in Dhaka

They should still keep the existing widebodies (777-300, 787) but yes no use getting more.

They can of course get more 737's on lease, but I prefer newer regional platforms like A220's and E195-E2's (fuel cost is magnitudes lower than 737's and A320's). Part of LCC strategy is lower fuel cost per seat-mile.

They really need to do their homework on cost cutting if they have to go the LCC route. Like I said, they need to emulate Air Asia, the largest LCC in Asia (240 aircraft in the fleet, mostly narrow-body like you said).
But Biman could do one better by leasing A220's and E195-E2's. The only thing is that they cannot allow any baggage pieces per passenger, just one carry on per passenger. These things have a lot lower baggage hold space than 737's.

A220
iu


E195-E2
1024px-Wider%C3%B8e%2C_LN-WEA%2C_Embraer_E190-E2_%40_HEL.jpg
800px-Embaer_195-E2%2C_Paris_Air_Show_2019%2C_Le_Bourget_%28SIAE0871%29.jpg


Some possible avenues might be, (of course) by trying cutting fares to the bone for a while to see if it fills seats and raises occupancy rates.

But the Bangladeshi penchant for two luggage pieces per passenger will be a huge problem. And you can't charge Bangladeshi people for those extra luggage pieces either.
Bruh truth be told I don’t like your strategy. Narrow bodies are extremely uncomfortable imo plus volume of bd market doesn’t help narrow body cause on long routes either
 
.
Bruh truth be told I don’t like your strategy. Narrow bodies are extremely uncomfortable imo plus volume of bd market doesn’t help narrow body cause on long routes either

Well LCC's usually don't serve long routes - they serve at most three/four hour routes. LCC's only serve local to regional flights (say DAC-BKK and DAC-SIN), and not intercontinental ones (DAC-LHR or DAC-MAN).

They serve routes only with one class of aircraft (in case of Air Asia, only A320 variants, for reduced pilot certification costs), which have limited ranges (medium range) which are not long/thin routes (like Reykjavik to Stansted or Vilnius to the London City Airport with 737-500's, A318's, E195's), but neither short/fat ones like those one class 600 passenger 747's from Tokyo to Osaka.

Long thin routes are typically not profitable. In the case of Vilnius flight, Lithuanian Govt. had to guarantee payment to LOT polish airlines that they'd pay for expenses even if the flight went empty. The Lithuanians did this to promote business travel to their country.

The presumption that narrow bodies are uncomfortable may not be so true with newer class of narrow bodies, with higher pressurization, lighting changes etc.

To go the LCC route - Biman has to spawn a new sub-brand, separate from their normal operations. You can't have FSC practices mixed in with LCC practices, they are diametrically opposed to each other. They also have to negotiate slots with foreign govts that fall within the LCC narrow body three/four hour range.

Air Asia has already taken over most of Asian slots so it will be tough competing with Air Asia and handling those destinations.

The LCC concept was borrowed from Southwest Airlines founded almost four/five decades ago (based in Dallas' Love field, not DFW Int'l) which is a phenomenally successful airline and their fares reflect it. But look at the small print, it says 21 days advance purchase, and you can't switch seats like full-service carriers (no assigned seating. You can however cancel a flight and get credit for future use provided you do so early enough.

iu


Here is the LCC philosophy better explained by Air Asia. If you don't want to read everything, at least read the bolded parts.

History of the Low Cost Carrier (LCC)
The LCC boom began about 36 years ago when Southwest Airlines roam the skies of USA. Rollin King and Herb Kelleher got together and decided to start a different kind of airline with four set of principles: fly one type of aircraft to keep down engineering costs; keep overheads down; turnaround aircraft as quickly as possible; and abandon loyalty or air miles schemes. They began with one simple notion:

"If you get your guests to their destinations when they want to get there, on time, at the lowest possible fares and make darn sure they have a good time in doing so, people will fly your airline."

And you know what? They were right. Southwest Airlines is now the third largest airline in the world in terms of number of guests carried and also one of the most profitable airlines in the world. Southwest Airline's success spruced up interest in the LCC concept to all corners of the world. LCC now commands approximately 30% market share of the domestic USA traffic. In Europe, the LCC phenomenon spread much later with Ryanair in 1991, but the growth has been at a much faster pace. Southeast Asia embraced the LCC concept last, but the growth trajectory is the fastest. The LCC concept continued to spread throughout the world with WestJet in Canada in 1996, Virgin Blue in Australia in 2000, GOL in Brazil in 2001, AirAsia in Malaysia in 2002, Kulula in South Africa in 2003 and Air Deccan in India in 2004.

The reason for the success of the new low cost carriers is very simple - move the maximum number of guests at the minimum of cost. The concept of LCC is based on the idea that people would fly a lot more often if it were more affordable. LCC airline's main mission is to make air travel the most simple, convenient and inexpensive form of transportation in the world. The fare differential between the full service carriers (FSC) and LCC can be as high as 40%-60% cheaper.

How LCCs Offer Such Low Fares
The key to delivering low fares is to consistently keeping cost low. Attaining low cost requires high efficiency in every part of the business and maintaining simplicity. Therefore every system process must incorporate the best industry practices.

The key components of the LCC business model are the following;
1. High Aircraft Utilisation
Aircraft is kept flying as much as possible, the first flight starts as early in the morning commercially possible and the final flight typically ends at midnight. A fast turnaround is critical to ensure time spent on the ground is minimal – an airline makes money when the aircraft is flying, not when the aircraft is parked. AirAsia's turnaround time is 25 minutes; as compared to a Full Service Carrier (“FSC”) which typically has a one hour turnaround time. On average, AirAsia's utilisation per aircraft is 12 block hours per day, a FSC might do about 8 block hours per day.

2. No Frills
The underlying business for a LCC is to get a person from point A to point B. Everything else is considered to be luxury items or "frills", of which can be acquired for a small fee. Among the many frills that AirAsia has excluded include;
  • No free food & beverages. Some of our passengers may prefer not to consume food & beverages when onboard. There are those who prefer to rest throughout a flight or those who prefer having their meals before flying off. Hence we do not force our guests to purchase something they do not want or need. Guests are most welcome to purchase food & drinks at an affordable price from our website before the flight, of from the cabin crew during the flight.
  • Assigned seating. Guests receive boarding passes with pre-assigned seats and are not allowed to request for a seat change unnecessarily. If the guests have preferences on where or with whom they would like to seat on the aircraft, they are able to do so by paying a small sum when checking-in online. This feature is called “Pick-a-Seat”.
  • Ticketless airline. Less hassle for the customer, as guests need not worry about collecting tickets before travelling. This also allows AirAsia to keep our costs down (less paper, lower printing and distribution costs) and continue to offer low fares to our guests.
  • Online check-in. Guests are highly encouraged to check-in online so they do not have to waste time lining up at the check-in counters at the airport. This helps us to improve efficiency and reduce congestion in the airport.
  • No refund. Airlines waste a lot of money, time and resources due to refunds and rescheduling when guests do not show up for a flight. Whether or not a guest shows up, the cost of flight to the airline is the same. LCCs are strict when it comes to no show guests and do not offer refunds for missed flights.
3. Streamline Operations
Making the process as simple as possible is the key of a successful LCC.
  • Single type of aircraft. Pilots, flight attendants, engineers, mechanics and operations personnel are specialized in a single type of aircraft. This means, among others, that there is no need for costly re-training of staff, for maintaining stock with parts for different types of aircraft, for different knowledge and skills to operate and maintain different types of aircraft with their own specifications, or for new work requirements.
  • Single class seating. There is only one class seating, i.e first class. Should a guest want to have the privilege of choosing his or her seat, they can do so by purchasing “Pick-a-Seat”.
  • Standard Operating Procedures. SOPs are important to ensure same level of competence among all staff. This way we can ensure the homogeneity of service throughout the company.
4. Secondary Airports
Low cost carriers mostly fly to and from airports that are not necessarily the busiest. These are often referred to as secondary airports. Operating from secondary airports is cheaper than the major airports. They are also a lot less congested and "turnaround times" for aircraft are a lot shorter. For instance, to minimize fees AirAsia flies into Clark Airbase in the Philippines which is 70km away from Manila as appose to flying into Manila Ninoy Aquino airport. And in Thailand, AirAsia operates from Don Mueang instead of Suvarnabhumi airport.

5. Point to Point Network
LCCs operate simple point-to-point network. Almost all AirAsia flights are short-haul (4 hour flight or less). No arrangements have been made with other airline companies on connecting flights, on possibilities of flight transfers, nor on having the luggage labeled and passed through from one flight to another.

6. Lean Distribution System
Distribution costs are something that FSCs most often ignore. Very often, FSCs rely on travel agents and their sales offices. Furthermore, FSCs tend to complicate their distribution channels by integrating their systems with multiple Global Distribution Systems, which are very costly. LCC will keep their distribution channel as simple as possible and will cover the whole spectrum of the clientele profile. For example, AirAsia can cater to the most sophisticated European traveler via internet and credit card sales. And at the same time, AirAsia has an established system to sell our tickets to the most remote and technology deprived locations, such as in Myanmar.
  • Internet sales. The bulk of sales (85%) are done via the airline's website (www.airasia.com), whereby the fares are paid using credit cards, debit cards or via online banking. This is the most cost effective distribution channel.
  • Sales office. AirAsia only has a few sales offices. We only establish a sales office if we are confident the sales derived from the centre will be worth it.
  • Travel agents. LCCs avoid reliance on travel agents as much as possible. This means that the airlines do not pay any commission to travel agents, which would otherwise have been reflected in the fares. Also, as LCCs do not use travel agents, we do not use nor participate in the world wide reservation systems. This allows us to save costs, which again are reflected in our pricing.
  • Call centres. Ticket sales can be done via telephone - a simple and cost effective method.

Why can't the full service carriers match LCC fares?
FSC can offer fares as low as LCC and have been known to do so from time to time, but it is always a temporary measure. The answer to the obvious follow up question, FSC have no mathematical chance of matching LCC's operating cost. And without the most competitive cost structure, you can't price yourself to the cheapest every time, unless you have a nefarious intention to sink the company into Chapter 11.

The rationale for the vast cost difference is quite simple. Imagine FSC to a 5-star hotel, it offers complete luxury for a sumptuous experience. And now equate LCC to a 3 star hotel, it is fairly basic but it get's the job done. It obviously cost much more to operate a 5-star hotel; you have to offer many facilities, hire many employees and not to mention a posh real estate to begin with. A 3-star hotel on the other hand does not need a posh location, less employees as most services are do-it-yourself and offer only basic facilities.


Market forces have it that when a player undercuts, the competitor will follow. In the end, those with the lowest unit cost and best cash resource will persevere. In the event of FSC engaging in a price war with LCC, conventional wisdom dictates that it is silly to go down that road. The products and clientele are vastly different, and there is little value proposition for FSC to capture LCC clientele as they are very low yield market. No matter how clearly history teaches us, there will be time again when we have to engage in a price war with a FSC. And that is exactly why AirAsia's main focus to lower cost perpetually, so that it can evade and fend off any sort of irrational competition.

How are low budget fares structured?
Unlike other airlines, low cost fares are not based on complicated restrictions. All fares are quoted one way to allow customers the flexibility to choose where and when they would like to fly. Also, where most traditional airlines will only offer cheap flights if the customer stays a Saturday night, or even a Sunday night, and therefore cheap fares will not be available for a one-way or a day-return business or shopping trip. Such a condition does not apply to low cost airlines.

ir-what-is-lcc-chart3_7.gif


LCC adopts a simplistic fare structure based on time value relationship for seats. Generally speaking, the earlier you book the cheaper the fare will be. There are a total of 12 fare buckets; each fare bucket is priced accordingly to our specification. The first few tiers are targeted to value conscious guests, but they can only get their hands to those extremely cheap tickets if they book way ahead of time. The mid tier buckets targets the captive market. Ones the revenue collected is sufficient to cover all the operational cost of the flight, the system will then move on to the top tier fare bucket. This is when prices start to creep up and our profit grows.

This is yield management from the perspective of a LCC. Want cheap fares, book early. If you book your tickets late, chances are you are desperate to fly and therefore don't mind paying a little more. Conversely, a FSC will do things totally opposite; they try to charge as much as they can early on and drop their fares in the last minute due to fear of flying empty seats.

Yield management is an exhaustive process that combines elements of science, psychology, market dynamics and most of the time basic common sense. Our yield management team continuously stress test the fare buckets in order to get the maximum revenue for every flight. Achieving the best mix (fare over load factor) is a never ending process and is a continuous learning process.

Common misconceptions on LCC
When talking about AirAsia as a LCC, there are those who are still very pessimistic and unsure about the business model. Believe it or not, questions like whether a passenger must stand in a flight due to lack of seats or whether there will be chickens in the flight do come up. Such misconceptions are not surprising, given the fact that scheduled, low-fare flights are a relatively new phenomenon in the world. We list down below some of the most common misconceptions with regards to the LCC:

i.
Are the aircraft safe?
Absolutely! The number one priority for AirAsia is safety, and that’s a trait that we never compromise. AirAsia complies with the global industry's best practices, international safety standards and procedures.
ii.
Are they flying old planes?
Our fleet consists of 100% brand new Airbus A320 aircraft. We have the biggest and youngest fleet among the LCCs in the region with 5-6 years average age.
iii.
Do they have well trained and qualified personnel?
Yes. Our pilots and cabin crew are among the best trained and well compensated. All of them are trained in our own Training Academy.
iv.
What service can one expect?
The airline’s key aim is to transport passengers from one destination to another, safely and comfortably. Any additional services might come with an extra charge that is in line with the Low Cost Carrier Business Model.
v.
Do they fly on time?
Our on time performance is now above industry average. And we continuously strive to improve our performance to service our guests better. The safety of our passengers is important hence any unforeseen bad weather or airport congestion are beyond our control and the company will strive to operate based on the best safety practices.
vi.
Do I have to stay through weekends to get the best fares?
Our tickets are point to point and fares are based on the demand for a particular flight. There are no such restrictions to get the cheapest fare; you just have to be fast and grab the best fare before someone else snaps it up first. The fares and promotions are system generated hence there is no interference internally or externally.
vii.
Do LCCs really offer the cheapest fare at all times?
Yes for AirAsia. Our business model allows the airline to offer low fares hence most of our fares are priced below full service carriers. By having low fares, it allows the company to stimulate new and existing demand to fly AirAsia.
 
Last edited:
.
They should still keep the existing widebodies (777-300, 787) but yes no use getting more.

They can of course get more 737's on lease, but I prefer newer regional platforms like A220's and E195-E2's (fuel consumption is magnitudes lower than 737's and A320's). Part of LCC strategy is of course lower fuel consumption per seat-mile.

They really need to do their homework on cost cutting if they have to go the LCC route. Like I said, they need to emulate Air Asia, the largest LCC in Asia (240 aircraft in the fleet, mostly narrow-body like you said).
But Biman could do one better by leasing A220's and E195-E2's. The only thing is that they cannot allow any baggage pieces per passenger, just one carry on per passenger. These things have a lot lower baggage hold space than 737's.

A220
iu


E195-E2
1024px-Wider%C3%B8e%2C_LN-WEA%2C_Embraer_E190-E2_%40_HEL.jpg
800px-Embaer_195-E2%2C_Paris_Air_Show_2019%2C_Le_Bourget_%28SIAE0871%29.jpg


Some possible avenues might be, (of course) by trying cutting fares to the bone for a while to see if it fills seats and raises occupancy rates.

But the Bangladeshi penchant for two luggage pieces per passenger will be a huge problem. And you can't charge Bangladeshi people for those extra luggage pieces either.

Biman to the best of my knowledge do not have problem filling their seats. The problem had been cost of expensive fuel in old planes which are now unprofitable to run.

Biman in my mind should run LCC operation under a slightly different badge but run a premium service for destinations where it wont work.

Biman should be LCC for asia and mideast but for longhaul such as uk it should be premium service as the demand is there. They need to stratified service strategy.
 
.
Well LCC's usually don't serve long routes - they serve at most three/four hour routes. LCC's only serve local to regional flights (say DAC-BKK and DAC-SIN), and not intercontinental ones (DAC-LHR or DAC-MAN).

They serve routes only with one class of aircraft (in case of Air Asia, only A320 variants, for reduced pilot certification costs), which have limited ranges (medium range) which are not long/thin routes (like Reykjavik to Stansted or Vilnius to the London City Airport with 737-500's, A318's, E195's), but neither short/fat ones like those one class 600 passenger 747's from Tokyo to Osaka.

Long thin routes are typically not profitable. In the case of Vilnius flight, Lithuanian Govt. had to guarantee payment to LOT polish airlines that they'd pay for expenses even if the flight went empty. The Lithuanians did this to promote business travel to their country.

The presumption that narrow bodies are uncomfortable may not be so true with newer class of narrow bodies, with higher pressurization, lighting changes etc.

To go the LCC route - Biman has to spawn a new sub-brand, separate from their normal operations. You can't have FSC practices mixed in with LCC practices, they are diametrically opposed to each other. They also have to negotiate slots with foreign govts that fall within the LCC narrow body three/four hour range.

Air Asia has already taken over most of Asian slots so it will be tough competing with Air Asia and handling those destinations.

The LCC concept was borrowed from Southwest Airlines founded almost four/five decades ago (based in Dallas' Love field, not DFW Int'l) which is a phenomenally successful airline and their fares reflect it. But look at the small print, it says 21 days advance purchase, and you can't switch seats like full-service carriers (no assigned seating. You can however cancel a flight and get credit for future use provided you do so early enough.

iu


Here is the LCC philosophy better explained by Air Asia. If you don't want to read everything, at least read the bolded parts.

History of the Low Cost Carrier (LCC)
The LCC boom began about 36 years ago when Southwest Airlines roam the skies of USA. Rollin King and Herb Kelleher got together and decided to start a different kind of airline with four set of principles: fly one type of aircraft to keep down engineering costs; keep overheads down; turnaround aircraft as quickly as possible; and abandon loyalty or air miles schemes. They began with one simple notion:

"If you get your guests to their destinations when they want to get there, on time, at the lowest possible fares and make darn sure they have a good time in doing so, people will fly your airline."

And you know what? They were right. Southwest Airlines is now the third largest airline in the world in terms of number of guests carried and also one of the most profitable airlines in the world. Southwest Airline's success spruced up interest in the LCC concept to all corners of the world. LCC now commands approximately 30% market share of the domestic USA traffic. In Europe, the LCC phenomenon spread much later with Ryanair in 1991, but the growth has been at a much faster pace. Southeast Asia embraced the LCC concept last, but the growth trajectory is the fastest. The LCC concept continued to spread throughout the world with WestJet in Canada in 1996, Virgin Blue in Australia in 2000, GOL in Brazil in 2001, AirAsia in Malaysia in 2002, Kulula in South Africa in 2003 and Air Deccan in India in 2004.

The reason for the success of the new low cost carriers is very simple - move the maximum number of guests at the minimum of cost. The concept of LCC is based on the idea that people would fly a lot more often if it were more affordable. LCC airline's main mission is to make air travel the most simple, convenient and inexpensive form of transportation in the world. The fare differential between the full service carriers (FSC) and LCC can be as high as 40%-60% cheaper.

How LCCs Offer Such Low Fares
The key to delivering low fares is to consistently keeping cost low. Attaining low cost requires high efficiency in every part of the business and maintaining simplicity. Therefore every system process must incorporate the best industry practices.

The key components of the LCC business model are the following;
1. High Aircraft Utilisation
Aircraft is kept flying as much as possible, the first flight starts as early in the morning commercially possible and the final flight typically ends at midnight. A fast turnaround is critical to ensure time spent on the ground is minimal – an airline makes money when the aircraft is flying, not when the aircraft is parked. AirAsia's turnaround time is 25 minutes; as compared to a Full Service Carrier (“FSC”) which typically has a one hour turnaround time. On average, AirAsia's utilisation per aircraft is 12 block hours per day, a FSC might do about 8 block hours per day.

2. No Frills
The underlying business for a LCC is to get a person from point A to point B. Everything else is considered to be luxury items or "frills", of which can be acquired for a small fee. Among the many frills that AirAsia has excluded include;
  • No free food & beverages. Some of our passengers may prefer not to consume food & beverages when onboard. There are those who prefer to rest throughout a flight or those who prefer having their meals before flying off. Hence we do not force our guests to purchase something they do not want or need. Guests are most welcome to purchase food & drinks at an affordable price from our website before the flight, of from the cabin crew during the flight.
  • Assigned seating. Guests receive boarding passes with pre-assigned seats and are not allowed to request for a seat change unnecessarily. If the guests have preferences on where or with whom they would like to seat on the aircraft, they are able to do so by paying a small sum when checking-in online. This feature is called “Pick-a-Seat”.
  • Ticketless airline. Less hassle for the customer, as guests need not worry about collecting tickets before travelling. This also allows AirAsia to keep our costs down (less paper, lower printing and distribution costs) and continue to offer low fares to our guests.
  • Online check-in. Guests are highly encouraged to check-in online so they do not have to waste time lining up at the check-in counters at the airport. This helps us to improve efficiency and reduce congestion in the airport.
  • No refund. Airlines waste a lot of money, time and resources due to refunds and rescheduling when guests do not show up for a flight. Whether or not a guest shows up, the cost of flight to the airline is the same. LCCs are strict when it comes to no show guests and do not offer refunds for missed flights.
3. Streamline Operations
Making the process as simple as possible is the key of a successful LCC.
  • Single type of aircraft. Pilots, flight attendants, engineers, mechanics and operations personnel are specialized in a single type of aircraft. This means, among others, that there is no need for costly re-training of staff, for maintaining stock with parts for different types of aircraft, for different knowledge and skills to operate and maintain different types of aircraft with their own specifications, or for new work requirements.
  • Single class seating. There is only one class seating, i.e first class. Should a guest want to have the privilege of choosing his or her seat, they can do so by purchasing “Pick-a-Seat”.
  • Standard Operating Procedures. SOPs are important to ensure same level of competence among all staff. This way we can ensure the homogeneity of service throughout the company.
4. Secondary Airports
Low cost carriers mostly fly to and from airports that are not necessarily the busiest. These are often referred to as secondary airports. Operating from secondary airports is cheaper than the major airports. They are also a lot less congested and "turnaround times" for aircraft are a lot shorter. For instance, to minimize fees AirAsia flies into Clark Airbase in the Philippines which is 70km away from Manila as appose to flying into Manila Ninoy Aquino airport. And in Thailand, AirAsia operates from Don Mueang instead of Suvarnabhumi airport.

5. Point to Point Network
LCCs operate simple point-to-point network. Almost all AirAsia flights are short-haul (4 hour flight or less). No arrangements have been made with other airline companies on connecting flights, on possibilities of flight transfers, nor on having the luggage labeled and passed through from one flight to another.

6. Lean Distribution System
Distribution costs are something that FSCs most often ignore. Very often, FSCs rely on travel agents and their sales offices. Furthermore, FSCs tend to complicate their distribution channels by integrating their systems with multiple Global Distribution Systems, which are very costly. LCC will keep their distribution channel as simple as possible and will cover the whole spectrum of the clientele profile. For example, AirAsia can cater to the most sophisticated European traveler via internet and credit card sales. And at the same time, AirAsia has an established system to sell our tickets to the most remote and technology deprived locations, such as in Myanmar.
  • Internet sales. The bulk of sales (85%) are done via the airline's website (www.airasia.com), whereby the fares are paid using credit cards, debit cards or via online banking. This is the most cost effective distribution channel.
  • Sales office. AirAsia only has a few sales offices. We only establish a sales office if we are confident the sales derived from the centre will be worth it.
  • Travel agents. LCCs avoid reliance on travel agents as much as possible. This means that the airlines do not pay any commission to travel agents, which would otherwise have been reflected in the fares. Also, as LCCs do not use travel agents, we do not use nor participate in the world wide reservation systems. This allows us to save costs, which again are reflected in our pricing.
  • Call centres. Ticket sales can be done via telephone - a simple and cost effective method.

Why can't the full service carriers match LCC fares?
FSC can offer fares as low as LCC and have been known to do so from time to time, but it is always a temporary measure. The answer to the obvious follow up question, FSC have no mathematical chance of matching LCC's operating cost. And without the most competitive cost structure, you can't price yourself to the cheapest every time, unless you have a nefarious intention to sink the company into Chapter 11.

The rationale for the vast cost difference is quite simple. Imagine FSC to a 5-star hotel, it offers complete luxury for a sumptuous experience. And now equate LCC to a 3 star hotel, it is fairly basic but it get's the job done. It obviously cost much more to operate a 5-star hotel; you have to offer many facilities, hire many employees and not to mention a posh real estate to begin with. A 3-star hotel on the other hand does not need a posh location, less employees as most services are do-it-yourself and offer only basic facilities.


Market forces have it that when a player undercuts, the competitor will follow. In the end, those with the lowest unit cost and best cash resource will persevere. In the event of FSC engaging in a price war with LCC, conventional wisdom dictates that it is silly to go down that road. The products and clientele are vastly different, and there is little value proposition for FSC to capture LCC clientele as they are very low yield market. No matter how clearly history teaches us, there will be time again when we have to engage in a price war with a FSC. And that is exactly why AirAsia's main focus to lower cost perpetually, so that it can evade and fend off any sort of irrational competition.

How are low budget fares structured?
Unlike other airlines, low cost fares are not based on complicated restrictions. All fares are quoted one way to allow customers the flexibility to choose where and when they would like to fly. Also, where most traditional airlines will only offer cheap flights if the customer stays a Saturday night, or even a Sunday night, and therefore cheap fares will not be available for a one-way or a day-return business or shopping trip. Such a condition does not apply to low cost airlines.

ir-what-is-lcc-chart3_7.gif


LCC adopts a simplistic fare structure based on time value relationship for seats. Generally speaking, the earlier you book the cheaper the fare will be. There are a total of 12 fare buckets; each fare bucket is priced accordingly to our specification. The first few tiers are targeted to value conscious guests, but they can only get their hands to those extremely cheap tickets if they book way ahead of time. The mid tier buckets targets the captive market. Ones the revenue collected is sufficient to cover all the operational cost of the flight, the system will then move on to the top tier fare bucket. This is when prices start to creep up and our profit grows.

This is yield management from the perspective of a LCC. Want cheap fares, book early. If you book your tickets late, chances are you are desperate to fly and therefore don't mind paying a little more. Conversely, a FSC will do things totally opposite; they try to charge as much as they can early on and drop their fares in the last minute due to fear of flying empty seats.

Yield management is an exhaustive process that combines elements of science, psychology, market dynamics and most of the time basic common sense. Our yield management team continuously stress test the fare buckets in order to get the maximum revenue for every flight. Achieving the best mix (fare over load factor) is a never ending process and is a continuous learning process.

Common misconceptions on LCC
When talking about AirAsia as a LCC, there are those who are still very pessimistic and unsure about the business model. Believe it or not, questions like whether a passenger must stand in a flight due to lack of seats or whether there will be chickens in the flight do come up. Such misconceptions are not surprising, given the fact that scheduled, low-fare flights are a relatively new phenomenon in the world. We list down below some of the most common misconceptions with regards to the LCC:

i.
Are the aircraft safe?
Absolutely! The number one priority for AirAsia is safety, and that’s a trait that we never compromise. AirAsia complies with the global industry's best practices, international safety standards and procedures.
ii.
Are they flying old planes?
Our fleet consists of 100% brand new Airbus A320 aircraft. We have the biggest and youngest fleet among the LCCs in the region with 5-6 years average age.
iii.
Do they have well trained and qualified personnel?
Yes. Our pilots and cabin crew are among the best trained and well compensated. All of them are trained in our own Training Academy.
iv.
What service can one expect?
The airline’s key aim is to transport passengers from one destination to another, safely and comfortably. Any additional services might come with an extra charge that is in line with the Low Cost Carrier Business Model.
v.
Do they fly on time?
Our on time performance is now above industry average. And we continuously strive to improve our performance to service our guests better. The safety of our passengers is important hence any unforeseen bad weather or airport congestion are beyond our control and the company will strive to operate based on the best safety practices.
vi.
Do I have to stay through weekends to get the best fares?
Our tickets are point to point and fares are based on the demand for a particular flight. There are no such restrictions to get the cheapest fare; you just have to be fast and grab the best fare before someone else snaps it up first. The fares and promotions are system generated hence there is no interference internally or externally.
vii.
Do LCCs really offer the cheapest fare at all times?
Yes for AirAsia. Our business model allows the airline to offer low fares hence most of our fares are priced below full service carriers. By having low fares, it allows the company to stimulate new and existing demand to fly AirAsia.
Was reading up more on airlines business model and their acquisition plan doesn’t reflect a LCC airline.
I also don’t understand how they intend to expand without a hub model
They’re relying on direct flights which only works if people are coming into your country in droves for different reasons
 
Last edited:
.
It is the youngest I am 99% sure. If we exclude a situation where a very small private Airlines(most probably Indian) which brought brand new 1 or 2 aircraft recently to satrt their business, then of course Biman has the youngest fleet. Among the 16 aircraft it own, oldest are 2 B777-300ER 9 years old, 2 same plane are 7 years old. Rest are less than 5 years old. In the last 2 and half years, Biman purchased 9 brand new aircraft. Six Dreamliners and three Dash-8. The remaining five dry leased(three 737-800 and two Dash-8) aircraft are also in the range of 5-10 years old.

Most importantly, Biman management now seems to eager to take the service quality seriously . They are organizing seminar with passengers to know about their complaints and announced that, from now on, Biman aircraft will not delay even a minute for any VIP. Let's see how much they stick to their promise.
To answer your query - "Shwet" means white in Bengali and "Balaka" in Bengali means Crane, Egret or Heron I believe (any waterfowl in Bangladesh with a gracious curved neck).

Biman should stick to LCC (Low Cost Carrier) operations but include food and amenities which other LCC carriers like Air-Asia don't (that should be their differentiating factor). In a three hour flight, no Bangladeshi is going to be happy if you throw a bag of peanuts and a can of soda-pop at them.

They should study other Asian LCC carriers and emulate their practices - but not take away food/amenities.

Biman needs to fill their seats and raise their occupancy ratio on flights. Right now - paying customers (any kind) will save their airline.

No plane makes money sitting on the tarmac.



Answered above.


It's not that archaic, just proper 'Bhadralok' Bengali.

Although you would not use it in casual talk, just in poetry and such.

Well Biman has about 4500 employees to support with 21 aircrafts ! United Airlines ( USA) has 829 aircrafts and about 93000 employees . I am surprised Biman can even get off the runway supporting so many employees !
 
.
Was reading up more on airlines business model and their acquisition plan doesn’t reflect a LCC airline.
I also don’t understand how they intend to expand without a hub model

Setting up a hub is a tremendously involved exercise, needing superior logistics skills and above all superior leadership skills, which Biman simply does not possess at this time (the last great leader they had was that British gentleman, and he left in frustration dealing with Bangladesh bureaucrats. Basically a bunch of "Bhat Khawa" folks, appointed by nepotism, and just glad to do 9-5 to keep a job, nothing more.

Looking at their route planning expertise, hard to imagine they can plan a hub-and-spoke operation. They need to hire someone superbly competent and experienced at the top level (helm). Ex-Airforce noob bureaucrats have no expertise to run an airline of this size, they need guidance.

And people who control Biman at the Transport Ministry also have to be flexible, stand aside and let this hired manager do his job. That was the primary reason these former managers left.
 
.
Setting up a hub is a tremendously involved exercise, needing superior logistics skills and above all superior leadership skills, which Biman simply does not possess at this time (the last great leader they had was that British gentleman, and he left in frustration dealing with Bangladesh bureaucrats. Basically a bunch of "Bhat Khawa" folks, appointed by nepotism, and just glad to do 9-5 to keep a job, nothing more.

Looking at their route planning expertise, hard to imagine they can plan a hub-and-spoke operation. They need to hire someone superbly competent and experienced at the top level (helm). Ex-Airforce noob bureaucrats have no expertise to run an airline of this size, they need guidance.

And people who control Biman at the Transport Ministry also have to be flexible, stand aside and let this hired manager do his job. That was the primary reason these former managers left.
Will have to employ westerners like middle eastern airlines until proper local talent can be trained. As for biman, they’re basically trying to adopt premium economy products of middle eastern airlines. They’ll need some specialist on interior design, cuisine and lounge service/ hotels to make up the experience to expand further than being a commuter bus for labors
 
.
Will have to employ westerners like middle eastern airlines until proper local talent can be trained. As for biman, they’re basically trying to adopt premium economy products of middle eastern airlines. They’ll need some specialist on interior design, cuisine and lounge service/ hotels to make up the experience to expand further than being a commuter bus for labors

Yeah if they can't do LCC and has to play Emirates' game, then they really have to up their game.
 
.
Yeah if they can't do LCC and has to play Emirates' game, then they really have to up their game.
Tim Clarke didn’t want to shift to premium economy for the longest time but now they intent to expand. Economy is willing to pay for comfortable spacious seats 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
.
Back
Top Bottom