What's new

Think-tank sees 6pc growth rate next year

farhan_9909

PROFESSIONAL
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
8,989
Reaction score
10
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
AS democratic Pakistan led by industrialist Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif garners liberal support from global donors, experts at a think tank expect the economy to bounce to a high six per cent growth in 2014-15 while describing 2013-14 as the most difficult year in 67 years of the country’s economic history.

According to these economists, the sustainability of the high growth trend would, however, depend on the quality of policy and governance, which they consider not up to the mark currently, referring to the lack of adherence to Fiscal Responsibility Act.

They believe for want of sound economic advice, the Dar team may not serve the economy and the ruling party well. And they think that the country’s future is linked to the government’s ability to deal with the hydra headed monster of extremism and terrorism.

While acknowledging a growing role for the private sector and civil society in shaping the future, they hold the government primarily responsible for creating the economic eco system to realise the country’s development potential for the benefit of the majority.

On the question why a government that enjoys a heavy electoral mandate internally and considers external aid and loan inflows as endorsement of its policies by friendly countries and global donors feel the need to change course, there was no answer.

Shahid Javed Burki and Dr Pervez Hasan, the duo who produced the flagship annual report of the Institute of Public Policy titled ‘The state of economy: challenges and response, were candid but concerned about the direction the country is geared towards by the Nawaz government in their conversation with Dawn in Lahore last week. Burki’s outlook appeared more optimistic than that of Dr Hasan.

“The need of the moment is to make public policy choices that will address the identified challenges in order to improve people’s wellbeing. This can be done, and the effort will be appreciated by a citizenry that has been hit by a perfect storm of poor governance, energy shortages, loss of investor’s confidence and a very difficult external environment”, says the preface of the 7th Annual Report 2014.

The report is loaded with ideas, refreshingly frank commentary and identification of markers on path ahead. Beside useful focus on challenges and their solutions, its last chapter is dedicated to extremism.

One witnesses an enlightened approach on the subject that envelops many difficult aspects to define its direct and indirect link to losses and opportunity cost of sub optimal application of physical and human resources in the country. The correlation of security situation to income disparity and public discontent has also been explored.

“There are good reasons for policymakers to see extremism as a serious economic issue and to focus on ways to making the country more secure. Bringing sustained growth to the economy and distributing its rewards evenly among different segments of the population and different regions must rank high on policymakers’ ‘to do’ list”, says the report.

An interior ministry document is referred to project the loss to the economy caused by terrorism since 9/11 estimated at $7.8 billion or about 3.5pc of an estimated GDP of $225bn in 2012-13. According to the IPP report, “This figure does not include the amount the state spent on maintaining a large armed force (estimated at over 600,000 and translating into a ratio of three people in uniform for every 100,000 citizens — one of the highest ratios in the world)”.

“The wavering on the government’s part has worsened the situation and persuaded the extremists that the state does not have the stomach or the political will to take them on with full force. The impression that the Punjab-based ruling party is inclined to protect its province, even when many other parts of the country are under severe terrorist assault, could pose another existential threat, further weakening the state and compromising nationhood”, the report commented after giving data of number of attacks in different provinces over the past years.

The think tank warns in the end: “Unless it brings extremism under control, Pakistan will continue to be treated as an outlier in the international community. It will be shunned by foreign investors whose capital and technology it badly needs to modernise the economy and move forward. The absence of security has isolated the country. The fact that no Western airline flies to Pakistan is just one indication of this isolation

Think-tank sees 6pc growth rate next year - Newspaper - DAWN.COM
 
only possible if govt imports gas next year, decrease gas losses from current 10% to 5% and solve much of the power crisis by increasing collection to 96% from current 82%.
long term will only be possible via reforms.
i dont see PML N achieving this. therefore i dont see a growth much better than 5 maximum.
may be after 2017 they can achieve 7% as energy crisis may have been solved by then but they will end up as india i.e losing growth momentum if reforms are not carried out.
 
AS democratic Pakistan led by industrialist Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif garners liberal support from global donors, experts at a think tank expect the economy to bounce to a high six per cent growth in 2014-15 while describing 2013-14 as the most difficult year in 67 years of the country’s economic history.

According to these economists, the sustainability of the high growth trend would, however, depend on the quality of policy and governance, which they consider not up to the mark currently, referring to the lack of adherence to Fiscal Responsibility Act.

They believe for want of sound economic advice, the Dar team may not serve the economy and the ruling party well. And they think that the country’s future is linked to the government’s ability to deal with the hydra headed monster of extremism and terrorism.

While acknowledging a growing role for the private sector and civil society in shaping the future, they hold the government primarily responsible for creating the economic eco system to realise the country’s development potential for the benefit of the majority.

On the question why a government that enjoys a heavy electoral mandate internally and considers external aid and loan inflows as endorsement of its policies by friendly countries and global donors feel the need to change course, there was no answer.

Shahid Javed Burki and Dr Pervez Hasan, the duo who produced the flagship annual report of the Institute of Public Policy titled ‘The state of economy: challenges and response, were candid but concerned about the direction the country is geared towards by the Nawaz government in their conversation with Dawn in Lahore last week. Burki’s outlook appeared more optimistic than that of Dr Hasan.

“The need of the moment is to make public policy choices that will address the identified challenges in order to improve people’s wellbeing. This can be done, and the effort will be appreciated by a citizenry that has been hit by a perfect storm of poor governance, energy shortages, loss of investor’s confidence and a very difficult external environment”, says the preface of the 7th Annual Report 2014.

The report is loaded with ideas, refreshingly frank commentary and identification of markers on path ahead. Beside useful focus on challenges and their solutions, its last chapter is dedicated to extremism.

One witnesses an enlightened approach on the subject that envelops many difficult aspects to define its direct and indirect link to losses and opportunity cost of sub optimal application of physical and human resources in the country. The correlation of security situation to income disparity and public discontent has also been explored.

“There are good reasons for policymakers to see extremism as a serious economic issue and to focus on ways to making the country more secure. Bringing sustained growth to the economy and distributing its rewards evenly among different segments of the population and different regions must rank high on policymakers’ ‘to do’ list”, says the report.

An interior ministry document is referred to project the loss to the economy caused by terrorism since 9/11 estimated at $7.8 billion or about 3.5pc of an estimated GDP of $225bn in 2012-13. According to the IPP report, “This figure does not include the amount the state spent on maintaining a large armed force (estimated at over 600,000 and translating into a ratio of three people in uniform for every 100,000 citizens — one of the highest ratios in the world)”.

“The wavering on the government’s part has worsened the situation and persuaded the extremists that the state does not have the stomach or the political will to take them on with full force. The impression that the Punjab-based ruling party is inclined to protect its province, even when many other parts of the country are under severe terrorist assault, could pose another existential threat, further weakening the state and compromising nationhood”, the report commented after giving data of number of attacks in different provinces over the past years.

The think tank warns in the end: “Unless it brings extremism under control, Pakistan will continue to be treated as an outlier in the international community. It will be shunned by foreign investors whose capital and technology it badly needs to modernise the economy and move forward. The absence of security has isolated the country. The fact that no Western airline flies to Pakistan is just one indication of this isolation

Think-tank sees 6pc growth rate next year - Newspaper - DAWN.COM
Beda garak
:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
In logon ne supar powa super powa karke hawa bhar di hum logon ke dimag me
ab growth rate 5 ho gaya
bharosa na karo iss BC pe
 
Hahaha this lollll
Haso mat
yeh haramkhor jo likhte hai uska ulta hota hai...
Jaise hi yeh dekhte hai ki market peak pe gaya ... iss tarah ki khabar faila ke Market ko kuch din peak pe rakhte hai
Phir dheere se paisa nikal lete hai
Bas iss chakkar me local logon ka paisa doob jata hai because middle class is long term investor.
Sab log inse mile hue hai
 
Haso mat
yeh haramkhor jo likhte hai uska ulta hota hai...
Jaise hi yeh dekhte hai ki market peak pe gaya ... iss tarah ki khabar faila ke Market ko kuch din peak pe rakhte hai
Phir dheere se paisa nikal lete hai
Bas iss chakkar me local logon ka paisa doob jata hai because middle class is long term investor.
Sab log inse mile hue hai

Well as said by others even 5% is expected but 6% will be miracle. No way Pakistan can archive that with current energy shortage.
 
Well as said by others even 5% is expected but 6% will be miracle. No way Pakistan can archive that with current energy shortage.
Not possible.
if Pak will grow @5 %
China must at 10%
and India at 8%
because all these economies are linked.
and it will take 2 yrs to get on this path
 
Not possible.
if Pak will grow @5 %
China must at 10%
and India at 8%
because all these economies are linked.
and it will take 2 yrs to get on this path

Not really, Pak growing at 5% is nothing to do with India. Lol Last year Pak growth rate was higher then India. Yes shocking news for you.

And this year it will be 4%.
 
I find 6% growth hard to believe for next year. We would likely be at 7% in four years, but next two years are going to be difficult.

Not possible.
if Pak will grow @5 %
China must at 10%
and India at 8%
because all these economies are linked.
and it will take 2 yrs to get on this path

Beta, when Pakistan regularly clocked 7% growth, India used to be at 3-4%. Things have changed, but basic strengths of Pakistan's economy remain intact even though dormant for now. A few years down the road, we'll see who grows faster.
 
I find 6% growth hard to believe for next year. We would likely be at 7% in four years, but next two years are going to be difficult.



Beta, when Pakistan regularly clocked 7% growth, India used to be at 3-4%. Things have changed, but basic strengths of Pakistan's economy remain intact even though dormant for now. A few years down the road, we'll see who grows faster.
Post 1991 reforms there has never been such a case.
here you go
World Development Indicators-Google Public Data Explorer
 
Post 1991 reforms there has never been such a case.
here you go
World Development Indicators-Google Public Data Explorer

"Post" is the operative word here. I remember '80s pretty well. It was more a case of Pakistan failing to grow, than India growing faster.

The reforms you talk about were implemented after Pakistan carried out such deregulation first under NS's first tenure as PM.

Pakistan consistently out-performed India until 1990s when our political instability caught up with us. But as I have already mentioned, the inherent strengths of Pakistan's economy are still there. Current policies would ensure that they come into play before long.
 
"Post" is the operative word here. I remember '80s pretty well. It was more a case of Pakistan failing to grow, than India growing faster.
The reforms you talk about were implemented after Pakistan carried out such deregulation first under NS's first tenure as PM.
Pakistan consistently out-performed India until 1990s when our political instability caught up with us. But as I have already mentioned, the inherent strengths of Pakistan's economy are still there. Current policies would ensure that they come into play before long.
But the level of integration of india in world economy is higher.
India will follow global trends to some extent.
If pak rises, india will rise because this will only happen when everyone rises.
 
But the level of integration of india in world economy is higher.
India will follow global trends to some extent.
If pak rises, india will rise because this will only happen when everyone rises.

You are right in that Pakistan is not that well-integrated in global economy. That has its pros and cons. In any case development in Pakistan is not contingent upon development in India and vice versa. Though both the countries get to enjoy a 'peace dividend' if they resolve mutual disputes, still their development is not contingent.
 
Back
Top Bottom