What's new

The Traitor Inside

joey

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Messages
1,163
Reaction score
0
The Traitor Inside
It's clear -- somebody is passing counter-insurgency plans to ultras
Outlook

Bhavna Vij-Aurora


| e-mail | one page format | feedback: send - read |


Maoists Accessed The Minutes

April 13, 2006
Venue: 7 Race Course Road
In the chair: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh
Attended By: Chief ministers of Naxal-affected states, senior security and intelligence officials.
Key points discussed:
* Possibility of penetrating the internal set-up of Maoist leadership
* Use of heliborne operations against the Maoists hiding in Kaimur Hills, Bihar
* Training of select paramilitary personnel in jungle warfare
* Redeployment and additional deployment of forces
(All detailed in the Maoist Annual Report 2005-2006)

August 29, 2006
Venue: North Block
In the chair: Union home secretary V.K. Duggal
Attended by: Home secretaries, directors general of police of the Naxal-affected states, chiefs of BSF, CRPF, SSB, other senior security and intelligence officials
Key points discussed:
* Ways to improve intelligence-gathering and sharing among various states
* Strategies to curb Maoist operations along the Nepal border
* Ways to disrupt the coordination among various Naxal groups across state borders.
* Level of increased deployment of security forces in areas identified as ultra-sensitive.
(All detailed in the Maoist Annual Report 2005-2006)


***

How did the Maoists operating from the hills and dense forests of Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Andhra Pradesh access the minutes of two crucial and secret meetings last year—one held by the prime minister at his residence and the other chaired by the home secretary at North Block? Both were focused on tackling the Maoist problem. The first was attended by chief ministers of Naxal-affected states and by senior intelligence and security officials. The second, which involved members of the Joint Operations Command of the security forces, dealt with strategy and deployment of forces.

The shocking truth that the Maoists had gained access to the minutes came to light after intelligence officials stumbled on an eight-page annual report (October 2005-06) of the Maoist Communist Centre (MCC) during a recent operation. An explosive part of its contents, yet to be revealed to the media, relates to the outfit's precise and detailed knowledge about what was discussed in the two closed-door and high-profile meetings.

Here is what the annual report has to say about the April 2006 meeting at 7, Race Course Road chaired by PM Manmohan Singh: "It is clear from the minutes of the April 13 meeting that the government is planning to infiltrate our ranks and use airpower in otherwise difficult and inaccessible terrains. The decisions at the meeting include penetration by intelligence agencies of Maoist leadership, use of heliborne operations against the Naxalites hiding in (the) forests of Kaimur hills, and training of select paramilitary personnel in jungle warfare."

The second meeting on August 29, 2006, was held in the Union home ministry, and was chaired by then secretary V.K. Duggal. It discussed details of deployment of security forces. Several steps to improve intelligence-gathering and sharing it among various states were also deliberated. The meeting also mooted possible ways to curb Maoist operations in border areas and disrupt their coordination across inter-state borders

All the details of what was discussed, intelligence officials say, were passed on to the Maoists. Which is why there is a conclusion in the report drawn after factoring in what was discussed on August 29. "We have to be careful. Don't stay at one place for too long. Keep moving. Do not forget your tasks and do not forget your aim."


The fact that the Maoists could lay their hands on the minutes of the two meetings has set the alarm bells ringing. Intelligence and security officials have expressed concern on what they describe as a serious security lapse.




The Maoist report cites only the main points of secretive government meetings; it's feared the ultras have got access to finer details too.


A senior intelligence official told Outlook, "It's clear the Maoists have access to secret information and plans—that too within days of being formulated. No wonder, there hasn't been much success in our operations against them. Any action plan should have an element of surprise. That's completely lost


in case of anti-Naxal operations."

Only the main points at the meeting have made their way into the annual report, but intelligence officials fear the finer details too may have been passed on to the Maoists. They say it does not help the Naxals reveal all they know, but the subtle message has been sent out that the ultras know what had actually transpired at the two secret meetings.

The annual report brought out in September 2006 was updated till the August 29 meeting. Points out an intelligence official: "There've been meetings since. There was one on September 5, 2006, again chaired by the PM and attended by the chief ministers. Now we have to proceed on the assumption that the Maoists may know what was discussed."

But how could the details of the two meetings have been passed on? It could have been leaked at the Centre or from officials of the states which attended the meetings or from security or intelligence agencies. Whatever, the Union home ministry feels steps have to be taken to ensure such access is halted. Which is why it has asked CMs of all Naxal-affected states to ensure there is no leakage of confidential information at their end.

The MCC report also lists the mining, irrigation and industrial projects it plans to target in Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh. It says there are plans to create "red terror" in Sitamarhi district of Bihar where the Kosi irrigation project is coming up. "The region needs attention not only for opposing government machinery but also for mobilising mass support."

The other sites on the Naxal hit-list are the proposed bauxite mines of Jindals near Visakhapatnam, Polavaram irrigation project in Andhra Pradesh, the projects of Tatas, Jindals and Essar in Chhattisgarh, the Rajghara-Raoghat-Jagdalpur rail line, steel plants of Posco and Tatas in Orissa, power plants of Reliance and ongoing Narmada projects in Madhya Pradesh.

The rest of the report lists several successful operations. There are also details of the sophisticated weaponry the Maoists have acquired in recent times, including AK-47s and SLR launchers. There is also talk of expanding operations to urban areas in Haryana, Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh. Delhi too is on the radar. But these are plans that the intelligence agencies already know about. What's vital are the details of the two meetings. They prove the Naxals are one step ahead of the the government.

In fact, so embarrassed is the Union home ministry that no official inquiry has been ordered into the leak. But intelligence agencies are looking into who could have been the sources who passed on information to the Maoists. Many in the ministry feel identifying them is important if the government's operation against what the PM described as the "biggest threat to country's internal security'' is to succeed.


Better late than never!
 
.
Thats something real serious!

After getting them inside the "Indian Nuclear Reserch Indsitute" now they are inside PM's office!

What are these Naxal guys, who are joining them, and what are their goals, can some one please post more stuff on them? It is quite a big development as they are gaining control over states and government affairs.
 
.
Thats something real serious!

After getting them inside the "Indian Nuclear Reserch Indsitute" now they are inside PM's office!

What are these Naxal guys, who are joining them, and what are their goals, can some one please post more stuff on them? It is quite a big development as they are gaining control over states and government affairs.


Not really, you dont have to believe DDM reports stating that they are inside BARC in literal sense, the Naxal movement was fierce in 70's and 80's almost nothing what it is now, difference is being in the Electronic media which reaches you today didnt yesterday.

There might be spies but government is taking stren action and that is what matters.

They are not anti country but anti-imperialism or capitalistic society, alas nor can you tell India to feed everyone before baking the cake nor walking down communism is the way.

It is now remains to seen how government tackles this, better cut the source of funds and have more vigilance.

Like the Tripura insurgency has its one of funding source in local churches, the ULFA;s also had links with Bangladesh based outfits and ISI, but Bangladesh recently has pledged to remove anti-india camps in her soil.
 
.
Yes, you are right, when a state is in a fragile condition due to internal problems the foreign agencies would get a chance to expliot the situation.

But the economic problems we can not ignore, you know whats happening to Dalits, farmers and minorities, some how these NAXAL guys are getting support of people and getting stronger, in 80's they were active then government of India killed a lot and it was peace, now they are getting organised again and on scientific basis, and its something serious, if India goes in to hands of these Maoists, it would be a hell for whole region.
 
.
my english teacher in india told me that the naxals started as a revolutioary movement, but indian govt cracked down heavily on then and they took up arms.
 
.
Yes, you are right, when a state is in a fragile condition due to internal problems the foreign agencies would get a chance to expliot the situation.

But the economic problems we can not ignore, you know whats happening to Dalits, farmers and minorities, some how these NAXAL guys are getting support of people and getting stronger, in 80's they were active then government of India killed a lot and it was peace, now they are getting organised again and on scientific basis, and its something serious, if India goes in to hands of these Maoists, it would be a hell for whole region.

your continously pushing your anti-india in PFF which PFF nor IDF is known to do.

What Dalits?
What farmer atrocities?
What Minority issues?

Those issues are decentralised issue and has nothing to do with naxal, A naxal is a true face of communism, My own grandfathers brothers one of who is a doctor was involved in Naxal movement in 80's , Presidency college in India and JNU were the two biggest places of naxal movement, he still repa snow how many young lives and brain went down to the drain in this movement which was nothing but for a false marxism ideology.

Illiteracy is the most important factor and economic factor to get rid of this, your agenda of false verbs proves you know squat about things your trying to argue with.

The CPI-M political party has a agenda of keeping peoples ililterates, because if your not illiterate you wont hold the red flag for them in elections, previously they used to use bangaladesh illegal immigration a tool for vote ank politics, 30 years of staying under cover when due to developement needs these CPI-M cadres government are changing policy from non-indurtailisation (read Dunlop issue) to industrialisation there is a drift among these peoples that their bosses are not supoprting what they did for 30 years.

It will slowly fade away.
 
.
Joey, you are a great guy, but please dont say bad things about me, I have no anti India aganda, I am just trying to learn more about our great neighbour.

If CPI is keeping people away from education, then it must be a powerful orgainiation, but I have learned somewhere that MAOISTS dont agree with CPIM as well and they want a "Red Revolution".

Now Indian government is saying that these Maoists control 14 states and are in every department like your post indicates.

Dont you think its getting serious?
 
.
If CPI is keeping people away from education, then it must be a powerful orgainiation, but I have learned somewhere that MAOISTS dont agree with CPIM as well and they want a "Red Revolution".

Read what I said,

"The CPI-M political party has a agenda of keeping peoples ililterates, because if your not illiterate you wont hold the red flag for them in elections, previously they used to use bangaladesh illegal immigration a tool for vote ank politics, 30 years of staying under cover when due to developement needs these CPI-M cadres government are changing policy from non-indurtailisation (read Dunlop issue) to industrialisation there is a drift among these peoples that their bosses are not supoprting what they did for 30 years."


Head of "blue farming?" heard of "shared corp ownership?" In it the CPI-M gave poor peoples land on share basis from a single owner, the people inturn will have to give a share on what they sow but he doesnt owns the land, Now after 30 years of such policy they want industrialisation in the same field, The land owner is comfortably getting away with the fund from government by giving the land but these shared crop owners are rendered jobless, a simple explanation of one issue.

Dont you think its getting serious?

Way way way less than what it was in 70's/80's.
 
.
The land owner is comfortably getting away with the fund from government by giving the land but these shared crop owners are rendered jobless, a simple explanation of one issue.

No offense meant, I am just trying to learn.

Who are these land owners by the way? Are they minorities gaining benifits of government policies or what?

The Indian PM is saying that the MAOISTS are biggest threat to India's security, you are saying that they are not dangerous, I am a bit confused.


But still I dont know what these Maoists want, can you please explain further?
 
.
No offense meant, I am just trying to learn.

Who are these land owners by the way? Are they minorities gaining benifits of government policies or what?

The Indian PM is saying that the MAOISTS are biggest threat to India's security, you are saying that they are not dangerous, I am a bit confused.

Trying to be devils advocate here and spew hatred there, you have serious double standard issues no offence meant :rolleyes: Which part I clearly said you dont understand?

Lets say you own a piece of land of 100 acres.

CPI-M policy so far was shared farming means you lend 10 acre each to farmers, they will farm for you and provide you with a % of profit margin. So your happy of getting money from a unused land, the farmer i also happy.

Now that policy is clearly not sustainable as see When government want to acquire that land for projects, who will get those money? the land owner alone! and the farmers working on shared basis wont have any work to do thereafter.



But still I dont know what these Maoists want, can you please explain further?
better economic policy, stopping double standards of CPI-M government etc etc.

Maoists all points are not bad, there are definitely genuine issues "ek hath se taliyan nehi bajti hain!!" , but violence is not and never the method of addressing.

while bengal maoists are against government due to shared farming issue, the situation is diffferent in MP where they have nexus with local underworld in the forests of chambal et al, and it is different in Assam where they have links with international terrorist organisations.

There needs to be a collective effort, and our government will go for it only there is a need, babudom has ruined a part of Indias developement which is undeniable. :cry:
 
.
I have read some where a former IB chief's interview, where he stated that Maoists are much batter the corrupt politicians in India and he would be happy to join Maoists, how come such a high official say that, if so called Maoists are wrong or misusing people?

Infact I am trying to learn more, but plz explain it without name calling or anger, just help me to understand things.
 
.
I have read some where a former IB chief's interview, where he stated that Maoists are much batter the corrupt politicians in India and he would be happy to join Maoists, how come such a high official say that, if so called Maoists are wrong or misusing people?

Infact I am trying to learn more, but plz explain it without name calling or anger, just help me to understand things.

No offense meant, I am just trying to learn.

Who are these land owners by the way? Are they minorities gaining benifits of government policies or what?

The Indian PM is saying that the MAOISTS are biggest threat to India's security, you are saying that they are not dangerous, I am a bit confused.

Trying to be devils advocate here and spew hatred there, you have serious double standard issues no offence meant :rolleyes: Which part I clearly said you dont understand?

Lets say you own a piece of land of 100 acres.

CPI-M policy so far was shared farming means you lend 10 acre each to farmers, they will farm for you and provide you with a % of profit margin. So your happy of getting money from a unused land, the farmer i also happy.

Now that policy is clearly not sustainable as see When government want to acquire that land for projects, who will get those money? the land owner alone! and the farmers working on shared basis wont have any work to do thereafter.



But still I dont know what these Maoists want, can you please explain further?
better economic policy, stopping double standards of CPI-M government etc etc.

Maoists all points are not bad, there are definitely genuine issues "ek hath se taliyan nehi bajti hain!!" , but violence is not and never the method of addressing.

while bengal maoists are against government due to shared farming issue, the situation is diffferent in MP where they have nexus with local underworld in the forests of chambal et al, and it is different in Assam where they have links with international terrorist organisations.

There needs to be a collective effort, and our government will go for it only there is a need, babudom has ruined a part of Indias developement which is undeniable.






Decentralised Issue, on which I have given you three examples already, I'm not interested in jumping with you :lol: From next time I will have to ignore some peoples, because your simply not getting in a discussion but taking the advantage of Indians replying to a already anti-indian mindset.

I dont understand which part you dont understand, or your even try to understand? :rolleyes:

To sum up maoists has different backing in different places,

1. Against government due to meticulous policies of government in CPI-M rules areas and now they have turned their back to them.

2. Nexux with underworld, representing under the banner of maoists but interested in antgi-national acvities.

3. International funding like incase of ULFA which has a bit religious angle as well.
 
.
Please provide those reports where the former IB chief said that.

Communism has a real political base in India, namely in the universities, for eg almost every person studying in JNU is a commy sympathiser. My mother was also a commy sympathiser. What is happening is that most of the civil servants are passing our from these universities and taking up key positions in the INdian official hierarchy, and voila...you have a 'connection'.

I think that this inquiry should be given to the CBI, they are thorough with their job if the government wants something done.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom