What's new

Tehran Stresses Illegitimacy of Israel

EagleEyes

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Messages
16,774
Reaction score
25
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Tehran Stresses Illegitimacy of Israel

TEHRAN (Fars News Agency)- Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Seyed Mohammad Ali Hosseini repeated Iran's stance in the face of the Zionist regime of Israel, stressing that Tehran views that regime as illegal, illegitimate and a usurper of the Palestinians' rights and land.

The spokesman made the remarks in reaction to the release of distorted quotations from Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki while addressing a regional meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Jordan.

Speaking to reporters during his weekly press conference here on Sunday, Hosseini expressed regret over misinterpretations and distortion of Mottaki's remarks.

He further noted Mottaki's statements about the Zionist regime and issues of the Palestinian nation at the WEF meeting as well as his address at the ministerial meeting of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in Islamabad, Pakistan, and said if media paid due attention to these statements then they could realize Mottaki's points given the abundant asymmetries existing in his remarks.

The spokesman further mentioned expatriation of the indigenous residents of Palestine and arrangement of free and democratic elections to be attended by the original and native residents of Palestine, including Muslims, Jews and Christians, to determine the type of government in that country as the only way to solve Palestine's issue, stressing that the result of such elections would receive Iran's unconditional support.

Elsewhere, he pointed to the achievements gained by the Iranian delegation at the 34th Foreign Ministers' Meeting of the Organization of the Islamic Conference in Islamabad, Pakistan, and said that Tehran had prepared 15 draft resolutions which were approved by the participants.

"One of these resolutions pertained to Iran's peaceful nuclear activities, which was approved by all the 57 member states. The resolution stresses the need for the use of peaceful means and precondition-free talks as the best way to resolve Iran's nuclear issue," the spokesman reminded.

He also said that as a result of Iran's efforts, participants also passed a resolution stressing Islamic solidarity in a bid to neutralize enemies' attempts and plots for sowing seeds of discord among Islamic countries and nations.

"After 38 years, the Organization of the Islamic Conference for the first time described Shiism as an official religion of Islam and stressed its strong opposition to aggressions against Shiites' lives and possessions," Hosseini continued.

He also voiced pleasure in the ratification of a resolution by the OIC meeting against the Zionist regime, condemning Tel Aviv for possessing nuclear arms.

"The resolution condemned the regime and described the weapons which the regime officials stress they possess, as a vital threat to regional and world peace and security," the foreign ministry spokesman continued.

Elsewhere, he stressed that Iran will not attend any talks with the US unless for the purpose of discussing Iraq's problems.

"We won't have any negotiations with the US until the US administration changes its policies and corrects its behavior and performance," Hosseini said.

He also denied reports that Syria is also due to attend the Iran-US talks, reminding that Iraq is the only country which will join the negotiations.

The diplomat also dismissed some reports alleging that Iran-US negotiations will be led along four major issues, and added, "The axes and quality of talks have not been specified in details yet, but the framework will be what the (Supreme) Leader has specified."

The spokesman also declined to say whether the Iranian delegation would be headed by Supreme National Security Council Undersecretary for home security Jafari, but mentioned that nothing has been specified yet.

He said that the head of the Iranian negotiating team will be appointed and announced to the public sometime before May 28.

Regarding the issue of Lebanon, he said that Iranian and Saudi Arabian foreign ministers are due to attend a meeting to exchange views about the issue of Lebanon.

Elsewhere, he said that President Ahmadinejad is due to pay a visit to Afghanistan, but added that no specific date has yet been decided fort the trip.

The official also strongly rejected an alleged letter from President Ahmadinejad to the Indian president about the issue of Kashmir, describing such reports as mere lies.

In response to questions about the upcoming meeting between Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani and EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana, the Iranian foreign ministry spokesman said that the two diplomats would meet in an European country on May 31, but declined to name any specific location for the meeting.

http://www.farsnews.com/English/newstext.php?nn=8602300216
 
.
Their legitimacy should be accepted for the sake of peace. They should be given a right to exist. They've been functioning as a nation for decades. Only thing is Palestinians are the rightful citizens of that land. There cannot be a Jewish state with a Palestinian state.

A totalitarian solution is impossible.
 
.
Accept the 'Peacefull Solution' for the sake of avoiding a so called 'Totalitarian Solution' ?
But whose solution is this? Even before that who are the criminals?
The crimes (never so openly discussed) of europe against jews are to be compensated with country, land, blood, economy and people of Palistine. Simply to put, a crimnal is punished by allowing to commit a bigger crime! And not only that but also giving the illegal state of jews to commit any crime, for now 60 years, without any check? Any resistance to get justice is termed as extremism? Any retalition as terrorism? Any democratic government selected by oppressed people of the nation as unacceptable?

You say:
Their legitimacy should be accepted for the sake of peace. They should be given a right to exist.
and then comment
Only thing is Palestinians are the rightful citizens of that land. There cannot be a Jewish state with a Palestinian state.

How come the contradictory situation exist? How is it possible? Come out of your dreams Asim.
Kashif
 
.
Just this Sunday the independent released evidence that israel knew that their occupation of Palestinian land was ILLEGAL back in 1967 !

The main thing which Tehran stresses and the arabs don't agree to is that let there be complete democracy in Palestine. Let the refugees return, and then let the people all live together and rule over themselves in democracy, today non Jews are discriminated in all aspects and the treatment of Palestinians is just appalling. Just read HRW & Amnesty.
 
.
Accept the 'Peacefull Solution' for the sake of avoiding a so called 'Totalitarian Solution' ?
But whose solution is this? Even before that who are the criminals?
The crimes (never so openly discussed) of europe against jews are to be compensated with country, land, blood, economy and people of Palistine.

But who has the best claim? The Jews have live thier longest, with an interupted pressence going back to at least the Hyskian expuslon from Egypt. Next in line are the Samarian/Christian Palestinian minority who have existed there since at least Hellenic era. The newest arrivals are infact the Arab decent Palestinians, most of whom moved in in the 1880 as workers on the Ottoman railroad. Very few if any familes can trace thier lineage back more than just a couple hundred years.

If we count add the decendants of the railroad workers to the Palestinian side and count them as indeginous then the jewish imigres also have to be added as that is where Abraham settled and all Jews trace lineage through him as well.

Ther eis no right answer both sides have valid points so in 47 the UN offered to split the land based on who owned what and who lived where. Israel accepted, the Arabs refused and invaded and lost. Perhaps if the Arabs had not resorted to war and talked in good faith instead.....
 
.
But who has the best claim? The Jews have live thier longest, with an interupted pressence going back to at least the Hyskian expuslon from Egypt. Next in line are the Samarian/Christian Palestinian minority who have existed there since at least Hellenic era. The newest arrivals are infact the Arab decent Palestinians, most of whom moved in in the 1880 as workers on the Ottoman railroad. Very few if any familes can trace thier lineage back more than just a couple hundred years.

If we count add the decendants of the railroad workers to the Palestinian side and count them as indeginous then the jewish imigres also have to be added as that is where Abraham settled and all Jews trace lineage through him as well.

Ther eis no right answer both sides have valid points so in 47 the UN offered to split the land based on who owned what and who lived where. Israel accepted, the Arabs refused and invaded and lost. Perhaps if the Arabs had not resorted to war and talked in good faith instead.....
Instead we extend your (il)logic we would end at stone age, may be earlier!
If a 'Cut-Off' for period is to be taken, as you have found in your argument, then this cut-off may be some few hundred years back when SPAIN was mulsim, India was Mughal and so on and on.

Kashif
 
.
Instead we extend your (il)logic we would end at stone age, may be earlier!
If a 'Cut-Off' for period is to be taken, as you have found in your argument, then this cut-off may be some few hundred years back when SPAIN was mulsim, India was Mughal and so on and on.

Kashif

By why pick a date that favors your religion over others or your cause over others? If we have to pick a date, lets go with the group with the longest indeginous presence on the land. There have been jews in Palestine without interuption sicne at least the Hyskion explusion, well over 2500 years of permament settlement. And if you do not think a minority of jews is lawful to claim an entire land- then the Islamic invasion of Andalusia is not legit beucase it was invited in by people with no legal claim (jewish minority). However if you say the invasion was legit by means of military force, might makes right and the right of conquest. Then how can you naysay the jews thier modern conquest?

If we pick a standar dit has to be applied evenly without favoritism to pet causes.
 
.
By your rationale, you should get the **** outta america, it belongs to the natives. It's an infantile argument, that even pro israeli academics don't even use. However, as you are all warmongerors with no moral standings, might is right in your world of injustice and greed.

Citizens of occupied palestine are russians, ukrainians, polish, they're all european. THey don't belong in the middle east, and they took it by force and have the worst human rights record after the US in iraq in the world. The creation of this illegal state was done through genocide and mass expulsion., not my words, it's FACT!
 
.
By your rationale, you should get the **** outta america, it belongs to the natives. It's an infantile argument, that even pro israeli academics don't even use. However, as you are all warmongerors with no moral standings, might is right in your world of injustice and greed.

Citizens of occupied palestine are russians, ukrainians, polish, they're all european. THey don't belong in the middle east, and they took it by force and have the worst human rights record after the US in iraq in the world. The creation of this illegal state was done through genocide and mass expulsion., not my words, it's FACT!


Most Palkestinian familes predat ethe jewish imigration by only 1 or 2 generations. of the minority that can trace long term roots to the region many (and almsot all of the oldest) are Christian. However the Jew's have the longest history in the region. You can deny this all you want but the area was never Jew-free.

As for might makes right, some toimes yes sometimes no. Islam didn't spread by peace as much as it did by sword. So keep the hypocrasy to yourself. The Jews have a right to thier homeland, it is where they trace their roots, thier religion and thier culture. So do the Palestinians. BTW the intial wave of Jewish imigration was invited in by the Sublime Porte.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom