What's new

The economic cost of the brown Raj to Pakistan - $17.4 billion

313ghazi

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
12,932
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
I have come across this article which references a UN report last week detailing the economic impact Brown Colonialism has had on Pakistan. I request everyone to take some time to read the actual report. It's massive, 155 pages long. We cannot defeat our enemy until we recognise it.

Elite privilege consumes $17.4bn of Pakistan’s economy: UNDP


Islamabad, Pakistan – Economic privileges accorded to Pakistan’s elite groups, including the corporate sector, feudal landlords, the political class and the country’s powerful military, add up to an estimated $17.4bn, or roughly 6 percent of the country’s economy, a new United Nations report has found.

Released last week, the UN Development Programme’s (UNDP) National Human Development Report (NHDR) for Pakistan focuses on issues of inequality in the South Asian country of 220 million people.

The report uses the prism of “Power, People and Policy” to examine the stark income and economic opportunity disparities in the developing country.

“Powerful groups use their privilege to capture more than their fair share, people perpetuate structural discrimination through prejudice against others based on social characteristics, and policies are often unsuccessful at addressing the resulting inequity, or may even contribute to it,” says the report.

Kanni Wignaraja, assistant secretary-general and regional chief of the UNDP has been on a two-week “virtual tour” of Pakistan to discuss the report’s findings, holding talks with Prime Minister Imran Khan and other top members of his cabinet, including the ministers of foreign affairs and planning.

She says Pakistani leaders have taken the findings of the report “right on” and pledged to focus on prescriptive action.

“[In our remarks in meetings] we focused right in on where […] the shadows are, and what is it that actually diverts from a reform agenda in a country,” she told Al Jazeera in an exclusive interview.

“My hope is that there is strong intent to review things like the current tax and subsidy policies, to look at land and capital access.”

The paradox of privileges


The biggest beneficiary of the privileges – which may take the form of tax breaks, cheap input prices, higher output prices or preferential access to capital, land and services – was found to be the country’s corporate sector, which accrued an estimated $4.7bn in privileges, the report says.

The second and third-highest recipients of privileges were found to be the country’s richest 1 percent, who collectively own 9 percent of the country’s overall income, and the feudal land-owning class, which constitutes 1.1 percent of the population but owns 22 percent of all arable farmland.


Both classes have strong representation in the Pakistani Parliament, with most major political parties’ candidates’ drawn from either the feudal landowning class or the country’s business-owning elite.

The UNDP’s Wignaraja noted that this creates a paradox where those responsible for doling out the privileges were also those who were receiving them.

“If with one hand you are providing a gain that benefits yourself, and taking the gain with the other hand, then what we have lost is that sense of separation of powers and oversight,” she said.

The country’s military was found to receive $1.7bn in privileges, mainly in the form of preferential access to land, capital and infrastructure, as well as tax exemptions [File: Salahuddin/Reuters]The country’s powerful military, which has directly ruled Pakistan for roughly half of its 74-year history, was found to receive $1.7bn in privileges, mainly in the form of preferential access to land, capital and infrastructure, as well as tax exemptions.

The report noted, however, that Pakistan’s military is also “the largest conglomerate of business entities in Pakistan, besides being the country’s biggest urban real estate developer and manager, with wide-ranging involvement in the construction of public projects”.


“These things are not neatly separate entities,” said Wignaraja. “You do see some of… these are overlapping so you almost get a double privilege by the military. The minute in a country the military is a part of big business, it obviously doubles the issue and the problem.”

In a country like Pakistan, where the military continues to hold power over many aspects of governance, she warned that it would take “almost a social movement” to displace structures of power that were so entrenched.


“It’s a tough one that has to be taken on because this is about power politics and it would be naive of me to expect or to recommend to leaders on what to do in this respect,” she said.


“I’m very clear that we can provide the analytics, we can put the impartial story out there and then it is up to the country, both the state and the people to say: ‘Enough, here is how we need to take break up these strongly-held power groups and dynamics in this country.’”

Deep-rooted inequality

The wide-ranging NHDR provides detailed data on deep-rooted inequality in Pakistan’s economy.

While the richest 1 percent held 9 percent of the country’s income of $314.4bn in 2018-19, the report found that the poorest 1 percent held just 0.15 percent.

Overall, the richest 20 percent of Pakistanis hold 49.6 percent of the national income, compared with the poorest 20 percent, who hold just 7 percent.

While the richest 1 percent held 9 percent of the country’s income of $314.4bn in 2018/19, the report found the poorest 1 percent held just 0.15 percent [File: Arif Ali/AFP]“The poorest and richest Pakistanis effectively live in completely different countries, with literacy levels, health outcomes, and living standards that are poles apart,” writes Aliona Niculita, deputy resident representative of the UNDP in Pakistan, in the report.

Of further concern to Pakistani policymakers will be a shrinking of the middle-class, with the UNDP’s data showing middle-income earners fell from 42 percent of the population in 2009 to 36 percent in 2019. Democracy is the best revenge!


The data highlights regional inequalities in service delivery and shows how higher-income areas also see higher rates of public expenditure.

“The NHDR 2020 reveals that Pakistan’s people do not benefit equally from public expenditure,” reads the report. “The overall share is 14.2 percent for the poorest income [category], compared with 37.2 percent for the richest [category].”

‘Extra rupee for girls’ education’

As part of its recommendations, the UNDP has suggested Pakistan’s government take on increased spending as part of a macroeconomic model that focuses on closing the gap between its Human Development Index (HDI) of 0.570 and that of other countries in the region.

Pakistan ranks second-to-last in South Asia based on HDI, outperforming Afghanistan but lagging behind all six of its other regional neighbours.

Pakistan ranks 153 out of 156 countries on the World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Index, with 32 percent of primary-school-aged girls out of school [File: Faisal Mahmood/Reuters]“This is something actually that the leadership brought up themselves, as to this conundrum of feeling like one is stuck at a certain point,” said the UNDP’s Wignaraja. “Is there a glass ceiling to human development and why, and what is needed to crack it?”

The UNDP has recommended policies that focus on removing privileges and targeting spending on outcomes that provide both structural support for the country’s poor and on the infrastructure – such as education and healthcare – that would provide them further economic opportunities.

“If I had just that one extra […] rupee, and you asked me where would I put it, I would put in girls education,” said Wignaraja.

Pakistan ranks 153 out of 156 countries on the World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Index (PDF), with 32 percent of primary-school-aged girls out of school.

“The evidence across the world on one of the biggest returns on investment comes from educating all of our children and getting them and keeping them in school,” said Wignaraja.

“But a huge return is that all of those missing girls from school and missing women from the workplace, it’s investing in that.”

Full report is here - https://www.pk.undp.org/content/pak...qvGp5mDonaeT3IFwgqS0Q3jYSu80LwRCfCRV9BF33Yz2s

See URL's on the left.
1618397360187.png
 
SO, Corporation given incentives to set up a business are bad for Pakistan while the same practices in other countries are considered business-friendly environment.

Having Rich people are bad for Pakistan while in other nations wealth creation shows sign of progress.

Other respected Nations spend 5 times Pakistan GDP on their military, our military getting $1.7billion is bad.

Conclusion what's good for the world is bad for Pakistan.
 
Inequality amongst the elites and the poor per province...

1618399122318.png


The Sindhi and Baloch elite have the highest disparity.
SO, Corporation given incentives to set up a business are bad for Pakistan while the same practices in other countries are considered business-friendly environment.

Having Rich people are bad for Pakistan while in other nations wealth creation shows sign of progress.

Other respected Nations spend 5 times Pakistan GDP on their military, our military getting $1.7billion is bad.

Conclusion what's good for the world is bad for Pakistan.

It's impossible that is exactly the case. What is suitable for developed countries isn't always the case for developing countries surely?
Surely you should read the report before jumping to conclusions? I've not read it all yet.
 
1618399866470.png

The most commonly acknowledged benefit that the feudal class enjoys is an extremely low tax rate on agricultural income. For example, the highest marginal income tax rate per acre is 1.7 percent of the net income generated.3 This means that the total annual revenue yielded by the tax, in all four provinces combined, is less than PKR 3 billion. If agricultural income was taxed at the same rate as non-agricultural income, the potential revenue yield in 2017–2018 would have been PKR 88 billion, according to updated calculations by Pasha and Ghaus-Pasha (2012). lion.
 
It seems our religious and ethnic minorities aren't doing as badly as they like to portray. Note how many of them are university educated middle classes compared to other ethnic groups. @krash this adds another perspective on the state of minorities.

1618400605211.png

1618400626850.png


If anything it shows the working class is the one being really screwed in Pakistan.
1618400673385.png

1618400729748.png

Seems the working class and youth of this country are not happy with their lot though.
 
In light of this report liberals in Pakistan must now turn from Military bashing to Corporate Bashing, Richest 1% Bashing and Feudal Lord bashing.
 
It's impossible that is exactly the case. What is suitable for developed countries isn't always the case for developing countries surely?
Surely you should read the report before jumping to conclusions? I've not read it all yet.

You mean job creation isn't suitable for Pakistan because she is developing?
 
You mean job creation isn't suitable for Pakistan because she is developing?

Read the report. How is tax breaks to fuedal lords and the likes of Nestle and Pepsi creating jobs in Pakistan? IPP's have lifetime tax free deals as well as some chinese companies investing in CPEC. Meanwhile awam is being taxed through the nose.

Mega corperations are not the only way to develop an economy.
 
It seems our religious and ethnic minorities aren't doing as badly as they like to portray. Note how many of them are university educated middle classes compared to other ethnic groups. @krash this adds another perspective on the state of minorities.

View attachment 733977
View attachment 733978

If anything it shows the working class is the one being really screwed in Pakistan.
View attachment 733979
View attachment 733980
Seems the working class and youth of this country are not happy with their lot though.

Does the report state who is included under 'ethnic minorities'? I couldn't find it but I didn't exactly go through it thoroughly either.
 
I don't disagree with any of them, although i think we can benefit from properly targeted tax breaks, like how the freelancer community has benefited. For example a tax break for any company who starts exporting goods for upto 5 years. These lifetime breaks are just nonsense.
Does the report state who is included under 'ethnic minorities'? I couldn't find it but I didn't exactly go through it thoroughly either.

I'll have to read it properly, its huge. I just spent the morning literally looking at the pictures...lol
 
way out is to have a growth oriented economy particularly the export factor.

We cant keep on blaming the brits. Need to improve management and bring reforms.
 
1618413478553.png


So Punjab and KP alone contribute 96% of $28 billion remittances.
 
Back
Top Bottom