The number zero was invented in Ancient Pakistan

[Rafi]

Well you quote this


So just show me what similarity in your culture and harappa culture

And now read post #506

Indus vally`s geography now divided b/w India and Pakistan but culture ... you know that

The two definative IVC sites are Harrapa and Mohenjadaro - there is nothing on the scale and significance anywhere else, proves that this civilisation was based on the Indus and therefore is Ancient Pakistan

 

[Rafi]

This is our heritage guys, learn to live with it, and bharati heritage is exclusively hindustani

 

[Rafi]

“Bharat” is the official and constitutional name of the country. “India” was never a country. It was a conglomeration of languages, tribes, states, provinces, East India Company (Company Bahadur) owned poppy fields and British owned lands. The more than 500 states and many countries including Iraq, Somalia, Aden, Burma and others formed the British “Indian” Empire. After 1947 when the British were leaving the states on the West banded together to form Pakistan and the ones in the Gangetic Civilization banded together to form “Bharat” (Constitutional name of “India.&#8221

 

[Ammyy]

The two definative IVC sites are Harrapa and Mohenjadaro - there is nothing on the scale and significance anywhere else, proves that this civilisation was based on the Indus and therefore is Ancient Pakistan

Instant of proving source you just

Hence proved its ancient Pakistan
now no comment unless any credible source posted

 

[Rafi]

The main ones being, Harappa and Mohenjodaro. The Indus Valley history should be referred to as Ancient Pakistani. Any history which took place in what is now Pakistan should be known as Ancient Pakistani history, since it belongs to the people of Pakistan.

 

[Veeru]

The people of the IVC are not Hindu, thousands of beef bones have been found, that show signs of human consumption. The cow is a holy animal for Hindus, in fact in modern india, many states have a ban on the killing of cows.

First of all i again remind you that don't jump to any conclusion and don't talk if you have no knowledge of subject.

1.) There are some sects that eat beef in Hindus.

2.) Don't jump to conclude on the basis of few bones because in digging historical areas you can find dinosaur bones that doesn't means that people used to eat dinosaurs.

3.) You can't deny that the IVC people have seal and other evidance to show that they respect cow/ox then only a fool can say that one will eat what they respect or worship.

 

[Rafi]

Instant of proving source you just

Hence proved its ancient Pakistan
now no comment unless any credible source posted

There is no site in india of the scale of Harrapa and Mohenjadaro, also the other sites are still not proven to be IVC - that is why international scientists are coming to Pakistan

 

[Rafi]

First of all i again remind you that don't jump to any conclusion and don't talk if you have no knowledge of subject.

1.) There are some sects that eat beef in Hindus.

2.) Don't jump to conclude on the basis of few bones because in digging historical areas you can find dinosaur bones that doesn't means that people used to eat dinosaurs.

3.) You can't deny that the IVC people have seal and other evidance to show that they respect cow/ox then only a fool can say that one will eat what they respect or worship.

Your argument holds no weight, to the vast majority of Hindu's the cow is a sacred animal, and the Indus Valley people were eating beef like it was going out of fashion, thousands of bones have been found that have signs of human consumption.

 

[Rafi]

What is more important, Ancient Pakistan as an independent country always looked westward and had more connections —— cultural, commercial as well as political —- with the Sumerian, Babylonian, Persian, Greek and Central Asian civilizations than with the Gangetic Valley.

 

[Veeru]

Following are the news of Dinosaurs bones found in India from BBC and National Geographic News it doesn't mean Indians used to eat Dinosaurs.

India's Gujarat state is home to one of the world's largest collections of dinosaur remains.

BBC News - The dinosaur wonders of India's Jurassic Park

New Dinosaur Species Found in India

'Anaconda' meets 'Jurassic Park': Fossil snake from India fed on hatchling dinosaurs

 

[Rafi]

As pointed out by more than one writer, the five thousand year history of Pakistan reveals that its independence had been a rule while its subservience to or attachment with India an exception. “Throughout most of the recorded history the north-west (i.e. Pakistan) has normally been either independent or incorporated in an empire whose centre lay further in the west. The occasions when it has been governed from a centre further east (India) have been the exception rather than the rule

 

[Hyde]

The people of the IVC are not Hindu, thousands of beef bones have been found, that show signs of human consumption. The cow is a holy animal for Hindus, in fact in modern india, many states have a ban on the killing of cows.

Yaar Rafi,

There is no denial of the heritage we got after the partition. I was reading your posts and you were trying to prove the heritage and 5000 year old history of Pakistan. Obviously the Indus valley existed, the old cities such as Lahore, Multan and Peshawar were there. Everything was there before the partition and that does not mean our heritage is lost after the partition. Obviously we can prove our 5000 years old history from this part of the subcontinent just like Indian claims about their heritage.

But the question is... anything that was invented during an era of a nation is usually regarded to the same era. Otherwise before the two nation theory and the British Raj/Empire there were hundreds of Raja's and Maharajas living in India...first they were Muslims and before them there were Hindus of course. But do you think a device that was invented during Haider Ali's (father of Tipu Sultan) era can be regarded as the invention of Krishna Raja? (the predecessor of Haider Ali) since both the kings/emperrors ruled over the same Indian land?

Obviously by historical records it will always say that the particular device was invented during the reign of Haider Ali's as he was the king of mysore those days. Now same rule must be applied here too.... when the number 0 was invented there was no concept of Pakistan.

It was either a separate specific kingdom of those days where this concept of Number 0 was born (since there were too many kingdoms in ancient india) or in easy terms we can call it Ancient India. Those days when the number 0 was invented... there was no concept of Today's Pakistan. It was either the Kingdom in which this 0 was invented or it becomes part of the History of India. So how can we claim something that was not created before

I am not taking side of Indians but it seems illogical to me