What's new

The Fall Of Dhaka: Lessons For Pakistan | PKKH.tv

QayPKKH

PKKH.tv
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
200
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The Fall Of Dhaka: Lessons For Pakistan | PKKH.tv


12-16-2011_82566_l_akb.jpg


PKKH Exclusive | by Talha Ibrahim

“The charges against us read out on the first day of hearing in the case (Agartala) were absolutely right.”

“We formed a Sangram Parishad led by Bangabandhu to free East Pakistan through armed protest,”
said Shawkat Ali, the Speaker of Bangladesh parliament in a court hearing.

Shawkat Ali is one of the accused that was implicated in Agartala Conspiracy Case, a sedition case brought forward by the Government of Pakistan in early 1968 against Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the leader of the Awami League and 34 other persons.
As a reporter of the events that happened, I believe in the proclamation of truth. In 2011, I had a chance encounter with a renowned former student leader of Dhakka University and it bloomed into a friendship based on mutual respect. Naive to the socio-political realities of what purported to the great tragedy of 1971, I learnt alot from that person. I can still remember his words, “If Mujib would have wanted, Pakistan would never have been broken.”


Since the past 40 years, Pakistan has been solely held responsible for the secession of East Pakistan. Notwithstanding that to some extent certain political bigwigs of Pakistan succumbed to dispel doubts inculcated in Bengalis minds, the focus of this essay would revolve around India’s illegitimate role in the creation of Bangladesh in 1971.

Experts suggest that the first instances of State Sponsored terrorism reported in Asia, to destabilize other nations harmony originated from India. The intimate involvement of RAW (Research and Analysis Wing) in dirty deeds includes drugs trafficking, human trafficking, arms trafficking, coup d’état in foreign nations, subversive activities, assassinations, nuclear proliferation, and downright recruiting, funding and training of terrorists in different countries. The documented evidence of India’s illegal measures were presented by Rabinder Nath, a double agent of CIA when he ultimately defected from RAW. This continued fetishism of India with terrorism, hidden beneath the banner of political talks has fostered dangerous notions in the terrorist elements of Asian region. Candid revelations of the intelligence community worldwide acknowledge that proxies like Baloch Liberation Army, Sindhu Desh Liberation Army, Tehreek e Taliban et cetera are funded and trained by Indian army. A killer Ajmal Pahari belonging to the terrorist wing of a political party MQM, caught by the police confessed about being trained by Delhi. Not only of her arch rival Pakistan, integrity of countries like Burma, Sri Lanka and Nepal have also been violated systematically by India to no avail.

But they got successful once.
The day when Bangladesh came into existence.

How Bangladesh came about?

The answer to this lies in the adoption of Chanakya Doctrine by India. Considered as a Hindu Machiavelli, Kautilya alias Chanakya, a Chandragupta’s minister who developed a strategy of destabilizing and weakening neighboring states around 320 B.C. The continued successes of Chandragupta and Asoka, is considered as a result of this doctrine. After the humiliating Indian defeat in 1965 Pakistan-India war, this theory was put to test by Indian forces and the factories to create traitors were set in Bangladesh.

India has a long history of activities in Bangladesh since 1960’s, and it reached its zenith at the time of Bangladesh creation. It most significant development was the creation of Mukti Bahini, a secessionist force made up of nationalists to counter the writ of Pakistan through armed struggle. Intelligence documents revealed that India had engaged these people from as back as 1967. The Six Points of Mujib that demanded certain autonomy for Eastern Pakistan came afterwards. Pragmatism demands us to raise our eyebrows on thoughts like “Why was India involved in Bangladesh at the time when there was relative calm in the society?” “Were they planning to aggravate the situation further?”

In the meanwhile, the Eastern Command of Inter Services Intelligence uncovered a plot. It was discovered that a navy steward Mujibur Rahman and the educationist Mohammad Ali Reza went to Agartala, a city in India to seek Indian support for an independent Bangladesh. On January 18, Sheikh Mujib was named as one of the accused. He and others were arrested on 9 May1968. The trial began on 19 June 1968 in Dhaka Cantonment under a special tribunal. The charge sheets of 100 paragraphs were presented before the tribunal, with 227 witnesses and 7 approvers. The accused maintained the stance of false implication. Being labelled as a traitor and separatist by Pakistan, Mujib’s followers instigated the masses and a massive upsurge of people thronged the streets. They organized mass movement and demanded immediate withdrawal of the case and release of all prisoners. The final date for the case decision was 6 February 1969, but it was deferred and Mujib ur Rehman was eventually released; to be commemorated by the Bengalis as hero.

The ranks of Mukti Bahini in the meanwhile multiplied. The already disenchanted leftists wary of Islamic Republic of Palistan, were made to join on the promises of a separate ethno centric land based on secular values. The creation and training of this proxy force was code-named Operation Jackpot. Training was provided to them in the Jungle Warfare and Counter Insurgency school at Vairengte, India. Later Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw revealed in his book “Soldiering with Dignity” that 80000 Hindus were also inducted in the ranks of Mukti Bahini.

This war was brought upon the Bengalis by India. Creation of Mukti Bahini and Agartala Conspiracy are a stark reminder of how Indian militiary and civilian leadership functions.

On 26 March 1971, the State of Pakistan launched Operation Searchlight in Eastern Pakistan against Mukti Bahini. This is widely considered that Bengalis were murdered by Pakistani forces, irrespective of the fact that the Bengalis killed were miscreants of Mukti Bahini. When the miscreants of Mukti Bahini were pillaging the houses, raping the women and killing men of Behari nationality; nothing more could have been expected from the army that is taught to value civilian lives. Later on to cover the rapes committed by Mukti Bahini, the government of Bangladesh accused Pakistan army. Later it was proved wrong when Sarmila Bose, a senior researcher in her book “Dead Reckoning” stated,

“During my field research on several incidents in East Pakistan during 1971, Bangladeshi participants and eyewitnesses described battles, raids, massacres and executions, but told me that women were not harmed by the army in these events except by chance such as in crossfire. The pattern that emerged from these incidents was that the Pakistan army targeted adult males while sparing women and children.”

As finally signs of progress started emerging and the chances of Mukti Bahini defeat got brighter, India violated the sovereign integrity of Eastern Pakistan by declaring support for the miscreants, and engaged in direct warfare with Pakistan army from both the East-West front. The proposal of ceasefire was also forwarded in the United Nations by Pakistan to which India didn’t respond. Clearly this operation was purely designed to disintegrate Pakistan, as India’s no response, as well as USSR veto tells a different story.

The story is that India didn’t want East Pakistan to remain as Pakistan.

Talha Ibrahim is an amateur writer currently pursuing Chartered Accountancy, Talha wants to be a wise man someday. Not having any particular affinity towards right wing or left wing politics, he forms his conclusions derived from his own idiosyncratic goggles.


Source
 
. .
The crow is white, Bengal is Pakistan


Exaggerations are permitted in poetry, and distortions can be tolerated in business but then there are limits. You can’t call a crow white. But come statecraft, everything becomes possible. Even the word ‘justice’ can stand in for ‘injustice’ or at least the word ‘parity’ can be deployed to hide ‘disparity’. If you think I am exaggerating, you need to revisit one important event of the early history of our country.

The areas that constituted Pakistan in 1947 were ruled by the British under different arrangements. Bengal, Punjab, Sindh and Pakhtunkhwa (then NWFP) were provinces with working elected assemblies. Balochistan was governed by an appointed Commissioner, tribal areas by Political Agents and then there were a number of, what were called Princely States, nominally ruled by Rajas under the paramountcy of the British Crown. And they came in all sizes. The princely state of Amb was so tiny that it drowned in the Tarbela Dam Lake in the 1970s. The Bahawalpur state was one of the largest princely states of India and its area now forms three large districts of Punjab. The Baloch states were very thinly populated, while Punjab was quite crowded. Each of these entities had a standing as a ‘state’, however rudimentary its stage might be.

The people who were handed over the reign of the new country on 14 August 1947 were supposed to work out a system for all of these entities to peacefully coexist and grow together. They did sit down and ponder over this but whatever the route they considered and howsoever they divided the state power, it came down to one dreadful point – the Bengalis were more in number than all the rest put together and under a democracy nothing could bar them from getting a major share in the new state. Now that was totally against the scheme of things for the country that was supposed to herald Islam’s renaissance and hoist its flag on every other building in South Asia. The dark skinned Bengalis, sharing culture and language with their Hindu compatriots did not cut a figure to fit the coveted slot. This glorious feat could only be performed by the blue-blooded Muslim elite that had migrated from India, with a few others playing second fiddle and the rest serving as foot soldiers.

So, that was the first crossroad that our country found itself at – if we take the simple democratic path, we miss the golden opportunity to revive all of our lost glories (by losing the government to Bengali majority). And if we stick to this cherished goal, we needed to get around democracy and find some non-democratic solution to ‘the Bengal problem’. At the end, it didn’t turn out to be very difficult. The ruling elite unearthed a trove of edicts, historical references and quotable quotes that allowed them to bend the rules the way that serves ‘the larger national interest’ and avoid rigidly following democracy that was anyways a ‘Western concept quite unsuitable to our kind of polity’. One of our visionaries had forewarned us about the pitfalls of democracy that counts everyone as one without distinguishing them on the basis of their piety.

When the first draft of the Constitution (Interim Report of the Basic Principles Committee) was presented to the Constituent Assembly in September 1950, it provided for two elected houses – the House of Units where all provinces will have equal representation (as provinces have in the Senate these days) and the House of People. The Committee did not forward any suggestion about how the provinces will be represented in this house whose members were supposed to be directly elected by the people, it lacked agreement. Bengalis were being offered half the seats, while their share proportionate to their population was more than that. They were not ready to surrender their right and thus the impasse.

Prime Minister Nazimuddin was, however, able to make clear suggestions. When he presented the second draft in the Assembly, it provided for 120 seats in the House of Units and 400 in House of People. Half of both of these were given to East Bengal and the other halves were divided among nine units of western Pakistan (the provinces of Punjab, Sindh, NWFP, what is now Fata, Bahawalpur, Balochistan, Balochistan States, Khairpur State, Federal Capital) roughly according to their share in population. The same principle, share proportionate to population, was not resorted to while allotting seats to Bengal. This obvious disparity and injustice was named the ‘Principle of Parity’. That’s how the narrative went: Pakistan comprises of two wings, East Pakistan, consisting of East Bengal and West Pakistan, constituted by nine units and the two wings must get equal representation. Bengalis did not accept to be less equal and the draft was rejected.

The next Prime Minister, Mohammad Ali Bogra, was over confident about his arithmetical skills. The third draft that he presented in October 1954 clubbed the nine units of western Pakistan into four groups and gave them, and the fifth unit, Bengal, equal seats (10 each) in the House of Units, while dividing the 300 seats of the House of People roughly according to each unit’s share in population. East Bengal, with 165 of the 300 seats got majority in the House of People but not in the House of Units where it had just 10 of the 50 seats. All laws had to be approved by both the Houses and in a joint sitting (of 350 members), East Bengal (with 165+10=175) was in parity with the West. In a way, it offered a win-win solution to both the Bengali nationalists and the Pakistani establishment. But, a solution was not what the ruling elite was looking for. The draft was approved by the Constituent Assembly and a team was tasked to write the constitution, Governor General Ghulam Muhammad, however, dismissed the government and dissolved the Assembly the same month.

The undemocratic step was sanctioned by the judiciary that innovated and employed the ‘Law of Necessity’ for the first time. It took Governor General a year to put in place the second Constituent Assembly. Unlike the first one, it followed the ‘Principle of Parity’; that is, only half of the members of the second Constituent Assembly (40 out of 80) were taken from East Bengal, while in the first one they had 44 of 69 seats. The first important thing that the new Constituent Assembly did was to ‘unify’ the nine units of the western wing into one province – the amalgam was called West Pakistan, and the initiative the One-Unit scheme. That gave the parity narrative some legal and moral grounds as the country now comprised of two provinces being treated equally, instead of 10 units with one being less equal than the other nine. The ruling elite, or the establishment as we know it now, made it known, loud and clear, that it would not accept anything more than ‘parity’ for East Bengal. There is no surprise then that the Constitution that this Assembly finally passed in March 1956 provided for one elected house – National Assembly – comprising of 300 members elected directly by the people with half coming from East Pakistan and half from the West.

Bengalis held faith in democracy and lost in Pakistan.

The first Assembly could not dare hold general elections. Everybody knew that given the vast disagreements, elections under the prescribed system would be disruptive. General Ayub thought that the blatant use of force was a viable alternative and jumped in. He was wrong. He held the country together at gun point. A decade later, when he finally had to withdraw the gun, General Yahya agreed to hold direct elections under adult franchise to a National Assembly that would formulate the country’s constitution. His Legal Framework Order (since there was no constitution in place at that time) conceived a 300 member National Assembly with 162 elected from East Bengal, accepting the old Bengali demand. But perhaps, it was already too late.


The writer works with Punjab Lok Sujag, a research and advocacy group that has a primary interest in understanding governance and democracy.

The crow is white, Bengal is Pakistan | DAWN.COM

Before blaming India for breaking up Pakistan,the writer should take a look at how West Pakistanis treated their Eastern counter part.
 
.
its funny how each country has its own version :lol:

India- we beat the east pakistan and west pakistan army while simultaneously guarding against China in the North and US 7th fleet in the south, in just 12 days. a feat unseen since the german blitzkrieg of WWII

BD- We were JUST ABOUT to defeat the pakistan army ourselves when the indians came at the last minute and took all the credit

Pakistan- we fought bravely and defeated them. but lost because of those nefarious hindus and their chanakya ideology.
 
.
its funny how each country has its own version :lol:

India- we beat the east pakistan and west pakistan army while simultaneously guarding against China in the North and US 7th fleet in the south, in just 12 days. a feat unseen since the german blitzkrieg of WWII

BD- We were JUST ABOUT to defeat the pakistan army ourselves when the indians came at the last minute and took all the credit

Pakistan- we fought bravely and defeated them. but lost because of those nefarious hindus and their chanakya ideology.
 
. .
the quality of the article can be trace by his writer.

Talha Ibrahim is an amateur writer
 
.
Lessons for Pakistan - the heading ...lol

If this is the lesson they are learning thru this pkkh, all the best to them.

Talha Ibrahim is an amateur writer currently pursuing Chartered Accountancy, Talha wants to be a wise man someday. Not having any particular affinity towards right wing or left wing politics, he forms his conclusions derived from his own idiosyncratic goggles.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/224905-fall-dhaka-lessons-pakistan-pkkh-tv.html#ixzz2FInET8DM

Thats your area man..!!
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom